Research Article
A Multimethodology Contractor Assessment Model for Facilitating Green Innovation: The View of Energy and Environmental Protection
Table 9
Most preferred point, constants, UF, and expected utility value for criteria.
| Criterion | | | | | | | Utility function | | Worst | Optimal |
| Multidesign (6.60) | 100 | 0 | 60 | 100 | 0.025 | −1.50 | | −9.90 | 6.6 | Reduction in energy consumption (13.20) | 50 | 0 | 20 | 50 | 0.033 | −0.66 | | −8.71 | 13.07 | Green building (13.20) | 100 | 0 | 60 | 100 | 0.025 | −1.50 | | −19.80 | 13.20 | Green procurement (3.92) | 100 | 0 | 60 | 100 | 0.025 | −1.50 | | −5.88 | 3.92 | Green specifications (9.52) | 100 | 0 | 60 | 100 | 0.025 | −1.50 | | −14.28 | 9.52 | Green supply chain (14.52) | 100 | 0 | 50 | 100 | 0.020 | −1 | | −14.52 | 14.52 | Green construction management (12.09) | 100 | 0 | 60 | 100 | 0.025 | −1.50 | | −18.14 | 12.09 | Green technology (19.11) | 100 | 0 | 50 | 100 | 0.020 | −1 | | −19.11 | 19.11 | Disposal of waste building materials (7.8) | 100 | 0 | 70 | 100 | 0.033 | −4.00 | | −18.17 | 7.8 | Expected utility value | −128.51 | 99.83 |
|
|