- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Annual Issues ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Recently Accepted Articles ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 385610, 6 pages
Allelic Variation at the Rht8 Locus in a 19th Century Wheat Collection
1Department of Ecology and Evolution, Uppsala University, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden
2Department of Crop Production Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
3Swedish Museum of Cultural History, SE-643 98 Julita, Sweden
4IFM Molecular Genetics, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden
5Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway
Received 28 October 2011; Accepted 25 December 2011
Academic Editors: T. Nakazaki and I. Tokatlidis
Copyright © 2012 Linnéa Asplund et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Wheat breeding during the 20th century has put large efforts into reducing straw length and increasing harvest index. In the 1920s an allele of Rht8 with dwarfing effects, found in the Japanese cultivar “Akakomugi,” was bred into European cultivars and subsequently spread over the world. Rht8 has not been cloned, but the microsatellite marker WMS261 has been shown to be closely linked to it and is commonly used for genotyping Rht8. The “Akakomugi” allele is strongly associated with WMS261-192bp. Numerous screens of wheat cultivars with different geographical origin have been performed to study the spread and influence of the WMS261-192bp during 20th century plant breeding. However, the allelic diversity of WMS261 in wheat cultivars before modern plant breeding and introduction of the Japanese dwarfing genes is largely unknown. Here, we report a study of WMS261 allelic diversity in a historical wheat collection from 1865 representing worldwide major wheats at the time. The majority carried the previously reported 164 bp or 174 bp allele, but with little geographical correlation. In a few lines, a rare 182 bp fragment was found. Although straw length was recognized as an important character already in the 19th century, Rht8 probably played a minor role for height variation. The use of WMS261 and other functional markers for analyses of historical specimens and characterization of historic crop traits is discussed.
During the green revolution in 1960’s and 1970’s the yield of cereal grain increased dramatically and annual production doubled . This was partly due to changed cultivation practices but primarily a result of the development of new varieties of wheat, corn, and rice. One important aspect of the new varieties was the shorter, sturdier straw that could take large amounts of fertilizers without suffering from lodging.
The reduction in straw length was a result of cultivars being insensitive to gibberellin . For example, Peng et al.  reported that the mutant alleles of the genes reduced height-1, (Rht-B1 and Rht-D1) leading to dwarfism in wheat, as well as the maize gene dwarf-8 (d8), are orthologues of the Arabidopsis Gibberellin Insensitive (GAI) gene. Unfortunately the two Rht genes, Rht-B1 and Rht-D1, also reduce seedling establishment and coleoptile length under some environmental conditions.
Such negative effects on seedling vigour have not been found in another semidwarfism gene, Rht8 , located on chromosome 2D . Although the molecular identity of Rht8 is still unknown, Korzun et al.  showed a close association with the microsatellite marker WMS261. Several alleles of this marker exist and the 164 bp allele increased height with 3 cm compared to the 174 bp allele, while the 192 bp allele, diagnostic for the semidwarf phenotype, was associated with a reduction in 7-8 cm compared to the 174 bp allele.
A few exceptions to the linkage between WMS261 and Rht8 have been reported . Nevertheless, WMS261 has been useful in a large number of screens for Rht8 polymorphisms in various materials (Table 1). The dwarfing allele of Rht8 and associated WMS261-192 bp was introduced from the Japanese variety “Akakomugi” through Italian breeding programs in the 1920’s . After that, it was used in several crossings and spread to the rest of the world . In southern and central Europe, this allele is now very abundant [4, 6] and it is found almost exclusively in certain areas like Ukraine  and Bulgaria . Additionally, in China the WMS261-192 bp is very common . Interestingly, WMS261-192 bp is also found in several Chinese landraces suggesting an alternative source of Rht8 in Chinese cultivars to the “Akakomugi”-Italian breeding origin . The semidwarf CIMMYT varieties usually carry the WMS261-164 bp allele . These lines have reduced height through Rht-B1b and Rht-D1b. Worland et al.  speculate that addition of Rht8 would lead to a too strong dwarfing phenotype. In varieties from USA, UK, Germany, and France WMS261-174 bp is the most common allele. This was suggested to be due to its linkage with the photoperiod sensitive Ppd-D1b allele that might be beneficial for northern varieties [4, 6].
In spite of these extensive screenings, the world-wide distribution of WMS261 alleles in the era before modern plant breeding as well as introduction of the “Akakomugi” allele is unknown. The objective of this study is to explore the presence of the different WMS261 alleles in a historic 19th century material. Although no formal plant breeding (i.e., planned crossings and pedigree-based selections) took place in the 19th century, numerous well-characterized wheat cultivars existed [18, 19]. These, more or less, pure lines derived from landraces were multiplied and sold by seed companies and were thus spread and cultivated over large areas.
Several of the most recognized wheat cultivars in the 1860s were displayed at the International Exhibition in London 1862. Seed samples from the exhibition were taken to Stockholm, Sweden where they, together with some German cultivars, were multiplied at the Experimental Field of The Royal Academy of Agriculture during subsequent years . Samples of the harvest of 1865 were saved in glass containers and stored at the academy museum for 100 years before being moved to the Swedish Museum of Cultural History where the samples have been kept since. Here, we report on the WMS261 genotyping of these 147-year-old seeds and the possible influence of Rht8 in 19th century wheats.
2. Material and Methods
2.1. Historical Plant Material
Fifty-nine historical wheat varieties, harvested in 1865, were obtained from the seed collection of The Royal Swedish Academy of Forestry and Agriculture (Table 2). The seeds in this seed collection are no longer viable but genetic analysis of the aged DNA is possible . Information regarding sample origin, cultivar origin, and subspecies (Table 2) was gathered from the archives of The Royal Swedish Academy of Forestry and Agriculture and complemented with data from 19th century literature on cereal cultivation [18–21]. Data on straw length (Table 2) and lodging resistance in test cultivations 1865 was taken from Juhlin-Dannfelt .
2.2. Molecular Analysis
DNA extractions of historical material were made at Linköping University in a laboratory where cereal DNA work is not regularly performed. DNA was extracted from single seeds using the FastDNA SPIN Kit and FastPrep Instrument (MP Biomedicals), with extraction blanks performed in parallel as negative controls.
Rht8 was genotyped through a seminested PCR for the marker WMS261. The primer pair Rht8f (TGTAAAACCACGGCCAGTCTCCCTGTACGC) and Rht8r (CTCGCGCTACTAGCCATTG) was used for a first round of PCR, followed by a second round using a fluorescently-labelled forward primer, M13f, together with Rht8r. Each PCR reaction of 20 μL consisted of 0.5 U Taq DNA Polymerase (New England BioLabs), 1X New England BioLabs ThermoPol Reaction Buffer, 0.25 μM of each dNTP, 0.1 μM each of the primers, and 1 μL and 3 μL of DNA-template for the first and the second PCR, respectively, where PCR product from the first PCR was used as template for the second. PCR amplifications were run at 3 min initial denaturation at 94°C, 30 cycles of 94°C for 20 s, 55°C for 1 min 20 s, and 72°C for 30 s and a final extension step of 72°C for 10 min. In samples failing to amplify the PCR reaction was repeated twice, the second time with an annealing temperature of 51°C to allow for annealing to mutated primer sites. Fragment lengths of PCR products were analyzed using MegaBACE 1000 (Amersham Biosciences) and MegaBACE Fragment Profiler version 1.2
We successfully amplified the marker WMS261 in 57 out of 59 seed samples harvested in 1865 and used it as a proxy for genotyping the linked Rht8 locus. Among the samples yielding a PCR product we found 15 accessions carrying the WMS261-164 bp genotype and 36 accessions with the WMS261-174 bp allele. Two accessions had an allele of length 182 bp. In addition four accessions were heterozygous, three for the 164, 174 genotype, and one for the 164, 182 genotype (Table 2).
For most accessions the country of origin was known. We were unable to detect any clear pattern with respect to country of origin and Rht8 genotype. In most countries from which we had more than one accession both the WMS261-164 bp and the WMS261-174 bp allele were present. The exceptions were Hungary (all three WMS261-174 bp), Sweden (both WMS261-174 bp) and the US (both WMS261-164 bp). All spelt wheats studied, except one, carried the WMS261-174 bp allele.
We evaluated data on straw length from the test cultivations performed in 1865, the cultivations from which the seeds were taken. Data was available for 41 cultivars and straw lengths ranged from 91 to 127 cm. We found no correlation between straw length and the two WMS261-genotypes, -164 bp and -174 bp (two sample t-test, df = 34, P = 0.78). The degree of lodging was registered in the cultivation records and we note that several of the tallest accessions suffer from lodging. Evidently, lodging was considered as a serious problem and tall strawwasan undesirable trait.
The genetic diversity at the WMS261 microsatellite has been an important diagnostic tool for genotyping the Rht8 locus (Table 1). Previous studies have shown three different alleles, WMS261-174 bp, WMS261-164 bp, and WMS261-192 bp, to be internationally widespread. The majority of the accessions in our sample had either of the first two of these alleles. Some of our PCR products yielded fragments that were sized a few base pairs larger than WMS261-164 bp or WMS261-174 bp, but in accordance with Schmidt et al.  we did not consider them as distinct alleles, but a result of slippage or “stutter”.
Our choice of samples is in many ways comparable with those of previous studies [9, 10, 15] in that it comprises of a range of, at the time, widely cultivated and internationally representative wheat accessions. As expected the WMS261-164 bp and the WMS261-174 bp alleles were the most common ones (28 and 68% of the homozygotes, resp.). Our samples were harvested some 60 years before the first use of “Akakomugi” in crosses and the 1865 test cultivations did not include any Japanese or Chinese accessions. It is therefore not surprising that we do not detect the WMS261-192 bp allele.
It has been suggested that the WMS261-174 bp allele is linked to the Ppd-D1b allele and has been selected for in northern Europe. However, in contrast to screens of extant material [4, 6] we did not see the clear dominance of the WMS261-174 bp allele in cultivars from northern Europe and North America. In our material we found both the WMS261-174 bp and the WMS261-164 bp alleles in wheats from a wide range of countries and in many cases we found both alleles in wheats from the same country. Although all the accessions from the same country in a few cases shared the same allele we could not distinguish any clear geographic pattern in the distribution of the WMS261-174 bp and WMS261-164 bp alleles. The limited number of accessions restricts the possibility to recognize geographic patterns, but the geographic segregation of allele types [4, 6] might actually have arisen later during modern plant improvement, often based on a few key cultivars. In the cultivation data for the winter wheats flowering time (not shown) was slightly earlier for accessions with the WMS261-174 bp than those with the WMS261-164 bp allele (298 versus 300 days after sowing) but not significantly (two sample t-test, df = 27, P = 0.19) and did thus not show any clear support for linkage to Ppd-D1b.
In addition to the two major alleles (WMS261-164 bp and WMS261-174 bp), we found a few accessions with a 182 bp allele. Other studies have reported alleles differing from the three main alleles, but an allele in the 182 bp size range has only been reported previously in a single cultivar, “Madison” . The wheats with the 182 bp allele was a Canadian wheat and a German wheat called “Ringelblumen” and it does not seem that they have a shared or limited origin that might otherwise have explained why the allele has been undetected in most previous studies. Unfortunately we lacked cultivation data for both the accessions homozygous for the 182 bp allele. Its correlation with a specific effect on plant height should be worthwhile investigating to further explore the relationship between different alleles at the WMS261 locus and differences in plant height.
In this study, we cannot find any correlation between genotype and plant height. The average effect of the WMS261-174 bp allele compared to the WMS261-164 bp allele is a reduction of 3 cm  and in the limited number of accessions this effect might be too small to detect. The test cultivations, carried out at the experimental fields of the Royal Swedish Agricultural Academy, were also performed in small and nonreplicated test plots, which further limit the possibility to reveal any effects of the Rht8. However, it is clear from the cultivation data that straw length and the amount of lodging were traits of concern to the 19th century plant breeders. Although Rht8 probably contributed little, if at all, to variation in straw length, the set of cultivars of 1865 displayed a large height range.
The cultivars studied here are from the time period when the seed industry first emerged in the Western world. Line selections from landraces with desirable traits were developed and multiplied to give rise to more uniform seed materials with more predictable traits, that is, cultivars. The most popular of these was named and described in the contemporary literature and received both national and international attention . The major wheat cultivars of the 19th century have in some cases survived to the present in genebank collections, and several of the cultivars genotyped in this study can be obtained as extant material from genebanks. Most of the cultivars studied here are, however, long extinct. For these, samples from historical collections provide the only possibility to study the genetic composition of early wheat cultivars. Also for accessions still available in genebanks, there are advantages in using historical material instead. Concerns regarding the integrity of genebank material have been raised  and the geographic distribution of functional alleles have been shown to be much more distinct with historical than extant material [25, 26]. The specific nature of the historic specimens used here, that is, large containers with thousands of seeds , also permits repeated or complementary experiments.
Molecular identification of genes involved in domestication and plant improvement has recently accelerated [27, 28]. By screening the genetic diversity present and testing for selection the individual importance of different alleles can be explored. In the case of Rht8 its role in 20th century wheat improvement is well known from extensive screens and documented crossings and pedigrees. Here we can add insight into the genetic diversity of the Rht8 during the transition from traditional and modern agriculture, a time less well documented and more difficult to study. The use of historical and archaeological plant material  in addition to extant plant material can in this way help to reveal a clearer picture to the processes that formed crop plants of today.
Dr. Per Larsson is acknowledged for help with analyses of data. This research was funded by the Lagersberg, Carl Tryggers and Nilsson-Ehle foundations, and the Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning (FORMAS).
- G. S. Khush, “Green revolution: the way forward,” Nature Reviews Genetics, vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 815–822, 2001.
- P. Hedden, “The genes of the green revolution,” Trends in Genetics, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 5–9, 2003.
- J. Peng, D. E. Richards, N. M. Hartley et al., ““Green revolution” genes encode mutant gibberellin response modulators,” Nature, vol. 400, no. 6741, pp. 256–261, 1999.
- A. J. Worland, V. Korzun, M. S. Röder, M. W. Ganal, and C. N. Law, “Genetic analysis of the dwarfing gene Rht8 in wheat—part II. The distribution and adaptive significance of allelic variants at the Rht8 locus of wheat as revealed by microsatellite screening,” Theoretical and Applied Genetics, vol. 96, no. 8, pp. 1110–1120, 1998.
- S. V. Chebotar, V. N. Korzun, and Y. M. Sivolap, “Allele distribution at locus WMS261 marking the dwarfing gene Rht8 in common wheat cultivars of Southern Ukraine,” Russian Journal of Genetics, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 894–898, 2001.
- A. J. Worland, E. J. Sayers, and V. Korzun, “Allelic variation at the dwarfing gene Rht8 locus and its significance in international breeding programmes,” Euphytica, vol. 119, no. 1-2, pp. 155–159, 2001.
- M. Ahmad and M. E. Sorrells, “Distribution of microsatellite alleles linked to Rht8 dwarfing gene in wheat,” Euphytica, vol. 123, no. 2, pp. 235–240, 2002.
- M. M. Manifesto and E. Y. Suárez, “Microsatellite screening of the Rht8 dwarfing gene in Argentinian wheat cultivars,” Annual Wheat Newsletter, vol. 48, pp. 23–24, 2002.
- A. L. Schmidt, K. R. Gale, M. H. Ellis, and P. M. Giffard, “Sequence variation at a microsatellite locus (XGWM261) in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum) varieties,” Euphytica, vol. 135, no. 2, pp. 239–246, 2004.
- Y. Liu, D. Liu, H. Zhang et al., “Allelic variation, sequence determination and microsatellite screening at the XGWM261 locus in Chinese hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum) varieties,” Euphytica, vol. 145, no. 1-2, pp. 103–112, 2005.
- G. Ganeva, V. Korzun, S. Landjeva, N. Tsenov, and M. Atanasova, “Identification, distribution and effects on agronomic traits of the semi-dwarfing Rht alleles in Bulgarian common wheat cultivars,” Euphytica, vol. 145, no. 3, pp. 305–315, 2005.
- X. Zhang, S. Yang, Y. Zhou, Z. He, and X. Xia, “Distribution of the Rht-B1b, Rht-D1b and Rht8 reduced height genes in autumn-sown Chinese wheats detected by molecular markers,” Euphytica, vol. 152, no. 1, pp. 109–116, 2006.
- M. H. Ellis, G. J. Rebetzke, P. Chandler, D. Bonnet, W. Spielmeyer, and R. A. Richards, “The effect of different height reducing genes on the early growth of wheat,” Functional Plant Biology, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 583–589, 2004.
- J. Worland, C. N. Law, and S. Petrovic, “Height reducing genes and their importance to Yugoslavian winter wheat varieties,” Savremena Poljo-Privreda, vol. 38, pp. 245–258, 1990.
- V. Korzun, M. S. Röder, M. W. Ganal, A. J. Worland, and C. N. Law, “Genetic analysis of the dwarfing gene (Rht8) in wheat. Part I. Molecular mapping of Rht8 on the short arm of chromosome 2D of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.),” Theoretical and Applied Genetics, vol. 96, no. 8, pp. 1104–1109, 1998.
- M. H. Ellis, D. G. Bonnett, and G. J. Rebetzke, “A 192bp allele at the Xgwm261 locus is not always associated with the Rht8 dwarfing gene in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.),” Euphytica, vol. 157, no. 1-2, pp. 209–214, 2007.
- K. Borojevic and K. Borojevic, “The transfer and history of “reduced height genes” (Rht) in wheat from Japan to Europe,” Journal of Heredity, vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 455–459, 2005.
- F. Alefeld, Landwirtschaftliche Flora, Wiegandt & Hempel, Berlin, Germany, 1866.
- F. Körnicke and H. Werner, Handbuch des Getreidebaues, Parey, Berlin, Germany, 1885.
- C. Juhlin-Dannfelt and A. Müller, Berättelse öfver verksamheten vid Kongl.Landtbruks-Akademiens försöksfält och agrikulturkemiska laboratorium underåren 1862 och 1863, P. A. Norstedt och söner, Kongl. Boktryckare, Stockholm, Sweden.
- C. Juhlin-Dannfelt, Berättelse öfver verksamheten vid Kongl. Landtbruks-Akademiens försöksfält under åren 1865 och 1868, P.A. Norstedt och söner, Kongl. Boktryckare, Stockholm, Sweden, 1870.
- M. W. Leino, J. Hagenblad, J. Edqvist, and E. M. K. Strese, “DNA preservation and utility of a historic seed collection,” Seed Science Research, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 125–135, 2009.
- A. P. Bonjean and W. J. Angus, The World Wheat Book: A History of Wheat Breeding, Intercept, London, UK, 2001.
- J. Hagenblad, J. Zie, and M. W. Leino, “Exploring the population genetics of genebank and historical landrace accessions,” Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution. In press.
- H. Jones, D. L. Lister, M. A. Bower, F. J. Leigh, L. M. Smith, and M. K. Jones, “Approaches and constraints of using existing landrace and extant plant material to understand agricultural spread in prehistory,” Plant Genetic Resources, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 98–112, 2008.
- D. L. Lister, S. Thaw, M. A. Bower et al., “Latitudinal variation in a photoperiod response gene in European barley: insight into the dynamics of agricultural spread from 'historic' specimens,” Journal of Archaeological Science, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 1092–1098, 2009.
- J. F. Doebley, B. S. Gaut, and B. D. Smith, “The molecular genetics of crop domestication,” Cell, vol. 127, no. 7, pp. 1309–1321, 2006.
- J. C. Burger, M. A. Chapman, and J. M. Burke, “Molecular insights into the evolution of crop plants,” American Journal of Botany, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 113–122, 2008.
- S. A. Palmer, O. Smith, and R. G. Allaby, “The blossoming of plant archaeogenetics,” Annals of Anatomy, vol. 194, no. 1, pp. 146–156, 2012.