An Effective Protocol for Micropropagation of Edible Bamboo Species (<i>Bambusa tulda</i> and <i>Melocanna baccifera</i>) through Nodal Culture

Waikhom, Sayanika Devi; Louis, Bengyella

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/345794

The Scientific World Journal

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results and Discussion Conclusion Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 | Article ID 345794 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/345794

An Effective Protocol for Micropropagation of Edible Bamboo Species (Bambusa tulda and Melocanna baccifera) through Nodal Culture

Sayanika Devi Waikhom^1,2and Bengyella Louis^1,3,4

Academic Editor: Amparo Latorre

Received03 Mar 2014

Revised01 May 2014

Accepted07 May 2014

Published21 May 2014

Abstract

High demand for edible bamboo shoots of Bambusa tulda and Melocanna baccifera in many Asian ethnic groups has led to the need for developing intensive bamboo farming. To achieve this, in vitro regeneration of bamboo plantlets is needed due to the long and irregular bamboo flowering cycle and scarcity of bamboo seeds. An effective protocol for plantlets regeneration in B. tulda and M. baccifera from nodal explants following validation of the species using the sequence of trnL-F intergenic spacer region is described. Effective axillary bud breaking was achieved at 3 mg/L of 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) in MS medium. Importantly, combining 2 mg/L of kinetin (Kn) with 3 mg/L of BAP produced a synergistic effect for shoot multiplication in B. tulda and M. baccifera. Under optimized conditions in half-strength MS medium supplemented with 3 mg/L of indole-3-butyric acid (IBA), 10 mg/L of coumarin, and 3% sucrose, profuse production of dark-brown rhizome in B. tulda and abundant rooting (81.67%, , ) for M. baccifera within 30 days were achieved. The established protocol and the validation of the reported species at the molecular level will be of help to stakeholders in edible bamboo trade to conserve gene-pool and increase productivity.

1. Introduction

The demand for bamboo is on the rise in Asian countries for their utility in handicraft industry, construction, paper making, fishery, and human consumption [1, 2]. Edible bamboos have been identified and grouped based on the total cyanogen content [3]. Such highly demanded edible bamboo with substantial nutritional attributes are Dendrocalamus hamiltonii [4–6], Chimonobambusa callosa, Bambusa tulda, and Melocanna baccifera [3]. M. baccifera is sparsely found in the valleys of North Eastern states of India such as Manipur, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, and Mizoram [7]. The market prices of fermented bamboo shoots for B. tulda and other species in India are at the range of Rs. 40 (≈US $0.66) to Rs. 50 (≈US $0.83) per kg [8], and they cost more than US $1.20 when canned or fried. Due to intense shifting cultivation and the use of fire for clearing the forest, M. baccifera is now restricted to the hilly regions and facing extinction.

There is no in vitro protocol for B. tulda reporting rhizogenesis herein described, and additionally, there is no report for micropropagation of M. baccifera. Thus, there is need to develop a new protocol for rhizome induction which forms buds that develops into new culms or shoots easily. Shoot regeneration and rooting are key steps for in vitro micropropagation. Recent advances in tissue culture explored the combined effects of silicon and sodium chloride to promote adventitious shoot regeneration in Ajuga multiflora [10]. Nonetheless, protocols based on zygotic embryos (i.e., explant from seed tissue) for woody bamboo plantlet regeneration have been developed [11–15]. Firstly, the limitation with zygotic embryos protocols in bamboo plantlets regeneration is that a given protocol is species specific and, consequently, does not often apply to other genera. Secondly, the long and irregular bamboo flowering cycle [16, 17], as well as low seed viability and scarcity in bamboo seeds [18, 19], often limits zygotic embryo protocols for bamboo plantlet regeneration. Therefore, new accurate protocols are required for successful propagation of several species since nodal explants are readily available.

B. tulda and M. baccifera are sympodial species which produce nutritive shoots [3, 20]. Protocols for plantlets regeneration were developed for B. tulda through seeds [11] and nodal explants [21], without achieving rhizogenesis. Till date, there is no protocol for plantlets regeneration for M. baccifera. Plantlets regeneration protocols in bamboo generally suffer from poor taxonomic identification and clonal fidelity for the reported species. Because of these setbacks, protocols reported on several bamboo species are frequently not reproducible. In this study, we first used trnL-F intergenic spacer to accurately ascertain the taxonomic placement of the studied species. Secondly, we developed an effective protocol for in vitro shoot proliferation from the nodal buds and optimized rooting of B. tulda and M. baccifera.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Plant Material and Phylogenetic Placement

Bambusa tulda and Melocanna baccifera were identified by the authorities of the Botanical Survey of India (BSI), Kolkata. The lateral branches of the authenticated specimen were collected from culms of B. tulda and M. baccifera which lies 23°47′–25°41′ NL and 92°58′–94°47′ EL from the Forest Department of Imphal District, Manipur, India, during the month of July 2011. Genomic DNA was isolated as described [22]. The quantity and quality of DNA were checked on a nanodrop spectrophotometer (BioSpec-nano, Shimadzu, Japan) and 0.8% w/v agarose gel electrophoresis, respectively. The trnL-F intergenic spacer was amplified as previously described [23] and sequenced. Sequences were analysed and assigned to molecular species based on 98–100% sequence similarity in the GenBank as accessions: JX507132 (Bambusa tulda) and JX507133 (Melocanna baccifera), respectively. Sequences were aligned using Muscle program [24] and best substitution model was determined based on Akaike Information Criterion, corrected (AICc), and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). Phylogenetic analysis was performed using the maximum likelihood method in MEGA6 software [25].

2.2. Explants and Surface Sterilization

The leaf sheaths covering the nodal segments containing axillary buds (1.5–2 cm) were carefully removed and wiped with 70% (v/v) ethanol using sterilized cotton. The explants were surface sterilized in 0.1% (v/v) solution of mercuric chloride (HgCl₂) for 15 min and washed 4 times, with each washing step lasting 5 min. The sterilized nodal segments were cultured in liquid Murashige-Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with 100 mg/L myo-inositol (Sigma, Saint Louis, MO, USA) and 30 g/L sucrose. It is worth noting that the pH of the medium was adjusted to with 1 N NaOH or 1 N HCl before autoclaving at 121°C and 117.68 kPa for 20 min. For bud breaking, the MS medium was supplemented with 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) at 10 levels (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 mg/L).

2.3. Shoots Multiplication

Proliferated axillary shoots of 3–5 shoot clusters were excised and transferred to MS medium supplemented either with (1) BAP at 5 levels (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 mg/L), (2) 6 mg/L kinetin (Kn) singly, or (3) combination of Kn at levels (1, 2, and 4 mg/L) with optimum concentration of 3 mg/L of BAP. It is worth mentioning that the choice of 6 mg/L of Kn at one level was based on preliminary finding where best effect was observed (data not shown). Shoot multiplication was performed using 3–5 axillary proliferated shoots excised from the clusters of shoots. Multiplied shoots in liquid cultures were supported by sterile filter paper bridges. Regularly, the shoots were transferred at interval of 10 days under sterile conditions to fresh medium in order to prevent phenolic oxidation that can trigger the shoots to become yellowish. The multiplied shoots on each culture medium were counted after 45 days to evaluate the multiplication rate of the nodal explants.

2.4. Rooting Process

We used 5 levels (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5%) of sucrose in half-strength MS medium to determine the optimum concentration that induces rooting. Furthermore, rooting was achieved by aseptically transferring multiplied shoots to a half-strength MS medium prepared with 3% sucrose (i.e., optimum concentration) and supplemented with different combinations of growth regulators as follows. For B. tulda, we used (1) 3 mg/L of indole-3-butyric acid (IBA), (2) 3 mg/L of IBA with 10 mg/L of coumarin, and (3) 3 mg/L of IBA, 3 mg/L of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), and 10 mg/L of coumarin. For M. baccifera, we used (1) 3 mg/L of IBA, (2) 3 mg/L of IBA with 10 mg/L of coumarin, and (3) 3 mg/L of IBA, 0.05 mg/L of BAP, and 10 mg/L of coumarin. All cultures in the experiment were incubated in a growth chamber at °C with a 16 h photoperiod at light intensity of 45 μmol/m²/sec photosynthetic photon flux (PPF) provided by cool white fluorescent tubes (TLD Cool White 40W, Phillips, India). Rooting percentage and average number of days for rooting were recorded. Following rooting, MS medium was removed and the plantlets were hardened in a bottle jar of 76 mm height × 60 mm diameter and 143 mL cap containing autoclaved soil. The soil was made of 4 : 1 (% w/w) rice-straw-vermin compose and sand. The plantlets were cultured for 25 days. Acclimatization was achieved at °C and at 84% humidity in the greenhouse.

2.5. Clonal Fidelity Test

We checked clonal fidelity by sequencing the trnL-F intergenic spacer of in vitro raised plantlets and compared the sequences with the mother explants.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The experiments were performed in replicates for a total of 3 biological repeats carried out at separate times. All data on shoot regeneration and in vitro rooting were analysed using one-way ANOVA associated with Tukey’s post hoc test at . Statistical analysis was performed in IBM SPSS statistical software v.19.0.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Phylogenetic Placement of Species

Based on trnL-F intergenic spacer sequence similarity test between B. tulda, M. baccifera, and closely related species, the overall mean distance between taxa was 0.54. A total of 167 patterns were found out of a total of 1040 sites, and 832 sites were without polymorphism (80.00%). The maximum likelihood (ML) inference authenticated the taxonomic placement of Bambusa tulda and Melocanna baccifera with respect to their closely related taxa (Figure 1). The ML inference confirmed the studied species were different. Failure to accurately identify bamboo species prior to propagation can lead to misleading reports on developed protocols. Motivated by recurring failure to achieve plantlets regeneration for B. tulda based on previously reported nodal protocol [21], we suspected the problem could probably be due to factors like species identity, the physiological state of mother explant, the quality of growth regulators used, and so forth. As reviewed in Mudoi et al. [16], poorly identified nodal clones, somatic clones, or the mother explant compromises the fidelity of protocols. Considering the species specificity of protocols in in vitro bamboo plantlets regeneration, we suggest that protocols should be validated at the DNA level for the identity of the explants so as to limit the number of factors that might affect reproducibility. There was no significant difference in the sequences of trnL-F intergenic spacer between mother explants and in vitro raised plantlets (data not shown). Thus, validating clonal fidelity is based on the developed protocol.

3.2. Culture Initiation and In Vitro Axillary Bud Break

The explants of B. tulda and M. baccifera were established successfully on the modified MS medium with low rate of contamination. Previous work on micropropagation of B. tulda from nodal explants had encountered problems in culture initiation due to fungal contamination [21]. In this protocol, we minimized the level of contamination by avoiding the use of water for cleaning the lateral branches at the initial step of surface sterilization. Additionally, it is shown that supplementing MS medium with NaCl and silicon significantly enhances the activities of antioxidant enzymes [10] and equally curbs contaminations encountered in tissue culture. Axillary proliferation took place after 15 days of bud break for B. tulda and M. baccifera. The highest frequency of bud break was observed at the optimum concentration of 3 mg/L BAP for B. tulda and M. baccifera. This was hallmarked by the production of 1–3 shoots as a result of axillary bud break for B. tulda and M. baccifera (Figure 2).

(a)

(b)

As shown (Figure 2), above or below 3 mg/L of BAP, a low rate of bud break was recorded. In vitro bud break was low in the basal medium for B. tulda and M. baccifera. Although we tested other cytokinin such as Kn, only BAP efficiently promoted bud break at all tested concentrations. In previous studies, BAP was successfully used in bud breaking in plant species like Arundinaria callosa, B. vulgaris, and Melocanna bambusoides [26–28] and in Origanum species [29, 30]. Previous studies on B. tulda did not explore the effect of BAP on axillary bud break [21]. Herein, rapid bud breaking of axillary explants dormancy for M. baccifera and B. tulda was achieved at 3 mg/L of BAP in 10 and 15 days, respectively. Details of the bud break (Figures 2, 3(a), and 4(a)), shoot multiplication (Figures 3(b) and 4(b)), and in vitro rooting (Figures 3(c) and 4(c)) are depicted for B. tulda and M. baccifera.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

3.3. Effects of BAP and Kn on Shoot Multiplication

In this study, it was observed that increase in concentration of BAP (2–4 mg/L) enhanced the rate of shoot multiplication. Nonetheless, above 5 mg/L of BAP, sharp decline in the shoot multiplication rate was observed (Figures 3(b) and 4(b)). BAP has been observed to be the most effective plant growth regulator for woody bamboo shoot in vitro multiplication [28, 31, 32]. In our study, the highest shoot multiplication rate per explant was 5.50 (, ) in B. tulda under the influence of 3 mg/L BAP and 2 mg/L Kn (Table 1). Also, the maximum shoot multiplication rate per explant was 5.83 (, ) in M. baccifera under the effect of 3 mg/L BAP and 2 mg/L Kn (Table 2). Comparatively, a single dose effect of Kn on B. tulda and M. baccifera did not increase the rate of shoot multiplication. Interestingly, the combined effect of BAP and Kn increased shoot multiplication rate as well as the quality of shoots in B. tulda and M. baccifera (Figures 3(b) and 4(b)). In this regard, the effective combined concentration was 2 mg/L of Kn and 3 mg/L of BAP which produced 17.67 and 18.17 of average shoots per explant in B. tulda and M. baccifera, respectively.

To achieve optimal shoot multiplication, other authors have combined synthetic auxin (such as 1-naphthalene acetic acid, NAA), natural auxin (such as IBA) with cytokinin (such as BAP) in culture medium [4, 27, 33]. In some cases, combination of BAP with Kn enhanced the rate of shoot multiplication [14, 34]. In the present investigation, combination of BAP and Kn produced a synergistic effect leading to an increase in shoot multiplication as well as the texture of shoots which turned deep green in both B. tulda and M. baccifera (Figures 3(b) and 4(b)). In contrast, Mishra et al. [21] achieved shoots multiplication of B. tulda by combining BAP, IAA, and glutamine.

3.4. Rooting Process and Rhizome Formation

The shoot clusters of 1-2 cm transferred to a half-strength MS medium fortified with different plant growth regulators were successfully rooted. As shown by the regression analysis (Figure 5), varied concentrations of sucrose in combination with 3 mg/L IBA + 10 mg/L of coumarin influenced the rooting percentage in B. tulda and M. baccifera (Figure 5, Table 3). Optimum rooting was obtained with 3% of sucrose. Primarily, at 3% sucrose we obtained increased rooting in B. tulda and M. baccifera. It was observed that 3 mg/L IBA + 3% sucrose produced moderate rooting of 45.00% at an average rate of 76 days in B. tulda. Adding 10 mg/L of coumarin in IBA supplemented medium increased rooting efficiency from 45.00% to 77.00% (Table 3). Interestingly, rhizome formation occurred in the culture medium supplemented with 3 mg/L of IBA + 10 mg/L of coumarin + 3% sucrose for B. tulda. Importantly, the highest rate of roots regenerated from the nodes of rhizome stood at 86.70% within 25 days in MS medium supplemented with 3 mg/L of IBA + 3 mg/L of IAA + 10 mg/L of coumarin + 3% sucrose. B. tulda produced dark-brown rhizome from which profuse whitish roots emerged (Figure 3(c)). Rhizogenesis is hard to achieve in in vitro micropropagation of woody bamboo. Nonetheless, similar rhizome morphology was described in Dendrocalamus asper and D. membranaceus in the presence of 3% sucrose in MS medium [35]. It is worth noting that a unique dose of 3 mg/L of IBA + 3% sucrose produced low level rooting (55.00%, , ) for M. baccifera (Table 3). To achieve optimal rooting, we combined 3 mg/L IBA + 10 mg/L coumarin + 0.05 mg/L BAP + 3% sucrose. This combination produced 81.67% rooting within 30 days (Table 3). No rhizome formation occurred in all the growth regulators combinations for M. baccifera culture (Table 3). In this study, we exploited the potentials of sucrose, BAP, coumarin, and IBA to root B. tulda and M. baccifera. Previous findings demonstrated that induction of in vitro rooting from shoot clusters in bamboos required auxins treatment alone or combined either with BAP or coumarin [14, 21, 36–38]. As shown in this study, coumarin was required in combination with IBA and BAP for promoting root induction in B. tulda and M. baccifera. Coumarin is a phenolic compound which may act synergistically with IBA to enhance endogenous liberation of IAA in explant during rooting process [39]. The freed endogenous IAA in turn favours roots initiation as earlier described [39]. Plantlets were successfully acclimatized (Figures 3(d) and 4(d)) under greenhouse conditions at a survival rate of 81.81% and 70.31% for B. tulda and M. baccifera, respectively.

(a)

(b)

4. Conclusion

In these established protocols, 3 mg/L BAP was found to be effective for bud break and shoot multiplication of B. tulda and M. baccifera. Rhizogenesis in bamboo micropropagation is difficult to achieve and has not been reported previously in B. tulda protocols [11, 21]. The developed protocol successfully produced rhizome in half-strength MS medium supplemented with 3 mg/L IBA, 10 mg/L coumarin, and 3% sucrose for B. tulda for the first time. This study provides an effective protocol for micropropagation of B. tulda and M. baccifera from the nodal segments of the field grown culm. This protocol shall be of help to stakeholders in edible bamboo trade to conserve gene pool and increase productivity.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This research was jointly supported by the Academy of Sciences for Developing World (TWAS), Trieste, Italy, and the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India (Program no. 3240223450).

References

J. M. O. Scurlock, D. C. Dayton, and B. Hames, “Bamboo: an overlooked biomass resource?” Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 229–244, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. M. Bal, P. Singhal, S. Satya, S. N. Naik, and A. Kar, “Bamboo shoot preservation for enhancing its business potential and local economy: a review,” Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 804–814, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
S. D. Waikhom, B. Louis, C. K. Sharma et al., “Grappling the high altitude for safe edible bamboo shoots with rich nutritional attributes and escaping cyanogenic toxicity,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2013, Article ID 289285, 11 pages, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. K. Agnihotri and S. K. Nandi, “In vitro shoot cut: a high frequency multiplication and rooting method in the bamboo Dendrocalamus hamiltonii,” Biotechnology, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 259–263, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Sangita, W. Shivani, G. Mahesh, and S. Anil, “Nutritional characterization of shoots and other edible products of an edible bamboo—Dendrocalamus hamiltonii,” Current Research in Nutrition and Food Science, vol. 1, pp. 169–176, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
S. D. Waikhom, S. Ghosh, N. C. Talukdar, and S. S. Mandi, “Assessment of genetic diversity of landraces of Dendrocalamus hamiltonii using AFLP markers and association with biochemical traits,” Genetic and Molecular Research, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 2107–2121, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
H. B. Naithani, “Diversity of bamboo species in North East India,” in Ecology, Diversity and Conservation of Plants and Ecosystems in India, H. N. Pandey and S. K. Barik, Eds., pp. 312–322, New Dehli, India, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
P. K. Singh, S. P. Devi, K. K. Devi, D. S. Ningombam, and P. Athokpam, “Bambusa tulda Roxb. in Manipur State, India: exploring the local values and commercial implications,” Notulae Scientia Biologicae, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 35–40, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Tamura and M. Nei, “Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 512–526, 1993.
View at: Google Scholar
I. Sivanesan and B. R. Jeong, “Silicon promotes adventitious shoot regeneration and enhances salinity tolerance of Ajuga multiflora Bunge by altering activity of antioxidant enzyme,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2014, Article ID 521703, 10 pages, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Saxena, “In vitro propagation of the bamboo (Bambusa tulda Roxb.) through shoot proliferation,” Plant Cell Reports, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 431–434, 1990.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Arya and S. Sharma, “Micropropagation technology of Bambusa bambos through shoot proliferation,” Indian Forester, vol. 124, no. 9, pp. 725–731, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
P. Chowdhury, M. Das, S. R. Sikdar, and A. Pal, “Influence of the physiological age and position of the nodal explants on micropropagation of field-grown Dendrocalamus strictus nees,” Plant Cell Biotechnology and Molecular Biology, vol. 5, no. 1-2, pp. 45–50, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
F. Shirin and P. K. Rana, “In vitro plantlet regeneration from nodal explants of field grown culms in Bambusa glaucescens Wild,” Plant Biotechnology Reports, vol. 1, pp. 141–147, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Negi and S. Saxena, “In vitro propagation of Bambusa nutans Wall. ex Munro through axillary shoot proliferation,” Plant Biotechnology Reports, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 35–43, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. M. Mudoi, P. S. Siddhartha, G. Adrita, G. Animesh, B. Debashisha, and B. Mina, “Micropropagation of important bamboos: a review,” African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 12, no. 20, pp. 2770–2785, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
W. S. Devi, B. Louis, and G. J. Sharma, “In vitro seed germination and micropropagation of edible Dendrocalamus giganteus munro using seeds,” Biotechnology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 74–80, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
D. H. Janzen, “Why bamboos wait so long to flower,” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, vol. 7, pp. 347–391, 1976.
View at: Google Scholar
S. D. Waikhom, L. Bengyella, R. Pranab, M. S. Wakambam, K. B. Pardeep, and C. T. Narayan, “Scanning electron microscopy of pollen structure throws light on resolving Bambusa-Dendrocalamus complex: bamboo flowering evidence,” Plant Systematics and Evolution, vol. 299, article 10, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C.-S. Lin, C. J. Liang, H. W. Hsaio, M. J. Lin, and W. C. Chang, “In vitro flowering of green and albino Dendrocalamus latiflorus,” New Forests, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 177–186, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Mishra, P. K. Patel, S. Yadav, F. Shirin, and S. A. Ansari, “A micropropagation system for cloning of Bambusa tulda Roxb,” Scientia Horticulturae, vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 315–318, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Aras, A. Duran, and G. Yenilmez, “Isolation of DNA for RAPD analysis from dry leaf material of some Hesperis L. specimens,” Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 461–462, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
P. Taberlet, L. Gielly, G. Pautou, and J. Bouvet, “Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA,” Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 1105–1109, 1991.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. C. Edgar, “MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 1792–1797, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Tamura, G. Stecher, D. Peterson, A. Filipski, and S. Kumar, “MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6. 0,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 30, pp. 2725–2729, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
W. S. Devi and G. J. Sharma, “In vitro propagation of Arundinaria callosa Munro-an edible bamboo from nodal explants of mature plants,” The Open Plant Science Journal, vol. 3, pp. 35–39, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
S. M. S. D. Ramanayake, V. N. Meemaduma, and T. E. Weerawardene, “In vitro shoot proliferation and enhancement of rooting for the large-scale propagation of yellow bamboo (Bambusa vulgaris “Striata”),” Scientia Horticulturae, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 109–113, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. S. Devi and G. J. Sharma, “In vitro proliferation and enhancement of rooting in Melocanna bambusoides Trin. from nodal explants,” Journal of Bamboo and Rattan, vol. 8, no. 1-2, pp. 43–52, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
E. A. Oluk and A. Çakir, “Micropropagation of Origanum sipyleum L., an endemic medicinal herb of Turkey,” African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 8, no. 21, pp. 5769–5772, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
M. U. Yildirim, “Micropropagation of Origanum acutidens (HAND.MAZZ.) IETSWAART using stem node explants,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2013, Article ID 276464, 3 pages, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Islam and M. M. Rahman, “Micro-cloning in commercially important six bamboo species for mass propagation and at a large scale,” Plant Tissue Culture and Biotechnology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 103–111, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Yasodha, S. Kamala, S. P. A. Kumar, P. D. Kumar, and K. Kalaiarasi, “Effect of glucose on in vitro rooting of mature plants of Bambusa nutans,” Scientia Horticulturae, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 113–116, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. D. Arya, P. K. Rana, R. Satsangi, F. S. Muzaffar, S. Sharma, and S. Arya, “Rapid and mass multiplication of bamboos through tissue culture techniques,” in Role of Plant Tissue Culture in Biodiversity Conservation and Economic Development, S. K. Nandi, L. M. S. Palni, and A. Kumar, Eds., pp. 29–39, Gyanodaya Prakashan, Nainital, India, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Das and A. Pal, “In vitro regeneration of Bambusa balcooa Roxb.: factors affecting changes of morphogenetic competence in the axillary buds,” Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 109–112, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Nirmala, A. H. Ali, and T. Badal, “De novo organogenesis in the form of rhizome in Dendrocalamus asper and D. membranaceus,” Current Science, vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 468–470, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Arya, P. K. Rana, R. Sharma, and I. D. Arya, “Tissue culture technology for rapid multiplication of Dendrocalamus giganteus Munro,” Indian Forester, vol. 132, no. 3, pp. 345–357, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Ndiaye, M. S. Diallo, D. Niang, and Y. K. Gassama-Dia, “In vitro regeneration of adult trees of Bambusa vulgaris,” African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 5, no. 13, pp. 1245–1248, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
S. M. S. D. Ramanayake, K. M. M. N. Maddegoda, M. C. Vitharana, and G. D. G. Chaturani, “Root induction in three species of bamboo with different rooting abilities,” Scientia Horticulturae, vol. 118, no. 3, pp. 270–273, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Tartoura, A. Da Rocha, and S. Youssef, “Synergistic interaction between coumarin 1,2-benzopyrone and indole-3-butyric acid in stimulating adventitious root formation in Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek cuttings: I. Endogenous free and conjugated IAA and basic isoperoxidases,” Plant Growth Regulation, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 253–262, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2014 Sayanika Devi Waikhom and Bengyella Louis. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

13294

Downloads

4165

Citations