Review Article

The Paradox Role of Regulatory T Cells in Ischemic Stroke

Table 1

Outcome of current studies in murine model.

Study (year)OutcomeInfarct volumeTreg depletionTreg adoptionMajor findings

Liesz et al. (2009) [55]Protective<30 mm3Anti-CD25 mAbNoneLarger infarcts and worse neurological function in depletion group on day 7, but not day 1 or 3
NoneTotal CD4+ T cells, Tregs or CD4+CD25− T cells to RAG2−/− mice; /mouse; 7 days before MCAOLarger infarcts in CD4+CD25− group on day 7

Ren et al. (2011) [60]Neutral~50 mm3DEREG mouse
(DT before MCAO)
NoneNo significant difference associated with depletion within 4 days after MCAO

Li et al. (2012) [51]Protective20–60 mm3NoneTregs to wide type; /mouse; the 2nd, 6th, and 24th hours after reperfusionReduced infarcts and better neurological function in adoption group out to day 28
Anti-CD25 mAbTregs to wide type; /mouse; the 2nd, 6th and 24th hours after reperfusion

Stubbe et al. (2013) [52]Neutral~40 mm3Anti-CD25 mAbNoneNo significant difference associated with depletion

Kleinschnitz et al. (2013) [50]
Deleterious60–90 mm3DEREG mouse
(DT before MCAO)
Smaller infarcts and better neurological function in depletion group on days 1 and 4; no secondary infarct growth associated with depletion by day 7
5–10 mm3DEREG mouse
(DT after MCAO)
No secondary infarct growth associated with depletion by day 7
5–10 mm3DEREG mouse
(DT before MCAO)
CD4+CD25+Tregs or CD4+CD25− T cells or CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ Tregs or CD4+CD25− FoxP3− T cells to RAG2−/− mice; /mouse; 1 day before MCAOLarger infarcts in all 4 adoption groups than Rag−/− group; no difference between any adoption group and Rag+/+ group

Gu et al. (2012) [61]NeutralEbi3 KONo significant difference associated with depletion within 2 days after MCAO