Monitoring Resistance to Spinosad in the Melon Fly (Bactrocera cucurbitae) in Hawaii and Taiwan
Table 5
Susceptibility of field populations of B. cucurbitae, collected during 2007 in Taiwan, to spinosad and other insecticides analyzed by topical application assay at 24 hr after treatment.
Insecticide and location
Regression parameters
RRa
Slope ± SE
LD50 (95% FL)1
LD90 (95% FL)
Fenthion
Lab.
320
15.4
(11.1–18.0) a
27.5
(24.0–35.0)
—
Hsinchu
200
29.1
(25.0–33.6) b
59.4
(49.1–78.2)
1.89
Nantou
240
30.8
(25.3–36.9) b
72.5
(57.5–104)
2.00
Changhwa
200
32.9
(28.0–39.0) b
79.4
(63.3–110)
2.14
Yunlin
240
21.0
(14.8–28.7) ab
51.3
(35.8–109)
1.36
Kaohsiung
152
32.3
(27.1–40.2) b
73.9
(54.8–132)
2.10
Pintung
200
88.3
(66.7–119) c
151
(114–303)
5.73
Malathion
Lab.
280
353
(322–387) a
574
(509–679)
—
Hsinchu
200
367
(315–426) a
775
(638–1030)
1.04
Nantou
280
508
(408–658) a
2050
(1390–3720)
1.44
Changhwa
200
427
(361–505) a
1050
(840–1450)
1.21
Yunlin
240
871
(639–1170) b
2080
(1470–4100)
2.47
Kaohsiung
200
871
(755–1010) b
1700
(1410–2270)
2.47
Pintung
200
1142
(998–1300) b
2040
(1720–2610)
3.24
aResistance ratios (RR) toward insecticides are compared with the LD50 (95% FL) of laboratory line (lab.) in Taiwan. 1Within each insecticide, different letters after the parentheses indicate significantly different LD50 values, as 95% FL did not overlap.