- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Annual Issues ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents

The Scientific World Journal

Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 129637, 5 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/129637

## Inclusions in a Single Variable in Ultrametric Spaces and Hyers-Ulam Stability

Pedagogical University, Podchorążych 2, 30-084 Kraków, Poland

Received 7 August 2013; Accepted 2 September 2013

Academic Editors: G. Dai and F. J. Garcia-Pacheco

Copyright © 2013 Magdalena Piszczek. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

We present some properties of set-valued inclusions in a single variable in ultrametric spaces. As a consequence, we obtain stability results for the corresponding functional equations.

#### 1. Introduction

A metric space is called an ultrametric space (or non-Archimedean metric space), if , called an ultrametric, satisfies the strong triangle inequality

One of the typical ultrametrics is a -adic metric. Let be a fixed prime. For , we define where is the largest nonnegative integer such that divides . This example is the introduction to the -adic numbers which play the essential role because of their connections with some problem coming from quantum physics, -adic string or superstring (see [1]).

The inequality yields and implies the following lemma.

Lemma 1. *A sequence in an ultrametric space is a Cauchy sequence if and only if . *

Let be an ultrametric space. The number is called the diameter of . We will denote by the family of all nonempty subsets of . Moreover, let stand for the family of all bounded sets of let and denote the family of all closed sets of . We understand the convergence of sets with respect to the Hausdorff metric derived from the metric . It is easy to see that is also an ultrametric space, that is, satisfies the strong triangle inequality

We say that is a complete ultrametric commutative groupoid with 0, if is a commutative groupoid with a neutral element 0, is a complete ultrametric space and the operation + is continuous with respect to the metric .

From now on, we assume that is a nonempty set and is a complete ultrametric commutative groupoid with 0. For , we define

The aim of the paper is to obtain some results concerning the following inclusion: where , , and and its generalization in an ultrametric space. In ultrametric spaces, it is possible to get better estimation with weaker assumptions, than in metric spaces. The ideas of proofs are based on the ideas in [2]. As a consequence we obtain stability results for the corresponding functional equation and its generalization. Some results of the stability of functional equations in non-Archimedean spaces can be found in [3–8].

#### 2. Main Results

Theorem 2. * Let , for all , , , , and
**
Then there exists a unique function such that and
*

*Proof. *Let us fix . Replacing by in (8), we get
and as , we have
for . Thus,
for all . According to Lemma 1 and , the sequence is a Cauchy sequence. Since is complete, there exists the limit . Moreover,
and the right side of the last inequality converges to 0 with . Therefore,
is a singleton and as is continuous,
so . Notice that
Consequently,
where is a closed unit ball.

It remains to prove the uniqueness of . Let be such that , , , for . By induction we get and for . Hence,
Since , we have .

Theorem 3. *Assume that , for all , , , , are such that
**
for , ,
**
Then there exists a unique function such that and for , where
*

*Proof. *Let us fix . Replacing by , , in (21), we obtain
Since , we have for . Hence,
We define a sequence by the following recurrence relation:
It is easy to see that
for . In virtue of (20), the sequence is a Cauchy sequence. As is a complete metric space, there exists the limit . Moreover,
and the right side of the last inequality converges to 0 as . Therefore,
is a singleton, and as satisfies (19),
By (26), we get
which, with , yields

It remains to prove the uniqueness of . Suppose that are such that , , , and . Replacing by , , in the penultimate equality, we get
Thus,
and we get a constant sequence
In the same way, we get a constant sequence
Hence,
Using the definition of , we get
It follows that with , and the proof is completed.

#### 3. Stability Results

We present the applications of the above theorems to the results concerning the stability of functional equations.

Corollary 4. * Let , , , , satisfy
**
Then there exists a unique function such that and
*

*Proof. *Let for . Then
where is a closed unit ball and
According to Theorem 2 there exists a unique function such that and for .

Corollary 5. *Let , , , , , satisfy (19) and
**
Then there exists a unique function such that
*

*Proof. *Let for . Then
where is a closed unit ball and
By Theorem 3, we get the assertion.

As it was observed in [9, 10] from the stability results concerning the equation , we can easily derive the stability of functional equations in several variables, for example, the Cauchy equation, the Jensen equation, or the quadratic equation. The equation is a generalization of the gamma-type equations or the linear equations (see [11, 12]).

#### References

- A. Khrennikov,
*Non-Archimedean Analysis: Quantum Paradoxes, Dynamical Systems and Biological Models*, vol. 427 of*Mathematics and Its Applications*, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1997. - M. Piszczek, “The properties of functional inclusions and Hyers-Ulam stability,”
*Aequationes Mathematicae*, vol. 85, pp. 111–118, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - K. Ciepliński, “Stability of multi-additive mappings in non-Archimedean normed spaces,”
*Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*, vol. 373, no. 2, pp. 376–383, 2011. View at Google Scholar - Y. J. Cho, C. Park, and R. Saadati, “Functional inequalities in non-Archimedean Banach spaces,”
*Applied Mathematics Letters*, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 1238–1242, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - Z. Kaiser, “On stability of the Cauchy equation in normed spaces over fields with valuation,”
*Publicationes Mathematicae*, vol. 64, no. 1-2, pp. 189–200, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - Z. Kaiser, “On stability of the monomial functional equation in normed spaces over fields with valuation,”
*Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*, vol. 322, no. 2, pp. 1188–1198, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - M. S. Moslehian and T. M. Rassias, “Stability of functional equations in non-archimedean spaces,”
*Applicable Analysis and Discrete Mathematics*, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 325–334, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - J. Schwaiger, “Functional equations for homogeneous polynomials arising from multilinear mappings and their stability,”
*Annales Mathematicae Silesianae*, vol. 8, pp. 157–171, 1994. View at Google Scholar - J. Brzdęk, “On a method of proving the Hyers-Ulam stability of functional equations on restricted domains,”
*The Australian Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2009. View at Google Scholar - G.-L. Forti, “Comments on the core of the direct method for proving Hyers-Ulam stability of functional equations,”
*Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*, vol. 295, no. 1, pp. 127–133, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - T. Trif, “Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability of a linear functional equation with constant coeffcients,”
*Nonlinear Functional Analysis and Applications*, vol. 11, pp. 881–889, 2006. View at Google Scholar - T. Trif, “On the stability of a general gamma-type functional equation,”
*Publicationes Mathematicae*, vol. 60, no. 1-2, pp. 47–61, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus