Research Article

Developing an Appropriate Digital Hearing Aid for Low-Resource Countries: A Case Study

Table 6

Specifications of the commercial-ready version.

Technology related WHO criteriaCommercial-ready version

BTE is preferred but body worn type may also be needed for low cost, ease of use, and availability of batteries, also in cases of rural areas where body worn is preferredBody worn designed for rural usage
Allowing ease of service, components available for five years; manufacturer provides sufficient detailYes
HA should be powered by zinc air or secondary rechargeable cells; rechargeable types are preferredRechargeable
Operating in temperature 5–45 degree range, humidity 0–80%Yes according to part datasheets
Having means to reduce gain below 750 HzYes (low freq cutoff 380 Hz)
Allowing at least 12 dB reduction at 250 Hz relative to 750 HzYes
Gain can be preset or adjusted by userProgrammable via computer
At least 30 dB volume range, volume control clearly numberedYes
Induction coil is an option but preferredInduction coil provided
HA with AGC is preferredAGC with WDRC
Manufacturer has ISO 9001 on quality management systemISO 13485 (medical product QS)
HA should be designed such that risk of injury or discomfort to user is minimizedYes
Manufacture should provide HA with at least few basic colorsYes
The number of moving parts should be minimalYes
DAI, FM, or other direct coupling input could be considered for educational settings but should not be considered priority if jeopardizes the provision of hearing aids themselveswith Bluetooth input (option)