• Views 654
• Citations 0
• ePub 20
• PDF 330
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 605412, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/605412
Research Article

## Monotonicity, Concavity, and Convexity of Fractional Derivative of Functions

School of Mathematical Sciences, Anhui University, Hefei 230039, China

Received 28 August 2013; Accepted 23 September 2013

Academic Editors: C. Li, F. Liu, A. Sikorskii, and S. B. Yuste

Copyright © 2013 Xian-Feng Zhou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

The monotonicity of the solutions of a class of nonlinear fractional differential equations is studied first, and the existing results were extended. Then we discuss monotonicity, concavity, and convexity of fractional derivative of some functions and derive corresponding criteria. Several examples are provided to illustrate the applications of our results.

#### 1. Introduction and Preliminaries

Fractional calculus is a generalization of the traditional integer order calculus. Recently, fractional differential equations have received increasing attention since behavior of many physical systems can be properly described as fractional differential systems. Most of the present works focused on the existence, uniqueness, and stability of solutions for fractional differential equations, controllability and observability for fractional differential systems, numerical methods for fractional dynamical systems, and so on see the monographs [14] and the papers [524]. However, there existed a flaw in paper [6], which has been stated in paper [21]. The main reason that the flaw arose is that one is unknown of monotonicity, concavity, and convexity of fractional derivative of a function.

It is well known that the monotonicity, the concavity, and the convexity of a function play an important role in studying the sensitivity analysis for variational inequalities, variational inclusions, and complementarity. Since fractional derivative of a function is usually not an elementary function, its properties are more complicated than those of integer order derivative of the function. The focal point of this paper is to investigate the monotonicity, the concavity, and the convexity of fractional derivative of some functions.

Now we recall some definitions and lemmas which will be used later. For more detail, see [14].

Definition 1. Given an interval of , the fractional order integral of a function of order is defined by where is the Gamma function.

Definition 2. Riemann-Liouville’s derivative of order with the lower limit for a function can be written as

Definition 3. Suppose that a function is defined on the interval and . The Caputo’s fractional derivative of order with lower limit for is defined as where .
Particularly, when , it holds that

Lemma 4. There exists a link between Riemann-Liouville and Caputo’s fractional derivative of order . Namely, where denotes the real parts of .
Particularly, for , it holds that

Definition 5. A function with is said to be convex if whenever , , and , the inequality holds.

The rest of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 is devoted to monotonicity of solutions of fractional differential equations. In Section 3, we present the monotonicity, the concavity, and the convexity of functions and . Summarizing this paper forms the content of Section 4.

#### 2. Monotonicity of Solutions of Nonlinear Fractional Differential Equations

In this section, we mainly investigate the monotonicity of the solution of nonlinear fractional differential equation with Caputo’s derivative which was discussed in [6, 21], where . The paper [21] gave two examples to show that Lemma  1.7.3 in [6] is invalid. Lemma  1.7.3 in [6] is as follows.

Lemma  1.7.3 in [6] consider (8), where and . Then, if the solutions exist, they are nondecreasing in .

In [21], the authors gave an improvement of Lemma , which is as follows.

Lemma  2.4 in [21] consider (8). Suppose that , , and . If the solutions exists and , then they are nonnegative. Furthermore, If for , then the solutions are nondecreasing in .

Now we will give a more general result for (8), which is an improvement of Lemma  2.4 in [21].

Theorem 6. Assume that . Assume that the solutions of (8) exist.(1)If on and , then the solutions of (8) are nonnegative on .(2)If and on , then the solution of (8) is nondecreasing on .(3)If and on , then the solution of (8) is not increasing on .

Proof. The conclusion of (1) is obvious. In fact, (8) is equivalent to Since , it holds that . Noting , we have .
Now we prove the validity of (2) and (3). First, by the definition of the Caputo’s derivative, it holds from (8) that Then it follows that That is, Then we can get that Since on and , thus on . Hence is nondecreasing on , and (2) holds.
Similar to the proof of (2), we can prove that (3) holds. This completes the proof.

Remark 7. Lemma  2.4 in [21] is a particular case of Theorem 6 of this paper. In fact in Lemma  2.4 in [21], if , then (8) is . The solution of is If , then which satisfies the conditions of (2) in Theorem 6.

Example 8. Assume that . Consider the fractional differential equation For , we have and . By Theorem 6, we see that is nondecreasing in for .

Example 9. Assume that . Consider the fractional differential equation Denote , then and for . By Theorem 6, it follows that is not increasing. In fact, by computation we get on , thus is decreasing.

The following fractional comparison principle is an improvement of Lemma  6.1 in [20] and Theorem  2.6 in [21]. The method we used here is different from the one used to prove Lemma  6.1 in [20] and the one used to prove Theorem  2.6 in [21].

Theorem 10. Suppose that and on interval . Suppose further that , then on .

Proof. Set , . Then Taking on both sides of (18) yields That is, Since , thus . Then we have Hence on , and the proof is completed.

Remark 11. The method used to prove Theorem  2.6 in [21] and to prove Lemma  6.1 in [20] is the Laplace transform, which demands . Theorem  2.6 in [21] and Lemma  6.1 in [20] are as follows, respectively.
Theorem  2.6 in [21] suppose that and on . If , then on .
Lemma  6.1 in [20] let and , where . Then .

#### 3. Monotonicity, Concavity, and Convexity of the Functions and

In this section, we first investigate the monotonicity of the functions and .

Theorem 12. Assume that . If there exists an interval such that (1), , and on , then is nondecreasing on ; (2), , and on , then is not increasing on ; (3), , and (i.e., is continuous on and ), then there exists a constant such that is not increasing on and is not decreasing on ; (4), , and , then there exists a constant such that is nondecreasing on and is not increasing on .

Proof. Using formula (6), we have Then we can get that By assumptions in (1), it follows that on . Thus is nondecreasing on . By assumptions in (2), it follows that is not increasing in on . Consequently, the conclusions of (1) and (2) are true.
Let us prove (3). Noting formula (23), Since and , then as . By the fact that , we have Thus there exists a constant such that on . On the other hand, when , Thus there exists a constant such that on and on . Therefore, the conclusion of (3) is valid.
The proof of (4) is similar to that of (3). This completes the proof.

Now we are to investigate the monotonicity of the function .

Theorem 13. Assume that . If there exists an interval such that on and , then is nondecreasing on . If on and , then is not increasing on .

Proof. Set . Note that If on and , then in on . Hence, is nondecreasing on interval . If and , then . Hence, is not increasing on . The proof is completed.

The following examples illustrate applications of Theorems 12 and 13.

Example 14. Assume that . Consider , where , for all . Since and , by Theorem 12, there exists a constant such that is decreasing on and is increasing on .

Example 15. Assume that . Consider for . Since for and , by Theorem 13, is decreasing on . By similar argument, is increasing on . Since = , thus is decreasing on and is increasing on .

Example 16. Assume that . Consider ; here and . Obviously, and . For , and . By Theorem 13, is not increasing on .

Next we are to investigate the concavity and the convexity of and . By formula (23), we have Thus we can obtain the following theorem.

Theorem 17. Assume that . If there exists an interval such that on , , and , then is concave on . If on , and and , then is convex on .

The next theorem is on the convexity and the concavity of .

Theorem 18. Assume that . If there exists an interval such that on , and , then is concave on . If on , and , then is convex on .

Proof. By formula (28), we have If on , , and , then on . Hence, is concave in on . If , on , , and , then on . Therefore is convex in on .

Example 19. Assume that . Consider the fractional differential equation ; here and . Obviously, , and . For all , it holds that , , and on . Then by Theorem 18, is convex on .

Example 20. Consider the concavity and convexity of the function , where , . Obviously, Theorems 17 and 18 are useless to the function . Now we employ the method which is used in the proof of Theorem 17 to investigate it. By formula (29), we have The three terms in the right side of (31) can be reduced to It is not difficult to get for and for . Thus on . Consequently, is concave on . Since as , and is increasing on , thus there exists a constant such that on and on . Hence is convex on and is concave on .

#### 4. Conclusions

In this paper, we first investigate the monotonicity of solutions of nonlinear fractional differential equations with the Caputo’s derivative. The results we derive are an improvement of the existing results. Meanwhile, several examples are provided to illustrate the applicability of our results.

The main part of this paper is to study the monotonicity, the concavity, and the convexity of the functions and . Based on the relation between the Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative and the Caputo’s derivative, we obtain the criteria on the monotonicity, the concavity, and the convexity of the functions and . In the meantime, five examples are given to illustrate the applications of our criteria.

#### Acknowledgments

This paper was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (11371027, 11071001, and 11201248), Program of Natural Science Research in Anhui Universities (KJ2011A020, KJ2013A032), the Research Fund for Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (20123401120001), Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation (1208085MA13), Scientific Research Starting Fund for Dr. of Anhui University (023033190001, and 023033190181), and the 211 Project of Anhui University (KJQN1001, 023033050055). The authors would like to thank the editors and the reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions, which helped to improve the quality of this paper.

#### References

1. I. Podlubny, Fractional Differential Equations, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1993.
2. A. A. Kilbas, M. Hari Srivastava, and J. Juan Trujillo, Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006.
3. K. S. Miller and B. Ross, An Introduction to the Fractional Calculus and Differential Equations, John Wiley, New York, NY, USA, 1993.
4. V. Lakshmikantham, S. Leela, and J. Vasundhara Devi, Theory of Fractional Dynamic Systems, Cambridge Scientific, Cambridge, UK, 2009.
5. D. Delbosco and L. Rodino, “Existence and uniqueness for a nonlinear fractional differential equation,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 204, no. 2, pp. 609–625, 1996.
6. V. Lakshmikantham and A. S. Vatsala, “Baisc theory of fractional differential equations,” Nonlinear Analysis, Theory, Methods and Applications, vol. 69, pp. 2677–2682, 2008.
7. V. Lakshmikantham, “Theory of fractional functional differential equations,” Nonlinear Analysis, Theory, Methods and Applications, vol. 69, no. 10, pp. 3337–3343, 2008.
8. F. Liu, M. M. Meerschaert, R. McGough, P. Zhuang, and Q. Liu, “Numerical methods for solving the multi-term time fractional wave equations,” Fractional Calculus & Applied Analysis, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 9–25, 2013.
9. R. P. Agarwal, Y. Zhou, and Y. He, “Existence of fractional neutral functional differential equations,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 1095–1100, 2010.
10. S. Chen, F. Liu, I. Turner, and V. Anh, “An implicit numerical method for the two-dimensional fractional percolation equation,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 219, pp. 4322–4331, 2013.
11. J. Chen, F. Liu, K. Burrage, and S. Shen, “Numerical techniques for simulating a fractional mathematical model for epidermal wound healing,” Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing, vol. 41, pp. 33–47, 2013.
12. C. Chen, F. Liu, I. Turner, V. Anh, and Y. Chen, “Numerical approximation for a variable-order nonlinear reaction-subdiffusion equation,” Numerical Algorithms, vol. 63, pp. 265–290, 2013.
13. S. Chen, F. Liu, and K. Burrage, “Numerical simulation of a new two-dimensional variable-order fractional percolation equation in non-homogeneous porous media,” Computer & Mathematics with Application, 2013.
14. X.-F. Zhou, S. Liu, and W. Jiang, “Complete controllability of impulsive fractional linear time-invariant systems with delay,” Abstract and Applied Analysis, vol. 2013, Article ID 374938, 7 pages, 2013.
15. J. Wang, M. Fěckan, and Y. Zhou, “On the new concept of solutions and existence results for impulsive fractional evolution equations,” Dynamics of Partial Differential Equations, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 345–361, 2011.
16. Y. Zhou and F. Jiao, “Existence of mild solutions for fractional neutral evolution equations,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 1063–1077, 2010.
17. W. Deng, C. Li, and J. Lü, “Stability analysis of linear fractional differential system with multiple time delays,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 409–416, 2007.
18. D. Qian, C. Li, R. P. Agarwal, and P. J. Y. Wong, “Stability analysis of fractional differential system with Riemann-Liouville derivative,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 52, no. 5-6, pp. 862–874, 2010.
19. Y. Zhou and F. Jiao, “Nonlocal Cauchy problem for fractional evolution equations,” Nonlinear Analysis. Real World Applications, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 4465–4475, 2010.
20. Y. Li, Y. Chen, and I. Podlubny, “Stability of fractional-order nonlinear dynamic systems: lyapunov direct method and generalized Mittag-Leffler stability,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 1810–1821, 2010.
21. S. K. Choi and N. Koo, “The monotonic property and stability of solutions of fractional differential equations,” Nonlinear Analysis, Theory, Methods and Applications, vol. 74, no. 17, pp. 6530–6536, 2011.
22. K. Balachandran, Y. Zhou, and J. Kokila, “Relative controllability of fractional dynamical systems with delays in control,” Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, vol. 17, pp. 3508–3520, 2012.
23. J. Wang and Y. Zhou, “Complete controllability of fractional evolution systems,” Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, vol. 17, pp. 4346–4355, 2012.
24. X.-F. Zhou, W. Jiang, and L. G. Hu, “Controllability of a fractional linear time-invarient neutral dynamical system,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 26, pp. 418–424, 2013.