Comparison of Geostatistical Kriging Algorithms for Intertidal Surface Sediment Facies Mapping with Grain Size Data

<table class="table-group" id="tab5"><tr><td><table class="table"><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="4"><hr/></td></tr><tr class="thead"><td align="left" rowspan="2">Component</td><td align="center" colspan="2">MAE</td><td align="center" rowspan="2">RI (%)</td></tr><tr class="thead"><td align="center">Cokriging without alr transformation</td><td align="center">Cokriging with <br/>alr transformation</td></tr><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="4"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td align="left">Sand</td><td align="center">15.71</td><td align="center">14.36</td><td align="center">8.55</td></tr><tr><td align="left">Silt</td><td align="center">14.17</td><td align="center">13.13</td><td align="center">7.34</td></tr><tr><td align="left">Clay</td><td align="center">1.71</td><td align="center">1.62</td><td align="center">5.27</td></tr><tr class="table-tr"><td colspan="4"><hr class="tbody-hr"/></td></tr></table></td></tr></table>

Predictive performance of fraction estimates by different cokriging algorithms.

The Scientific World Journal

tab5

Table 5

Table 5: Comparison of Geostatistical Kriging Algorithms for Intertidal Surface Sediment Facies Mapping with Grain Size Data 