Research Article

Evaluation of Facial Beauty Using Anthropometric Proportions

Table 3

(a) Division of the face into horizontal thirds. (b) Division of the face into vertical fifths.
(a)

Horizontal thirds
Mean Std. dev.ANOVA Post hoc multiple comparison Bonferroni testSig.

Anonymous females
 147.47596.905681 versus 25.604170.162
 244.65066.77366 0.0001 versus 31.187500.919
 349.60846.590392 versus 15.604170.162
2 versus 34.416670.319

Attractive females
 143.7511.57302
 238.145810.97772 0.158
 342.56258.78402

1: trichion-glabella, 2: glabella-subnasale, and 3: subnasale-menton.
(b)

Vertical fifths
Mean (mm)Std. dev.ANOVA Post hoc multiple comparison Bonferroni testSig.

Anonymous females
 116.90962.588841 versus 2 7.21687*0.000
1 versus 37.07229*0.000
1 versus 47.36145*0.000
1 versus 5−1.210840.114

 224.12653.378412 versus 17.21687*0.000
2 versus 30.144580.998
2 versus 4−0.144580.998
2 versus 56.00602*0.000

 323.98193.522960.0003 versus 17.07229*0.000
3 versus 2−0.144580.998
3 versus 4−0.289160.978
3 versus 55.86145*0.000

 424.27113.382434 versus 17.36145*0.000
4 versus 20.144580.998
4 versus 30.289160.978
4 versus 56.15060*0.000

 518.12053.204035 versus 1−1.210840.114
5 versus 26.00602*0.000
5 versus 35.86145*0.000
5 versus 46.15060*0.000

Attractive females
 121.70834.94737
 222.58335.66965
 321.31255.433020.947
 422.12085.63938
 522.08335.58271

1: postaurale right-exocanthion right, 2: exocanthion right-endocanthion right, 3: endocanthion right-endocanthion left, 4: endocanthion left-exocanthion left, and 5: exocanthion left-postaurale left.
Statistical significance.