Abstract

Elizabethkingia miricola is an emerging nosocomial pathogen responsible for meningitis, sepsis, urinary tract infection, pneumonia, and joint infection in humans. These pathogens were also reported to be causal agents for meningitis-like disease in cultured frogs, which displayed high infectivity, mortality, and significant loss. In July 2023, 10 outbreaks of infectious meningitis-like disease in bullfrogs occurred in Tangshan area. To determine the causal agent, 70 diseased frogs from 10 farms were collected for etiological identification. Gram-negative bacilli were isolated from the brain and liver of sick bullfrogs and identified as members of E. miricola by biochemical characterization and 16S rRNA sequencing analysis. A total of 42 strains of E. miricola were isolated and further determined as the etiological agent by reproducing neurological symptoms and deaths in an artificial infection test. A representative isolate, HBTS-1, was picked up for the pathogenicity test, and the data showed that this stain was highly pathogenic to bullfrogs with an LD50 of 3.7 × 105 CFU. Notably, the isolate also showed high pathogenicity to 5-day-old suckling mice, with an LD50 of 3.1 × 106 CFU, indicating its potential threat to mammals. Moreover, all the 42 E. miricola isolates showed resistance to multiple antibotics without an apparent inhibition zone observed in the test, making the choice of antimicrobial therapy challenging. These novel findings prioritized E. miricola as an important zoonotic agent, which may provide a reference for human medicine.

1. Introduction

Bullfrog, the colloquial name for Rana catesbeiana, is a native specie of eastern North America and has been widely introduced around the world as a high-quality protein source [1]. Owing to the strong market demand, outstanding reproductive performance, and fast growth rate, the bullfrog aquaculture developed rapidly, and the bullfrog has become the most farmed amphibian globally [2]. However, due to the increased breeding density and poor water environment, increased outbreaks of emerging infectious diseases have occurred on farmed bullfrogs, causing significant losses and posing a major threat to the bullfrog industry [3].

Crooked head disease is an emerging communicable neurologic disease in multifrog species, including black-spotted frog Pelophylax nigromaculatus [1], spiny frog Quasipaa spinosa [2], Chapa bug-eyed frog Theloderma bicolor, northern leopard frog Lithobates pipiens, dwarf frogs Hymenochirus curtipes [3], warty toad Bombina microdeladigitora, and Sabana Surinam toad Pipa parva [4]. The suffered frogs present similarly meningitis-like manifestations, including anorexia, crooked head, bent body, torticollis, swimming in circles, and lethargy, and some individuals display cataracts, meteorism, and skin hyperemia [4]. Most diseased frogs would die within several days to weeks after the onset of illness [1, 2]. This emerging disease, with high infectivity and mortality, has brought great threats and losses to the frog industry. Some species of the genus Elizabethkingia mainly Elizabethkingia miricola and Elizabethkingia meningoseptica are reported responsible for crooked head disease in frogs [5].

E. miricola is Gram-negative, aerobic, pale yellow-pigmented, nonmotile, non-spore-forming, oxidase-positive, and nitrate-negative bacilli and was ubiquitously distributed in natural environments such as water, soils, fish, frogs, and insects [6, 7]. As a medically important species of Elizabethkingia, this bacterium was reported to cause multitype infections in humans, especially in immunocompromised populations and newborn children, such as encephalitis [8], sepsis [9], bacteremia [10], joint infection [11], urinary tract infection [12], and pulmonary abscess [3]. Recently, the reports about E. miricola-caused infection in other animals, such as dogs, cats, and frogs [13], are increasing, indicating this bacterium may be an important zoonosis pathogen. However, the literature about cross-species infection of E. miricola is rare. Here, we reported outbreaks of crooked head disease in cultured bullfrogs in Tangshan city, Hebei Province, China. From the sick frogs, we isolated strains of E. miricola and demonstrated their high pathogenicity to both bullfrogs and suckling mice.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Epidemiological Survey of Crooked Head Disease in Bullfrogs on Farms

Clinical symptoms of crooked head disease were recorded based on gross lesions and necropsy of bullfrogs from 10 traditional bullfrog farms in Hebei Province. Pathological examination and isolation of pathogenic bacteria were performed after euthanasia of diseased frogs. All procedures were approved by the Animal Protection and Utilization Committee of Hebei Science and Technology Normal University.

2.2. Etiological Isolation and Inoculum Preparation

Under aseptic conditions, brain, liver, spleen, eye, blood, and muscle tissue samples of infected bullfrogs were collected and inoculated into LB, Trypticase Soy Agar Medium (TSA) (Hope Biology Co., Ltd, Qingdao) and blood agar media (Kont Biology and Technology Co., Ltd, Wenzhou) and then cultured at 30°C for 24–30 hr. The isolates were purified and then replicated on the TSB liquid medium. Log-phase growing cultures were washed twice with PBS and stored at −70°C until use.

2.3. Identification of Clinical Isolates
2.3.1. Physiological and Biochemical Characterization of the Isolates

The isolates were streaked on LB plates and TSB plates, respectively, and cultured at 30°C for 24 hr to determine the growth characteristics and colony morphology. The isolates were incubated at 30 and 37°C, respectively, to determine the effect of incubation temperature on bacterial growth. The hemolytic capacity of the isolates was analyzed by observing the hemolysis on blood agar. Gram’s staining was performed to determine the bacterial morphology characteristics. Bacterial microbial biochemical identification tubes (Landbridge Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing) were used to detect the presence of oxidative, lysine decarboxylase, and other biochemical indices in the clinical isolates, and the data were compared with the results of E. miricola CM160701 [2].

2.3.2. Molecular Identification of E. miricola by 16S rRNA Sequencing

DNA was extracted via commercial DNA Extraction Kit per the manufacturer’s instruction (TianGen Biotech (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing). PCR was performed as previously described [14], using primers of 16S rRNA (27F:5-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3; 1492R: 5-TACGGCTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3). The reaction was performed under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of thermal denaturation at 94°C for 30 s; annealing at 55°C for 30 s; and extension at 72°C for 45 s. The amplification products were detected and analyzed by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis. The PCR amplification products were sent to Shengong Bioengineering (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., for sequencing, and the DNA sequence data were analyzed using BLAST software (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). Phylogenetic analysis was performed based on 16S rRNA genes, and the phylogenetic position for the isolated strain was determined by comparison with related taxa (five E. miricola isolates, two Elizabethkingia anopheles isolates, two E. meningoseptica isolates, and two Chryseobacteria strains) obtained from the GenBank database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). A phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbor-joining method in MEGA11 [15]. The topologies of the phylogenetic trees were assessed by bootstrap analysis of 1,000 replications. All ambiguous positions were removed for each sequence pair (pairwise deletion option). There were a total of 1,388 positions in the final dataset [16, 17].

2.4. Virulence Gene Testing

PCR amplification of the causative agent was performed to verify the presence of genes coding for virulence components including polar flagella (fabG), T4SS effectors (fabV), capsule (wecB), urease (ureB), isocitrate lyase (aceA), acyl carrier protein (acyl), hemolysin (hly), and O-antigen biosynthesis enzyme (wbpO), with the specific primers that are listed in Table 1, referring to a previous study [18]. PCR products were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis with a 1% agarose gel containing nucleic acid dye (Saibai Sheng Gene Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing).

2.5. Bullfrog Infection Test

A total of 96 healthy bullfrogs in eight groups were raised temporarily before the experiment and identified as not carrying E. miricola through oral, skin, and anal bacteria identification via PCR with primers [4]. The isolate was inoculated in the TSB medium and incubated at 30°C in a shaker for 12 hr. A 1 mL bacterial sample was taken, the medium was discarded, and then suspended with sterile PBS for bacterial drop plate counting. Each group of bullfrogs was half male and half female for the next test. The bullfrogs in four groups were intramuscularly injected with 0.2 mL of E. miricola isolate solution at the doses of 2 × 107 CFU, 2 × 106 CFU, 2 × 105 CFU, and 2 × 104 CFU, respectively. The bullfrogs in the other three groups were injected with 2 × 107 CFU isolates in 0.2 mL sterile PBS by oral, intraperitoneal injection and immersion infection, respectively. The control group was injected with an equal volume of PBS, and the infected bullfrogs were observed for 14 consecutive days. The morbidity, mortality, and pathologic changes of experimental bullfrogs were recorded, and the liver and brain of infected bullfrogs were taken to detect the presence of the isolates.

Five diseased bullfrogs postchallenge with apparent neurologic symptoms, cataracts, and skin erythema were randomly picked up for histopathologic examination. The brain, liver, spleen, kidney, and eye tissues (0.5 cm × 0.5 cm × 0.2 cm) were taken and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde fixative (Lanjieke Science and Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing) for 48 hr. Routine paraffin sections and HE (hematoxylin and eosin) staining were carried out, and the histopathological changes were observed under the microscope.

2.6. Suckling Mouse Infection Test

Thirty 5-day-old KM suckling mice were divided into five groups with six suckling mice per group. Suckling mice of four groups were intramuscularly injected with 0.02 mL isolated bacterial solution at the doses of 2 × 108 CFU, 2 × 107 CFU, 2 × 106 CFU, and 2 × 105 CFU, respectively, and the control group was injected with an equal volume of PBS, 120 hr of continuous observation. The liver and brain of infected mice were homogenized, and the presence of bacteria was detected by PCR [4].

2.7. Antibiotic Sensitivity Test

There are currently no established standards for Elizabethkingia, and susceptibilities are largely reported based on the Enterobacteriaceae standard of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M100 guidelines and/or the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic (PK–PD) [14, 19]. Here, we evaluated the antibiotic susceptibility of E. miricola isolate bacteria by referring to the Enterobacteriaceae standard in CLSI M100 guidelines. A total of 22 antibiotics, including ampicillin, cefuroxime, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, cefaclor, aztreonam, meropenem, streptomycin, gentamicin, kanamycin, amikacin, tetracycline, doxycycline, minocycline, chloramphenicol, florfenicol, trimethoprim, rifampicin, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, norfloxacin, and nitrofurantoin, were selected for testing bacterial antibiotic susceptibility. According to the method recommended by CLSI, the Kirby–Bauer method was used to determine the drug resistance spectrum of the isolated strains. Briefly, the isolated bacteria were inoculated in MHB (cation-adjusted Mueller–Hinton broth) and incubated at 30°C on a shaker for 12 hr. Log-phase bacterial cultures were diluted to a 0.5 McFarland unit with normal saline and spread on the surface of MHA (cation-adjusted Mueller–Hinton agar). The standard antibiotic disks (Hangzhou Microbial Reagent Co., Ltd., China) were placed on the surface of the MHA and cultured in a constant temperature incubator at 30°C for 24 hr. The diameter of the inhibition zone of each strain was measured, and the isolates were categorized based on the presence or absence of an inhibition ring.

3. Results

3.1. Outbreaks of Crooked Head Disease in Farmed Bullfrogs in Tangshan City

In 2023, an extensive outbreak of crooked head disease occurred in cultured bullfrogs in Tangshan city of Hebei Province, which caused large-scale deaths of bullfrogs and significant loss. To determine the primary causative agent of these diseases, a total of 70 sick frogs from 10 bullfrog farms (Figure 1) of Tangshan region were performed for etiological examination. The information of geographical distribution and coordinates of bullfrog farms sampled is illustrated in Supplementary 1.

The diseased frogs showed crooked heads, stiff bodies, and dyskinesia (Figures 2(a) and 2(b)), reddish patches on the abdomen and legs (Figure 2(c)), the livers of the diseased frogs were found to be congested and enlarged with yellow and red spots on the surface (Figure 2(d)), and some with turbid and cloudy eyeballs of different degrees (Figures 2(e) and 2(f)).

3.2. Strains of E. miricola Were Isolated from Brain Tissues of Sick Bullfrogs

The brain tissues of the diseased bullfrogs were collected for bacterial isolation and identification. A dominant strain was isolated and named HBTS-1. This isolate, when challenged by intramuscular injection, was able to cause typical meningitis-like signs in bullfrogs. Koch’s postulates were satisfied by isolation of bacteria from dead frogs identical to HBTS-1. Furthermore, we also performed other routes of exposure, such as oral, intraperitoneal injection and immersion, and all these ways of infection could lead to meningitis-like illness and death of bullfrogs, with existence of E. miricola in the liver, spleen, and brain of challenged frogs. All these results strongly demonstrated that the strain HBTS-1 was the causative agent of crooked head disease.

Then, we performed the identification of the HBTS-1 isolate through morphological and biochemical examination. The isolate showed Gram-stain-negative bacilli under the microscope (Figure 3(a)) and was able to grow on LB, TSA, and blood agar and possessed hemolytic properties (Figure 3(e)). Interestingly, the bacterium was able to grow at 37°C, with a slight retardation as compared to that at 30°C (Figures 3(b) and 3(d)). The data of biochemical examination showed that the biochemical characteristics of the HBTS-1 isolate were similar to those of E. miricola [2] (Table 2). To verify the results of biochemical examination, we further analyzed the strain HBTS-1 at a molecular level using the 16S rRNA sequencing assay and also examined the virulence genes of the bacteria. According to 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity and phylogenetic analysis, all the tested isolates including HBTS-1 were classified as members of E. miricola (Figure 4). As shown in Figure 3(c), the HBTS-1 strain carried the eight virulence factors of E. miricola previously reported. Taken together, these results indicated that the isolate HBTS-1, the causative agent of crooked head disease, was a strain of E. miricola.

After that, we examined the prevalence of in sick bullfrogs in Tangshan region. A total of 42 strains of E. miricola were isolated from 70 sick bullfrogs of 10 farms, with an isolation rate of 60% (42/70). This result suggested that E. miricola is the major cause of crooked head disease of bullfrogs in Tangshan region.

The positions of the five isolates (marked with blue triangles) and reference strains of genus Elizabethkingia and Chryseobacteria were shown in the phylogenomic tree, and bootstrap values (the percentage of 1,000 data resamplings) ≥50% were shown at the nodes based on the neighbor-joining method. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units as those of the evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogenetic tree. The evolutionary distances were computed using the Kimura 2-parameter method and are in the units of the number of base substitutions per site.

3.3. E. miricola HBTS-1 Was Highly Pathogenic to Bullfrogs

In order to determine the pathogenicity of E. miricola isolates, the HBTS-1 isolate was taken as a representative strain for the bullfrog infection test. When intramuscularly injected with HBTS-1 at the doses of 2 × 107 CFU, 2 × 106 CFU, 2 × 105 CFU, and 2 × 104 CFU, the frogs showed head tilt to one side, mental retarding, cataract, loss of orientation, and even death. The cumulative mortality rate of cultured bullfrogs during the experiment was 100%, 75%, 50%, and 0%, respectively, while bullfrogs of the control group did not get sick and die during the whole experimental observation period (Figure 5(b)). The LD50 of HBTS-1 in bullfrogs was calculated as 3.7 × 105 CFU using Karber’s method. These results demonstrated that E. miricola HBTS-1 was highly pathogenic to the cultured bullfrogs.

Tissue samples from dying bullfrogs were collected for pathological analysis. The results revealed that the brain glial cells of the affected bullfrogs were increased and there were vacuoles in the stroma (Figures 6(a) and 6(b)); the cytoplasmic structure of the affected frogs’ hepatocytes was blurred, there were a varying number of vacuoles, the hepatocytes collapsed and disappeared, and there were a lot of brown pigmentation (Figures 6(c) and 6(d)); the spleens of the frogs had vacuolar degeneration (Figures 6(e) and 6(f)); and the kidneys had a large number of inflammatory cell infiltration (Figures 6(g) and 6(h)).These results indicated that the E. miricola isolate could cause multiorgans injures in bullfrogs.

3.4. E. miricola HBTS-1 Displayed Pathogenicity to Suckling Mouse

As the HBTS-1 isolate has the ability to grow at 37°C, the body temperature of mammals, we also determined its pathogenicity in mice. We infected adult KM mice and 5-day-old suckling mice with the HBTS-1 isolate by intramuscular injection. The data showed that the HBTS-1 isolate failed to establish an infection in adult mice without any abnormal performance and existence of bacteria in organs. While the suckling mice, when received inoculation of the HBTS-1 isolate, developed red bodies and cerebral hemorrhage and eventual death (Figures 7(a) and 7(c)), with existence of E. miricola detected in livers and brain tissues. As shown in Figure 7(b), all the suckling mice (6/6) received intramuscular injection with a dose of 2 × 108 CFU died within 24 hr postinfection; the majority of the suckling mouse (5/6) received with a dose of 2 × 107 CFU died within 48 hr after. During the experimental observation period, some lactating mice injected with 2 × 106 CFU also died (3/6), while those injected with 2 × 105 CFU did not die. The LD50 of HBTS-1 in suckling mice was calculated as 3.1 × 106 CFU using Karber’s method. The control group was injected with PBS, and the adult mice all survived. These results clearly show that E. miricola HBTS-1 is pathogenic to suckling mice, suggesting its potential to infect other mammals.

3.5. The E. miricola Isolates Showed Severe Multidrug Resistance

The existence of multidrug resistance of E. miricola has already been documented in several literature [14, 18], which causes considerable trouble for the control and prevention of this pathogen. In order to clarify the prevalence of the antibiotic resistance of the bullfrog-derived E. miricola in Tangshan, we performed drug sensitivity tests for the 42 E. miricola isolates in this study. Although there is no standardized method to perform antimicrobial susceptibility testing for E. miricola, the data showed that the majority of the isolates were resistant to ampicillin, cefuroxime, ceftazidime, cefaclor, streptomycin, gentamicin, kanamycin, amikacin, tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, nitrofurantoin, norfloxacin, and aztreonam without an apparent inhibition zone, as is shown in Figure 5(a). The data of antibiotic susceptibility testing of each isolate are illustrated in Supplementary 2. Taken together, the E. miricola isolates from Tangshan region displayed considerable antibiotic resistance, which brought challenges for antibiotic control of crooked head disease of bullfrogs in this region.

4. Discussion

E. miricola-caused crooked head disease was first reported in black-spotted frogs in 2016 in China [1]. Since then, this bacterium has been increasingly documented as an infectious pathogen in several other frog species with similar symptoms of neurological disorder, cataracts, and red legs [4]. Several cases of crooked head disease in bullfrogs were reported in 2023, and both E. miricola and E. meningoseptica were determined to be the causal pathogen [5, 14]. In 2023, serious outbreaks of meningitis-like disease occurred on bullfrog farms in Tangshan, a northern city of China. In some farms, this disease resulted in a total of 50% death of cultured bullfrogs. From the diseased frogs, we isolated strains of E. miricola and determined the etiological agents via the artificial infection experiment. Furthermore, E. miricola strains were isolated from the majority of sick frogs from different farms, suggesting that this bacterium is the major causative agent of crooked head disease in bullfrogs in Tangshan region.

Of note, this disease spread very fast, and almost half of the cultured bullfrogs got sick and died within 2 months after the onset, indicating its high infectivity. We collected swabs from the skin, oral cavity, and anus of sick frogs, and all the samples were determined E. miricola positive by PCR. Importantly, we also detected the existence of this bacterium in water from the habitat of sick frogs. A previous study had reported that immersion infection of E. miricola displayed high infection efficiency with 100% death in black-spotted frogs [1, 20]. Therefore, environmental disinfection, particularly water cleaning, may exert a pivotal role in the control of E. miricola caused-infection.

In this study, we successfully reproduced crooked head disease in bullfrogs by oral feeding, intramuscular injection, intraperitoneal injection, or immersion infection, suggesting multiple routes of exposure may be involved in this disease. Neurological disorders are usually associated with E. miricola infection in frogs, and the brain was reported as the main target organ of this pathogen [21]. However, E. miricola infection is not limited to brain tissue. In this study, we isolated E. miricola from the blood, brain, liver, spleen, eyes, and even muscles, supported by the results of histopathological analysis, suggesting a systematic septic infection occurred.

As a significant source of meat, bullfrogs are known to harbor a variety of pathogenic bacteria, such as Aeromonas hydrophila, Vibrio cholerae, Streptococcus agalactiae, Edwardsiella tarda, and Elizabethkingia spp. [22], which are also capable of causing infections in both mammals and humans, posing a potential threat to human health. Here, we noticed that, although the optimal culture temperature of E. miricola isolate HBTS-1 is 30°C, they grew well at 37°C, close to the body temperature of mammalian animals. Therefore, we attempted to infect KM mice with the HBST-1 isolate. Interestingly, the adult vaccinated mice showed no abnormalities, while 5-day-old suckling mice developed a red body and died within 72 hr post intramuscular injection, with E. miricola isolated from organs including the brain. The unexpected data suggest that the bullfrog-derived E. miricola isolate may have potential pathogenicity in mammals. Interestingly, although cases of E. miricola infections in humans are increasing, it occurs mainly in immunocompromised populations, such as elderly people, newborn, and children [23], and these reports have some similarities with our data.

E. miricola has the ability to cross the blood–brain barrier, and thus, mainly resulted in brain damage neurological disorders [24]. However, the most antibiotics are unable to cross the blood–brain barrier, brings great difficulty in the treatment of this bacterium. Moreover, E. miricola isolates either from human and frogs showed multiantibotic reisitance [19, 25], which aggravated the limitation of antibiotics in E. miricola treatment. E. miricola also showed resistance to a variety of antibiotics.

5. Conclusion

In this paper, we reported outbreaks of E. miricola caused neurologic disorders and cataracts in cultured bullfrogs in Tangshan city, Hebei Province. From diseased bullfrogs of 10 farms, we isolated 42 strains of E. miricola. The isolate could reproduce fatal meningitis-like disease in bullfrogs and displayed highly pathogenicity in both bullfrogs and suckling mice, indicating its potential threat to mammals. Antibiotic sensitization tests of the isolates were also performed in this study. These findings prioritized E. miricola as important zoonotic agents, which may have ramifications for human medicine.

Data Availability

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Ethical Approval

The authors confirm that the ethical policies of the journal, as noted on the journal’s author guidelines page, have been adhered to. All procedures were approved by the Animal Protection and Utilization Committee of Hebei Science and Technology Normal University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the S&T Program of Hebei (19226629D), the Science and Technology Project of Hebei Education Department (BJ2021055), the Hebei Province High-level Talent Funding Project (C20231014), the S&T Program of Qinhuangdao (202301A094), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31802186).

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary 1. The information of geographical distribution and coordinates of bullfrog farms sampled.

Supplementary 2. The antibotic susceptibility test results of the 42 isolates.