- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Advance Access ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Annual Issues ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 618709, 9 pages
Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Isolated from Bovine Mastitic Milk: Serogroups, Virulence Factors, and Antibiotic Resistance Properties
1Department of Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord Branch, P.O. Box 166, Shahrekord, Iran
2Young Researchers Club, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord Branch, P.O. Box 166, Shahrekord, Iran
3Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord Branch, P.O. Box 166, Shahrekord, Iran
4College of Veterinary Medicine, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord Branch, P.O. Box 166, Shahrekord, Iran
Received 25 September 2012; Accepted 12 October 2012
Academic Editors: C. DebRoy and G. Leitner
Copyright © 2012 Hassan Momtaz et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The aim of this study was to detect the virulence factors, serogroups, and antibiotic resistance properties of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli, by using 268 bovine mastitic milk samples which were diagnosed using California Mastitis Test. After E. coli identification, PCR assays were developed for detection of different virulence genes, serogroups, and antibiotic resistance genes of Escherichia coli. The antibiotic resistance pattern was studied using disk diffusion method. Out of 268 samples, 73 (27.23%) were positive for Escherichia coli, and, out of 73 positive samples, 15 (20.54%) were O26 and 11 (15.06%) were O157 so they were the highest while O111 was not detected in any sample so it was the lowest serogroup. Out of 73 STEC strains, 11 (15.06%) and 36 (49.31%) were EHEC and AEEC, respectively. All of the EHEC strains had stx1, eaeA, and ehly, virulence genes, while in AEEC strains stx1 had the highest prevalence (77.77%), followed by eaeA (55.55%). Totally, aadA1 (65.95%) had the highest while blaSHV (6.38%) had the lowest prevalence of antibiotic resistance genes. The disk diffusion method showed that the STEC strains had the highest resistance to penicillin (100%), followed by tetracycline (57.44%), while resistance to cephalothin (6.38%) was the lowest.
Milk is raised as a complete food especially for children and seniors. Its high value for proteins, minerals, fats, and vitamins is undeniable. It is the primary source of nutrition for young mammals before they are able to digest other types of foods. In addition, milk has been processed into various dairy products such as cheese, cream, butter, yogurt, kefir, and ice cream. Daily, millions of people use milk and dairy products. Milk production has a complex process which is done due to activity of bovine mammary glands. The hygienic quality of milking room and animals has a high importance in milk production, but in cases of low hygienic conditions several infections and illnesses occurred in udder tissue.
Mastitis is considered the most costly disease in dairy herds due to discarded milk and lowered milk production for approximately 80% of costs associated with mastitis, treatment costs, veterinary fees, labor costs early culling, and death . In addition, lowered milk quality due to increased somatic cell count (SCC) in the milk decreases shelf life of milk and cheese making quality . Previous study showed that bacteremia occurs in a significant proportion of cows with severe systemic disease signs . Besides, the quality and hygiene of milk are changed due to mastitis and usually cannot be used for human and animal consumption. Usually in all mastitic cases the amount of milk production reduced. An increase of 25% on world milk demand between 2007 and 2020 is expected . Dairy cattle with acute coliform mastitis, caused primarily by Escherichia coli (E. coli), exhibit a wide range of systemic disease severity, from mild, with only local inflammatory changes of the mammary gland, to severe, with significant systemic signs including rumen stasis, dehydration, shock, and even death .
E. coli strains can further be classified according to the presence of virulence factors such as enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), attaching and effacing E. coli (AEEC), and Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC or VTEC) [5–8]. Several studies showed that STEC strains are an important group for mastitis [9, 10].
Previous study showed that, from all serogroups of STEC strains, O55. O111, O124, O119, O114, O26, O157, and O44 are the most prevalent serotypes of E. coli isolated from mastitic milk . Numerous studies to identify virulence factors of E. coli isolated from cows with clinical mastitis have been conducted . Studies showed that Shiga toxins (Stx1, Stx2) and eae (intimin) are the most important virulence genes in E. coli strains isolated from bovine mastitic milk [10, 12, 13]. The cytotoxic necrotizing factor (CNF) toxins (CNF1 and CNF2 genes) are associated with damage to vascular endothelial cells and thrombotic microangiopathy.
Mainly, treatment of diseases caused by this bacterium often requires antimicrobial therapy; however, antibiotic-resistant strains of bacteria cause more severe diseases for longer periods of time than their antibiotic-susceptible counterparts. Several studies showed that antibiotic resistant in E. coli is increasing in these days [14–16]. Therefore, identification of resistance genes of bacteria seems to be so essential in reduction of treatment costs. There is no previous data about detection of virulence genes, serotypes, and antimicrobial resistance of E. coli strains isolated from cow in Iran so this present study was carried out for molecular characterization of STEC strains isolated from bovine mastitic milk.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Sampling and Detecting E. coli
Overall 268 bovine mastitic raw milk samples were collected from centers from several geographic regions of Iran, from January 2011 to March 2012. The animals selected for this study were clinically healthy, and the milk samples showed normal physical characteristics. In this study, mastitic milks were identified by the California Mastitis Test (CMT). Samples (5 mL, in sterile glass containers) were transported to the laboratory at ca. 4°C within a maximum of 6–12 h after sampling.
Samples were cultured in MacConkey (MAC) agar (Merck, Germany). Agar plates were incubated at 37°C, and bacterial growth was evaluated after 24 and 48 h. Gram-negative microorganisms were isolated from MAC agar and determined at the species level using cytochrome oxidase, triple sugar iron agar, urea, and indole tests as putatively E. coli .
2.2. DNA Isolation
Bacterial strains were overnight grown in trypticase soy agar (TSA-Merck, German) at 37°C. One colony was suspended in 100 L of sterile distilled water. After boiling the suspension for 13 min; this was followed by freezing and subsequently centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 15 min to pellet the cell debris . The supernatant was used as a template for amplification reaction.
2.3. Polymerase Chain Reaction
Tables 1, 2, and 3 showed the list of primers which were used for detection of serogroups, virulence genes, and antibiotic resistance genes of STEC strains isolated from mastitic milk samples. Table 4 showed the PCR conditions for detection of serogroups, virulence genes, and antimicrobial resistance genes in STEC strains isolated from bovine mastitic milk samples. In all PCR reactions, a DNA thermocycler (Eppendorf Mastercycler, Eppendorf-Nethel-Hinz GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) was used. The amplified products were visualized by ethidium bromide staining after gel electrophoresis of 10 L of the final reaction mixture in 1.5% agarose.
2.4. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing
Antimicrobial susceptibility tests was performed by the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method using Mueller-Hinton agar (HiMedia Laboratories, Mumbai, India, MV1084), according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (CLSI) . After incubating the inoculated plate aerobically at 37°C for 18–24 h in an aerobic atmosphere, the susceptibility of the E. coli isolates to each antimicrobial agent was measured and the results were interpreted in accordance with interpretive criteria provided by CLSI (2006). E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as quality control organisms in antimicrobial susceptibility determination.
2.5. Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS/16.0 software for significant relationship between incidences of virulence factors and antibiotics resistance genes of E. coli isolated from various dairy products. Statistical significance was regarded at a P value < 0.05.
In the current study, all E. coli colonies were tested by applying PCR method in order to detect 16S rRNA gene of bacterium. According to data, out of 268 bovine mastitic milk samples, 73 (27.23%) were positive for presence of E. coli (Table 5). Therefore, it was shown that incidence of E. coli in bovine mastitic milk was high. From a total of 73 E. coli positive samples, 36 (49.31%) were AEEC and 11 (15.06%) were EHEC subtypes (Table 6). In the other hand, 26 samples (35.61%) were diagnosed as nondetected serotypes (Table 6). Results showed that all of the 11 positive EHEC serogroups had stx1, eaeA, ehly virulence genes, while in AEEC serogroups, 28 (77.77%), 5 (13.88%), and 20 (55.55%) samples had stx1, stx2, and eaeA virulence genes, respectively (Table 6). Significant differences () were shown between the presences of AEEC and EHEC serogroups in mastitic milk samples.
By applying specific primers for detection of STEC serogroups in mastitic milk samples, it was indicated that, out of 73 positive samples for E. coli, 15 (20.54%) and 11 (15.06%) samples were positive for incidences of O26 and O157 serogroups while O111, O45, O121, and O128 serogroups had a lower incidences (0.0%, 2.73%, 2.73%, and 2.73%, resp.) (Table 7). In the other hand, 26 (35.61%) samples have been determined as nondetected serogroups. Statistical analysis of data indicated significant differences () between total presence of O26 with O111, O45, O121, and O128 serogroups.
Distribution of antimicrobial resistance genes in Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli serogroups isolated from bovine mastitis showed that aadA1 had the highest prevalence of antibiotic resistance genes (65.95%), followed by Sul1 (57.44%) and dfrA1 (55.31%) while blaSHV (6.38%) and CITM (12.76%) had the lowest incidence of antibiotic resistance genes (Table 8). Besides, O26 serotype had the highest incidence of antibiotic resistance genes while O111 had the lowest incidence of antibiotic resistance genes in E. coli isolated from mastitic milk samples. Statistical analysis of data indicated significant differences () between total presence of aadA1 with blaSHV, CITM and cmlA, Sul1 with blaSHV, CITM and dfrA1 with blaSHV gene.
The disk diffusion method indicated that the STEC serogroups had the highest resistance to penicillin (100%), followed by tetracycline (57.44%), lincomycin (55.31%), streptomycin (48.93%), ampicillin (46.80%), and sulfamethoxazole, (40.42%) but resistance to cephalothin (6.38%), ciprofloxacin (10.63%), and nitrofurantoin (10.63%) was the lowest (Table 9). Significant differences were seen between level of resistance to penicillin with cephalothin, ciprofloxacin, and nitrofurantoin () and tetracycline and lincomycin only with cephalothin.
Our results showed that the STEC strains can cause mastitis in bovine and reduce milk quality for human consumption because some of mastitic cases are subclinical and its diagnosis only is based on the accurate diagnostic tests. Therefore, application of accurate and sensitive assays for detection of subclinical mastitic milks is essential. The rules of milk inspection and control are more important in cases where raw milk is consumed. Several outbreaks of diseases due to E. coli [33, 34] showed that inspection and control of food and especially foods with animal origin is a golden key to reducing the risk of contamination.
There are many studies which showed that the STEC strains are the most prevalent resources for milk-poisoning [7, 35, 36]. Our results showed that the milk of animals with mastitis and especially subclinical mastitis is the main resource for STEC strains. In addition to unsanitary conditions in milk collection and processing, methods of milking, unsanitary conditions of milking machine, and preventing contamination of raw milk with extrinsic factors like staff, insects, and dust, the primary hygiene of milk can be important in presences of STEC strains in milk. Unfortunately, the mechanism of mastitis in bovine herds is not clear. E. coli is one of the most frequent bacteria in the environments and, following parturition and the onset of lactation, the immune system is less able to react appropriately to bacterial challenges. Therefore, mastitis occurred due to E. coli. A combination of metabolic and hormonal influences may temporarily suppress the immune system in the periparturient period. Additionally, the altered nutritional and energy demands that occur in the periparturient cow during the last trimester and early lactation increase fat metabolism, leading to a buildup of ketone metabolites (ketosis), which also negatively impact the microbicidal properties of circulating neutrophils and increase the cow’s susceptibility to mastitis . This temporary and transient immunosuppression increases the cow’s susceptibility to opportunistic organisms and increases the likelihood for environmental bacteria to invade the udder and cause mastitis [37, 38].
Our results showed that 27.23% of all milk samples were positive for presence of E. coli and from these positive samples, O26 serogroup, stx1 gene, aadA1 antibiotic resistance gene, and resistance to penicillin antibiotic have the highest frequencies in bovine mastitic milk samples. Previous study  showed that, from a total of 181 mastitic milk samples, 57 were positive for E. coli and, from these numbers, 19.2%, 15.8%, 12.3%, 12.3%, 10.5%, 7%, 7%, and 3.5% were O55, O111, O124, O119, O114, O26, O157, and O44 serogroups which was inconsistent with our results. Another study  showed that, from 40 mastitic milk samples, 77.4% of the isolates belonged to four different O serogroups (O26, O86, O111, and O127) which was in agreement with our results.
Bean et al.  evaluated the “health status” of cows from which isolates were obtained to study virulence genes. In addition to it, in the majority of cases, presence of STEC strains is related to attendance of various virulence genes. Previous study in Egypt  revealed that all E. coli strains which were isolated from mastitic milk samples had stx1, stx2, hylA, Flic(h7), stb, F41, K99, sta, F17, LT-I, LT-II, and eaeA virulence genes. Another study confirmed that the stx2 and eaeA genes were the most prevalent virulence factors in cow's environment that is contaminated by feces, and it is also a frequent cause of bovine mastitis . Study in Turkey indicated that genes encoding Shiga toxins 1 and 2 (stx1 and stx2), intimin (eaeA), heat-stable enterotoxin a (Sta), and F5 (K99), F41, and F17 fimbriae were the most prevalent virulence factors which were isolated from clinical bovine mastitis cases .
Previous study from Iran showed that out of 400 samples, 42 specimens were found to be E. coli positive and 14 out of 42 isolates carried the eaeA gene, 4 isolates were positive for the gene of F41fimbriae and 10 for stxI and stxII genes . Another investigation on mastitic milk samples during 17 months showed that the most common virulence gene detected was stx1, with a prevalence of 31%, followed by cnf2 (7.5%), vt2e (6.25%), and eaeA (4%) which was in agreement with our study .
Some studies indicated that, in addition to virulence genes like stx1, stx2, eae, and ehly, the presence of STEC strains is mainly accompanied by attendance of antibiotic resistance genes [11, 43]. Unfortunately studying of the antibiotic resistance genes in E. coli strains isolated from mastic milk samples has been done very rare. In one study, of the 123 E. coli strains isolated from milk, 15 (10.7%) had a single virulence gene detected by PCR and CNF2 is the most common virulence gene which was identified , but our study showed that the aadA1 was the most common virulence gene in mastitic milk samples (65.95%). Another study showed that S and P fimbriae, CNF1, and CNF2 are the most common virulence genes in E. coli isolated from mastitic milk samples . Despite the presence of these numerous antibiotic resistance genes in E. coli strains isolated from mastitic milk samples, developing resistance against common antibiotic drugs is not unexpected. Our results showed that resistance to penicillin, tetracycline, and lincomycin was the highest, while previous study showed that the predominantly observed resistance was to tetracycline (92.2%), streptomycin (90.4%), nalidixic acid (88.3%), amikacin (86.5%), and cephalothin (84.8%). Multidrug resistance was found among 152 isolates (65.8%) . Langoni et al.  reported a discrete level of resistance to tetracycline (13.0%) and ampicillin (12.0%) among E. coli isolates from bovine mastitis which was lower than our results. Studies performed in the United States indicate that there is no correlation among increased resistance and antimicrobials that are commonly used in dairy cattle for treatment of mastitis [46, 47]. In Switzerland , there was no increased antibiotic resistance of mastitis pathogens during the last 20 years, indicating different points of view about this theme. Our results are in contrast with previous study in Switzerland and, in addition to common used antibiotics, the E. coli strains which were isolated from mastitic milk samples in our study even had resistance to chloramphenicol and nitrofurantoin. Chloramphenicol and nitrofurantoin are forbidden antibiotics, and the high antibiotic resistance to them in our study indicated the irregular and unauthorized uses of these antibiotics in veterinary treatment in Iran. Unfortunately, veterinarians in many fields of veterinary such as large animal internal medicine, poultry, and even aquaculture use these antibiotics as a basic one. Therefore, in a very short period of time, antibiotic resistance will appear. Therefore, prescription of antibiotics and prescribed antibiotics has the highest effects on providing of antibiotic resistance. In addition to our study, the multiple antibiotic resistance has been reported by Spînu et al. , Rangel and Marin , Maidhof et al. , Mora et al. , and Lira et al. . In total the finding which is common between our study and previous researches [54–56] is the high resistance of STEC strains isolated from milk to tetracycline. Therefore, in these situation not only in our country (Iran), nut also all around the world, prescription of tetracycline and penicillin is not effective for the cases of coliforms bovine mastitis.
On the other hand, in the current situation in Iran, the use of cephalothin, ciprofloxacin, and nitrofurantoin, due to low antibiotic resistance, can be more effective for treatment of diseases caused by E. coli. This survey indicated the highest antimicrobial resistance in O26 and O157 serogroups. Totally E. coli antibiotic resistance against common antibiotics which are used in veterinary in Iran was so high.
We recommended (i) vaccination of dairy animals (if necessary), observe hygiene in animal’s platform, improving methods of milking, checking milking halls in order to detect E. coli especially in the animal feces monthly, fumigating milking halls frequently, observing hygiene during milking for prevent E.coli mastitis; (ii) using PCR method as an accurate, safe, and fast diagnostic one for accurate detection of pathogens in mastitic milks; (iii) using simple disk diffusion method in order to evaluate the antibiotic resistance of pathogens in mastitis cases; (iv) due to antibiotic resistance especially in E. coli, the veterinarians should pay more attention to prescribing the antibiotics; (v) in order to prevent antibiotic resistance in bacteria, we should apply antibiotics more cautiously in animals, detect resistance genes, and finally use different antibiotics periodically. Our results recommended the use of PCR for detection of antibiotic resistance genes of bacteria as a safe, rapid, and accurate method in laboratories.
The authors would like to thank Dr. E. Tajbakhsh, Mr. M. Momeni, and Dr. M. H. Fazeli at the Biotechnology Research Center and Large Animal Clinic of the Islamic Azad University of Shahrekord for their important technical and clinical support.
- M. H. Salwa, M. A. Ammar, R. A. Aisha et al., “Molecular and virulence characterization of Escherichia colistrains isolated from persistent bovine mastitis,” Journal of American Science, vol. 7, pp. 614–624, 2011.
- Y. Ma, C. Ryan, D. M. Barbano, D. M. Galton, M. A. Rudan, and K. J. Boor, “Effects of somatic cell count on quality and shelf-life of pasteurized fluid milk,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 264–274, 2000.
- J. R. Wenz, G. M. Barrington, F. B. Garry, R. P. Dinsmore, and R. J. Callan, “Use of systemic disease signs to assess disease severity in dairy cows with acute coliform mastitis,” Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, vol. 218, no. 4, pp. 567–572, 2001.
- Food and Agriculture Organization Statistics (FAO Statistics), Annual Agricultural Data, 2007.
- I. Holko, T. Bisova, Z. Holkova, and V. Kmet, “Virulence markers of Escherichia coli strains isolated from traditional cheeses made from unpasteurised sheep milk in Slovakia,” Food Control, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 393–396, 2006.
- H. Karch, P. I. Tarr, and M. Bielaszewska, “Enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli in human medicine,” International Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 295, no. 6-7, pp. 405–418, 2005.
- N. Solomakos, A. Govaris, A. S. Angelidis et al., “Occurrence, virulence genes and antibiotic resistance of Escherichia coli O157 isolated from raw bovine, caprine and ovine milk in Greece,” Food Microbiology, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 865–871, 2009.
- Q. Wang, X. Ruan, D. Wei et al., “Development of a serogroup-specific multiplex PCR assay to detect a set of Escherichia coli serogroups based on the identification of their O-antigen gene clusters,” Molecular and Cellular Probes, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 286–290, 2010.
- L. Güler and K. Gündüz, “Virulence properties of Escherichia coli isolated from clinical bovine mastitis,” Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 361–365, 2007.
- D. Kobori, E. C. Rigobelo, C. Macedo, J. M. Marin, and F. A. Avila, “Virulence properties of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolated from cases of bovine mastitis in Brazil,” Revue d'Elevage et de Medecine Veterinaire des pays Tropicaux, vol. 57, pp. 15–20, 2004.
- J. R. Wenz, G. M. Barrington, F. B. Garry, R. P. Ellis, and R. J. Magnuson, “Escherichia coli isolates' serotypes, genotypes, and virulence genes and clinical coliform mastitis severity,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 89, no. 9, pp. 3408–3412, 2006.
- J. C. Paton and A. W. Paton, “Pathogenesis and diagnosis of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infections,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 450–479, 1998.
- L. H. Wieler, E. Vieler, C. Erpenstein et al., “Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains from bovines: association of adhesion with carriage of eae and other genes,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 2980–2984, 1996.
- T. Lehtolainen, T. Pohjanvirta, S. Pyörälä, and S. Pelkonen, “Association between virulence factors and clinical course of Escherichia coli mastitis,” Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, vol. 44, no. 3-4, pp. 203–205, 2003.
- V. Srinivasan, B. E. Gillespie, M. J. Lewis et al., “Phenotypic and genotypic antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolated from dairy cows with mastitis,” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 124, no. 3-4, pp. 319–328, 2007.
- L. Suojala, T. Pohjanvirta, H. Simojoki et al., “Phylogeny, virulence factors and antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolated in clinical bovine mastitis,” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 147, no. 3-4, pp. 383–388, 2011.
- S. M. Franck, B. T. Bosworth, and H. W. Moon, “Multiplex PCR for enterotoxigenic, attaching and effacing, and shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains from calves,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1795–1797, 1998.
- U. Reischl, M. T. Youssef, J. Kilwinski et al., “Real-time fluorescence PCR assays for detection and characterization of Shiga toxin, intimin, and enterohemolysin genes from Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 2555–2565, 2002.
- Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests, Approved Standard-Ninth Edition (M2-A9), Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, Pa, USA, 2006.
- M. J. Brian, M. Frosolono, B. E. Murray et al., “Polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli infection and hemolytic-uremic syndrome,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 1801–1806, 1992.
- A. E. Heuvelink, N. C. A. J. van de Kar, J. F. G. M. Meis, L. A. H. Monnens, and W. J. G. Melchers, “Characterization of verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli O157 isolates from patients with haemolytic uraemic syndrome in Western Europe,” Epidemiology and Infection, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 1995.
- M. Idress, U. Mussarat, Y. Badshah, R. Qamar, and H. Bokhari, “Virulence factors profile of drug-resistant Escherichia coli isolates from urinary tract infections in Punjab, Pakistan,” European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 1533–1537, 2010.
- B. Possé, L. de Zutter, M. Heyndrickx, and L. Herman, “Metabolic and genetic profiling of clinical O157 and non-O157 Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli,” Research in Microbiology, vol. 158, no. 7, pp. 591–599, 2007.
- C. DebRoy, P. M. Fratamico, E. Roberts, M. A. Davis, and Y. Liu, “Development of PCR assays targeting genes in O-antigen gene clusters for detection and identification of Escherichia coli O45 and O55 serogroups,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 71, no. 8, pp. 4919–4924, 2005.
- S. Perelle, F. Dilasser, J. Grout, and P. Fach, “Identification of the O-antigen biosynthesis genes of Escherichia coli O91 and development of a O91 PCR serotyping test,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 93, no. 5, pp. 758–764, 2002.
- C. DebRoy, E. Roberts, J. Kundrat, M. A. Davis, C. E. Briggs, and P. M. Fratamico, “Detection of Escherichia coli serogroups O26 and O113 by PCR amplification of the wzx and wzy genes,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 1830–1832, 2004.
- P. M. Fratamico, C. E. Briggs, D. Needle, C. Y. Chen, and C. DebRoy, “Sequence of the Escherichia coli O121 O-antigen gene cluster and detection of enterohemorrhagic E. coli O121 by PCR amplification of the wzx and wzy genes,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 3379–3383, 2003.
- J. Shao, M. Li, Q. Jia, Y. Lu, and P. G. Wang, “Sequence of Escherichia coli O128 antigen biosynthesis cluster and functional identification of an α-1,2-fucosyltransferase,” FEBS Letters, vol. 553, no. 1-2, pp. 99–103, 2003.
- L. P. Randall, S. W. Cooles, M. K. Osborn, L. J. V. Piddock, and M. J. Woodward, “Antibiotic resistance genes, integrons and multiple antibiotic resistance in thirty-five serotypes of Salmonella enterica isolated from humans and animals in the UK,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 208–216, 2004.
- C. S. Toro, M. Farfán, I. Contreras et al., “Genetic analysis of antibiotic-resistance determinants in multidrug-resistant Shigella strains isolated from Chilean children,” Epidemiology and Infection, vol. 133, no. 1, pp. 81–86, 2005.
- H. Mammeri, M. van de Loo, L. Poirel, L. Martinez-Martinez, and P. Nordmann, “Emergence of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance in Escherichia coli in Europe,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 71–76, 2005.
- T. T. H. Van, J. Chin, T. Chapman, L. T. Tran, and P. J. Coloe, “Safety of raw meat and shellfish in Vietnam: an analysis of Escherichia coli isolations for antibiotic resistance and virulence genes,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 124, no. 3, pp. 217–223, 2008.
- European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), “The community summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents, antimicrobial resistance and foodborne outbreaks in the European Union in 2006,” EFSA Journal, vol. 130, pp. 1–352, 2007.
- I. A. Gillespie, S. J. O'Brien, G. K. Adak, T. Cheasty, and G. Willshaw, “Foodborne general outbreaks of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157 in England and Wales 1992–2002: where are the risks?” Epidemiology and Infection, vol. 133, no. 5, pp. 803–808, 2005.
- H. S. Hussein and T. Sakuma, “Invited review: prevalence of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in dairy cattle and their products,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 450–465, 2005.
- R. Stephan, S. Schumacher, S. Corti, G. Krause, J. Danuser, and L. Beutin, “Prevalence and characteristics of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in Swiss raw milk cheeses collected at producer level,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 91, no. 7, pp. 2561–2565, 2008.
- W. Suriyasathaporn, C. Heuer, E. N. Noordhuizen-Stassen, and Y. H. Schukken, “Hyperketonemia and the impairment of udder defense: a review,” Veterinary Research, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 397–412, 2000.
- A. Diez-Fraile, E. Meyer, and C. Burvenich, “Sympathoadrenal and immune system activation during the periparturient period and their association with bovine coliform mastitis. A review,” Veterinary Quarterly, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 31–44, 2003.
- K. M. Osman, A. M. Mustafa, M. A. K. Aly, and G. S. AbdElhamed, “Serotypes, virulence genes, and intimin types of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli and enteropathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from mastitic milk relevant to human health in Egypt,” Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 297–305, 2012.
- A. Bean, J. Williamson, and R. T. Cursons, “Virulence genes of Escherichia coli strains isolated from mastitic milk,” Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series B, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 285–287, 2004.
- I. M. Moussa, M. H. Ashgan, H. A. Alwathnani, K. F. Mohamed, and A. A. Al-Doss, “Multiplex polymerase chain reaction for detection and characterization of shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli (STEC),” African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 9, no. 28, pp. 4356–4363, 2010.
- H. Momtaz, “Investigation of virulence factors in Escherichia coliisolated from clinical and subclinical bovine mastitis,” Bulgarian Journal of Veterinary Medicine, vol. 13, pp. 122–126, 2010.
- K. de Verdier, A. Nyman, C. Greko, and B. Bengtsson, “Antimicrobial resistance and virulence factors in Escherichia coli from swedish dairy calves,” Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, vol. 54, no. 1, article 2, 2012.
- T. Lehtolainen, A. Shwimmer, N. Y. Shpigel, T. Honkanen-Buzalski, and S. Pyörälä, “In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolates from clinical bovine mastitis in Finland and Israel,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 86, no. 12, pp. 3927–3932, 2003.
- H. Langoni, W. N. de Araújo, A. V. da Silva, and L. C. de Souza, “Tratamento da mastite bovina com amoxicilina e enrofloxacina bem como com a sua associação,” Área de Zoonoses e Saúde Pública, vol. 67, pp. 177–180, 2000.
- R. J. Erskine, R. D. Walker, C. A. Bolin, P. C. Bartlett, and D. G. White, “Trends in antibacterial susceptibility of mastitis pathogens during a seven-year period,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 85, no. 5, pp. 1111–1118, 2002.
- J. A. Makovec and P. L. Ruegg, “Antimicrobial resistance of bacteria isolated from dairy cow milk samples submitted for bacterial culture: 8,905 samples (1994–2001),” Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, vol. 222, no. 11, pp. 1582–1589, 2003.
- M. Roesch, V. Perreten, M. G. Doherr, W. Schaeren, M. Schällibaum, and J. W. Blum, “Comparison of antibiotic resistance of udder pathogens in dairy cows kept on organic and on conventional farms,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 989–997, 2006.
- M. Spînu, L. Köbölkúti, D. Cadar et al., “Changes in antibiotic resistance indices of animal Escherichia colistrains with number of isolate,” Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology, vol. 17, pp. 361–366, 2012.
- P. Rangel and J. M. Marin, “Analysis of Escherichia coli isolated from bovine mastitic milk,” Pesquisa Veterinaria Brasileira, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 363–368, 2009.
- H. Maidhof, B. Guerra, S. Abbas, H. M. Elsheikha, T. S. Whittam, and L. Beutin, “A multiresistant clone of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O118:[H16] is spread in cattle and humans over different European countries,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 68, no. 12, pp. 5834–5842, 2002.
- A. Mora, J. E. Blanco, M. Blanco et al., “Antimicrobial resistance of Shiga toxin (verotoxin)-producing Escherichia coli O157:H7 and non-O157 strains isolated from humans, cattle, sheep and food in Spain,” Research in Microbiology, vol. 156, no. 7, pp. 793–806, 2005.
- W. M. Lira, C. Macedo, and J. M. Marin, “The incidence of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in cattle with mastitis in Brazil,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 861–866, 2004.
- E. Rahimi, S. S. Chaleshtori, and P. Parsaei, “Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli o157 isolated from traditional cheese, ice cream and yoghurt in Iran,” African Journal of Microbiology Research, vol. 5, no. 22, pp. 3706–3710, 2011.
- C. M. Schroeder, C. Zhao, C. DebRoy et al., “Antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli O157 isolated from humans, cattle, swine, and food,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 576–581, 2002.
- A. Skočková, S. Cupáková, R. Karpíšková, and B. Janštová, “Detection of tetracycline resistance genes in Escherichia coli from raw cow's milk,” Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Food Sciences, vol. 1, pp. 777–784, 2012.