Assessment of Knowledge and Attitude of Tuberculosis Patients in Direct Observation Therapy Program towards Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study
Table 3
TB patients’ overall knowledge and associated factors on MDR-TB in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2016 ().
Characteristics
Overall knowledge ( (%))
Odds ratio
Poor
Good
Crude (COR)
Adjusted (AOR)
Sex
Male
84 (19.9)
133 (31.5)
1.7 (1.2, 2.5)
1.62 (1.1, 2.4)
Female
106 (25.1)
99 (23.5)
1.0
1.0
Age (years)
≤34
124 (29.4)
156 (36.9)
1.0
1.0
35-54
55 (13.0)
60 (14.2)
0.87 (0.56, 1.34)
0.81 (0.5, 1.3)
≥55
8 (1.9)
13 (3.1)
1.3 (0.52, 3.22)
1.2 (0.5, 2.9)
Marital status
Never married
92 (18.7)
115 (31.1)
1.1 (0.7, 1.55)
0.9 (0.6, 1.5)
Ever married
98 (26.3)
116 (23.9)
1.0
1.0
Educational status
None (illiterate)
24 (5.7)
16 (3.8)
1.0
1.0
Primary level
79 (18.7)
68 (16.1)
1.3 (0.634, 2.64)
1.4 (0.6, 3.0)
Secondary level
43 (10.2)
52 (12.3)
1.8 (0.86, 3.8)
2.2 (1.0, 5.2)
Tertiary level
44 (10.4)
96 (22.8)
3.3 (1.6, 6.8)
4.3 (1.9, 9.8)
Occupational status
Unemployed
65
64
1.0
1.0
Employed
125
168
1.4 (0.8, 2.1)
0.9 (0.6, 1.5)
Average monthly income of respondent’s family or friends (ETB)
<585
85 (20.1)
81 (19.2)
0.6 (0.4, 1.1)
0.5 (0.2, 1.3)
586-1650
30 (7.1)
36 (8.5)
0.4 (0.2, 0.7)
0.4 (0.2, 0.9)
1651-3145
39 (9.2)
44 (10.4)
0.4 (0.23, 0.7)
0.6 (0.3, 1.3)
≥3146
35 (8.3)
70 (16.6)
1.0
1.0
Sleeping practice in your home
Alone and separate room
69 (16.4)
120 (28.4)
3.5 (2.14, 5.65)
8.0 (4.0, 15.7)
Alone but not separate room
43 (10.2)
73 (17.3)
3.4 (2.0, 5.82)
5.8 (2.9, 11.2)
In one bed with other members of family or friends
78 (18.5)
39 (9.3)
1.0
1.0
No. of family/friends live with TB patients
No one with me
39 (9.2)
63 (14.9)
1.7 (1.01, 2.8)
1.9 (0.7, 4.5)
2-3 members
69 (16.4)
90 (21.3)
1.2 (0.7, 1.9)
1.2 (0.6, 2.2)
≥4 members
82 (19.4)
79 (18.7)
1.0
1.0
indicates statistical significance association independent and dependent variable. indicates statistical strongly significance association independent and dependent variables. indicates percentage sum was more than 100% because of multiple responses and think that there are missed value in variables.
