Clinical Study
Comparison of Medpor Coated Tear Drainage Tube versus Silicon Tear Drainage Tube in Conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy: Problems and Solutions
Table 3
The comparative advantages and disadvantages of both tubes.
| Medpor coated tube | Silicon tube |
| Advantages | Advantages | (1) No stabilization problems and perfect tissue compatibility. | (1) Perioperative tube length can be adjusted. | (2) Lower occurrence of lumen obstruction owing to glass lumen internal structure. | (2) It may be used during reoperation. | (3) The ability to vascularize prevents extrusion. | (3) Cheaper. |
| Disadvantages | Disadvantages | (1) Perioperative adjustment problems due to standard length. | (1) It poses stabilization problems. | (2) Inability to use the coated section in reoperation. | (2) High rates of extrusion and malposition. | (3) Expensive. | (3) High rate of lumen obstruction. | (4) High rates of proximal and distal obstruction in the early postoperative term due to irritation of the adjacent tissues by Medpor coating. | (4) Low success rate. |
|
|