Research Article

Comparison of Three Methods for the Estimation of Pineal Gland Volume Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Table 2

The result of analysis of variance along with postrhoc test (Tukey).

Mean differencesStandard error (SE)Confidence interval (CI) 𝑃
LowerUpper

ROI—Planimetry1.647.96−17.1820.460.97
ROI—Point counting4.787.96−14.0423.610.82
Planimetry—Point counting−3.147.96−21.9615.680.91