Research Article

Gene Expression Profiles for Predicting Metastasis in Breast Cancer: A Cross-Study Comparison of Classification Methods

Table 1

Overview of datasets used.

DatasetChipProbes (K)PatientsOutcomeTreatmentDefine genesInternal CVExternal validation trainExternal validation testReference

Amsterdam Agilent/Rosetta25295, N+, NDMNone, et, ct[31]
Amsterdam (AM)
(subset of the above)
Agilent/Rosetta25151, NDMNone[31]
Rotterdam (RO)Affymetrix
HG-133A
22286, NDMNone[28]
HUMACSpotted oligonucleotides2960, NMENone[4]
HuangAffymetrix
95av2
1252, N+REct[27]
Sotiriou 2003Spotted cDNA7.699, N+/NREet, ct[24]
Sotiriou 2006Affymetrix
HG-133A
22179, N+/NDMet[25]
UppsalaAffymetrix
HG-133A+B
44236, N+/NDFNone, ct, et[6]
StockholmAffymetrix
HG-133A+B
44159, N+/NRENone, ct, et[23]
TRANSBIG (TR)Affymetrix
HG-133A
22147, NDMNone[32]
Mainz (MA)Affymetrix
HG-133A
22200, NDMNone[33]

The columns show the following: “dataset”: the individual names for the eight datasets; “chip”: microarray chip used; “probes”: number of probes on the chip measured in thousands (K = 1000); patients': number of patients in the study and their nodal status (N+ and N indicates number of node-positive and -negative patients; “outcome” covers the clinical outcome being DM: distant metastasis, ME: metastasis, RE: relapse, and DF: death from breast cancer; “treatment” shows patient treatments abbreviated by et: endocrine therapy, ct: chemo therapy, and none: no adjuvant therapy.