Research Article

Performance Evaluation of Volumetric Water Content and Relative Permittivity Models

Table 1

Summary of all equations of relationship.

Equations SourceExperimental method Soil typeProperties of soil
Porosity
(cm3cm−3)
Bulk density
(g cm−3)
Particle density
(g cm−3)

Model with one parameter
(1a) (i) Mineral soil
(ii) Organic soil
(iii) Vermiculite
(iv) Glass beads
(i) 1.04–1.44
(ii) 0.422
(iii) 1.08
(iv) 1.49–1.61
(1b) Topp et al. [22]ε: using TDR Tektronik Model 7S12 to perform 18 experiments with different treatments
θ: using gravimetric technique
(1c) Organic soil 0.422
(1d)450 μm glass beads1.60–1.61
(2a) Roth et al. [21]ε: TDR miniprobe 250 ps rise time needle pulse
θ: gravimetric technique
9 Mineral soils0.418–0.4821.26–1.552.28–2.67
(2b)7 Organic soils0.527–0.7850.2–0.770.70–1.63
(3) Ferré et al. [25] Using model of inverse averaging for TDR method by analysing the mixing model
(4)Schaap et al. [29]ε: TDR Tektronix 1502B
θ: gravimetric technique
25 samples of forest floors0.086–0.2631.3
(5)Curtis [18]Coaxial Transmission/reflection apparatus controlled by a Hewlett-Packard 8510C Vector Network Analyzer system 45 MHz to 26.5 GHz
(6)Wu et al. [20]ε: based on capacitance measurement
θ: gravimetric technique
Quartz sand

Model with two parameters
(7a) Wang and Schmugge [30]Modelling using data from other studies [3436]22 different samples 0.4–0.6 1.1–1.7 2.6–2.75
(7b)
(8a) Roth et al. [21]TDRFrom 11 different field sites
(8b)
(9) Malicki et al. [23]TDR CAMI62 kinds of soil samples0.33–0.950.13–1.661.06–2.7
(10)Gardner et al. [19]Capacitance probe 80–150 MHz (i) Brown earths
(ii) Silica materials
(i) 1.08–1.49
(ii) 1.24–1.63
(11)Robinson et al. [14]TDR Tektronix 1502BCoarse grained, quartz grain, sandy soil