Propose a Wall Shear Stress Divergence to Estimate the Risks of Intracranial Aneurysm Rupture

<table><svg height="14.85" id="M56" style="vertical-align:-2.22495pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 41.125 14.85" width="41.125" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,12.012)"><path d="M162 -163h-61v866h61v-866z" id="x7C"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,4.533,12.012)"><path d="M956 650v-28q-52 -7 -69 -22.5t-39 -77.5q-60 -175 -165 -533h-31l-175 499h-2l-163 -499h-31l-164 535q-18 60 -36 76.5t-65 21.5v28h243v-28q-53 -7 -63 -18.5t3 -49.5l122 -412h2l162 499h29l175 -500h2q87 277 113 401q12 45 0.5 59t-68.5 21v28h220z" id="x57"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,20.478,12.012)"><path d="M409 504l-29 -5q-16 60 -44.5 96t-86.5 36q-54 0 -82.5 -32t-28.5 -77q0 -51 30.5 -82.5t96.5 -65.5l35.5 -18t33 -19.5t33.5 -23.5l27 -25.5t24.5 -32t13.5 -36.5t6 -45q0 -80 -62 -134.5t-160 -54.5q-47 0 -98 15q-22 7 -50 21q-8 23 -27 155l30 7q7 -27 18 -52
t30 -51.5t49 -42.5t67 -16q56 0 88 32.5t32 87.5q0 51 -31.5 82t-98.5 67q-80 44 -110 73q-55 53 -55 124q0 75 56 126.5t150 51.5q53 0 126 -23z" id="x53"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,28.535,12.012)"><path d="M409 504l-29 -5q-16 60 -44.5 96t-86.5 36q-54 0 -82.5 -32t-28.5 -77q0 -51 30.5 -82.5t96.5 -65.5l35.5 -18t33 -19.5t33.5 -23.5l27 -25.5t24.5 -32t13.5 -36.5t6 -45q0 -80 -62 -134.5t-160 -54.5q-47 0 -98 15q-22 7 -50 21q-8 23 -27 155l30 7q7 -27 18 -52
t30 -51.5t49 -42.5t67 -16q56 0 88 32.5t32 87.5q0 51 -31.5 82t-98.5 67q-80 44 -110 73q-55 53 -55 124q0 75 56 126.5t150 51.5q53 0 126 -23z" id="x53"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,36.593,12.012)"><path d="M162 -163h-61v866h61v-866z" id="x7C"></path></g>
</svg> and WSSD distributions at the systolic for a ruptured aneurysm.</table>

The Scientific World Journal

fig2

Figure 2

Figure 2: Propose a Wall Shear Stress Divergence to Estimate the Risks of Intracranial Aneurysm Rupture 