About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 615920, 7 pages
Research Article

The Effects of Subchronic Exposure to Terbuthylazine on Early Developmental Stages of Common Carp

1Department of Veterinary Public Health and Toxicology, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Palackého 1/3, 612 42 Brno, Czech Republic
2Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, v.v.i., Květná 8, 603 65 Brno, Czech Republic
3Department of Pathological Morphology and Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Palackého 1/3, 612 42 Brno, Czech Republic

Received 3 January 2012; Accepted 7 February 2012

Academic Editors: J.-M. Sabatier, M. F. Soto-Jimenez, and K. M. Swaileh

Copyright © 2012 Stanislava Štěpánová et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


The aim of this study was to assess the impact of terbuthylazine in surface waters on fish under experimental conditions. Subchronic toxic effects on embryos and larvae of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) were investigated during a 30-day toxicity test. The exposure to terbuthylazin showed no effect on mortality, but significant differences (𝑃<0.0001) were revealed on weight and growth parameters at concentrations of 520 and 820 μg/L. The inhibition of specific growth rate at concentrations of 520 and 820 μg/L was 14% compared to the control group. No significant negative effects on total body length and body weight were observed at lower concentrations (0.9 and 160 μg/L). The concentrations 520 and 820 μg/L were associated with a delay in development compared to other experimental groups and controls. On the basis of weight and growth rate evaluation and determination of developmental stages, the No Observed Effect Concentration (NOEC) of terbuthylazine was estimated at 160 μg/L and the Lowest Observed Effect Concentration (LOEC) was 520 μg/L. According to these results, the reported environmental concentration of terbuthylazine in Czech rivers does not impact growth, development, morphology, or histology of carp embryos and larvae.

1. Introduction

Terbuthylazinee (N2-tert-butyl-6-chloro-N4-ethyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine), a triazine herbicide, is a selective systemic herbicide which acts as a photosynthesis inhibitor. It is used as a broad spectrum herbicide in maize, sorghum, vines, citrus, coffee, potatoes, legumes, and forestry [1]. It is taken up through roots and leaves and is distributed throughout the plant, which enables it to be used in both pre- and postemergence treatment. Terbuthylazine is used as a substitute for atrazine, which has been banned in many countries.

Terbuthylazine is stable in neutral, weakly acid, and weakly alkaline media. Degradation of terbuthylazine in aquatic environment depends on the presence of sediments and biological activity. The half-life in water at 20°C is 8 days at pH 1, 86 days at pH 5, >200 days at pH 9, and 12 days at pH 13. In sunlight the half-life is >40 days. The major metabolic process in animals is N-dealkylation and oxidation [1]. Its solubility in water is 8.5 mg/L at 20°C, and log Kow is 3.04 [2].

Triazine pesticides are divided into two groups: asymmetrical triazines or triazinones, such as metribuzin, and symmetrical triazines. The symmetrical triazines (𝑠-triazines) can be further divided into chloro-𝑠-triazines (e.g., atrazine, terbuthylazine, simazine, propazin, and cyanazine), thiomethyl-𝑠-triazines (ametryn, prometryn, terbutryn), and methoxy-𝑠-triazine (e.g., prometron) [3].

Triazine herbicides are for animals relatively nontoxic during acute exposure and well tolerated during long-term administration. They are not considered a developmental or reproductive toxin, are not mutagenic or carcinogenic, and are not irritating to skin or eyes [3]. On the contrary, some studies of the effects of atrazine report alterations in reproduction, the endocrine system, and development or increased incidence of mammary tumors in rats [4].

The extensive use of pesticides in agriculture results in environmental contamination. In Czech Republic it was according to the Czech State Phytosanitary Administration applied about 107 000 kg of terbuthylazine in 2010. The Czech Hydrometeorological Institute has reported atrazine, cyanazine, metamitron, metribuzin, prometryn, simazine, terbuthylazine, and terbutryn in Czech rivers. Terbuthylazine was present in about 50% of water samples taken in the years 2005 to 2009. The highest environmental concentrations reached 0.1 μg/L in 2005 to 2.8 μg/L in 2006 (2.6 μg/L in 2009) [5]. Monitoring of terbuthylazine in groundwater, surface water, and drinking water has been undertaken by many authors [610]. Terbuthylazine levels were monitored in the River Po (Italy) from 1988 to 1991 and concentrations ranging from less than detection limits up to 0.3 μg/L were reported [6]. Terbuthylazine contamination of the aquifer in Italy was monitored from 1998 to 2004, concentrations never exceeded the EU drinking water limit (0.1 μg/L); the maximum concentration was 0.04 μg/L. Concentrations ranging from less than detection limits up to 1.27 μg/L were reported in surface and groundwater in northern Spain by Hildebrandt et al. [8]. Terbuthylazine concentrations in Spain in the range of 0.02–0.39 μg/L were reported by Castillo et al. [7]. The presence of terbuthylazine in drinking water in Athens was less than detection limits up to 0.02 μg/L [10].

Studies of the toxicity of various triazine herbicides to fish indicate that it can cause growth retardation and morphological, biochemical, hematological, histopathological, and physiological alteration [1120], but less is known about the specific effects of terbuthylazine on fish.

The aim of this study was to assess effects of subchronic exposure to sublethal concentrations of terbuthylazine on growth, development, and histology of embryolarval developmental stages of common carp (Cyprinus carpio).

2. Material and Methods

Testing solutions were prepared from Click 500 SC. The active compound is terbuthylazine at a concentration of 500 g/L. The tested concentrations were prepared by using the stock solution (100 mg/L of terbuthylazine), which included the solvent dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) to improve solubility. The highest tested concentration of terbuthylazine included 0.005 mL/L DMSO.

2.1. Experimental Protocol

Embryolarval toxicity tests were carried out using a modified protocol according to the OECD guideline 210 (fish, early-life stage toxicity test) [21]. Fertilized eggs of common carp were obtained from commercial fish farm. Eggs were produced according to standard methods of artificial reproduction as described by Kocour et al. [22].

Twenty-four hours after fertilization, 100 fertilized eggs were separated from unfertilized eggs and randomly distributed into fifteen crystallization dishes containing one of four ascending concentrations of terbuthylazine solution, or to a control dish (terbuthylazine-free tap water). The experiment was conducted in triplicate (a total of 300 fertilized eggs for each concentration and control). Tested concentrations were selected according to the environmental concentration, with the lowest tested concentration corresponding to the environmental concentration: 0.9, 160, 520, and 820 μg/L. Concentrations during the test did not sink below 80% of the nominal concentration.

A semistatic method was used in which the testing solution was replaced twice daily. Hatching and survival were also observed twice daily, and dead embryos and larvae were removed. During the test, larvae were fed freshly hatched Artemia salina ad libitum twice a day prior to the bath exchange. The temperature, pH, and oxygen saturation were recorded daily.

The beginning of the test was designated day 1 (one day after fertilization). Hatching began on day 4 and was completed by day 6. Feeding with A. salina was initiated on day 7. The test was concluded on day 30, when all of the larvae in the control groups reached the juvenile stage.

During the test embryos and larvae were sampled to record developmental stage, length, weight, Fulton’s condition factor (FCF), length-weight relationship, and morphological anomalies. Samples from each concentration and from the control were collected on day 6 (before feeding began) and on day 13 (15 fish, 5 from each replicate group), on day 20 (30 fish, 10 from each replicate group), on day 27 (15, 5 from each replicate group), and at the completion of the test on day 30 (45, 15 from each replicate group). Fish were fixed in 4% formalin.

2.2. Water Parameters

The basic physical and chemical parameters of tap water used in the tests were acid neutralization capacity (ANC4.5) 1.0–1.2 mmol/L; chemical oxygen demand (CODMn) 0.8–1.2 mg/L; total ammonia below the limit of determination (<0.04 mg/L); NO3 11.2–13.5 mg/L; NO2 below the limit of determination (<0.02 mg/L); Cl 10.2–12.5 mg/L; Σ Ca + Mg 3.01 mmol/L. The water temperature ranged from 19 to 22°C; pH was between 7.5 and 8.5, and dissolved oxygen did not fall below 60%.

2.3. Determination of Developmental Stages

The developmental stages were determined according to Penaz et al. [23] who have described nine embryonic (E1–E9), six larval (L1–L6), and two juvenile (J1-J2) stages in common carp. Total length (TL) was measured stereomicroscopically using a micrometer to 0.01 mm; weight (𝑊) was measured to 0.1 mg.

2.4. Weight and Growth Rate Evaluation

Fulton’s condition factor (FCF) was calculated at each sampling time:FCF=𝑊105𝐿3,(1) where 𝑊 is the weight in g and 𝐿 is the total length in mm.

The mean specific growth rate (SGR) was calculated for each experimental group beginning on day 6 (the first sampling time) and on day 30 (completion of the test): SGR=ln𝑤2ln𝑤1𝑡2𝑡1100,(2) (SGR: specific growth rate, 𝑤1: weight of one fish at time 𝑡1, 𝑤2: weight of one fish at time 𝑡2,𝑡1: first sampling time, 𝑡2: end of the test).

The inhibition of specific growth (I) rate for each experimental group was calculated as follows: 𝐼%=SGR(control)SGR(group)SGR(control)100.(3)

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Results were analyzed using STATISTICA 8.0 for Windows (StatSoft CR). After testing for normality of all parameters (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test) and homogenity of variances across groups (Levene’s test), data were subjected to the parametric ANOVA Tukey’s HSD test [24].

2.6. Histopathological Examination

The fish were prepared for histopathological examination, fixed in buffered 10% neutral formalin, dehydrated, embedded in paraffin wax, sectioned (cross-section) on a microtome at 4 μm, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Histology of skin, gill, and liver was examined by light microscopy.

2.7. Measurement of Terbuthylazine

Gas chromatography with ion trap mass spectrometry (GC/IT-MS) was used for measurement of terbuthylazine. Sample preparation was based on simple liquid-liquid extraction into hexane.

Separation, identification, and quantification of terbuthylazine were based on the GC/IT-MS method. The gas chromatograph Varian 450-GC and VF-5 ms (30 m × 0.25 mm) column were used for separation. A Varian 220-MS ion trap mass spectrometer was used for identification and quantification. Chromatographic and MS conditions were based on methods described by Perreau and Einhorn [25]. All solvents were GC/MS-grade purity. Certified standard terbuthylazine was used.

Detection limit (3σ) of terbuthylazine is 0.01 μg/L. Expanded uncertainty was 6.0% conditional on a coefficient of expansion of 𝑘=2.

3. Results

3.1. Hatching

Eggs began hatching on day 4. The majority of the eggs hatched by day 5, and hatching was completed by day 6. No negative effects of terbuthylazine on hatching and viability of embryos at the tested concentrations were found.

3.2. Cumulative Mortality

No significant differences were found in total cumulative mortality among groups. In all experimental groups and control mortality was below 10%.

3.3. Length and Weight Parameters

The time course for total body length (mm) and weight increase of the embryos and larvae in relation to terbuthylazine concentration in water are depicted in Figures 1 and 2. The influence of terbuthylazine concentration on body weight and body length of carp larvae began to be evident from day 20. Larval growth correlated with the tested concentrations. At the completion of the test, significant differences (𝑃<0.0001) in total length and weight were seen between control and experimental groups at 520 and 820 μg/L. Total body length of fish in all groups at completion of the test is depicted in Figure 3. Greater variability was found in total body length between each fish in the same group in experimental groups 520 and 820 μg/L compared with the control group.

Figure 1: Total body length of common carp during the embryolarval toxicity test (mean ± SD; (a, b) groups with different alphabetic superscripts differ significantly (𝑃<0.05); day 6, 13, and 27 𝑛=75; day 20 𝑛=150; day 30 𝑛=225).
Figure 2: Body weight of common carp during the embryolarval toxicity test (mean ± SD; (a, b) groups with different alphabetic superscripts differ significantly (𝑃<0.05); day 6, 13, and 27 𝑛=75; day 20 𝑛=150; day 30 𝑛=225).
Figure 3: The variability of total body length of common carp after a 30-day embryolarval toxicity test; 𝑛=225.

The influence of terbuthylazine on FCF was not significant. The mean FCF value at the end of the test was 1.28 in control and 1.29, 1.20, 1.69, and 1.26 in tested concentrations 0.9, 160, 520, and 820 μg/L, respectively.

Specific growth rate and inhibition of growth are shown in Table 1. The inhibition of specific growth rate was greatest at concentrations of 520 and 820 μg/L; it was 14% compared to the control group.

Table 1: Growth rate results of the 30-day embryolarval test on common carp. 𝑤6,𝑤30 = mean fish weight in selected group after 6 and 30 days of exposure, SGR: mean specific growth rate after 24 days of exposure, I: inhibition of specific growth after 24 days of exposure.
3.4. Early Ontogeny

Developmental stages were recorded at each sampling time in all groups. The differences in early ontogeny among control and experimental groups were evident at the completion of the test. Fish from the 520 and 820 μg/L groups were significantly delayed in development (𝑃<0.0001) in a dose-dependent manner compared with the control group. After 30 days all fish in the control group reached the juvenile stage (J1). At terbuthylazine concentrations of 0.9 and 160 μg/L, the rate was 96%, but at 520 and 820 μg/L only 64% and 50%, respectively. The delay of development of carp at day 27 of the test is depicted in Figure 4, at day 27 reached 80% of fish juvenile stage (J1) in the control whereas only about 25% at 820 μg/L.

Figure 4: Developmental stages of common carp at day 27 (L5, L6-larval, and J1-juvenile developmental stages); 𝑛=75.
3.5. Morphological Anomalies

No significant morphological anomalies were found. On day 13 elevated pigmentation in all fish exposed to 820 μg/L was seen. At subsequent sampling times, this pattern was observed in individual larvae of the 820 μg/L group. Pigmentation in other experimental groups was comparable with controls.

3.6. Histopathology

Histological examination revealed lesions only in liver in fish exposed to 820 μg/L after 30-days of the test. In liver were observed mild lesions including diffuse formation of small round to oval vacuoles in the cytoplasm of hepatocytes (Figure 5). Liver tissue was histologically comparable to that of the control (Figure 6). Tissue and organs of fish in experimental groups exposed to terbuthylazine at the concentrations of 0.9 μg/L, 160 μg/L, and 520 μg/L exhibited no histological changes.

Figure 5: Vacuoles in the cytoplasm of hepatocytes of common carp exposed to the concentration of 820 μg/L terbuthylazine for 30 days.
Figure 6: Section of liver of common carp from the control group.

Based on growth parameters, developmental, and histological examination of all replications, No Observed Effect Concentration (NOEC) = 160 μg/L and Lowest Observed Effect Concentration (LOEC) = 520 μg/L were generated.

4. Discussion

Pesticides are serious pollutants of the aquatic environment that can have harmful effects on biota, including fish. Fish are subjected to prolonged exposure of small doses of contaminants in water that do not cause death but which could induce retardation of growth and developmental or histological changes. During the 30 day exposure of embryolarval developmental stages of carp to low concentrations of terbuthylazine (0.9, 160, 520, and 820 μg/L), no effects on mortality of the exposed group compared to controls were found. The effect of terbuthylazine exposure was observable on length and weight growth. Retardation of growth in the experimental group compared to control became evident on day 20. After 30 days of exposure significantly smaller fish were found at exposure to 520 and 820 μg/L. Variability in fish growth is influenced by a range of biotic and abiotic factors. The most important abiotic factors are temperature, light, oxygen concentration, and pH, along with water contamination and other factors [26]. All biotic and abiotic factors were identical except for the different concentration of the toxic substance. It is possible that the increasing individual variability in fish growth is influenced by the presence of terbuthylazine.

Some studies have indicated that fish mortality is the most sensitive parameter upon exposure to the 𝑠-triazine herbicides [11, 27]. According to our results of embryolarval test on carp, growth seems to be a more sensitive parameter than mortality. Arufe et al. [11] in a study of the toxic effect of a terbutryn-triasulfuron mixture to seabream (Sparus aurata L.) larvae found no terbutryn concentration that affected weight that did not also cause 100% mortality. Similar results were reported by Neskovic et al. [14] who did not find any significant change in carp body weight after exposure to atrazine. Growth reduction of Galaxias maculates after exposure to low concentrations of atrazine was observed by Davies et al. [28]. Plhalova et al. [15] reported growth reduction of Danio rerio after 28 days of exposure to terbutryn. In other studies, low doses of triazine herbicides on fish that did not induce mortality or retard growth but affected hematological and biochemical profile of common carp and rainbow trout have been reported [13, 1618].

Histological examination revealed lesions in the livers of carp after 30 days of exposure to 820 μg/L of terbuthylazine. The liver is the primary organ of metabolism and excretion of pollutants. It is able to detoxify toxic compounds, but their elevated concentrations can result in structural damage. Dezfuli et al. [29] reported severe damage to liver and gill of Dicentrarchus labrax after exposure to terbuthylazine. This included myelin-like structures and acute cell swelling of hepatocytes in the liver and necrosis, lamellar and cellular edema, epithelial lifting, telangiectasia, and fusion of secondary lamellae in the gills. Histological alterations in the liver of seabream (Sparus aurata L.) after exposure to a terbutryn-triasulfuron mixture were reported by Arufe et al. [11]. These alterations included nuclear pyknosis and cellular alterations related to shape of hepatocytes caused by the amount of lipid inclusions. Biagianti-Risbourg and Bastide [12] found a number of abnormalities in liver of juvenile grey mullet (Liza ramada) associated with exposure to atrazine. Changes in the liver after triazine exposure were also reported by Neskovic et al. [14] and Velisek et al. [17, 18]. Other reported histological lesions caused by triazines include changes to the respiratory epithelium and to the renal tubules of the caudal kidney [1418].

Arufe et al. [11] identified morphological changes (curvature of the vertebral column) in some individuals after exposure to a terbutryn-triasulfuron mixture. Terbuthylazine did not induce morphological anomalies during the present trial, but delay in early development of carp was evident. After 30 days of exposure all fish in the control group reached the juvenile stage. At terbuthylazine concentrations of 0.9 and 160 μg/L, the rate was 96%, but at 520 and 820 μg/L only 64% and 50%, respectively. Disturbance of normal development and retardation in organogenesis of D. rerio embryos after atrazine exposure was observed by Wiegand et al. [20].

The advantage of toxicity tests on early-life stages of fish is the opportunity to observe developmental and morphological changes during exposure. Embryolarval toxicity testing on fish is a sensitive method, since it covers two developmental stages which differ in susceptibility as a result of physiological and biochemical differences, with fish exposed to chemicals in critical periods of development including hatching, start of exogenous nutrition, and changes of respiratory function [23, 30].

As terbuthylazine is relatively insoluble, we used the solvent DMSO. In the highest tested concentration (820 μg/L), the concentration of DMSO was 0.005 mL/L. Machova et al. [31] stated that the concentration of 1 mL/L of DMSO did not result in lethal effects, abnormalities, or changes in growth parameters during an embryolarval toxicity test on carp.

The subchronic toxic effect of terbuthylazine on embryolarval developmental stages expressed as the LOEC value was 160 μg/L, and the NOEC value was 520 μg/L. According to these results, the environmental concentration of terbuthylazine in Czech rivers should have no effect on growth, developmental, morphological, or histology of embryos and larval stages of carp.


This study was supported by the MSM Project no. 6215712402. The authors would like to thank Lucidus Consulting for paper improvement and English correction.


  1. T. R. Roberts, D. H. Hutson, P. W. Lee, P. H. Nicholls, and J. R. Plimmer, “Metabolic pathways of agrochemicals,” in Part 1: Herbicides and Plant Growth Regulators, The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK, 1st edition, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  2. S. Gangolli, Ed., The Dictionary of Substances and Their Effects, vol. 7, The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2nd edition, 1999.
  3. J. T. Stevens, C. B. Breckenridge, J. Simpkins, and J.C. Eldridge, “Symmetrical and asymmetrical triazine herbicides,” in Handbook of Pesticide Toxicology, R. Krieger, Ed., pp. 1511–1519, Academic Press, San Diego, Calif, USA, 2nd edition, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  4. K. R. Solomon, J. A. Carr, L. H. Du Preez et al., “Effects of atrazine on fish, amphibians, and aquatic reptiles: a critical review,” Critical Reviews in Toxicology, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 721–772, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. V. Kodeš, J. Vejvodová, and M. Kollerová, “Screening pesticidů v hydrosféře ČR. Hydrologické dny 2010,” in Voda v měnícím se prostředí, pp. 193–198, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  6. A. Brambilla, B. Rindone, S. Polesello, S. Galassi, and R. Balestrini, “The fate of triazine pesticides in River Po water,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 132, no. 2-3, pp. 339–348, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. A. Castillo, P. Aragon, and C. Sabater, “Herbicide residues in irrigation well water in a citrus area of Spain,” in Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium Pesticide Chemistry: Pesticide in Air, Plant, Soil & Water System, A. A. M. DelRe, E. Capri, L. Padovani, and M. Trevisan, Eds., pp. 641–648, Piacenza, Italy, June 2003.
  8. A. Hildebrandt, M. Guillamón, S. Lacorte, R. Tauler, and D. Barceló, “Impact of pesticides used in agriculture and vineyards to surface and groundwater quality (North Spain),” Water Research, vol. 42, no. 13, pp. 3315–3326, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. Otto, L. Altissimo, and G. Zanin, “Terbuthylazine contamination of the aquifer North of Vicenza (North-East Italy),” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 109–113, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D. Tsipi and A. Hiskia, “Organochlorine pesticides and triazines in the drinking water of Athens,” Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 250–257, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. I. Arufe, J. Arellano, M. J. Moreno, and C. Sarasquete, “Toxicity of a commercial herbicide containing terbutryn and triasulfuron to seabream (Sparus aurata L.) larvae: a comparison with the Microtox test,” Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 209–216, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. Biagianti-Risbourg and J. Bastide, “Hepatic perturbations induced by a herbicide (atrazine) in juvenile grey mullet Liza ramada (Mugilidae, Teleostei): an ultrastructural study,” Aquatic Toxicology, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 217–229, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. H. Modra, I. Haluzova, J. Blahova et al., “Effects of subchronic metribuzin exposure on common carp (Cyprinus carpio),” Neuroendocrinology Letters, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 669–674, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. N. K. Neskovic, I. Elezovic, V. Karan, V. Poleksic, and M. Budimir, “Acute and subacute toxicity of atrazine to carp (Cyprinus carpio L.),” Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 173–182, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. L. Plhalova, S. Macova, I. Haluzova et al., “Terbutryn toxicity to Danio rerio: effects of subchronic exposure on fish growth,” Neuroendocrinology Letters, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 242–247, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. Velisek, Z. Svobodova, V. Piackova et al., “Effects of metribuzin on rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss),” Veterinarni Medicina, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 324–332, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. Velisek, Z. Svobodova, V. Piackova, and E. Sudova, “Effects of acute exposure to metribuzin on some hematological, biochemical and histopathological parameters of common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.),” Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 492–495, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. Velisek, K. Stastna, E. Sudova, J. Turek, and Z. Svobodova, “Effects of subchronic simazine exposure on some biometric, biochemical, hematological and histopathological parameters of common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.),” Neuroendocrinology Letters, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 236–241, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. Velisek, E. Sudova, J. Machova, and Z. Svobodova, “Effects of sub-chronic exposure to terbutryn in common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.),” Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 384–390, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C. Wiegand, E. Krause, C. Steinberg, and S. Pflugmacher, “Toxicokinetics of atrazine in embryos of the zebrafish (Danio rerio),” Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 199–205, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. OECD, Guideline for Testing of Chemicals 210. Fish, Early-Life Stage Toxicity Test, 1992.
  22. M. Kocour, D. Gela, M. Rodina, and O. Linhart, “Testing of performance in common carp Cyprinus carpio L. under pond husbandry conditions I: top-crossing with Northern mirror carp,” Aquaculture Research, vol. 36, no. 12, pp. 1207–1215, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. Penaz, M. Prokes, J. Kouril, and J. Hamackova, “Early development of the carp, Cyprinus carpio,” Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universita, vol. 17, pp. 1–39, 1983. View at Google Scholar
  24. J. H. Zar, Biostatistical Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 3rd edition, 1996.
  25. F. Perreau and J. Einhorn, “Determination of frequently detected herbicides in water by solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography coupled to ion-trap tandem mass spectrometry,” Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, vol. 386, no. 5, pp. 1449–1456, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. D. Ju Ju, Ekologičeskie zakonomernosti izmenčivosti rosta ryb, Nauka, Moskva, Russia, 2001.
  27. G. Gorge and R. Nagel, “Toxicity of lindane, atrazine, and deltamethrin to early life stages of zebrafish (Brachydanio rerio),” Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 246–255, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. P. E. Davies, L. S. J. Cook, and D. Goenarso, “Sublethal responses to pesticides of several species of Australian fresh-water fish and crustaceans and rainbow trout,” Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 1341–1354, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  29. B. S. Dezfuli, E. Simoni, L. Giari, and M. Manera, “Effects of experimental terbuthylazine exposure on the cells of Dicentrarchus labrax (L.),” Chemosphere, vol. 64, no. 10, pp. 1684–1694, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. J. M. McKim, “Early life stage toxicity tests,” in Fundamentals of Aquatic Toxicology, G. M. Rand and S. R. Petrocelli, Eds., pp. 58–95, Hemisphere Publishers Corporation, New York, NY, USA, 1985. View at Google Scholar
  31. J. Machova, M. Prokes, H. Kroupova, et al., “Early ontogeny, growth and mortality of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) at low concentrations of dimethyl sulfoxide,” Acta Veterinaria Brno, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 505–512, 2009. View at Google Scholar