About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
The Scientific World Journal

Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 692307, 25 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/692307
Review Article

Recent Advances in Heterogeneous Photocatalytic Decolorization of Synthetic Dyes

Nanotechnology & Catalysis Research Centre (NANOCAT), IPS Building, University Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Received 19 February 2014; Revised 10 April 2014; Accepted 14 April 2014; Published 25 June 2014

Academic Editor: Baibiao Huang

Copyright © 2014 Nurhidayatullaili Muhd Julkapli et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

During the process and operation of the dyes, the wastes produced were commonly found to contain organic and inorganic impurities leading to risks in the ecosystem and biodiversity with the resultant impact on the environment. Improper effluent disposal in aqueous ecosystems leads to reduction of sunlight penetration which in turn diminishes photosynthetic activity, resulting in acute toxic effects on the aquatic flora/fauna and dissolved oxygen concentration. Recently, photodegradation of various synthetic dyes has been studied in terms of their absorbance and the reduction of oxygen content by changes in the concentration of the dye. The advantages that make photocatalytic techniques superior to traditional methods are the ability to remove contaminates in the range of ppb, no generation of polycyclic compounds, higher speed, and lower cost. Semiconductor metal oxides, typically TiO2, ZnO, SnO, NiO, Cu2O, Fe3O4, and also CdS have been utilized as photocatalyst for their nontoxic nature, high photosensitivity, wide band gap and high stability. Various process parameters like photocatalyst dose, pH and initial dye concentrations have been varied and highlighted. Research focused on surface modification of semiconductors and mixed oxide semiconductors by doping them with noble metals (Pt, Pd, Au, and Ag) and organic matter (C, N, Cl, and F) showed enhanced dye degradation compared to corresponding native semiconductors. This paper reviews recent advances in heterogeneous photocatalytic decolorization for the removal of synthetic dyes from water and wastewater. Thus, the main core highlighted in this paper is the critical selection of semiconductors for photocatalysis based on the chemical, physical, and selective nature of the poisoning dyes.

1. Introduction

1.1. Photocatalytic Decolorization in Water and Wastewater Treatment

Generally, dyes are complex unsaturated aromatic compounds with accomplishing characteristics like color, intensity, solubility, fastness, and substantiveness [1, 2]. It could be compounds with different coloring particles, each varying in type from each other in terms of chemical composition, and are used for coloring textiles in different colors and shades that are completely soluble in aqueous media [2, 3]. Dyes derived from inorganic or organic compounds are called synthetic dyes and they are categorized based on their basic chemistry (Table 1; Figure 1). There are various ways used for the assortment of dyes. It should be noted that each category of dyes has an exclusive chemistry, source of materials, nature of its respective chromophores, nuclear structure, industrial classification, and specific way of bonding. Although some dyes can chemically react with the substrates forming robust bonds in the process, others can be sustained by physical forces. The most common synthetic dyes in use today are dispersible types for polyester dyeing and reactive and direct types for cotton dyeing.

tab1
Table 1: Usage and characterization of dyes.
692307.fig.001
Figure 1: Synthetic dyes and its derivatives.

Synthetic dyes are also utilized in high technology applications, like in the electronics, medical, and specifically the nonimpact printing industries. For instance, they are utilized in electrophotography (laser printing and photocopying) in both the organic photoconductor and the toner, in direct and thermal transfer printing, and also in ink-jet printing. With increasing synthetic dye usage, dye removal becomes an important but challenging area of research for wastewater treatment since most of dyes and their degradation products may be carcinogenic and toxic to mammals [4, 5].

Heterogenous photocatalysis using semiconductors for water and wastewater treatment continues to attract much interest [4, 5, 37, 38]. The lower cost of catalysts and the utilization of environmental protection and renewable energy form this technology to be adequately attractive compared to other techniques [37]. Because the process relies on the photoactivation of semiconductors, the efficiency of the catalyst is qualified by the capacity to generate electron-hole pairs in addition to radical production [39, 40]. Hence, the selection of proportionate semiconductors is the key to reactivity control [38].

1.2. Poisoning Dyes

Only 45 to 47% of dyes have been reported as organic dyes with biodegradable and solubility characteristics. The remaining 55 to 53% of dyes are toxic and their persistence in wastewater has recently become an issue of interest [8, 41, 42]. Synthetic or poisoning dyes engaged more often on industrial scale are acid dyes, water soluble anionic, basic dyes-water soluble cationic, substantive dyes-alkaline, vat dyes-water soluble alkali metal salt, azoic dyes, sulfur dyes, and chrome dyes. Generally, there are two important components in the dye molecules: chromophore component that is responsible for producing the color and the auxochrome component which increases the affinity of the dye towards cellulose fibers [14, 43].

The mentioned dyes are released in aqueous streams as effluents of several industries, including textiles, paper, leather, plastic, automobile, furniture, finishing sector, and others, which consequently create intense environmental pollution problems via the release of potential carcinogenic and toxic substances into the aqueous phase [22, 23]. The discharge of an enormous volume of wastewater containing dyes is an inevitable consequence, because the textile industry consumes large quantities of water and all dyes cannot be completely combined with fibers during the dyeing process. More than 79105 metric tonnes of dye stuffs are produced worldwide annually, with 10 to 50% of this amount being released into wastewater [18, 44]. These high concentrations of dyes in effluents interfere with the penetration of visible light into the water, resulting in a hindrance to photosynthesis and a decrease in gas solubility, since less than 1 mgL−1 of dye is highly visible. Furthermore, synthetic dyes, which include an aromatic ring in their basic structure, are regarded as toxic, carcinogenic, and xenobiotic compounds [4346]. Also, this type of dyes may convey toxicity to aquatic life and may be mutagenic and carcinogenic and can cause intense damage to human beings, including the reproductive system and dysfunction of the kidneys, brain, liver, and central nervous system [34].

Therefore, decolorization and detoxification of dye-containing wastewater need to be conducted before discharging wastewater into natural water bodies [26, 27, 29]. Certain physical, chemical, and biological treatments are currently being used for dye wastewater treatment. Although physical and chemical methods usually show high dye-removal efficiencies, high operating costs are the main drawback due to the large-scale application of these methods [32, 47, 48]. Furthermore, due to the high chemical stability of synthetic dyes, conventional biological treatment using bacteria cannot remove the dyes efficiently [43, 49, 50].

2. Photocatalytic Decolorization of Synthetic Dyes

The complete degradation of the dyes is not possible by conventional methods such as precipitation, adsorption, flocculation, flotation, oxidation, reduction, electrochemical, aerobic, anaerobic, and biological treatment methods. These methods have inherent limitations in technologies such as less efficiency and production of secondary sludge, the disposal of which is a costly affair [4353]. Merely, transferring hazardous materials from one medium to another is not a long-term solution to the issue of toxic waste loading on the environment [30]. Many technologies have been applied to remedy dyes from wastewater, like coagulation/flocculation, biological treatment, electrochemical, membrane filtration, ion exchange, adsorption, and chemical oxidation [54, 55]. Chemical coagulations for dye removal require loading of chemical coagulation and optimal operating conditions like pH and coagulation dosage should be rigidly reminded for achieving maximum dye removal [56]. The coagulation-flocculation process can be utilized as a pre- or post- or even as a main treatment. This process is cost effective and easy as it consumes less energy than the conventional coagulation treatment [57]. However, utilizing inorganic salts like aluminum chloride and aluminum sulfate as the coagulation agent has now become controversial because of their possibility of contributing to Alzheimer’s disease [5658]. Polyacrylamide-based materials are also often utilized in the coagulation process, but the possible release of monomers is now considered damaging due to their entering into the food chain and causing potential health impacts (e.g., carcinogenic effects).

Adsorption removal method is a simple and effective method/design since it is easy to use and can be implemented for dye treatment even in small plants; however, it usually produces huge amounts of sludge, especially in the wastewater with high dye concentrations [59]. Adsorption of dyes on many adsorbents (e.g., SiO2, Al2O3, CaO, MgO, Fe2O3, Na2O, K2O, bentonite, and montmorillonite) has been broadly studied, but the activated carbon has been proven to be the most effective catalyst due to its high specific surface area, ultra high adsorption capacity, and low selectivity for both nonionic and ionic dyes. However, it has some limitations, including the need for regeneration after exhausting, high cost of the activated carbon, and the lack of adsorption efficiency after regeneration [59, 60]. Taking all these facts into consideration, much of the present work involves the degradation and mineralization of synthetic dyestuff in industry by heterogenous photocatalyst.

The heterogenous photocatalyst relates to the water decontamination processes that are concerned with the oxidation of biorecalcitrant organic compounds [4, 61, 62]. This impressive method relies on the formation of highly reactive chemical species that degrade a number of recalcitrant molecules into biodegradable compounds and is known as the advanced oxidation process (AOP).

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has approved the inclusion of AOP as the best available technology to meet the standard with specifications that provide safe and sufficient pollution control of industrial processes and remediation of contaminated sites [42, 63].

Advanced oxidation processes are based on the production of hydroxyl radicals which oxidize a wide range of organic pollutants including dyes quickly and nonselectively. AOPs include homogenous and heterogeneous photocatalytic oxidation systems. The homogenous photocatalytic oxidation system employs various oxidants such as H2O, O3, Fenton reagent, NaOCl, and many others either alone or in combination with light [64] (Figure 2). Recently, heterogeneous photocatalysis has emerged as an important degradation technology leading to the total mineralization of organic pollutants, especially synthetic dyes [5, 37, 38, 65, 66].

692307.fig.002
Figure 2: General view on photocatalytic mechanism and degradation process.
2.1. Photocatalytic Decolorization of Acid Dyes-Water Soluble Anionics

Acid dyes are chemically a sodium (less often ammonium) salt of a carboxylic or phenol organic acid, or sulfuric acid, with ionic substitution to be soluble in water and contains affinity for amphoteric fibers, while lacking direct dye affinity for cellulose fibers (via hydrogen bonding, Van de Waals, and ionic bonding) [67, 68]. Acid dyes consist of several compounds from the most varied categories of dyes, which represent characteristic differences in structure (e.g., nitro dyes, triphenylmethane, and anthraquinone) [69]. Acid dyes are commonly divided into several classes which depend on level dyeing properties, fastness requirements, and economy, which are indicated by the strength of the anionic characteristic of dyes to the cationic sites of the cellulose fibers [68]. Most of acid dyes are generated from chemical intermediates, where anthraquinone-like structures and triphenylmethane predominate as the final state, which give blue, yellow, and green color [6870].

Acid dyes, just as any of the synthetic dyes, have the capability of persuading sensitization in humans because of their complex molecular structure and the way in which they are metabolized in the body. Moreover, their water solubility is harmful to human beings since they are sulphonic acids [71]. The sulphonate groups are spread evenly along the molecule on the opposite side to the hydrogen bonding –OH groups, to minimize any repulsive effect [69]. This in consequence determines the main problem with anionic dyes, which is the lack of fastness during the washing and removing process.

Thus, many research works have paid increasing attention to the degradation of acid dyes in the water stream in recent years. Several techniques, including the use of activated carbon, membrane filteration, adsorption, and coagulation have been known to unravel the problems caused by the presence of acid dyes (Table 2).

tab2
Table 2: Types of adsorbents used with different anionic/acid dyes.

However, due to the recalcitrant nature of acid dyes and the high salinity of wastewater containing acid dyes, these conventional treatment processes are feckless. Adsorption and coagulation methods have also been applied to treat acid dyes in wastewater, which always result in secondary pollutants [66]. Furthermore, it is noted that acid dyes have –SO3−, –COOH, –OH, and hydrophilic groups and excellent solubility in the water stream [74, 75]. Their molecules spread linearly in solution and have a notable tendency to aggregate by hydrogenous bonding, and consequently form colloids in solution and also tend to be adsorbed and flocculated [81]. To overcome such limitations, photocatalytic decolarization of acid dyes water soluble is essential. This process done through the formation of electron-hole pairs with proper photon energy. It has been assumed that once the energy is larger than the band gap, the electron-hole pairs are separated between the semiconductor’s valence and conduction bands [61, 82]. The acid dyes as adsorbed species on suitable sites on the surface of semiconductors undergo photooxidation, reduction, and synthesis under either ultraviolet, sunlight, or even ultrasonic lights. In addition, the aromatic linkages are susceptible to reduction under light irradiation [83] (Figure 3).

692307.fig.003
Figure 3: The photocatalytic decolorization of TiO2 towards Acid Red 44 as a model of acid dyes [83].

This encourages a promising technology based on the advanced oxidation process that has been studied extensively through a broad range of acid dyes that can be nonselectively oxidized quickly [43, 84, 85]. Photocatalysis of acid dyes entails the formation of adequate concentrations of highly reactive transitory species like hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl radicals, and superoxides to react with acid dyes and degrade them in the presence of a semiconductor and visible light or ultraviolet (UV) light [86]. Usually the semiconductors with band gap energy of 3.2 eV are used as photocatalysts with the assumption that as a proton at equal or higher energy (λ < 400 nm) illuminates the semiconductor, the photon energy creates an electron to jump from the valence band to the conduction bands, generating electrons and positively charged holes [51, 87]. These electron-hole pairs persuade a series of reactions, which oxidize the dye acids.

Among the various semiconductor oxides, TiO2 and ZnO have been intensively investigated since the discovery of their ability to photocatalyse acid dyes [37]. Briefly, once the aqueous semiconductor (TiO2 and/or ZnO) suspensions are irradiated in light energy greater than the band gap energy of the semiconductors, conduction band electrons and valence band holes are generated [51, 88, 89]. As the charge separation is maintained, the electrons and holes may migrate to the semiconductor surface where it takes part in the redox reaction with acid dyes [9092]. The photogenerated electrons react with the adsorbed acid dye molecules (O2) on the semiconductor site and diminish it to superoxide radical anion ( ) while the photogenerated holes oxidize the H2O or OH ions adsorbed at the semiconductor surface to OH radicals [43, 9395]. These generated radicals with other highly oxidant species act as strong oxidizing agents which could easily attack the adsorbed acid dye molecules or those located close to the surface of the semiconductor, thus resulting in complete degradation of acid dyes into its smaller biodegradable fragments [89, 96].

Despite the many benefits of using TiO2 and ZnO as a photocatalyst to degrade the dye acids, if the aim is to expand a solar-powered treatment technology, there are few disadvantages of the technology that barricade commercialization. Even if both semiconductors offer high absorption and surface areas, they can be adjusted by preparation parameters [84, 97, 98]. Although many acid dyes can be effectively photodecomposed using TiO2 and/or ZnO as the photocatalyst, the kinetics and mechanism of photocatalytic decolorization with respect to both semiconductors as photocatalysts are comparatively unclear. It has been recorded that both semiconductors can contribute to the decomposition reaction in different ways without decreasing their activity over time [99]. Several kinetic models for catalyzed oxidation utilizing heterogenous catalyst supported by both organic and inorganic carriers have been published in the literature [51, 83, 100]. However, only a few kinetic models of catalyzed photocatalytic decolorization of acid dyes were published. The Mars-Van Krevelen mechanism stated that the surface of the semiconductor catalyst acted as redox mediator, which transferred electrons to oxygen to form oxygen anions as radicals, . The anion radical oxidized the adsorbed acid dye compounds to form various products, while the reduced form of could be regenerated by gaseous oxygen [61, 101]. The stationary-state adsorption mechanism was based on the steady-state assumption and also the oxidation reduction of the adsorbed phase [102]. The Ely-Rideal mechanism envisaged that a heterogeneous reaction took place among strongly chemisorbed acid dye atoms and physically adsorbed molecules which become attached to the surface by faint Van der Waals forces [84]. The Langmuir-Hinshelwood mechanism is based on the reaction that occurred between both acid dyes and semiconductors [95, 103].

2.2. Photocatalytic Decolorization of Basic Dyes-Water Soluble Cationics

Water soluble basic dyes are commonly considered as the most difficult to eliminate or degrade from the dyeing effluent, because of their high stability and resistance ability in the water stream [104106]. Basic dyes possess cationic functional groups such as –NH3+ or =NR2+ [105]. Both of these protein functional groups in basic conditions generate a negative charge as the –COOH groups are deprotonated to give –COO [107]. Basic dyes perform weakly on natural fibers but work very well in acrylics [105]. Basic dyes will form a covalent bond with the proper polyacrylic functionality, and once attached, these basic dyes are very difficult to remove [106]. Cationic triphenylmethane dyes are one of the most extensive basic dyes utilized as colorants and antimicrobial agents in different industries. Previous articles demonstrate that it may further serve as targetable sensitizers in photodestruction of specific cellular components or cells [107, 108]. Methyl green (MG) is a basic triphenylmethane and dicationic dye frequently utilized for staining of solutions in biology and medicine. It is also utilized as a photochromophore to sensitize gelatinous films [109]. The increasing interest in the development of modern and new methodologies for the degradation of toxic basic dyes has led to the deduction that the most effective way for oxidation of the basic dyes is with a powerful oxidizing agent, specifically when a free radical like OH is generated [110112] (Figure 4).

692307.fig.004
Figure 4: The steps in the photocatalytic process of basic dyes using TiO2 or ZnO.

Lately, advanced oxidation processes have been broadly investigated and have become alternative methods for decolorizing and reducing recalcitrant wastewaters generated by basic dyes. Likewise, the use of cadmium oxide (CdO) nanostructure as one of the promising semiconductors for this operation demonstrates positive results [113115]. CdO is an n-type semiconductor with a direct band gap of 2.2 to 2.5 eV and an indirect band gap of 1.36 to 1.98 eV [114]. Since CdO has a band gap tailored to the visible region of solar light with a similar photocatalytic mechanism to semiconductor oxides, it can be an important option as photocatalyst materials especially in the decolorization process of basic dyes [45, 113]. Indeed, the evaluation of photocatalytic activity of CdO towards basic dyes is considered as cauliflower-like [116]. The nanostructure of CdO for removing the basic dyes from aqueous solution has been reported and it is believed that the crystal orientation, morphology, crystallinity, particle size, architecture types, and oxygen defects play an important role in changing the band gap. Actually, diversity in the band gap energy is highlighted to lattice defects because of the Burstein-Moss effect. Besides, the catalytic, optical, and electrical properties originate from the difference of band gaps in different structures [115]. Thus, it is critical to probe an investigation on the generation of new CdO structures for better photodegradation of basic dyes. Different structures of CdO on a nanoscale have been reported, such as nanowires, nanoparticles, nanoneedles, thin film, nanocrystal, and others [117]. CdO micro- and nanoarchitectures with three-dimensional structures such as rods, tubes, and cauliflower-like structures have a larger specific surface area and enhanced oxygen vacancy, which in turn increases the degree of oxidation process on basic dyes [118]. Cauliflower-like architectures have attracted great interest due to its special and novel morphology with high specific surface area that can facilitate the diffusion and mass transportation of the basic dye molecules in photodegradation applications [116]. This particular structure can be easily synthesized using mechanochemical methods, a cheap process, followed by thermal treatment conforming to the detailed process presented in former studies.

Most studies related to photodegradation techniques have been done using TiO2 and/or ZnO as the model photocatalyst because of their nontoxicity, cheapness, chemical stability, and high photocatalytic activity [37, 119121]. The photocatalytic decolorization of basic dyes with TiO2 and/or ZnO as the charge carrier or generation is summarized in Figure 2. The OH or the directly produced charge is a strong oxidizing agent which attacks basic dyes present at or near the surface of the semiconductor [122]. It ultimately causes the complete degeneration of the basic dyes into harmless compounds. In general, two different types of TiO2 phase are normally used in photocatalytic decolorization of basic dyes: anatase (3.2 eV) and rutile (3.0 eV). The adsorptive affinity of anatase for the basic dyes is higher than that of rutile, and thus anatase is generally regarded as the more photocatalytic active phase of TiO2, presumably due to the combined effect of lower rates of recombination and higher surface sites [123, 124].

The dye derivative reactive brilliant blue (KN-R) has been broadly utilized as a model of basic dyes in the photocatalysis process. The effects of key operational factors like reaction pH, catalyst loading, H2O2 dosage, and the initial basic dye concentration on the decolorization were extensively studied to optimize the process for maximum degradation of basic dyes [125]. It can be concluded that the photocatalytic decolorization process performed a fast oxidation without the formation of polycyclic products and intermediate products at a suitable wavelength of light [51, 126]. The reactions frequently take place on the surface of the semiconductors. Hence, the need for a semiconductor supported by a good adsorbent is much felt because of the power to concentrate pollutants near semiconductor particles and the capacity for adsorption of generated intermediates and the capability of reusing adsorbents [127]. In addition, to ensure full use of the solar energy source, it is of great interest to develop photocatalysis of basic dyes for expansion of the adsorption to the visible light range. For both TiO2 and/or ZnO, a great deal of effort has been focused to extend their photoadsorption to the visible light range, for example, by doping with anions of C, S, and N or transition metal cations [128, 129]. Besides TiO2 and/or ZnO, a great deal of attention has also been focused in the search for semiconductor oxides of Bi2WO6, BiMoxO6, Bi2 , and Bi4Ti3O12 which have been recently revealed to exhibit photocatalytic activity and decolorization of basic dyes in the visible light range owing to their lower band gap than that of TiO2 and/or ZnO [130140].

2.3. Photocatalytic Decolorization of Disperse Dyes—Alkaline

Disperse dyes have low solubility in water. However, they can interact with the polyester chains by forming dispersed particles. Their main application is the dyeing of polyester, and they find less use in dyeing cellulose acetates and polyamides [141145]. The general structure of disperse dyes is planar, small, and nonionic, with attached polar functional groups such as –NO2 and –CN. In addition, this type of dyes is a mitotic toxication agent and should be considered as a biohazard component [142]. Thus, discharge of disperse dyes have become a subject of concern in the universe due to its harmful and toxic effects to living organisms and the environment [143]. As far as the wastewater treatment technologies are concerned, different techniques have been utilized for the reduction and degradation of dispersed dyes such as chemical precipitation, H2O2 adsorption, oxidation by chlorine, electrochemical treatment, ozone electrolysis, adsorption, ion pair extraction, flocculation, coagulation, membrane filtration, and specially the photocatalytic process [145147].

The dispersed dyes (alkaline compounds) can be most effectively decomposed by photocatalytic methods [148150]. Recently, owing to their unique and special electrical and optical properties, semiconductor materials have gained global acceptance for alkaline dispersed dye treatments [151]. It has been demonstrated that the photooxidation of CN to OCN occured during the photodegradation of alkaline dyes in the presence of powerful oxidation agents [152154]. Considering that disperse alkaline dyes cannot be treated by conventional biological processes, intensive investigations on the latest treatment techniques of these wastewaters have been conducted to develop effective methods for the remediation and treatment of a wide variety of alkaline-dye pollutants owing to their capability to produce a complete degradation process. The photocatalytic degradation reaction is usually conducted for compounds dissolved in water-like alkaline dyes, at mild temperature and pressure conditions, utilizing ultraviolet-illuminated semiconductor powders without the requirements of expensive oxidants [86, 155158] (Figure 5).

692307.fig.005
Figure 5: Proposed mechanism of the photoelectrocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine B with TiO2 as the electrode [155].

A semiconductor is generally characterized by the band gap energy between its electronically populated valence band and its broadly vacant conduction band [33].

Copper oxide (CuO) is a one of the most promising semiconductors used in advanced oxidation processes for degradation of alkaline dyes [159161]. With an energy band gap of 1.21 to 1.5 eV it has the ability to perform under irradiation in sunlight. Reactions involving Cu+/Cu2+ lead to the oxidative transformation of alkaline dyes. The unique electronic structure of Cu allows for the interaction with the spin restricted O2 enabling Cu to participate in the redox reaction with alkaline dyes [162]. Many researchers have anticipated the reaction of CuO on different adsorbents like activated alumina, zeolite, or activated carbon in wastewater treatments. It was found that in order to achieve an efficient, stable, and economical catalyst, CuO semiconductors must be fixed on an ideal and an inert support [163165]. Among all CuO supported systems for alkaline dye photodecolorization, zeolite was found to be the most ideal with several distinct advantages, including super adsorption capability, unique uniform pores, and special ion-exchange capability [166].

2.4. Photocatalytic Decolorization of Vat Dyes-Water Soluble Alkali Metal Salts

Almost 22% of the total volume of industrial wastewater produced comes from the textile industry, with 7 × 105 tonne of materials classified as vat dyes or water soluble alkali metal salts [167, 168]. This type of dyes produces undesirable effluents and is discharged into the environment without further treatment. Once the vat dyes enter natural water bodies, it can cause intense problems if not treated, since the dyes are toxic, mutagenic, and carcinogenic to human life as well as can inhibit photosynthesis of aquatic life even in quantities as low as 1 ppm [169]. To solve this problem, several semiconductors for oxidative photodecolorization have been tested, including WO3, TiO2, MnO, CuS, ZnO, Fe2O3, ZrO2, CuO, CdS, ZnS, In2O3, SnO2, and Nb2O5 [170176].

The selection of the type of semiconductor is based on its ability to convert the vat dyes into nontoxic products [44, 90, 177, 178]. Additionally, the use of mesoporous materials, like zeolite as a support for these series of semiconductors, has recently become the focus of intensive research on vat dye photodecolorization, due to the fact that the semiconductor support influences the photocatalytic efficiency through structural features, and the interaction between the vat dyes leads to the enhancement of contact between the surface, and irradiation likewise decreases with the amount of semiconductor required [179]. Thus, there are some studies focused on the importance of semiconductor supported zeolite for vat dye photodegradation, including Co-ZSM-5, TiO2-HZSM-5, Fe-exchange zeolite, and CuO-X zeolite [180, 181].

TiO2 has been the most studied material for the photocatalysis of vat dyes [182186]. ZnO has also been identified to be the main contender whose physicochemical properties are comparable to those of TiO2. However, ZnO, just as with TiO2, suffers from its large band gap energy that is close to 3.2 eV, which limits its adsorption of solar light emission that reaches the earth to less than 3 to 4%. For both semiconductor materials, the valence band is composed of O2− (2p orbital), which is of anionic character, that induces interactions and oxidation composition with the vat dyes (alkali metal salts) [187190]. However, this anionic character gains rapid recombination and holes during the oxidation process and in turn diminishes the efficiency of the photocatalytic reaction [191, 192]. From this viewpoint, efforts have been allocated to extend the adsorption of TiO2 and ZnO to deal with the photosensitization by vat dye molecules. According to the literature, reports on ZnO for the vat dye photodegradation are still scarce. The nanosized ZnO has extracted intense interest in recent years, especially in vat dye photodegradation for enhancing its performance, such as changes in surface properties and increase in surface area as well as in quantum effects of the overall decolorization process [193195]. Upon light irradiation, this nanosized ZnO produced a highly active radical species that can quickly oxidize the vat dyes into harmful residues.

Copper sulfide (CuS) is another type of semiconductor that is currently used in photocatalytic decolorization of vat dyes [196199]. CuS with a layered structure is a transparent p-type semiconductor with a band gap above 3.1 eV [198]. The top of the valence band is principally composed of well-hybrid state of Cu 3d and S-3p states, while the bottom of the conduction band consists primarily of Cu 4s state [196, 197]. The band gap of CuS was recognized to be a direct-allowed transition type through the analysis of the symmetry [199]. This small dispersion of the conduction band leads to the broadband gap and high stability of CuS to be more convenient for vat dye adsorption and oxidation.

2.5. Photocatalytic Decolorization of Azoic Dyes

The azoic dyes that are normally used on industrial scale have characteristics that are dependent on one or more azo bonds (–N=N–) with aromatic rings [167, 200202]. The aromatic ring system of the dyes helps to strengthen the Van-der-Waals forces between dye and fibers [203]. Most synthetic dyes have significant structural variations and are extremely stable in performance under light and washing and most severely are resistant to aerobic biodecolorization by bacteria [204, 205]. Thus, it has been reported that the effluents from textile or dye industries involve aromatic compounds which are chemically stable and harmful to human health [201]. Various substitutions on the aromatic nucleus and most versatile groups of compounds give structurally diverse which make them recalcitrant, xenobiotic, noticeable in public, teratogenic, and resistant to degradation [204]. The amount of azo dye concentrations present in wastewater varied from very low to high concentrations (5 to 1500 mgL−1) that leads to color dye effluents causing toxicity, including carcinogenic and mutagenic effects in biological ecosystems. In addition, under anaerobic conditions acid dyes are promptly decreased to potentially hazardous aromatic amines [206]. Therefore, water soluble azo dyes even at low concentrations can cause water streams to be highly colored. On the other hand, azo dyes are insoluble in water but may become solubilised by alkali reduction, for instance, by sodium dithionite which is a reducing agent in the presence of sodium hydroxide [207]. Hence, they tend not to contain several functional groups which may be assailable to oxidation and reduction, which in turn gives harmful effects to the water stream habitat.

The biological approach of the decolorization of azo dyes takes place either by adsorption on the microbial biomass such as fungi, algae, yeast, and bacteria, along with anaerobic to aerobic treatments or biodegradation by the cell [208]. Azo dyes can also be reduced chemically by sulfide and dithionite. The decolorization mechanism of azo dyes based on the extracellular chemical reduction with sulfide was postulated for sulfate reducing environments [209]. However, it has also been noted that for the treatment of azo dyes containing wastewater, traditional methods like flocculation, adsorption onto activated carbon, activated sludge process, and reverse osmosis have difficulties in complete degradation of pollutants and also have the further disadvantage of resulting in secondary pollution [208210]. Moreover, anaerobic decolorization of azo dyes may also produce carcinogenic aromatic amines.

Therefore, the photocatalytic oxidation technique has received significant attention for destroying of azo dyes in recent years. This technique can be divided into homogenous and heterogeneous subgroups, based on the action of OH which enables almost complete mineralization of azo dyes under mild experimental conditions due to the high oxidation potential [211215]. In heterogeneous photocatalysis of azo dyes, the electron-hole pairs will be initially produced by irradiation of a semiconductor with a photon of energy equivalent to or greater than its band gap width [213]. The electrons and holes may migrate to the semiconductors on the catalyst surface where they take part in redox reactions with the adsorbed azo dyes [212]. The oxidizing radicals could attack the azo dye molecule and disintegrate it into CO2 and H2O molecules which are nontoxic [212214]. It has been suggested that the formation of free radicals acts as a primary oxidizing species [216]. The mechanism on photodecolorization of azo dyes with methyl red and methyl orange as a model of compound is illustrated in Figures 6 and 7, respectively.

692307.fig.006
Figure 6: Proposed pathway for the photodecolorization of methyl red [216].
692307.fig.007
Figure 7: Proposed pathway for the photodecolorization degradation of methyl orange [216].

It is claimed that azo dyes are noted for their photocatalytic decolorization in the absence of oxygen whenever a suitable electron donor or hydrogen source is present [217]. Structurally, azo dyes are double bonded belonging to different chromophoric groups and are heterocyclic and adsorb visible light [208]. The reduction of the chromophoric group shifts the visible region of the ultraviolet or infrared region, and thus a reduction in color is achieved. Consequently this phenomenon has encouraged several research works using heterogenous semiconductor photocatalysts like TiO2, ZrO2, SnO2, Fe2O3, CuO, ZnO, and CdSas as an alternative to conventional methods for the degradation of azo dyes from wastewater streams [218220]. The degradation of hydrophobic and hydrophilic azo dyes has been demonstrated to be effective in acetone solution under exposure to UV light.

Recently, photocatalysis of azo dyes using solar or artificial light and TiO2 has been the objective of several studies as it is an attractive low energy strategy that has been applied to many other organic compounds (e.g., phenol) [4]. TiO2 is chemically inert, corrosion resistant, and most importantly, it works under mild conditions without any chemical additives [221, 222]. Meanwhile, it was found that in degradation of methyl orange or 4-4-[(dimethylamone)phenylazo] benzenesulfonic acid, a TiO2 film was up to 50% less effective than the TiO2 slurry. However, some improvements were observed after coating/doping the TiO2 film with metals, but the films were still not as impressive as the slurry [223, 224]. Meanwhile, other studies have shown that only cationic azo dyes can be adsorbed on the surface of the photocatalyst and simultaneously their photocatalytic degradation was quicker than the degradation of anionic azo dyes like Eriochrome Black T [225, 226]. It has been found that TiO2 adsorbed almost only cationic azo dyes, except for the anionic Quinizarin with an adsorption efficiency of 21.8% [227, 228]. Apart from photooxidation, the photoreduction of azo dyes is also known as a significant decolorizing or a folding pathway. This fact can be explained in relation to the surface structure of TiO2. In the unmodified surface structure of crystal TiO2, oxygen atoms are mainly present with a high electron density which creates a negative center [228230]. Thus, the TiO2 particles have a negative charge and are more suitable to adsorb cationic azo dyes than the ones with anionic characteristics [182, 231, 232]. Furthermore, the modelling of photodecoloration of nonbiodegradable azo dyes was investigated recently with Reactive Red 2 in a cocktail mixture of triethylamine and acetone. It was found that the cocktail photolysis system was able to entirely decolorize the azo dye in a short time and the overall dye removal followed pseudo-first-order decay kinetics [233].

Furthermore, a TiO2-based photocatalysis for azo dye degradation has been developed. It can be applied as a film and has the effectiveness of the slurry [234236]. An approach to enhance the photocatalytic reaction rate is by modifying the semiconductor with transition metal. Decorating TiO2 with other metal/nonmetal or metal/metal combinations can decrease its band gap and allow for activation by the longer wavelength of visible light [237239]. Hence, solar energy can be used more effectively in the photocatalysis process. Currently, many metals (e.g., Fe, Cu, Co, Al, Cr, Ce, Ag, and Nd) and nonmetals (N, C, F, S, and B) have been attached onto TiO2 for azo dye degradation [237242]. Among the metals, Ag+ has been recognized to be more effective than Fe3+, Co2+, Ce4+, and Cu2+, since it traps the photogenerated electrons and avoids the recombination of electrons and holes [243].

ZnO has been demonstrated to have a much higher efficiency than TiO2 in the case of azo dyes degradation irradiated by UV light; however, studies on heterojunction systems applied to water treatment have primarily been restricted to the sensitization of TiO2 [244, 245]. This statement has been supported by the fact that ZnO has numerous advantages over TiO2. This includes high efficient photocatalytic activity, and photodegradation of diluted azo dyes cannot proceed sufficiently because of insufficient contact between azo dyes and semiconductors. This is an important factor in hindering photocatalytic activity [246]. The mass transfer from azo dyes to the semiconductor surface limits the photodegradation rate of diluted azo dyes. It is important that visible light degradation of some dyes utilizing ZnO was shown to be more effective than TiO2. In this case the degradation mechanism was based on electron injection from the exited dyes to the ZnO conduction band. This was much more significant as compared to TiO2 which indicates high efficiency of charge transport and limited charge loss [247249].

2.6. Photocatalytic Decolorization of Sulfur Dyes

Textile industries generate large amounts of colored sulfur dye effluents which are toxic and induce a lot of damage to the environment. In view of the mutagenic character or carcinogenic nature of sulfur dyes, the deleterious effects of the color in receiving water, and the customary resistance of the sulfur dyes to biological degradation, the necessity of investigating new alternatives for appropriate treatment of this kind of dyes is evident [250252]. Thus, various methods for the removal of sulfur dyes have been reported, including biological and chemical flocculation, coagulation, adsorption and oxidation, electrochemical oxidation, membrane separation, and ion exchange methods [253255]. These methods have their own limitations for the removal of sulfur dyes, including being expensive, time consuming, and commercially unattractive as well as resulting in the production of secondary wastes [254]. Furthermore, these processes are also ineffective for sulfur dye removal since sulfur dyestuff is biorecalcitrant. In addition, these series of physicochemical treatments prepare only a phase transfer of sulfur dyes and produce huge quantities of sludge [256, 257].

The efficiency of a photocatalytic decolorization reaction is determined by the properties and quality of the photocatalyst, which is often a semiconductor with the ability to create electron-hole pairs under photoillumination [258, 259]. Thus, it is an important step to recognize an efficient and suitable photocatalyst during the decomposition process. In recent decades, different mixed metal oxides consisting of TiO6, TaO6, or NbO6 octahedral units, such as BaTi4O9, SrTiO3, K4Nb6O17, InTaO4, and NixTaO4 had been extensively investigated as a new class of photocatalysts in the field of sulfur dye degradation [260262]. These kinds of photocatalysts belong to a family of uniform heterogenous catalysts [261]. Yet only a few of these photocatalysts have been studied for the removal of environmental contaminants, and earlier authors have all used the solid-solid blending method to synthesize their sample. Recently, the typical photocatalysts developed are mostly oxides containing d-block element ions as Ti4+, Ta5+, Nb5+, and Zr4+ with d0 electron configuration [263]. Very recently, researches have also focused on p-block metal oxide photocatalyst with d10 electron configuration due to their fair mobility for sulfur dye degradation [261, 262]. TiO2 was found to be the most efficient photocatalyst for photodegradation of sulfur dyes because of faster electron transfer of molecular oxygen [264266]. Furthermore, TiO2 photocatalyst is largely available as a nontoxic, inexpensive, and with relatively high chemical stability [42]. It has been noted that the photocatalytic degradation of sulfur dyes in solution is initiated by photoexcitation of the semiconductor, followed by formation of an electron-hole pair on the semiconductor surface [267]. The high oxidation potential of the hole in the semiconductor permits the direct oxidation of sulfur dyes into reactive intermediates [268, 269]. Highly reactive OH can also be formed either by decomposition of water or by the reaction of the hole with OH. The OH radical is a very strong, nonselective oxidant that leads to the degradation of organic chemicals [270].

There are certain relationships between properties of dyes and treatment mechanisms. Sulfur dyes are often made of azo compounds, sulfide structures, or anthraquinones, and they have several –C=O, –NH–, and aromatic groups. These dyes tend to be adsorbed by Fe particles [271273]. However, the photodegradation of sulfur dyes utilizing semiconductors is not new. The sulfur dye treatment of photocatalyst would be more suitable if the semiconductor was immobilized, so the semiconductors would not have to be separated from the sulfur dye solution [274, 275]. Thin films are one of the most important technological applications. Thin film photocatalyst towards sulfur dyes photodegradation offers high stability and convenient reuse and hence has received more and more attention [276]. Furthermore, photocatalysis supports such as zeolite have been extensively used to enhance the photodegradation of sulfur dyes. Zeolites are crystalline aluminosilicates with cavities in which the size can change in the range from one to several tens of nanometers depending on the type of aluminosilicate framework, Al/Si ratio, and the origin of the ion exchange cations [277279]. These characteristics of zeolite make it more selective for photocatalytic oxidation and are crucial especially when using environmentally benign oxidants.

3. Recent Advances in Synthetic Dyes Photocatalytic Decolorization

Industrial effluent detoxification is one of the most challenging global problems. Dyes, phenols, pesticides, fertilizers, detergents, herbicides, surfactants, and other synthetic organic compounds are disposed of directly into the environment, without being treated, controlled, or uncontrolled, without an effective treatment strategy [280282]. Their toxicity, stability to natural decomposition, and persistence in the environment have been the cause of much concern to societies and regulatory authorities around the world [283, 284].

Although the strong potential of photocatalytic process for wastewater treatment is widely recognized via numerous patents and publications, technical development at industrial level has not been met with much success [285287]. This is due to the high operating cost of the photocatalytic oxidation process relative to existing biological treatments [288]. Since in tropical countries, sunshine is available in abundance; therefore, application of this oxidation technology using solar light can be a cost- and energy-effective detoxification technology. Furthermore, the limitations of the photocatalyst system can be addressed in terms of the tight range of pH in which the reaction proceeds, the requirement for recovering the precipitated catalyst after treatment, and the deactivation by some ion-complexing agents such as phosphate anions [289, 290].

Using solar energy is an interesting aspect in photocatalyst technologies. Solar photocatalysis has become an important area of research in which sunlight is the source of illumination to perform various photocatalytic reactions with regard to different kinds of dyes [291, 292]. As visible light is the main component of solar radiation, the development of a stable photocatalytic system, which can be affected by visible light, is most probably indispensable. In order to overcome the limitations, many studies on coupled semiconductor photocatalysts like ZnO-TiO2, CuO-ZnO, CuO-TiO2, CuO-SnO2, TiO2-SnO2, ZnO-SnO2, and so on have been reported [198, 293295]. These series of binary oxide photocatalysts showed enhanced catalytic activities and selectivities compared to the monocomponent photocatalyst. This combined system also provides a more controllable rate of recombination as the composition of two semiconductors with different band gaps can suppress the recombination of e/h+ pairs [296]. Amongst the series of binary systems, CdS/TiO2 showed the most prospect as an effective visible light photocatalyst for dye reduction and degradation. In the system of TiO2/CdS, the photogenerated electrons in CdS are transferred into the TiO2 particle, while the holes remain in the CdS particles [297, 298]. This combination has also overcome the limitation of native CdS as photocatalyst due to its photocorrosion. Other researchers have loaded semiconductor with carbon-based nanomaterials like activated carbon, CNTs, graphene, graphite, and other matrices to improve the photocatalytic activity or cycling and its ratings performance [299302]. Meanwhile, recent research has indicated that organic polymer films such as chitosan and cellulose films can ensure the stabilization of semiconductors especially in nanosized form and also provide an interface for the charge transfer and correspondingly improve photocatalytic efficiency [301303]. In addition, the incorporation of such biopolymers assist in reducing the leakage of semiconductor particles in treated water during the dye removal and degradation, since those types of biopolymers are effective adsorbents and chelators for semiconductor ions in aqueous solutions [304].

4. Influence of Dye Type on the Photocatalytic Process

The chemical structure of the organic dyes has a considerable effect on the reactivity of dyes on photodegradation system [301]. This effect has been explored by different researchers. For example, the COD removal rate of RY17 was found to be higher than RR2 and RB4 dyes. This is due to the structural difference among the three molecules of dyes. RY17 and RR2 are equipped with an azo group (–N=N–), which is not present in RB4 molecules and suspected to photodegradation. In addition, –CH2–OS2– linkage in RY17 is also labile in the reaction environment. In RB4, the presence of anthraquinone structure and the absence of azo band make it resistant to photodegradation [305].

Meanwhile, the removal of reactive orange 16 was maximum, closely followed by reactive blue 4 and reactive 5 in case of TiO2 photocatalysis. It may be due to the difference in chemical structure of dyes, resulting in difference in adsorption characteristics and difference in susceptibility to photodegradation [43, 44, 47]. The chemical structure of the dyes indicates that reactive black 5 has more complex structure, making it less photodegradable. Another reason may be due to absorption of light photon by dye itself leading to a less availability of photons for hydroxyl radical generation. It was observed from the absorption spectra of three dyes in near UV range that reactive black 5 strongly absorbs near UV radiation compared to reactive orange 16 and reactive blue 4, leading to less by the dye molecules is thought to have an inhibitory effect on the photogeneration of holes or hydroxyl radicals, because of the lack of any direct contact between the photons and immobilized TiO2. [48]. Indeed, it causes the dye molecules to adsorb light and the photons never reach the photocatalyst surface; thus, the photodegradation efficiency decreases.

It is also important to notice that degradation pathway of organic dyes may be different as according to the chemical structure and functional groups. For example, with an addition of a OH radical to an aromatic ring of dyes molecules, a labile H atom is produced [5660]. This mechanism is also unsatisfactory for hydroxy azo dyes (AO7 and AO8). In that case, abstraction of the H atom, carried by an oxygen atom in the azo form and by a nitrogen atom in the hydrazone form, competes with the addition of OH radical on a phenyl or naphthyl nucleus [72].

The functional groups in the chemical structure of dye could be nitrite groups, alkyl side chain, chloro group, carboxylic group, sulfonic substituent, and also hydroxyl groups [305]. The appropriate photocatalyst material has to be chosen depending on these functional groups in the chemical structure of dye [8184]. Every group that tends to decrease the solubility of molecules in water will decrease the degradation process. In order to evaluate the influence of a nitrite group, the degradation of an analogous pair of dyes such as Acid Red 29 and Chromotrope 2B can be mentioned. Chromotrope 2B contains a nitrite group in the para position with respect to the azo function [305]. This substituent interacts with the phenyl ring and there is a consequent delocalization of the p electrons of the ring and of the unpaired electrons of the heteroatom. As a result, the phenyl ring is electron-enriched, and the nitrite group thus favors attack of an electrophilic entity. The experiment confirms this hypothesis: Chromotrope 2B reaction rate is slightly higher than that of AR29. Hydroxyl radicals have a very short lifetime, so that they can only react where they are formed [72]. Therefore, oxidation reactions can only be successfully performed in homogeneous media. As it was previously mentioned, every group that tends to decrease the solubility of molecules in water will decrease the degradation process. This explains why the rate of decomposition clearly decreases with increasing length of the side chain and consequently with increasing hydrophobicity of the dye molecule, as seen at the degradation of AB25 and RB19 [8185]. A parallel reaction may take place between OH radical and hydrogen atoms of the side chains. This reaction competes with destruction of the dye chromophore, without leading to a decrease in the absorbance of the solution.

Considerable decrease of photocatalytic decolorization rate was observed when two or three chloro substituents were present on the phenyl ring of a pyrazolone dye [104, 170]. Indeed, comparison of acid yellow 17 and acid yellow 23 decolorization rates suggests that the difficulty of the dye to be degraded directly depends on the number of electron withdrawing chloro groups in the molecule. The decolorization kinetics of acid yellow 17 is less than those of acid yellow 23.

The photocatalytic decolorization of four organic dyessuch as Alizarin S, Orange G, Methyl Red, and Congo Red by UV/TiO2 has been processed to explore the effect of the presence of carboxylic substituent in dye chemical structure. The photocatalytic rate constants were in the following order: Methyl Red > Orange G Alizarin S > Congo Red [274]. It has been explained that the higher degradability of MR could be due to the presence of a carboxylic group which can easily react with H+ via a photo-Kolbe reaction. However, the presence of a withdrawing group such as – is probably at the origin of the less efficient Orange G and Alizarin S degradations [274]. Another suggestion to explain the different reactivity of these dyes could also be their ability to adsorb on TiO2 surface.

Unexpectedly, the presence of the more powerful electron withdrawing sulfonic group on a molecule makes it only very slightly less sensitive to oxidation. Indeed, molecules with one, two, or three sulfonic functions have almost the same reactivity with respect to oxidation by hydroxyl radicals [63, 83, 169, 209]. Acid red 14 containing two sulfonic groups is more reactive in a photocatalytic degradation process in comparison with acid red 18 and acid red 27 that contain three sulfonic substituents [169]. Study of the influence of the sulfonic group is very difficult, because this substituent operates in different fields: it decreases electron density in the aromatic rings and the β nitrogen atom of the azo bond by −I and +M effects. On the other hand, it increases the hydrophilic-lipophilic balance of the dye molecules and consequently slows down their aggregation degree [63, 209].

The electronic properties of a hydroxyl group are −I and +M effects. That is why the photocatalytic decolorization rate of acid red 29, which contains two hydroxyl substituents, is more than that of orange G, which contains one hydroxyl substituent [83]. In both dyes, one molecule contains a hydroxyl group next to the azo bond. But the resonance effect of a substituent operates only when the group is directly connected to the unsaturated system. Therefore, to explain the effect of the hydroxyl group on the reactivity of the organic matter, only the field effect (−I) must be considered. The number of hydroxyl groups in the dye molecule can intensify this resonance and, consequently, the degradation rate of the dye [209].

Photocatalytic decolorization rate of monoazo dyes is higher than dyes with anthraquinone structure. The presence of methyl and chloro groups in the dye molecule decreases slightly the process efficiency while a nitrite group acts in an opposite direction [305]. Alkyl side chain decreases the solubility of molecule in water and consequently disfavors the photocatalytic degradation process. The dyes which contain more sulfonic substituents are less reactive in the photocatalytic process, while hydroxyl group intensifies the electron resonance in the molecule and the degradation rate of the dye. Photocatalytic decolorization takes place at the surface of the catalyst. Dye molecules adsorb onto the surface of photocatalyst material by electrostatic attraction and get mineralized by nonselective hydroxyl radicals. Therefore, the adsorption of the target molecule on photocatalyst material surface may be regarded as a critical step toward efficient photocatalysis.

5. Conclusion

In the textile industry, regulations concerning the discharge of wastewater have become more and more stringent. The synthetic dyes utilized in the textile and other industries generate hazardous waste. The dye is utilized to impart color to materials of which it becomes an integral part. However, dye removal is an important but challenging area of wastewater treatment since some dyes and their degradation products are carcinogenic and toxic to mammals. Destructive oxidation of poisonous dyes via photocatalytic approaches have recently received considerable attention since colored aromatic compounds have proven to be degraded effectively by a variety of heterogenous semiconductor catalysts. Photocatalysis aims at mineralization of poisonous dyes to CO2, H2O and inorganic compounds or at least their transformation into biodegradable or harmless products. Finally, taking into account that UV light is not only expensive but also harmful to aquatic life, there is the need to improve the ability of photocatalysts to work with visible light.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work is financially supported by University Malaya Research Grant (UMRG RP022-2012E) and Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS: FP049-2013B) by Universiti Malaya and Ministry of High Education, Malaysia, respectively.

References

  1. W. Zhang and C. W. Wu, “Dyeing of multiple types of fabrics with a single reactive azo disperse dye,” Chem Papers, vol. 68, pp. 330–335, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. S. Nagai, “Induction of the respiration-deficient mutation in yeast by various synthetic dyes,” Science, vol. 130, no. 3383, pp. 1188–1189, 1959. View at Scopus
  3. A. Heinfling, M. J. Martinez, A. T. Martinez, M. Bergbauer, and U. Szewzyk, “Transformation of industrial dyes by manganese peroxidases from Bjerkandera adusta and Pleurotus eryngii in a manganese-independent reaction,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 64, no. 8, pp. 2788–2793, 1998. View at Scopus
  4. Y.-C. Hsiao, T.-F. Wu, Y.-S. Wang, C.-C. Hu, and C. Huang, “Evaluating the sentizing effect on the photocatalytic degradation of fyes using anatase-TiO2,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 148, pp. 250–257, 2014.
  5. S. Zhang, “Preparation of controlled shape Zn S microcrystals and photocatalytic property,” Ceramics International, vol. 40, pp. 4553–4557, 2014.
  6. A. Cavaco-Paulo, J. Morgado, L. Almeida, and D. Kilburn, “Indigo backstaining during cellulase washing,” Textile Research Journal, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 398–401, 1998. View at Scopus
  7. H. Duffner, E. Bach, E. Cleve, and E. Schollmeyer, “New mathematical model for determining time-dependent adsorption and diffusion of dyes into fibers through dye sorption curves in combination shades. Part II: kinetic data from dyeing cotton with a trichrome direct dye system,” Textile Research Journal, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 223–229, 2000. View at Scopus
  8. T. Bechtold and A. Turcanu, “Electrochemical vat dyeing combination of an electrolyzer with a dyeing apparatus,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 149, no. 1, pp. D7–D14, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. H. E. Liang, S. Zhang, B. Tang, L. Wang, and J. Yang, “Dyeability of polylactide fabric with hydrophobic anthraquinone dyes,” Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 156–159, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. R. Marder, C. B. Gorman, F. Meyers, et al., “A unified description of linear and nonlinear polarization in organic polymethine dyes,” Science, vol. 265, no. 5172, pp. 632–635, 1994. View at Scopus
  11. C. S. Tidball, “Intestinal and hepatic transport of cholate and organic dyes,” The American Journal of Physiology, vol. 206, pp. 239–242, 1964. View at Scopus
  12. W. Tanthapanichakoon, P. Ariyadejwanich, P. Japthong, K. Nakagawa, S. R. Mukai, and H. Tamon, “Adsorption-desorption characteristics of phenol and reactive dyes from aqueous solution on mesoporous activated carbon prepared from waste tires,” Water Research, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 1347–1353, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. O. Greengauz-Roberts, H. Stoppler, S. Nomura et al., “Saturation labeling with cysteine-reactive cyanine fluorescent dyes provides increased sensitivity for protein expression profiling of laser-microdissected clinical specimens,” Proteomics, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 1746–1757, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. Casetta, V. Koncar, and C. Caze, “Mathematical and modeling of the diffusion coefficient for disperse dyes,” Textile Research Journal, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 357–361, 2001. View at Scopus
  15. K. Ryberg, B. Gruvberger, E. Zimerson, et al., “Chemical investigations of disperse dyes in patch test preparations,” Contact Dermatitis, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 199–209, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. P. Lebaron, N. Parthuisot, and P. Catala, “Comparison of blue nuclei acid dyes for flow cytometric enumeration of bacteria in aquatic systems,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 1725–1730, 1998. View at Scopus
  17. N. Daneshvar, D. Salari, and A. R. Khataee, “Photocatalytic degrdataion of azo dye acid red 14 in water on azo as an alternative catalyst of TiO2,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A, vol. 162, no. 2-3, pp. 317–322, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. R. Russ, J. Rau, and A. Stolz, “The function of cytoplasmic flavin reductases in the reduction of azo dyes by bacteria,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 1429–1434, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. H. Xu, T. M. Heinze, S. Chen, C. E. Cerniglia, and H. Chen, “Anaerobic metabolism of 1-amino-2-naphthol-based azo dyes (Sudan dyes) by human intestinal microflora,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 73, no. 23, pp. 7759–7762, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. R. R. Peterson and J. Weiss, “Staining of the adenohypophysis with acid and basic dyes,” Endocrinology, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 96–108, 1955. View at Scopus
  21. L. Peters, K. J. Fenton, M. L. Wolf, and A. Kandel, “Inhibition of the renal tubular excretion of N′-methylnicotinamide (NMN) by small doses of a basic cyanne dye,” The Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 113, no. 2, pp. 148–159, 1955.
  22. M. Wang, N. Chamberland, L. Breau, et al., “An organic redox electrolyte to rival triiodide/iodide in dye-sensitized solar cells,” Nature Chemistry, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 385–389, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. L. Camarero, R. Peche, J. M. Merino, and E. Rodríguez, “Photo-assisted oxidation of indigocarmine in an acid medium,” Environmental Engineering Science, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 281–287, 2003. View at Scopus
  24. S. Blumel, M. Contzen, M. Lutz, A. Stolz, and H.-J. Knackmuss, “Isolation of a bacterial strain with the ability to utilize the sulfonated azo compound 4-carboxy-4′-sulfoazobenzene as the sole source of carbon and energy,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 2315–2317, 1998. View at Scopus
  25. Y. Hong, M. Xu, J. Guo, Z. Xu, X. Chen, and G. Sun, “Respiration and growth of Shewanella decolorationis S12 with an azo compound as the sole electron acceptor,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 64–72, 2007.
  26. A. Sharma, S. Rani, A. Bansal, and A. Sood, “Effect of mordant combination on silk dyeing with apricot dye,” in Natural Dyes: Scope and Challenges, pp. 137–143, Scientific Publishers, 2006.
  27. K. Harbinder and K. Namrita, “Eco-friendly finishing and dyeing of jute with direct and mordant dye method,” Asian Journal of Home Science, vol. 7, pp. 19–22, 2012.
  28. G. R. Cameron and G. Scholar, “The staining of calcium,” The Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology, vol. 33, pp. 929–955, 2005.
  29. N. Panchuk-Voloshina, R. P. Haugland, J. Bishop-Stewart et al., “Alexa dyes, a series of new fluorescent dyes that yield exceptionally bright, photostable conjugates,” Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 1179–1188, 1999. View at Scopus
  30. A. Mathur, Y. Hong, B. K. Kemp, A. A. Barrientos, and J. D. Erusalimsky, “Evaluation of fluorescent dyes for the detection of mitochondrial membrane potential changes in cultured cardiomyocytes,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 126–138, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. H. H. Szeto, P. W. Schiller, K. Zhao, and G. Luo, “Fluorescent dyes alter intracellular targeting and function of cell-penetrating tetrapeptides,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 118–120, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. D. A. Hinckley, P. G. Seybold, and D. P. Borris, “Solvatochromism and thermochromism of rhodamine solutions,” Spectrochimica Acta Part A, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 747–754, 1986. View at Scopus
  33. F. H. Hussein, “Chemical properties of treated textile dyeing wastewater,” Asian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 25, pp. 9393–9400, 2013.
  34. L. He, H. S. Freeman, L. Lu, and S. Zhang, “Spectroscopic study of anthraquinone dye/amphiphile systems in binary aqueous/organic solvent mixtures,” Dyes & Pigments, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 389–395, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. I. Yumoto, K. Hirota, Y. Nodasaka, Y. Yokota, T. Hoshino, and K. Nakajima, “Alkalibacterium psychrotolerans sp. nov., a psychrotolerant obligate alkaliphile that reduces an indigo dye,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 2379–2383, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. C. P. Raut, M. D. Daley, K. K. Hunt et al., “Anaphylactoid reactions to isosulfan blue dye during breast cancer lymphatic mapping in patients given preoperative prophylaxis,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 567–568, 2004. View at Scopus
  37. Z.-F. Huang, J.-J. Zou, L. Pan, S. Wang, X. Zhang, and L. Wang, “Synergetic promotion on photoactivity and stability of W18O49/TiO2 hybrid,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 147, pp. 167–174, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. S. Sarkar and K. K. Chattopadhyay, “Visible light photocatalysis and electron emission from porous hollow spherical BiVO4 nanostructures synthesized by a novel route,” Physica E, vol. 58, pp. 52–58, 2014.
  39. V. L. Blair, E. J. Nichols, J. Liu, and S. T. Misture, “Surface modification of nanosheet oxide photocatalysts,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 268, pp. 410–415, 2013.
  40. Z. Li, Y. Shen, C. Yang et al., “Significant enchancement in the visible light pjotocatalytic properties of BiFeO3-graphene nanohybrids,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 1, pp. 823–829, 2013.
  41. C. J. Miller, H. Yu, and T. Waite, “Degradation of rhodamine B during visible light photocatalysis employing Ag@AgCl embedded on reduced graphene oxide,” Colloids & Surface A, vol. 435, pp. 147–153, 2013.
  42. S. Rashidi, M. Nikazar, A. V. Yazdi, and R. Fazaeli, “Optimized photocatalytic degradation of reactive blue 2 by TiO2/UV process,” Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A, vol. 49, pp. 452–462, 2014.
  43. R.-H. Jie, G.-B. Guo, W.-G. Zhao, and S.-L. An, “Preparation and photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange of nano-powder TiO2 by hydrothermal method supported on activated carbon,” Journal of Synthetic Crystals, vol. 42, pp. 2144–2149, 2013.
  44. Z. Bouberka, K. A. Benobbou, A. Khenifi, and U. Maschke, “Degradation by irradiation of an acid orange 7 on colloidal TiO2/(LDHs),” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A, vol. 275, pp. 21–29, 2014.
  45. B. Pant, H. R. Pant, N. A. M. Barakat et al., “Incoporation of cadmium sulfide nanoparticles on the cadmium titanate nanofibers for enhanced organic dyes degradation and hydrogen release,” Ceramics International, vol. 40, pp. 1553–1559, 2014.
  46. H. Hagiwara, M. Nagatomo, C. Seto, S. Ida, and T. Ishihara, “Dye-modification effects on water splitting activity of GaN:ZnO photocatalyst,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A, vol. 272, pp. 41–48, 2013.
  47. A. Prasannan and T. Imae, “One-pot synthesis of fluorescent carbon dots from orange waste peels,” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 52, pp. 15673–15678, 2013.
  48. L. G. Devi and M. L. Arunakumari, “Enhanced photocatalytic performance of Hemin (chloro(protoporhyinato) iron (III)) anchored TiO2 photocatalyst for methyl orange degradation: a surface modification method,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 276, pp. 521–528, 2013.
  49. B. P. Nenavathu, A. V. R. Krishna Rao, A. Goyal, A. Kapoor, and R. K. Dutta, “Synthesis, characterization and enchanced photocatalytic degradation efficiency of Se doped ZnO nanoparticles using trypan blue as a model dye,” Applied Catalysis A, vol. 459, pp. 106–113, 2013.
  50. Y. Huo, Z. Xie, X. Wang, H. Li, M. Hoang, and R. A. Caruso, “Methyl orange removal by combined visible-light photocatalysis and membrane distillation,” Dyes & Pigments, vol. 98, pp. 106–112, 2013.
  51. H. U. Lee, G. Lee, J. C. Park et al., “Efficient visible-light responsive TiO2 nanoparticles incoporated magnetic carbon photocatalysts,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 240, pp. 91–98, 2014.
  52. S. O. Saheed, S. J. Modise, and A. M. Sipamla, “TiO2 supported clinoptilotile: characterization and optimization of operational parameters for methyl orange removal,” Advanced Materials Research, vol. 781, pp. 2249–2252, 2013.
  53. S. J. Hu, J. Yang, and X. H. Liao, “Highly efficient degradation of methylene blue on microwave synthesized FeVO4 nanoparticles photocatalyst under visible-light irradiation,” Applied Mechanics and Materials, vol. 372, pp. 153–157, 2013.
  54. E. S. Aazam and R. M. Mohamed, “Environmental remediation of direct blue dyes solutions by photocatalytic oxidation with cuppor oxide,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 577, pp. 550–555, 2013.
  55. M. Xu, J. Guo, Y. Cen, X. Zhong, W. Cao, and G. Sun, “Shewanella decolorationis sp. nov., a dye-decolorizing bacterium isolated from activated sludge of a waste-water treatment plant,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 363–368, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. E. Abadulla, T. Tzanov, S. Costa, K.-H. Robra, A. Cavaco-Paulo, and G. M. Gubitz, “Decolorization and detoxification of textile dyes with a laccase from Trametes hirsuta,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 66, no. 8, pp. 3357–3362, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. N. Sakkayawong, P. Thiravetyan, and W. Nakbanpote, “Adsorption mechanism of synthetic reactive dye wastewater by chitosan,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 286, no. 1, pp. 36–42, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. Y. Wang, G. Wang, H. Wang, C. Liang, W. Cai, and L. Zhang, “Chemical-template synthesis of micro/nanoscale magnesium silicate hollow spheres for waste-water treatment,” Chemistry: A European Journal, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 3497–3503, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. J.-L. Gong, B. Wang, G.-M. Zeng et al., “Removal of cationic dyes from aqueous solution using magnetic multi-wall carbon nanotube nanocomposite as adsorbent,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 164, no. 2-3, pp. 1517–1522, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. J. M. Peralta-Hernándeza, Y. Meas-Vong, F. J. Rodríguez, T. W. Chapman, M. I. Maldonado, and L. A. Godínez, “Comparison of hydrogen peroxide-based processes for treating dye-containing wastewater: decolorization and destruction of Orange II azo dye in dilute solution,” Dyes & Pigments, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 656–662, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. B. N. Joshi, H. Yoon, S.-H. Na, J.-Y. Choi, and S. S. Yoon, “Enchanced photocatalytic performance of graphene-ZnO nanoplatet composite thin films prepared by electrostatic spray deposition,” Ceramics International, vol. 40, pp. 3647–3654, 2014.
  62. M. Wang, J. Huang, Z. Tong, W. Li, and J. Chen, “Reduced graphene oxide-cuprous oxide composite via facial deposition for photocatalytic dye-degradation,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 568, pp. 26–35, 2013.
  63. U. G. Akpan and B. H. Hameed, “Development and photocatalytic activities of TiO2 doped with Ca-Ce-W in the degradation of acid red 1 under visible light irradiation,” Desalination & Water Treatment, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  64. S. Zhang, J. Li, M. Zeng et al., “In situ synthesis of water-soluble magnetic graphitic carbon nitride photocatalyst and its synergistic catalytic performance,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 5, pp. 1235–1243, 2013.
  65. P. Peralta-Zamora, “Photoelectrochemical or electrophotochemical processes?” Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 1621–1625, 2010. View at Scopus
  66. M. E. Olya and A. Pirkarami, “Cost-effective photoelectrocatalytic treatment of dyes in a batch reactor equipped with solar cells,” Separation & Purification Technology, vol. 118, pp. 557–566, 2013.
  67. J. Ma, B. Cui, J. Dai, and D. Li, “Mechanism of adsorption of anionic dye from aqueous solutions onto organobentonite,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 186, no. 2-3, pp. 1758–1765, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. M.-X. Zhu, L. Lee, H.-H. Wang, and Z. Wang, “Removal of an anionic dye by adsorption/precipitation processes using alkaline white mud,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 149, no. 3, pp. 735–741, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. Y. Dong, W. Dong, C. Liu, Y. Chen, and J. Hua, “Photocatalytic decoloration of water-soluble azo dyes by reduction based on bisulfite-mediated borohydride,” Catalysis Today, vol. 126, no. 3-4, pp. 456–462, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. A. Szyguła, E. Guibal, M. A. Palacín, M. Ruiz, and A. M. Sastre, “Removal of an anionic dye (Acid Blue 92) by coagulation-flocculation using chitosan,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 90, no. 10, pp. 2979–2986, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. M. A. M. Salleh, D. K. Mahmoud, W. A. W. A. Karim, and A. Idris, “Cationic and anionic dye adsorption by agricultural solid wastes: a comprehensive review,” Desalination, vol. 280, no. 1–3, pp. 1–13, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. G. A. Ikhtiyarova, A. S. Özcan, O. Gök, and A. Özcan, “Characterization of natural- and organo-bentonite by XRD, SEM, FT-IR and thermal analysis techniques and its adsorption behaviour in aqueous solutions,” Clay Minerals, vol. 47, pp. 31–44, 2012.
  73. P. Baskaralingam, M. Pulikesi, D. Elango, V. Ramamurthi, and S. Sivanesan, “Adsorption of acid dye onto organobentonite,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 128, no. 2-3, pp. 138–144, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  74. J. F. Ma, J. M. Yu, B. Y. Cui, D. L. Li, and J. Dai, “Treatment of dye wastewater by zero valent iron composited organobentonite,” Advanced Materials Research, vol. 340, pp. 229–235, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  75. I. L. Lagadic, M. K. Mitchell, and B. D. Payne, “Highly effective adsorption of heavy metal ions by a thiol-functionalized magnesium phyllosilicate clay,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 984–990, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. F. Gao, P. Botella, A. Corma, J. Blesa, and L. Dong, “Monodispersed mesoporous silica nanoparticles with very large pores for enhanced adsorption and release of DNA,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 113, no. 6, pp. 1796–1804, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. X. Wang, R. Liu, M. M. Waje et al., “Sulfonated ordered mesoporous carbon as a stable and highly active protonic acid catalyst,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 2395–2397, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. T. Suteewong, H. Sai, R. Cohen et al., “Highly aminated mesoporous silica nanoparticles with cubic pore structure,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 133, no. 2, pp. 172–175, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. J. Tao, W. Jiang, H. Zhai, H. Pan, R. Xu, and R. Tang, “Structural components and anisotropic dissolution behaviors in one hexagonal single crystal of β-tricalcium phosphate,” Crystal Growth and Design, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 2227–2234, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. H. Pan, J. Tao, R. Xu, and R. Tang, “Adsorption processes of gly and glu amino acids on hydroxyapatite surfaces at the atomic level,” Langmuir, vol. 23, no. 17, pp. 8972–8981, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. S. Rashmi and V. Preeti, “Decolorisation of aqueous dye solutions by low-cost adsorbents: a review,” Coloration Technology, vol. 129, pp. 85–108, 2013.
  82. F. H. Hussein, “Effect of photocatalytic treatments on physical and biological properties of textile dyeing wastewater,” Asian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 25, pp. 9387–9392, 2013.
  83. J. Moon, C. Y. Yun, K.-W. Chung, M.-S. Kang, and J. Yi, “Photocatalytic activation of TiO2 under visible light using Acid Red 44,” Catalysis Today, vol. 87, no. 1–4, pp. 77–86, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. M. Y. Abdelaal and R. M. Mohamed, “Novel Pd/TiO2 nanocomposite prepared by modified sol-gel method for photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue dye under visible light irradation,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 576, pp. 201–207, 2013.
  85. M. G. Weinbauer, C. Beckmann, and M. G. Höfle, “Utility of green fluorescent nucleic acid dyes and aluminum oxide membrane filters for rapid epifluorescence enumeration of soil and sediment bacteria,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 64, no. 12, pp. 5000–5003, 1998. View at Scopus
  86. A. Hamrouni, H. Lachheb, and A. Houas, “Synthesis, characterization and photocatalytic activity of ZnO-SnO2 nanocomposites,” Materials Science and Engineering B, vol. 178, pp. 1371–1379, 2013.
  87. H. G. Cha, H. S. Noh, M. J. Kang, and Y. S. Kang, “Photocatalysis: progress using manganese-doped hematite nanocrystals,” New Journal of Chemistry, vol. 37, pp. 4004–4009, 2013.
  88. T. Jiang, L. Zhang, M. Ji et al., “Carbon nanotubes/TiO2 nanotubes composite photocatalysts for efficient degrdation of methyl orange dye,” Particuology, vol. 11, pp. 737–742, 2013.
  89. A. Fatemeh, F. Nazanin, and M. A. Tehrani Ramin, “Preparation of NiO loaded on TiO2 nanostructure as nanophotocatalyst and its photocatalytic activity for degradation of methylene blue,” Research Journal of Chemistry and Environment, vol. 17, pp. 92–96, 2013.
  90. F. A. Harraz, R. M. Mohamed, M. M. Rashad, Y. C. Wang, and W. Sigmund, “Magnetic nanocomposite based on titania-silica/cobalt ferrite for photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue dye,” Ceramics International, vol. 40, pp. 375–384, 2014.
  91. J. Zhang, W. Liu, X. Wang, X. Wang, B. Hu, and H. Liu, “Enchanced decolarization activity by Cu2O@TiO2 nanobelts heterostructures via a strong adsorption-weak photodegradation process,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 282, pp. 84–91, 2013.
  92. M. Hamadanian, M. Behpour, A. S. Razavian, and V. Habbari, “Structural, morphological and photocatalytic characterisations of Ag-coated anatase TiO2 fabricated by the sol gel dip coating method,” Journal of Experimental Nanoscience, vol. 8, pp. 901–912, 2013.
  93. B. Shahmoradi, A. Maleki, and K. Byrappa, “Removal of dispersed orange 25 using in situ surface iron-doped TiO2 nanoparticles,” Desalination & Water Treatment, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  94. Priyanka and V. C. Srivastava, “Photocatalytic oxidation of dye bearing wastewater by iron doped zinc-oxide,” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 52, no. 50, pp. 17790–17799, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  95. L. Sun, Y. Shi, B. Li, X. Li, and Y. Wang, “Preparation and characterization of polypyyrole/TiO2 nanocomposites by reverse microemulsion polymerization and its photocatalytic activity for the degradation of methyl orange under natural light,” Polymer Composites, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 1076–1080, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  96. B. Saygi and D. Tekin, “Photocatalytic degradation kinetics of reactive black 5 (RB 5) dyestuff on TiO2 modified by pretreatment with untrasound energy,” Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 251–258, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  97. C. C. Pei and W. W. F. Leung, “Photocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine B by TiO2/ZnO nanofibers under visible-light irradiation,” Separation & Purification Technology, vol. 114, pp. 108–116, 2013.
  98. A. F. Shojaei, A. R. Tabari, and M. H. Loghmani, “Normal spinel CoCr2O4 and CoCr2O4/TiO2 nanocomposite as novel photocatalysts for degradation of dyes,” Micro & Nano Letters, vol. 8, pp. 426–431, 2013.
  99. J. B. Joo, I. Lee, M. Dahl, G. D. Moon, F. Zaera, and Y. Yin, “Controllable synthesis of mesoporous TiO2 hallows shells: toward an efficient photocatalyst,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 23, pp. 4246–4254, 2013.
  100. L. Shi, L. Liang, J. Ma et al., “Highly efficient visible light-driven Ag/AgBr/ZnO composite photocatalyst for degrading Rhodamine B,” Ceramics International, vol. 40, pp. 3495–3502, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  101. B. M. Rajbongshi and S. K. samdarshi, “ZnO and Co-ZnO nanorods-Complementary role of oxygen vacancy in photocatalytic activity of under UV and visible radiation flux,” Materials Science and Engineering B, vol. 182, pp. 21–28, 2014.
  102. P. Muthirulan, C. K. Nirmala Devi, and M. M. Sundaram, “Facile synthesis of novel hierarchiral TiO2@Poly(o-phenylenediamine) core-shell structures with enchanced photocatalytic performance under solar light,” Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, vol. 1, pp. 620–627, 2013.
  103. W. Zhang, T. Hu, B. Yang, P. Sun, and H. He, “The effect of boron content on properties of B-TiO2 photocatalyst prepared by sol-gel method,” Journal of Advanced Oxidation Technologies, vol. 16, pp. 261–267, 2013.
  104. A. Mohamed, S. Alberto, M.-F. Victor, and E. Luis, “Removal of basic yellow cationic dye by an aqueous dispersion of Moroccan stevensite,” Applied Clay Science, vol. 80, pp. 46–51, 2013.
  105. Z. D. Meng, L. Zhu, S. Ye et al., “Heterogenous photocatalytic degradation of anionic and cationic dyes over fe-fullerence/TiO2 under visible light,” Asian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 25, pp. 6001–6007, 2013.
  106. V. V. Panic and S. J. Velickovic, “Removal of model cationic dye by adsorption onto poly(methacrylic acid)/zeolite hydrogel composites: kinetics, equilibrium study and image analysis,” Separation & Purification Technology, vol. 122, pp. 284–294, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  107. Q. Li, Q.-Y. Yue, H.-J. Sun, Y. Su, and B.-Y. Gao, “A comparative study on the properties, mechanisms and process designs for the adsorption of non-ionic or anionic dyes onto cationic-polymer/bentonite,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 91, no. 7, pp. 1601–1611, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  108. Y. Zhen, Y. Hu, J. Ziwen et al., “Flocculation of both anionic and cationic dyes in aqueous solutions by the amphoteric grafting flocculant carboxymethyl chitosan-graft-polyacrylamide,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 254, pp. 36–45, 2013.
  109. A. Afkhami, M. Saber-Tehrani, and H. Bagheri, “Modified maghemite nanoparticles as an efficient adsorbent for removing some cationic dyes from aqueous solution,” Desalination, vol. 263, no. 1–3, pp. 240–248, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  110. S. Iyyapushpam, S. T. Nishanti, and D. Pathinettam Padiyan, “Photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange using α-Bi2O3 prepared without surfactant,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 563, pp. 104–107, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  111. S. K. Kansal, R. Lamba, S. K. Mehta, and A. Umar, “Photocatalytic degradation of Alizarin Red S using simply synthesized ZnO nanoparticles,” Materials Letters, vol. 106, pp. 385–389, 2013.
  112. C. Zhu, Y. Li, Q. Su et al., “Electrospinning direct preparation of SnO2/Fe2O3 heterojunction nanotubes as an efficient visible-light photocatalyst,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 575, pp. 333–338, 2013.
  113. S. Balachandran, S. G. Praveen, R. Velmurugan, and M. Swaminathan, “Facile fabrication of highly efficient, reusable heterostructured Ag-ZnO-CdO and its twin applications of dye degradation under natural sunlight and self-cleaning,” RSC Advances, vol. 4, pp. 4353–4362, 2014.
  114. H. Gulce, V. Eskizeybek, B. Haspulat, F. Sari, A. Gulce, and A. Avci, “Preparation of a new polyaniline/CdO nanocomposite and investigation of its photocatalytic activity: comparative study under UV light and natural sunlight irradation,” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 52, pp. 10924–10934, 2013.
  115. E. Repo, S. Rengaraj, S. Pulkka et al., “Photocatalytic degradation of dyes by CdS micropoheres under near UV and blue LED radiatin,” Separation & Purification Technology, vol. 120, pp. 206–214, 2013.
  116. N. Divya, A. Bansal, and A. K. Jana, “Nano-photocatalysts in the treatment of colored wastewater—a review,” Materials Science Forum, vol. 734, pp. 349–363, 2013.
  117. D. Pathania, S. Sarita, and B. S. Rathore, “Synthesis, characterization and photocatalytic application of bovine serum albumin capped cadmium sulphide nanopartilces,” Chalcogenide Letters, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 396–404, 2011. View at Scopus
  118. A. Tadjorodi, M. Imani, and H. Kerdari, “Experimental design to optimize the synthesis of CdO cauliflower-like nanostructure and high performance in photodegaradtion of toxic azo dyes,” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 48, pp. 935–942, 2013.
  119. L. Bouna, B. Rhouta, and F. Maury, “Physicochemical study of photocatalytic activity of TiO2supported polygorskite clay mineral,” International Journal of Photoenergy, vol. 2013, Article ID 815473, 6 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  120. Z.-L. Ma, G.-F. Huang, D.-S. Xu, M.-G. Xia, W.-Q. Huang, and Y. Tian, “Coupling effect of la doping and porphyrin sensitization on photocatalytic activity of nanocrystalline TiO2,” Materials Letters, vol. 108, pp. 37–40, 2013.
  121. Z. Shi, M. Zhou, D. Zheng, H. Liu, and S. Yao, “Preparation of Ce-doped TiO2 hollow fibers and their photocatalytic degradation properties for dye compound,” Journal of the Chinese Chemical Society, vol. 60, pp. 1156–1162, 2013.
  122. N. B. Gusiak, I. M. Kobasa, and S. S. Kurek, “Nature inspired dyes for the sensitization of titanium dioxide photocatalyst,” Chemik, vol. 67, pp. 1191–1198, 2013.
  123. Y. Huo, X. Chen, J. Zhang, G. Pan, J. Jia, and H. Li, “Ordered macroporous Bi2O3/TiO2 film coated on a rotating disk with enchanced photocatalytic activity under visible irradiation,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 148, pp. 550–556, 2014.
  124. L.-J. Kim, J.-W. Jang, and J.-W. Park, “Nano TiO2 functionalized magnetic-cored dendrimer as a photocatalyst,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 147, pp. 973–979, 2014.
  125. J. Rattanarak, W. Mekprasart, W. Pecharapa, and W. Techitdheera, “Photocatalytic activities under UV light of ball-milled TiO2 photocatalyts,” Advanced Materials Research, vol. 802, pp. 237–241, 2013.
  126. W. C. Liu, H. Y. Xu, T. N. Shi, L. C. Wu, and P. Li, “Preparation and photocatalytic activity of TiO2/tourmaline composite catalyst,” Advanced Materials Research, vol. 800, pp. 464–470, 2013.
  127. T. E. Agustina, F. S. Arsyad, and M. Abdullah, “Photocatalytic degradation of C.I reactive red 2 by using TiO2-coated PET plastic under solar irradiation,” Advanced Materials Research, vol. 789, pp. 180–188, 2013.
  128. X. Sun, C. Li, L. Ruan et al., “Ce-doped SiO2@TiO2 nanocomposite as an effective visible light photocatalyst,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 585, pp. 800–804, 2014.
  129. M.-C. Wu, H.-C. Liao, Y.-C. Cho et al., “Photocatalytic activity of nitrogen-doped TiO2-based nanowires: a photo-assisted Kelvin probe force microcopy study,” Journal of Nanoparticle Research, vol. 16, pp. 1–11, 2014.
  130. S. Shi, M. A. Gondal, A. A. Al-Saadi et al., “Facile preparation of g-C3N4 modified BiOCl hybrid photocatalyst and vital role of frontier orbital energy levels of model compounds in photoactivity enchecement,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 416, pp. 212–219, 2014.
  131. A. E. Nogueira, E. Longo, E. R. Leite, and E. R. Camargo, “Synthesis and photocatalytic properties of bismuth titanate with different structures via oxidant peroxo method (OPM),” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 415, pp. 89–94, 2014.
  132. Q. Wang, J. Hui, L. Yang et al., “Enchanced photoactivity performance of Bi2O3/H-ZSM-5 composite for rgodamine B degradation under UV light irradiation,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 289, pp. 224–229, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  133. Y. L. Ma, R. S. Xue, and H. S. Yan, “Photo-degaradtion alkali lignin by Bis-(2-Methyl Quinoline) squarylium cyanine TiO2 photocatalyst in sunlight,” Advanced Materials Research, vol. 838, pp. 2717–2720, 2014.
  134. Q. Wang, J. Hui, Y. Huang et al., “The preparation of BiOCl photocatalyst and its performance of photodegradation on dyes,” Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing, vol. 17, pp. 87–93, 2014.
  135. W. T. Yi and C. Y. Yan, “A novel visible-light-driven photocatalyst: Pt surface modofied Bi2WO6-WO3 composite,” Applied Mechanics and Materials, vol. 448, pp. 178–181, 2014.
  136. Z. Liu, B. Wu, J. Niu, X. Huang, and Y. Zhu, “Solvothermal synthesis of BiOBr thin film and its photocatalytic performance,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 288, pp. 369–372, 2014.
  137. Z. Li, S. Yang, J. Zhou et al., “Novel mesoporous g-C3N4 and BiPO4 nanorods hybrid architectures and their enchanced visible-light-driven photocatalytic performances,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 241, pp. 344–351, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  138. M. Wang, Y. Che, C. Niu, M. Dang, and D. Dong, “Effective visible light-active boron and europium co-doped BiVO4 synthesized by sol-gel method for photodegradation of methyl orange,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 262, pp. 447–455, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  139. G. Zhu, M. Hojamberdiev, K. I. Katsumata et al., “Heterostructured Fe3O4/Bi2O2CO3 photocatalyst: synthesis, characterization and application in recycleable photodegradation of organic dyes under visible light irradiation,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 142, pp. 95–105, 2013.
  140. Q. Wang, J. Hui, J. Li et al., “Photodegradation of methyl orange with PANI-modified BiOCl photocatalyst under visble light irradiation,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 283, pp. 577–583, 2013.
  141. Z. Zhanying, I. M. O'Hara, A. K. Geoff, and O. S. D. William, “Comparative study on adsorption of two cationic dyes by milled sugarcane bagasse,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 42, pp. 41–49, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  142. S.-K. Mousa, A. Mokhtar, and G. Kamaladin, “Preparation of chitosan-ethyl acrylate as a biopolymer adsorbent for basic dyes removal from colored solutions,” Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, vol. 1, pp. 406–415, 2013.
  143. K. Turhan, I. Durukan, S. A. Ozturkcan, and Z. Turgut, “Decolorization of textile basic dye in aqueous solution by ozone,” Dyes & Pigments, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 897–901, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  144. A. T. Kah, M. Norhashimah, T. T. Tjoon, N. Ismail, and P. Panneerselvam, “Removal of cationic dye by magnetic nanoparticle (Fe3O4) impregnated onto activated maize cob powder and kinetic study of dye waste adsorption,” APCBEE Procedia, vol. 1, pp. 83–89, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  145. S. M. R. Billah, R. M. Christie, and R. Shamey, “Direct coloration of textiles with photochromic dyes. Part 1: application of spiroindolinonaphthoxazines as disperse dyes to polyester, nylon and acrylic fabrics,” Coloration Technology, vol. 124, no. 4, pp. 223–228, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  146. M. M. Hassan and C. J. Hawkyard, “Decolourisation of aqueous dyes by sequential oxidation treatment with ozone and Fenton's reagent,” Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, vol. 77, no. 7, pp. 834–841, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  147. B. Mralidharan and S. Laya, “A new approach to dyeing of 80 : 20 polyester/cotton blended fabric using disperse and reactive dyes,” ISRN Materials Science, vol. 2011, Article ID 907493, 12 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  148. H. Y. Ze, F. T. Jing, Q. W. Xiao, C. Xiu, L. Wei, and Z. Ying, “Effects of disperse dyes on dyeing of ethylated Chinese fir powder,” Advanced Materials Research, vol. 788, pp. 241–245, 2013.
  149. W. Cui, H. Wang, L. Liu, Y. Liang, and J. G. McEvoy, “Plasmonic Ag@AgCl-intercalated K4Nb6O17 composite for enchanced photocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine B under visible light,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 283, pp. 820–827, 2013.
  150. Z. Ali, N. R. Khalid, M. Nawaz Chaudhry, S. Tajammul Hussain, I. Ahamad, and N. A. Niaz, “Significant effect of graphene on catalytic degradation of methylene blue by pure and Ce doped TiO2 at nanoscale,” Digest Journal of Nanomaterials and Biostructures, vol. 8, pp. 1525–1534, 2013.
  151. Q. Wang, J. Li, Y. Bai et al., “Photodegradation of textile dye Rhodamine B over a novel biopolymer-metal complex wool-Pd/CdS photocatalysts under visible light irradiation,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B, vol. 126, pp. 47–50, 2013.
  152. B. Krishnakumar and M. Swaminathan, “Solar photocatalytic degradation of Naphthol Blue Black,” Desalination & Water Treatment, vol. 51, pp. 6572–6579, 2013.
  153. O. Sharma and M. K. Sharma, “Use of cobalt hexacyanoferrate(II) semiconductor in photocatalytic degradation of neutral red dye,” International Journal of ChemTech Research, vol. 5, pp. 1615–1622, 2013.
  154. P. Du, L. Song, J. Xiong, L. Wang, and N. Li, “A photovoltaic smart textile and a photocatalytic functional textile based on co-electronspun TiO2/MgO core-sheath nanorods: novel textile of integrating energy and environmental science with textile research,” Textile Research Journal, vol. 83, pp. 1690–1702, 2013.
  155. J. Yang, C. Chen, H. Ji, W. Ma, and J. Zhao, “Mechanism of TiO2-assisted photocatalytic degradation of dyes under visible irradiation: photoelectrocatalytic study by TiO2-film electrodes,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 109, no. 46, pp. 21900–21907, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  156. P. Eskandari, F. Kazemi, and Y. Azizian-Kalandaragh, “Convenient preparation of CdS nanostructures as a highly efficient photocatalyst under blue LED and solar light irradiation,” Separation & Purification Technology, vol. 120, pp. 180–185, 2013.
  157. F. Wen and C. Li, “Hybrid artificial photosynthetic systems comprising semiconductors as light harvesters and biomimetic complexes as molecular cacatalyst,” Accounts of Chemical Research, vol. 46, pp. 2355–2364, 2013.
  158. L. M. Duan, J. H. Liu, Q. Y. Pang, L. Xu, and Z. R. Liu, “Efficient sunlight active nanocomposite photocatalytst for degradation of pollutant organic dyes,” Advanced Materials Research, vol. 726, pp. 650–653, 2013.
  159. S. Da Dalt, A. K. Alves, and C. P. Bergmann, “Photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange in water solutions in the presence of MWCNT/TiO2 composites,” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 48, pp. 1845–1850, 2013.
  160. N. Divya, A. Bansal, and A. K. Jana, “Photocatalytic degradation of azo Orange II in aqueous solutions using copper-impregnated titania,” International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 10, pp. 1265–1274, 2013.
  161. J. Dong, H. Xu, F. Zhang, C. Chen, L. Liu, and G. Wu, “Synergistic effect over photocatalytic active Cu2O thin films and their morphological and orientational transformation under visible light irradaiation,” Applied Catalysis A, vol. 470, pp. 294–302, 2014.
  162. O. Sharma and M. K. Sharma, “Copper hexacyanoferrate (II) as photocatalyst: decolarisation of neutral red dye,” International Journal of ChemTech Research, vol. 5, pp. 2706–2716, 2013.
  163. S. S. Shinde, C. H. Bhosale, and K. Y. Rajpure, “Kinetic analysis of heterogenous photocatalysis: role of hydroxyl radicals,” Catalysis Review, vol. 55, pp. 79–133, 2013.
  164. K. Zhou, Y. Shi, S. Jiang, Y. Hu, and Z. Gui, “Facile preparation of Cu2O/carbon heterostucture with high photocatalytic activity,” Materials Letters, pp. 213–216, 2013.
  165. X. Lu, N. Hu, J. Li, H. Ma, K. Du, and R. Zhao, “Influence of TiO impregnated with a novel copper (II) carboxylic porphyrin and its application in photocatalytic degradation of 4-nitrophenol,” Research on Chemical Intermediates, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 1911–1922, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  166. W. Hu, F. Ren, R. Bai, Z. Zhou, and W. Xu, “Preparation and photocatalytic properties of CuO-TiO2/conductive polymer fiber composites,” Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, vol. 33, pp. 431–436, 2013.
  167. P. Deepak and S. Shikha, “Effect of surfactants and electrolyte on removal and recovery of basic dye by using ficus carica cellulosic fibers as biosorbent,” Surfactant, vol. 49, pp. 306–314, 2011.
  168. R. O. Cristavoa, A. P. M. Tavares, J. M. Loureiro, R. A. R. Boaventura, and E. A. Macedo, “Optimisation of reactive dye degradation by laccase using Box-Behnken design,” Environmental Technology, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 1357–1364, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  169. A. Khan, N. A. Mir, M. M. Haque, M. Muneer, and C. Boxall, “Solar photocatalytic decolorization of two azo dye derivatives, acid red 17 and reactive red 241 in aqueous suspension,” Science of Advanced Materials, vol. 5, pp. 160–165, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  170. S. K. Kavitha and P. N. Palanisamy, “Solar photocatalitic degradation of Vat Yellow 4 dye in aqueous suspension of TiO2-optimization of operational parameters,” Advances in Environmental Sciences, vol. 2, pp. 189–202, 2010.
  171. S. T. Tan, A. A. Umar, A. Balouch et al., “ZnO nanocubes with (1 0 1) basal plane photocatalyst prepared via a low-frequency ultrasonic assisted hydrolysis process,” Untrasonic Sonochem, vol. 21, pp. 754–760, 2014.
  172. A. A. Taha, A. A. Hriez, Y.-N. Wu, H. Wang, and F. Li, “Direct synthesis of novel vanadium oxide embedded porous carbon nanofiber decorated with iron nanoparticles as a low-cost and highly efficient visible-light-driven photocatalyst,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 417, pp. 199–205, 2014.
  173. H. Xu, J. Zhang, Y. Chen, H. Lu, J. Zhuang, and J. Li, “Synthesis of polyaniline-modified MnO2 composite nanorods and their photocatalytic application,” Materials Letters, vol. 117, pp. 21–23, 2014.
  174. C. Wang, X. Zhang, B. Yuan et al., “Multi-heterojunction photocatalyst based on WO3 nanorods: structural design and optimization for enchanced photocatalytic activity under visible light,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 237, pp. 29–37, 2014.
  175. N. A. S. Al-Areqi, A. Al-Alas, A. S. N. Al-Kamali, K. A. S. Ghaleb, and K. Al-Mureish, “Photodegradation of 4-SPPN dye catalyzed by Ni(II)-substited Bi2VO5.5 system under visible light irradiation: influence of phase stability and perovskite vanadate oxygen vacancies of photocatalyst,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis A, vol. 381, pp. 1–8, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  176. Y. He, D. Li, J. Chen et al., “Sn3O4: a novel heterovalent-tin photocatalyst with hierarchical 3D nanostructures under visible light,” RSC Advances, vol. 4, pp. 1266–1269, 2014.
  177. O. F. Lopes, E. C. Paris, and C. Ribeiro, “Synthesis of Nb2O5 nanoparticles through the oxidant peroxide method applied to organic pollutant photodegradation: a mechanistic study,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 144, pp. 800–808, 2014.
  178. M. Buchalska, J. Kuncewicz, E. Swietek et al., “Photoinduced hole injection in semiconductor-coordination compoun system,” Coordination Chemistry Reviews, vol. 257, pp. 767–775, 2013.
  179. A. Abidov, B. Allebergenov, O. Tursunkulov et al., “The evaluation of photocatalytic properties of iron doped titania photocatalyst by degradation of methylene blue using fluorescent light source,” Advanced Materials Research, vol. 652, pp. 1700–1703, 2013.
  180. M. Luo, D. Bowden, and P. Brimblecombe, “Removal of dyes from water using a TiO2 photocatalyst supported on black sand,” Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, vol. 198, no. 1–4, pp. 233–241, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  181. H. M. Lim, J. S. Jung, D. S. Kim, D. J. Lee, S.-H. Lee, and W. N. Kim, “Modification of natural zeolite powder and its application to interior non-woven textile for indoor air quality control,” Materials Science Forum, vol. 510-511, pp. 934–937, 2006. View at Scopus
  182. R. Rahimi, M. M. Moghaddas, S. Zargari, and R. Rahimi, “Synthesis of mesoporous V-TiO2 with different surfactants: the effect of surfactant type on photocatalytic process,” Advanced Materials Research, vol. 702, pp. 56–61, 2013.
  183. L. Pinho, J. C. Hernandez-Garrido, J. J. Calvino, and M. J. Mosquera, “2D and 3D characterization of a surfactant-synthesized TiO2-SiO2 mesoporous photoctalytst obtained at ambient temperature,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 15, pp. 2800–2808, 2013.
  184. H. Park, Y. Park, W. Kim, and W. Choi, “Surface modification of TiO2 photocatalyst for environmental applications,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C, vol. 15, pp. 1–20, 2013.
  185. P. Goswami, R. K. Debnath, and J. N. Ganguli, “Photophysical and photochemical properties of nanosized cobalt-doped TiO2 photocatalyst,” Asian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 25, pp. 7118–7124, 2013.
  186. H. Meng, B. Wang, S. Liu, R. Jiang, and H. Long, “Hydrothermal preparation, characterization and photocatalytic activity of TiO2/Fe-TiO2 composite catalysts,” Ceramics International, vol. 39, pp. 5785–5793, 2013.
  187. S. Vivekanandhan, M. Schreiber, C. Mason, A. K. Mohanty, and M. Misra, “Maple leaf (Acer sp.) extract mediated green process for the functionalization of ZnO powders with silver nanoparticles,” Colloids and Surface B, vol. 113, pp. 169–175, 2014.
  188. S. Xie, Y. Liu, Z. Chen, X. Chen, and X. Wang, “Superior photocatalytic properties of phosphorous-doped ZnO nanocombs,” RSC Advances, vol. 3, pp. 26080–26085, 2013.
  189. S. Balachandran, K. Selvam, B. Babu, and M. Swaminathan, “The simple hydrothermal synthesis of Ag-ZnO-SnO2 nanochain and its multiple applications,” Dalton Transactions, vol. 42, pp. 16365–16374, 2013.
  190. J. Miao, Z. Jia, H.-B. Lu, D. Habibi, and L.-C. Zhang, “Heterogenous photocatalytic degradation of mordant black 11 with ZnO nanoparticles under UV-Vis light,” Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  191. Q.-L. Ma, R. Xiong, B.-G. Zhai, and Y. M. Huang, “Core-shelled Zn/ZnO microspheres synthesised by ultrasonic irradation for photocatalytic applications,” Micro & Nano Letters, vol. 8, pp. 491–495, 2013.
  192. S. Ameen, A. M. Shaheer, H.-K. Seo, and H.-S. Shin, “Mineralization of rhodamine 6G dye over rose flower-like ZnO nanomaterials,” Materials Letters, vol. 113, pp. 20–24, 2013.
  193. N.-F. Hsu, M. Chang, and K.-T. Hsu, “Rapid synthesis of ZnO dandelion-like nanostructures and their applications in humidity sensing and photocatalysis,” Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing, vol. 21, pp. 200–205, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  194. N. W. C. Jusoh, A. A. Jalil, S. Triwahyono et al., “Sequential desilication-isomorphous substitution route to prepare mesostructured silica nanoparticles loaded with ZnO and their photocatalytic activity,” Applied Catalysis A, vol. 468, pp. 276–287, 2013.
  195. L. M. Duan, J. H. Liu, X. T. Xu, L. Xu, and Z. R. Liu, “The preparation and sunlight activity of nanocomposite photocatalysts for degradation of methyl orange solution,” Advanced Materials Research, vol. 750, pp. 1397–1400, 2013.
  196. Y. V. Marathe and V. S. Shrivastava, “Effective removal of non-biodegradable methyl orange dye by using CdS/activated carbon nanocomposite as a photocatalyst,” Desalination & Water Treatment, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  197. G. Yang, B. Yang, T. Xiao, and Z. Yan, “One-step solvothermal synthesis of hierarchically porous nanostructured CdS/TiO2 heterojunction with higher visible light photocatalytic activity,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 283, pp. 402–410, 2013.
  198. M. Liu, J. Zheng, Q. Liu et al., “The preparation, load and photocatalytic performance of N-doped and CdS-coupled TiO2,” RSC Advabces, vol. 3, pp. 9483–9489, 2013.
  199. J. Fu, B. Chang, Y. Tian, F. Xi, and X. Dong, “Novel C3N4-CdS composite photocatalysts with organic-inorganic heterojunctions: in situ synthesis, exceptional activity, high stability and photocatalytic mechanism,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 1, pp. 3083–3090, 2013.
  200. L. Shao, G. Xing, W. Lv et al., “Photodegradation of azo-dyes in aqueous solution by polyacrylonitrile nanofiber mat-supported metalloporphyrins,” Polymer International, vol. 62, pp. 289–294, 2013.
  201. N. Sobana, B. Krishnakumar, and M. Swaminathan, “Synergism and effect of operational parameters on solar photocatlytic degradation of an azo dye (Direct Yellow 4) using activated carbon-loaded zinc oxide,” Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing, vol. 16, pp. 1046–1051, 2013.
  202. H.-Y. Zhu, J. Yao, R. Jiang, Y.-Q. Fu, Y.-H. Wu, and G.-M. Zeng, “Enchanced decolarization of azo dye solution by cadmium sulfide.multi-walled carbon nanotubes/polymer composite in combination with hydrogen peroxide under simulated solar light irradiation,” Ceramics International, vol. 40, pp. 3769–3777, 2014.
  203. N. A. S. Al-Areqi, A. S. N. Al-Kamali, K. A. S. Ghaleb, A. Al_Alas, and K. Al-Mureish, “Influence of phase stabilization and perovskite vanadate oxygen vacancies of the BINIVOX catalyst on photocatalytic degradation of azo dye under visible light irradiation,” Radiation Effects & Defect Solids, vol. 169, pp. 117–128, 2014.
  204. C. Andriantsiferana, E. F. Mohamed, and H. Delmas, “Photocatalytic degradation of an azo-dye on TiO2/activated carbon composite material,” Environmental Technologies, vol. 35, pp. 355–363, 2014.
  205. J. H. Shariffuddin, M. I. Jones, and D. A. Patterson, “Greener photocatalysts: hydroxyapatite derived from waste mussel shells for the photocatalytic degradation of model azo dye wastewater,” Chemical Engineering Research and Design, vol. 91, pp. 1693–1704, 2013.
  206. B. Subash, A. Senthilraja, P. Dhatshanamurthi, M. Swaminthan, and M. Shanti, “Solar active photocatalyst for effctive degradation of RR 120 with dye sensitized mechanism,” Spectrochimica Acta, vol. 115, pp. 175–182, 2013.
  207. M. H. Habibi and E. Askari, “Spectrophotometric studies of photo-induced degradation of Tertrodirect Light Blue (TLB) using a nanostructure zinc zirconate composite,” Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, vol. 19, pp. 1400–1405, 2013.
  208. H. Liu, G. Li, J. Qu, and H. Liu, “Degradation of azo dye Acid Orange 7 in water by Fe0/granular activated carbon system in the presence of ultrasound,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 144, no. 1-2, pp. 180–186, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  209. G. Buitrón, M. Quezada, and G. Moreno, “Aerobic degradation of the azo dye acid red 151 in a sequencing batch biofilter,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 143–149, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  210. S. M. A. G. Ulson de Souza, E. Forgiarini, and A. A. Ulson de Souza, “Toxicity of textile dyes and their degradation by the enzyme horseradish peroxidase (HRP),” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 147, no. 3, pp. 1073–1078, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  211. W. Zhai, G. Li, P. Yu, L. Yang, and L. Mao, “Silver phosphate/carbon nanotube-stabilized pickering emulsion for highly efficient photocatalysis,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry, vol. 117, pp. 15183–15191, 2013.
  212. K. Ullah, Z.-D. Meng, S. Ye, L. Zhu, and W.-C. Oh, “Synthesis and characterization of novel PbS-graphene/TiO2 composite with enchanced photocatalytic activity,” Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1035–1042, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  213. M. Cheng, M. Zhu, Y. Du, and P. Yang, “Enchanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution based on efficient electron transfer in triphenylaminebased dye functionalized Au@Pt bimetallic core/shell nanocomposite,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 38, pp. 8631–8638, 2013.
  214. T. Soltani and M. H. Entezari, “Photolysis and photocatalysis of methylene blue by ferrite bismuth nanoparticles under sunlight irradiation,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis A, vol. 377, pp. 197–203, 2013.
  215. H.-Y. Sun, C.-B. Liu, Y. Cong, M.-H. Yu, H.-Y. Bai, and G.-B. Che, “New photocatalyst for the degradation of organic dyes based on [Co2(1,4-BDC)(NCP)2]n · 4nH2O,” Inorganic Chemistry Communications, vol. 35, pp. 130–134, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  216. R. Comparelli, E. Fanizza, M. L. Curri, P. D. Cozzoli, G. Mascolo, and A. Agostiano, “UV-induced photocatalytic degradation of azo dyes by organic-capped ZnO nanocrystals immobilized onto substrates,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 60, no. 1-2, pp. 1–11, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  217. S. K. Sharma, H. Bhunia, and P. K. Bajpai, “TiO2-assisted photocatlytic degradation of diazo dye reactive red 120: decolarization kinetics and mineralization investigations,” Journal of Advanced Oxidation Technologies, vol. 16, pp. 306–313, 2013.
  218. H. Aliyan, R. Fazaeli, and R. Jalilian, “Fe3O4@mesoporous SBA-15: a magnetically recoverable catayst for photodegradation of malachite green,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 276, pp. 147–153, 2013.
  219. A. Khanna and V. K. Shetty, “Solar light induced photocatalystic degradation of Reactive Blue 220 (RB 220) dye with highly efficient Ag@TiO2 core-shell nanoparticles: a comparision with UV photocatalysis,” Solar Energy, vol. 99, pp. 67–76, 2014.
  220. M.-C. Chang, H.-Y. Shu, T.-H. Tseng, and H.-W. Hsu, “Supported zinc oxide photocatalyst for decolarization and mineralization of orange G dye wastewater under UV 365 irradiation,” International Journal of Photoenergy, vol. 2013, Article ID 595031, 12 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  221. K. Zhao, Z. Wu, R. Tang, and Y. Jiang, “Preparation of highly visible-light photocatalytic active N-doped TiO2 microcuboids,” Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, vol. 57, pp. 489–492, 2013.
  222. P. Xiong, L. Wang, X. Sun, B. Xu, and X. Wang, “Ternary titania-cobalt ferrite-polyaniline nanocomposite: a magnetically recycleable hybrid for adsorption and photodegradation of dyes under visible light,” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 52, pp. 10105–10113, 2013.
  223. Y.-J. Xu, Y. Zhuang, and X. Fu, “New insight for enhanced photocatalytic activity of TiO2 by doping carbon nanotubes: a case study on degradation of benzene and methyl orange,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 114, no. 6, pp. 2669–2676, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  224. Y. Zhang, J. Wan, and Y. Ke, “A novel approach of preparing TiO2 films at low temperature and its application in photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 177, no. 1–3, pp. 750–754, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  225. M. R. Xu, G. Ni, and F. Zhao, “Preparation, characterization and photocatalytic properties of Cu, P-codoped TiO2 nanoparticles,” Advanced Materials Research, vol. 239-242, pp. 2562–2565, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  226. B. Leena, B. Mohit, and K. S. Mohan, “Photocatalysis of giemsa dye: an approach towards biotechnology laboratory effluent treatment,” Journal of Environmental & Analytical Toxicology, vol. 113, pp. 1–10, 2011.
  227. S. G. Abuabara, L. G. C. Rego, and V. S. Batista, “Influence of thermal fluctuations on interfacial electron transfer in functionalized TiO2 semiconductors,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 127, no. 51, pp. 18234–18242, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  228. I. H. Laura, G. Robert, J. B. Jesse, et al., “Spectral characteristics and photosensitization of TiO2 nanoparticles in reverse micelles by perylenes,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 117, pp. 4568–4581, 2013.
  229. Y. Zhang, Z.-R. Tang, X. Fu, and Y.-J. Xu, “TiO2-graphene nanocomposites for gas-phase photocatalytic degradation of volatile aromatic pollutant: is TiO2-graphene truly different from other TiO2-carbon composite materials?” ACS Nano, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 7303–7314, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  230. I. Arslan, I. A. Balcioǧlu, and D. W. Bahnemann, “Advanced chemical oxidation of reactive dyes in simulated dyehouse effluents by ferrioxalate-Fenton/UV-A and TiO2/UV-A processes,” Dyes & Pigments, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 207–218, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  231. I. A. Alaton, I. A. Balcioglu, and D. W. Bahnemann, “Advanced oxidation of a reactive dyebath effluent: comparison of O3, H2O2/UV-C and TiO2/UV-A processes,” Water Research, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 1143–1154, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  232. G. Li, J. Qu, X. Zhang, and J. Ge, “Electrochemically assisted photocatalytic degradation of Acid Orange 7 with β-PbO2 electrodes modified by TiO2,” Water Research, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 213–220, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  233. I. Arslan, I. A. Balcioglu, and D. W. Bahnemann, “Heterogeneous photocatalytic treatment of simulated dyehouse effluents using novel TiO2-photocatalysts,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 193–206, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  234. Z.-X. Lu, L. Zhou, Z.-L. Zhang et al., “Cell damage induced by photocatalysis of TiO2 thin films,” Langmuir, vol. 19, no. 21, pp. 8765–8768, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  235. H. Yu, S. Chen, X. Quan, H. Zhao, and Y. Zhang, “Fabrication of a TiO2-BDD heterojunction and its application as a photocatalyst for the simultaneous oxidation of an azo dye and reduction of Cr(VI),” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 3791–3796, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  236. Z. Zainal, L. K. Hui, M. Z. Hussein, A. H. Abdullah, and I. K. R. Hamadneh, “Characterization of TiO2-Chitosan/Glass photocatalyst for the removal of a monoazo dye via photodegradation-adsorption process,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 164, no. 1, pp. 138–145, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  237. S. U. M. Khan, M. Al-Shahry, and W. B. Ingler Jr., “Efficient photochemical water splitting by a chemically modified n-TiO2,” Science, vol. 297, no. 5590, pp. 2243–2245, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  238. F. Dong, S. Guo, H. Wang, X. Li, and Z. Wu, “Enhancement of the visible light photocatalytic activity of C-doped TiO2 nanomaterials prepared by a green synthetic approach,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 115, no. 27, pp. 13285–13292, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  239. P. C. Maness, S. Smolinski, D. M. Blake, Z. Huang, E. J. Wolfrum, and W. A. Jacoby, “Bactericidal activity of photocatalytic TiO2 reaction: toward an understanding of its killing mechanism,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 65, no. 9, pp. 4094–4098, 2009.
  240. C. Shifu, L. Xuqiang, L. Yunzhang, and C. Gengyu, “The preparation of nitrogen-doped TiO2-xNx photocatalyst coated on hollow glass microbeads,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 253, no. 6, pp. 3077–3082, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  241. D. Chen, D. Yang, Q. Wang, and Z. Jiang, “Effects of boron doping on photocatalytic activity and microstructure of titanium dioxide nanoparticles,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 4110–4116, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  242. W. Li, Y. Bai, C. Liu et al., “Highly thermal stable and highly crystalline anatase TiO2 for photocatalysis,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 43, no. 14, pp. 5423–5428, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  243. D. B. Ingram and S. Linic, “Water splitting on composite plasmonic-metal/semiconductor photoelectrodes: evidence for selective plasmon-induced formation of charge carriers near the semiconductor surface,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 133, no. 14, pp. 5202–5205, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  244. J.-H. Sun, S.-Y. Dong, Y.-K. Wang, and S.-P. Sun, “Preparation and photocatalytic property of a novel dumbbell-shaped ZnO microcrystal photocatalyst,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 172, no. 2-3, pp. 1520–1526, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  245. W. Xie, Y. Li, W. Sun, J. Huang, H. Xie, and X. Zhao, “Surface modification of ZnO with Ag improves its photocatalytic efficiency and photostability,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A, vol. 216, no. 2-4, pp. 149–155, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  246. W. Chen, W. Lu, Y. Yao, and M. Xu, “Highly efficient decomposition of organic dyes by aqueous-fiber phase transfer and in situ catalytic oxidation using fiber-supported cobalt phthalocyanine,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 41, no. 17, pp. 6240–6245, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  247. A. C. Lucilha, C. E. Bonancêa, W. J. Barreto, and K. Takashima, “Adsorption of the diazo dye Direct Red 23 onto a zinc oxide surface: a spectroscopic study,” Spectrochimica Acta Part A, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 389–393, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  248. L. S. Andrade, L. A. M. Ruotolo, R. C. Rocha-Filho et al., “On the performance of Fe and Fe,F doped Ti-Pt/PbO2 electrodes in the electrooxidation of the Blue Reactive 19 dye in simulated textile wastewater,” Chemosphere, vol. 66, no. 11, pp. 2035–2043, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  249. M. Nasr-Esfahani and M. H. Habibi, “Silver doped TiO2 nanostructure composite photocatalyst film synthesized by sol-gel spin and dip coating technique on glass,” International Journal of Photoenergy, vol. 2008, Article ID 628713, 11 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  250. L. Björnsson, P. Hugenholtz, G. W. Tyson, and L. L. Blackall, “Filamentous Chloroflexi (green non-sulfur bacteria) are abundant in wastewater treatment processes with biological nutrient removal,” Microbiology, vol. 148, no. 8, pp. 2309–2318, 2002. View at Scopus
  251. J. J. Plumb, J. Bell, and D. C. Stuckey, “Microbial populations associated with treatment of an industrial dye effluent in an anaerobic baffled reactor,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 67, no. 7, pp. 3226–3235, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  252. T. Ito, K. Sugita, and S. Okabe, “Isolation, characterization, and in situ detection of a novel chemolithoautotrophic sulfur-oxidizing bacterium in wastewater biofilms growing under microaerophilic conditions,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 3122–3129, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  253. S. M. Burkinshaw and G. W. Collins, “Aftertreatment to reduce the washdown of leuco sulphur dyes on cotton during repeated washing,” Journal of the Society of Dyers and Colourists, vol. 114, no. 5-6, pp. 165–168, 1998. View at Scopus
  254. R. S. Shraddha, S. Simran, K. Mohit, and K. Ajay, “Laccase: microbial sources, production, purification, and potential biotechnological applications,” Enzyme Research, vol. 2011, Article ID 217861, 11 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  255. M. Alvaro, E. Carbonell, M. Esplá, and H. Garcia, “Iron phthalocyanine supported on silica or encapsulated inside zeolite Y as solid photocatalysts for the degradation of phenols and sulfur heterocycles,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 37–42, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  256. S.-L. Chen, X.-J. Huang, and Z.-K. Xu, “Functionalization of cellulose nanofiber mats with phthalocyanine for decoloration of reactive dye wastewater,” Cellulose, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 1295–1303, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  257. K. K. Kim, C. S. Lee, R. M. Kroppenstedt, E. Stackebrandt, and S. T. Lee, “Gordonia sihwensis sp. nov., a novel nitrate-reducing bacterium isolated from a wastewater-treatment bioreactor,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 1427–1433, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  258. L. Zhou, W. Guo, G. Xie, and J. Feng, “Photocatalytic degradation of reactive brilliant red X-3B over BiOI under visible light irradiation,” Desalination & Water Treatment, vol. 51, pp. 6517–6525, 2013.
  259. D. C. Xu, Z.-W. Lian, M.-L. Fu, B. Yuan, J.-W. Shi, and H.-J. Cui, “Advanced near-infrared-driven photocatalyst: fabrication, characterization and photocatalytic performance of β-NaYF4: Yb3+, Tm3+@TiO2 core@ shell microcrystals,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 142, pp. 377–386, 2013.
  260. S. Song, L. Xu, Z. He, J. Chen, X. Xiao, and B. Yan, “Mechanism of the photocatalytic degradation of C.I. reactive black 5 at pH 12.0 using SrTiO3/CeO2 as the catalyst,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 41, no. 16, pp. 5846–5853, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  261. C. Pan and Y. Zhu, “New type of BiPO4 Oxy-acid salt photocatalyst with high photocatalytic activity on degradation of dye,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 44, no. 14, pp. 5570–5574, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  262. A. Furube, T. Shiozawa, A. Ishikawa, A. Wada, K. Domen, and C. Hirose, “Femtosecond transient absorption spectroscopy on photocatalysts: K4Nb6O17 and Ru(bpy)32+-intercalated K4Nb6O17 thin films,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 106, no. 12, pp. 3065–3072, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  263. U. Ruh, S. Hongqi, W. Shaobin, M. A. Hua, and O. T. Moses, “Wet-chemical synthesis of InTaO4 for photocatalytic decomposition of organic contaminants in air and water with UV-vis light,” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 51, pp. 1563–1569, 2011.
  264. V. Gunasekar, B. Divya, K. Brinda, J. Vijakrishnan, V. Ponnusami, and K. S. Rajan, “Enzyme mediated synthesis of Ag-TiO2 photocatalyst for visible light degradation of reactive dye from aqueous solution,” Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology, vol. 68, pp. 60–66, 2013.
  265. X. Liu, J. Xing, J. Qiu, and X. Sun, “Preparation and characterization of visible light-driven praseodymium-doped mesoporous titania coated magnetite photocatalyst,” Indian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 52, pp. 1257–1262, 2013.
  266. Y. Y. Wang, H. Xie, W. Zhang, Y. B. Tang, and F. Y. Chen, “Preparation and photocatalytic activity of Fe-Ce-N tri-doped TiO2 photocatalyst,” Advanced Materials Research, vol. 750, pp. 1276–1282, 2013.
  267. L. Liu, H. Bai, J. Liu, and D. D. Sun, “Multifuntional graphene oxide-TiO2-Ag nanocomposites for high performance water disinfection and decontamination under solar irradiation,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 261, pp. 214–223, 2013.
  268. C. T. Nam, W.-D. Yang, and L. M. Duc, “Study on photocatalysis of TiO2 nanotubes prepared by methanol-thermal synthesis at low temperature,” Bulletin of Materials Science, vol. 36, pp. 779–778, 2013.
  269. X. Lin, D. Fu, L. Hao, and Z. Ding, “Synthesis and enchanced visible-light responsive of C, N, S-tridoped TiO2 hollow spheres,” Journal of Environmental Sciences, vol. 25, pp. 2150–2156, 2013.
  270. L.-X. Zhu, Z.-H. Zhao, X.-Y. Yue, and J.-M. Fan, “One-pot hydrothermal synthesis of Ag@Ag2S modified porous TiO2 and its photocatalytic and antimicrobial properties,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis, vol. 27, pp. 467–473, 2013.
  271. C. Namasivayam, R. Jeyakumar, and R. T. Yamuna, “Dye removal from wastewater by adsorption on “waste” Fe(III)/Cr(III) hydroxide,” Waste Management, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 643–648, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  272. A. Jain, K. P. Raven, and R. H. Loeppert, “Arsenite and arsenate adsorption on ferrihydrite: surface charge reduction and net OH-release stoichiometry,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 1179–1184, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  273. A. Gürses, M. Yalçin, and C. Doğar, “Electrocoagulation of some reactive dyes: a statistical investigation of some electrochemical variables,” Waste Management, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 491–499, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  274. H. Lachheb, E. Puzenat, A. Houas et al., “Photocatalytic degradation of various types of dyes (Alizarin S, Crocein Orange G, Methyl Red, Congo Red, Methylene Blue) in water by UV-irradiated titania,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 75–90, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  275. C. Guillard, H. Lachheb, A. Houas, M. Ksibi, E. Elaloui, and J.-M. Herrmann, “Influence of chemical structure of dyes, of pH and of inorganic salts on their photocatalytic degradation by TiO2 comparison of the efficiency of powder and supported TiO2,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A, vol. 158, no. 1, pp. 27–36, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  276. F. Han, V. S. R. Kambala, M. Srinivasan, D. Rajarathnam, and R. Naidu, “Tailored titanium dioxide photocatalysts for the degradation of organic dyes in wastewater treatment: a review,” Applied Catalysis A, vol. 359, no. 1-2, pp. 25–40, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  277. C.-Y. Kuo, “Prevenient dye-degradation mechanisms using UV/TiO2/carbon nanotubes process,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 163, no. 1, pp. 239–244, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  278. M. Alvaro, E. Carbonell, and H. Garcia, “Photocatalytic degradation of sulphur-containing aromatic compounds in the presence of zeolite-bound 2,4,6-triphenylpyrylium and 2,4,6-triphenylthiapyrylium,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 195–202, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  279. M. Alvaro, E. Carbonell, H. Garcia, C. Lamaza, and M. Narayana Pillai, “Ship-in-a-bottle synthesis of 2,4,6-triphenylthiapyrylium cations encapsulated in zeolites Y and beta: a novel robust photocatalyst,” Photochemical and Photobiological Sciences, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 189–193, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  280. H.-Y. Xu, W.-C. Liu, J. Shi, H. Zhao, and S.-Y. Qi, “Photocatalytic discoloration of Methyl Orange by anatase/schorl composite: optimization using response surface method,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 1582–1591, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  281. J. Cao, C. Zhou, H. Lin, B. Xu, and S. Chen, “Direct hydroysis preparation of plate-like BiOI and their visible light photocatalytic activity for contaminant removal,” Materials Letters, vol. 109, pp. 74–77, 2013.
  282. S. Sharma, R. Ameta, R. K. Malkani, and S. C. Ameta, “Use of semi-conducting bismuth sulfide as a photocatalyst for degradation of Rose Bengal,” Macedonian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 229–234, 2011. View at Scopus
  283. Q. Yan, J. Wang, X. Han, and Z. Liu, “Soft-chemical method for fabrication of SnO-TiO2 nanocomposites with enchanced photocatalytic activity,” Journal of Materials Research, vol. 28, pp. 1862–1869, 2013.
  284. J. Liu, Q. Yang, W. Yang, M. Li, and Y. Song, “Aquatic plant inspired hierarchical artificial leaves for highly efficient photocatalysis,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 26, pp. 7760–7766, 2013.
  285. A. Y. Stepanov, L. V. Sotnikova, A. A. Vladimirov, D. V. Dyagilev, and T. A. Larichev, “The synthesis and investigation of crystallographic and adsorption properties of TiO2 powders,” Advanced Materials Research, vol. 704, pp. 92–97, 2013.
  286. S. Moradi, P. Aberoomand-Azar, S. Raeis-Farshid, S. Abedini-Khorrami, and M. H. Givianrad, “Synthesis and characterzation of Al-TiO2/ZnO and Fe-TiO2/ZnO photocatalyst and their photocatalytic behaviour,” Asian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 25, pp. 6635–6638, 2013.
  287. W.-J. Yoo and S. Kobayashi, “Hydrophosphinylation of unactivated alkenes with secondary phosphine oxides under visible-light photocatalysis,” Green Chemistry, vol. 15, pp. 1844–1848, 2013.
  288. Y. Zhang, Y. Zhang, and J. Tan, “Novel magnetically separable AgCl/iron oxide composites with enchanced photocatalytic activity driven by visible light,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 574, pp. 383–390, 2013.
  289. H.-N. Cui, J.-Y. Wang, M.-Q. Hu et al., “Efficient photo-driven hydrogen evolution by binuclear nickle catalysts of different coordination in noble-metal-free systems,” Dalton Transactions, vol. 42, pp. 8684–8691, 2013.
  290. Q. Zhang, C. Tian, A. Wu, Y. Hong, M. Li, and H. Fu, “In situ oxidation of Ag/ZnO by bromine water to prepare ternary Ag-AgBr/ZnO sunlight-derived photocatalyst,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 563, pp. 269–273, 2013.
  291. L. Li, X. Liu, Y. Zhang et al., “Visible-light photochemical activity of heterostructured core-shell materials composed of selected ternary titanates and ferrites coated by TiO2,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 5, pp. 5064–5071, 2013.
  292. P. Jiang, D. Ren, D. He, W. Fu, J. Wang, and M. Gu, “An easily sedimentable and effective TiO2 photocatalyst for removal of dyes in water,” Separation & Purification Technology, vol. 122, pp. 128–132, 2014.
  293. P. Guo, L. T. Meng, and C. H. Wang, “Core-shell WO3/TiO2 nanorod heterostructures for solar light photocatalysis,” Advanced Materials Research, vol. 850, pp. 78–81, 2014.
  294. K. Ullah, S. Ye, L. Zhu, Z.-D. Meng, S. Sarkar, and W.-C. Oh, “Microwave assisted synthesis of a noble metal-graphene hybrid photocatalyst for high efficient decomposition of organic dyes under visible light,” Materials Science and Engineering B, vol. 180, pp. 20–26, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  295. R. Adhikari, G. Gyawali, S. H. Cho, R. Narro-Garcia, T. Sekino, and S. W. Lee, “Fe3+/Yb3+ co-doped bismuth molybdote nanosheets upconversion photocatalyst with enchanced photocatalytic activity,” Journal of Solid State Chemistry, vol. 209, pp. 74–81, 2014.
  296. J. Gamage McEvoy, W. Cui, and Z. Zhang, “Synthesis and characterization of Ag/AgCl-activated carbon composites for enchanced visible light photocatalysis,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 144, pp. 702–712, 2014.
  297. M. Shamshi Hassan, T. Amma, and M.-S. Khil, “Synthesis of high aspect ratio CdTiO3 nanofibers via electrospinning: characterization and photocatalytic activity,” Ceramics International, vol. 40, pp. 423–427, 2014.
  298. C. Karakaya, Y. Türker, and O. Dag, “Molten-salt-assisted self-assembly (MASA)-synthesis of mesoporous metal titanate-titania, metal sulfide-titania, and metal selenide-titania thin films,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 23, pp. 4002–4010, 2013.
  299. X. Cai, Y. Cai, Y. Liu et al., “Photocatalytic degradation properties of Ni(OH)2 nanosheets/ZnO nanorods composites for azo dyes under visible-light irradaiation,” Ceramics International, vol. 40, pp. 57–65, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  300. X. Zhang, W. Chen, Z. Lin, and J. Yao, “Preparation and photocatalysis performances of bacterial cellulose/TiO2 composite membranes doped by rare earth elements,” Chinese Journal of Materials Research, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 540–546, 2010. View at Scopus
  301. X. Zhang, W. Chen, Z. Lin, J. Yao, and S. Tan, “Preparation and photocatalysis properties of bacterial cellulose/TiO2 composite membrane doped with rare earth elements,” Synthesis and Reactivity in Inorganic, Metal-Organic and Nano-Metal Chemistry, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 997–1004, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  302. G. Manimegalai, S. Shantha Kumar, and C. Sharma, “Pesticide mineralization in water using silver nanoparticles,” International Journal of Chemical Sciences, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1463–1471, 2011. View at Scopus
  303. A. Yahia Cherif, O. Arous, M. Amara, S. Omeiri, H. Kerdjoudj, and M. Trari, “Synthesis of modified polymer inclusion membranes for photo-electrodeposition of cadmium using polarized electrodes,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 227, pp. 386–393, 2012.
  304. J. Taranto, D. Frochot, and P. Pichat, “Photocatalytic air purification: comparative efficacy and pressure drop of a TiO2-coated thin mesh and a honeycomb monolith at high air velocities using a 0.4 m3 close-loop reactor,” Separation & Purification Technology, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 187–193, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  305. A. R. Khataee and M. B. Kasiri, “Photocatalytic degradation of organic dyes in the presence of nanostructured titanium dioxide: influence of the chemical structure of dyes,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis A, vol. 328, no. 1-2, pp. 8–26, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus