Analyses of Crime Patterns in NIBRS Data Based on a Novel Graph Theory Clustering Method: Virginia as a Case Study

Table 8

Likelihood index and clustering for drug dealing.

	Name	Cluster	Drug dealing likelihood index
1	CHARLOTTESVILLE	B	0.9094
2	NEWPORT NEWS	B	0.9012
3	CHESAPEAKE	B	0.8851
4	PETERSBURG	B	0.8637
5	RICHMOND	B	0.8365
6	PORTSMOUTH	A	0.8281
7	HOPEWELL	A	0.7917
8	ROANOKE	B	0.791
9	SUFFOLK	B	0.7839
10	NORFOLK	B	0.7756
11	BRISTOL	B	0.7365
12	DANVILLE	A	0.707
13	GREENSVILLE	A	0.7032
14	GALAX	A	0.6881
15	CAROLINE	A	0.6852
16	SUSSEX	A	0.6396
17	WINCHESTER	A	0.6327
18	FREDERICKSBURG	B	0.6031
19	CLARKE	A	0.6021
20	FRANKLIN	A	0.5808
21	RICHMOND	A	0.5667
22	LYNCHBURG	A	0.5395
23	MECKLENBURG	A	0.5185
24	RADFORD	A	0.5133
25	GOOCHLAND	A	0.5114
26	MANASSAS	A	0.494
27	HENRY	B	0.4844
28	NORTON	A	0.4456
29	WISE	B	0.4381
30	WILLIAMSBURG	A	0.395