- About this Journal
- Abstracting and Indexing
- Aims and Scope
- Annual Issues
- Article Processing Charges
- Articles in Press
- Author Guidelines
- Bibliographic Information
- Citations to this Journal
- Contact Information
- Editorial Board
- Editorial Workflow
- Free eTOC Alerts
- Publication Ethics
- Reviewers Acknowledgment
- Submit a Manuscript
- Subscription Information
- Table of Contents
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 785840, 6 pages
Amplify-and-Forward Cooperative Diversity for Green UWB-Based WBSNs
1Electronics and Communications Engineering, Arab Academy for Science, Technology & Maritime Transport (AASTMT), Alexandria 1029, Egypt
2Computer Engineering, Arab Academy for Science, Technology & Maritime Transport (AASTMT), Alexandria 1029, Egypt
Received 7 July 2013; Accepted 1 October 2013
Academic Editors: R. J. Ferrari, M. Nappi, N. Nishchal, and P. Siohan
Copyright © 2013 Heba Shaban and Mohamad Abou El-Nasr. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This paper proposes a novel green cooperative diversity technique based on suboptimal template-based ultra-wideband (UWB) wireless body sensor networks (WBSNs) using amplify-and-forward (AF) relays. In addition, it analyzes the bit-error-rate (BER) performance of the proposed nodes. The analysis is based on the moment-generating function (MGF) of the total signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at the destination. It also provides an approximate value for the total SNR. The analysis studies the performance of equally correlated binary pulse position modulation (EC-BPPM) assuming the sinusoidal and square suboptimal template pulses. Numerical results are provided for the performance evaluation of optimal and suboptimal template-based nodes with and without relay cooperation. Results show that one relay node provides ~23 dB performance enhancement at BER, which mitigates the effect of the nondesirable non-line-of-sight (NLOS) links in WBSNs.
Diversity is one of the prominent techniques for fading mitigation. One of the most effective diversity techniques is space diversity, where multiple antennas are adopted at the transmitter, receiver, or both ends. Recently, cooperative diversity has been proposed as a promising candidate for wireless communication systems. It achieves the performance of multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) systems through the use of neighboring relays for relaying the signal between the source and destination nodes. Accordingly, the destination node receives multiple independent signals and achieves diversity without using multiple antennas [1–3].
On the other hand, ultra wideband (UWB) has received increased attention from researchers as well as industry as a promising technology for short-range communications. In particular, UWB is characterized by its ultra wide bandwidth, −10 dB bandwidth greater than 500 MHz, as well as robust performance in dense multipath environments. Nakagami-m fading demonstrates many types of fading channels and was proposed by the IEEE 802.15.4a model for ray-arriving clusters [4–7]. In , based on actual on-body measurements, Nakagami-m channel was used to model actual on-body UWB channel and the average m parameter from different scenarios was found to be 1.5.
One of the challenges associated with UWB systems, especially UWB-based wireless body sensor networks (WBSNs), is the design of an efficient receiver. Particularly, one of the main requirements of WBSNs is low-power consumption. WBSNs include medical and nonmedical applications, such as health monitoring, biomedical applications, gaming, and computer animations [9, 10]. However, in the medical applications, data is highly sensitive to errors. Thus, it is desirable to use optimum coherent receivers, which requires the template pulse be matched to the incoming pulse which is in turn hard to implement and power consuming. On the other hand, suboptimal noncoherent detectors are available, but their performance is highly suboptimal.
Another challenge associated with the design of efficient WBSNs is the highly degraded performance of non-line-of-sight (NLOS) links. Recent studies showed that for NLOS on-body communications, up to 20 dB attenuation occurs due to the presence of a body limb that blocks the line-of-sight (LOS) path between transmit and receive nodes [10, 11]. In order to guarantee freedom of movement in on-body nodes of wearable BSNs, the employment of diversity techniques would not be the ultimate solution. Thus, cooperative communication is a promising candidate for BSNs to mitigate the attenuation caused by body limb obstruction in NLOS links. However, the trade-off between power consumption and BER performance remains as an important issue.
Greening of networking refers to reducing unnecessary energy expenditure in the network. A real challenge in green networking is to save energy consumption (or equivalently power consumption) while maintaining high network performance [12, 13]. Consequently, green communications require efficient alternatives that save energy/power with a minimal performance loss. Thus, low-power alternatives that save energy/power traded for performance degradation, such as noncoherent detectors, are not considered appropriate candidates for green networking.
Recently, low-power suboptimal template-based coherent detectors have been proposed in the literature as a low-power alternative for optimal coherent detectors that provide an approaching performance to the corresponding optimal template-based coherent detectors [10, 14–16]. These templates include windowed sinusoidal and square pulses [12, 17]. The power consumption of an impulse radio UWB (IR-UWB) analog correlation receiver that uses a real suboptimal sinusoidal template for a signal bandwidth of 500 MHz and 2 Mbps bit-rate is ≈16.8% of the power consumed by the corresponding digital receiver structure for the same design parameters. This value is also smaller than the power consumed by the corresponding noncoherent transmitted-reference (TR) receiver, also with the same design parameters [15, 18].
In this paper, we study the performance of amplify-and-forward (AF) cooperative diversity with multiple relays (L) that employ suboptimal sinusoidal and square pulse templates in independent nonidentical Nakagami-m channels for green WBSNs. In our analysis, we use the moment-generating function (MGF) of the signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) and provide approximation of the performance based on the analysis introduced in . In our analysis, we consider equally correlated BPPM (EC-BPPM).
2. System Model and Design of Template Pulses
In this section, we present the optimal and suboptimal pulses and their parameters that will be used at the receive nodes of WBSNs. Figure 1 shows a schematic diagram of WBSNs. The studied suboptimal pulses include sinusoidal and square pulses. In the system model, there are a source node () and destination node () that communicate over a channel that exhibits flat Nakagami-m fading. Between the source and destination nodes, there are a number of cooperative nodes that relay the signal to the destination node. We assume using maximal ratio combiner (MRC) at the destination node to combine the different incoming replicas of the signal. At the destination node, the receiver fingers are based on coherent detection, where a template pulse is correlated with the incoming signal. The most commonly used pulses for impulse-radio UWB (IR-UWB) transmission are the derivatives of the Gaussian pulse, also referred to as Gaussian monocycles. For optimal detection, the template pulse should perfectly be matched to the received pulse.
The th-order Gaussian pulse in terms of and the pulse duration , have the following form : Assuming a correlation receiver, the optimal template should be matched to the received pulse. Typically, the pulse order should be chosen to meet a specified Federal Communication Commission (FCC) system’s allowable emission limits. Typically, for correlator receivers, the design parameters of optimal and suboptimal templates should be chosen to maximize the output SNR  as follows: where is the bit energy, is the noise PSD, is the normalized cross correlation of the received pulse and the template waveform, is the timing error, and is the normalized autocorrelation of the template pulse. In case of optimal pulse, is equal to the pulse autocorrelation . The autocorrelation of the optimal pulse is given by
2.1. Suboptimal Sinusoidal Templates
Suboptimal windowed sinusoidal template is given by  where , is the window length, and is the carrier frequency. The normalized cross correlation function of the received pulse and windowed sinusoidal template can be calculated as  where and are the pulse and template energies, respectively. Assuming that the received pulse is the Gaussian pulse , this gives [10, 15, 16] where , , , is the oscillator angular frequency in rad/sec, is the window duration, is the error function defined as , and is the time shift.
2.2. Suboptimal Square Templates
For a square template pulse with amplitude volts and duration , the normalized cross correlation function of the received and square template pulses can be calculated as Without loss of generality, we assume that the received pulse is the Gaussian pulse and that the square pulse width is equal to ; this gives
Figure 2(a) shows the eighth-order Gaussian pulse and suboptimal sinusoidal template. The received pulse autocorrelation and cross correlation with sinusoidal template are shown in Figure 2(b). As can be seen, the pulse and autocorrelation function are well approximated by the suboptimal template and cross correlation function, respectively. Similarly, Figure 2(c) shows the optimal and suboptimal square pulse templates assuming the eighth-order Gaussian pulse and Figure 2(d) shows the corresponding autocorrelation and cross correlation functions.
3. BER Performance Analysis
For MRC detection at the destination node, the moment-generating functions (MGF) in terms of the approximate SNR is given by [1, 19] where is the instantaneous between the source and destination, is the number of combined paths, is the upper bound on the total SNR, and and are the MGF of and , respectively. is calculated as on (11) [1, 19], and is equal to [1, 20] where and are the Nakagami-m fading parameters of the links between the source to relay and relay to destination, respectively. is the incomplete gamma function, is the gamma function, and is the Gauss’ hypergeometric function [1, 20]. Consider where If and = =, then (11) can be simplified to  Substituting (10) and (11) in (9), this gives a closed form of . In the following analysis, we will obtain the BER of EC-PPM scheme based on the calculated MGF. In BPPM, with a transmitted pulse , the optimal template is calculated as in  where is the PPM modulation parameter. In the case of the optimum receiver, the BER can be minimized by choosing to minimize the autocorrelation  as follows:
3.1. Performance in Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN) Channel
For M-ary EC-PPM, the transmitted signal is composed of time-shifted pulses with , where each signal is identified by a sequence of cyclic shifts of an m-sequence of length . The union bound on the bit error probability of M-ary EC-PPM assuming an optimum receiver is  where is the Gaussian tail function [20, 22]. The alternate representation for the tail function is expressed as , , and is the pulse energy. To minimize BER, we wish to choose the value of that minimizes the correlation . Further, at the receiver, we choose a sample time to maximize the correlation between the suboptimal template and the generated pulse [12, 17] as follows:
3.2. Performance in Dense Multipath Channels
The BER of low complexity Partial Rake (PRake) receivers [23, 24], assuming PPM modulation and optimal templates in terms of MGF, , over a Nakagami-m channel with uniform power delay profile (PDP), and independent identically distributed (i.i.d.) paths, is [23, 25] where . Ideal Rake (ARake) receivers capture all the energy in all paths; that is, . Substituting with the MGF gives [10, 15] The probability of bit error of PRake receivers for PPM modulation with a suboptimal template is [10, 15]
4. Numerical Results
In this section, we use the analysis provided in Section 3 to compare the performance of cooperative IR-UWB correlation receivers with the optimal and suboptimal templates. Figure 3 shows a performance comparison of cooperative IR-UWB coherent receivers with optimal and suboptimal sinusoidal and square pulses. As can be seen, suboptimal pulses are traded for a minimal BER performance. Furthermore, one relay node provides 23 dB BER performance enhancement as compared to noncooperative communications at BER.
This value is sufficient for mitigating the effect of attenuation caused by body-limb obstruction in NLOS links in WBSNs. Using two and three relay nodes further provides 9 and 4 dB performance enhancement for the same BER, respectively.
This paper studied the performance of cooperative IR-UWB suboptimal template-based detectors for green WBSNs. Results showed that suboptimal templates are traded for minimal BER performance degradation and that one relay node is sufficient for mitigating the effect of attenuation caused by body-limb obstruction in NLOS links.
- V. Ganwani, B. KumarDey, G. V. V. Sharma, S. N. Merchant, and U. B. Desai, “Performance analysis of amplify and forward based cooperative diversity in MIMO relay channels,” in Proceedings of the 69th IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring '09), pp. 1–5, Barcelone, Spain, April 2009.
- N. C. Beaulieu and Y. Chen, “Novel approximation to the average symbol error rate of AF cooperative diversity in Nakagami fading,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC '11), pp. 1387–1391, Cancun, Mexico, March 2011.
- A. Annamalai, B. Modi, and R. Palat, “Analysis of amplify-and-forward cooperative relaying with adaptive modulation in Nakagami-m fading channels,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC '11), pp. 1116–1117, Las Vegas, Nev, USA, January 2011.
- T.-M. Wu and Y.-F. Hou, “Exact performance evaluation of the UWB differential transmitted reference system in multiuser environments,” in Proceedings of the 71st IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring '10), pp. 1–5, Taipei, Taiwan, May 2010.
- V. Sipal, B. Allen, and D. Edwards, “Exploration of Nakagami fading in ultra-wideband wireless channels,” Electronics Letters, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 520–521, 2011.
- J. An and S. Kim, “An ordered successive interference cancellation scheme in UWB MIMO systems,” ETRI Journal, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 472–474, 2009.
- C. Zhao, Z. Zhou, and K. Kwak, “Novel UWB transceiver for WBAN networks: a study on AWGN channels,” ETRI Journal, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 11–21, 2010.
- A. Fort, J. Ryckaert, C. Desset, P. de Doncker, P. Wambacq, and L. van Biesen, “Ultra-wideband channel model for communication around the human body,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 927–933, 2006.
- S.-H. Han and S. K. Park, “Performance analysis of wireless body area network in indoor off-body communication,” IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 335–338, 2011.
- H. Shaban, A novel highly accurate wireless wearable human locomotion tracking and gait analysis system via UWB radios [Ph.D. dissertation], Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Va, USA, 2010.
- M. di Renzo, R. M. Buehrer, and J. Torres, “Pulse shape distortion and ranging accuracy in UWB-based body area networks for full-body motion capture and gait analysis,” in Proceedings of the 50th Annual IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM '07), pp. 3775–3780, Wachinton, DC, USA, November 2007.
- M. Ismail and W. Zhuang, “Network cooperation for energy saving in green radio communications,” IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 76–81, 2011.
- A. P. Bianzino, C. Chaudet, D. Rossi, and J.-L. Rougier, “A survey of green networking research,” IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 3–20, 2012.
- L. Sangyoub, Design and analysis of ultra-wide bandwidth impulse radio receiver [Ph.D. dissertation], Southern California University, Los Angeles, Calif, USA, 2002.
- H. Shaban, M. A. El-Nasr, and R. M. Buehrer, “Performance of ultralow-power IR-UWB correlator receivers for highly accurate wearable human locomotion tracking and gait analysis systems,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM '09), pp. 1–6, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, December 2009.
- M. Abou El-Nasr, H. A. Shaban, and R. M. Buehrer, “Low-power IR-UWB coherent TOA estimators with suboptimal sinusoidal templates for UWB-based body area networks,” Wireless Networks, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 1641–1648, 2011.
- J. Wu, Y. Zhao, and H. Xiang, “Performance of ultra-wideband correlation receiver using rectangular template signal in AWGN channel,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing (WCNM '05), pp. 348–351, Wuhan, China, September 2005.
- J. Ryckaert, M. Verhelst, M. Badaroglu et al., “A CMOS ultra-wideband receiver for low data-rate communication,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 2515–2527, 2007.
- S. Ikki and M. H. Ahmed, “Performance analysis of cooperative diversity wireless networks over Nakagami-m fading channel,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 334–336, 2007.
- M. Simon and K. Alouni, Eds., Digital Communication over Fading Channels: A Unified Approach to Performance Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1st edition, 2000.
- B. Hu and N. C. Beaulieu, “Pulse shapes for ultrawideband communication systems,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1789–1797, 2005.
- F. Ramírez-Mireles, “On the performance of ultra-wide-band signals in Gaussian noise and dense multipath,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 244–249, 2001.
- T. Q. S. Quek and M. Z. Win, “Analysis of UWB transmitted-reference communication systems in dense multipath channels,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 1863–1873, 2005.
- M. Pausini and G. J. M. Janssen, “Performance analysis of UWB autocorrelation receivers over Nakagami-fading channels,” IEEE Journal on Selected Topics in Signal Processing, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 443–455, 2007.
- M. di Renzo, F. Graziosi, and F. Santucci, “An exact framework for performance analysis of IR-UWB systems: the need for approximations,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 769–771, 2007.