Damage Assessment of Two-Way Bending RC Slabs Subjected to Blast Loadings

<table>Displacement time histories of RC slab center under different reinforcement types: (a) <svg height="11.375" id="M96" style="vertical-align:-0.20064pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 53.137501 11.375" width="53.137501" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,11.112)"><path d="M1004 650l-6 -29q-54 -6 -71 -19.5t-51 -74.5l-271 -539h-33l-98 506h-3l-258 -506h-30l-78 532q-10 67 -21.5 80t-66.5 21l6 29h241l-8 -29l-26 -5q-34 -6 -41 -16t-3 -47l59 -425h4l251 510h31l102 -510h2q150 299 198 423q14 40 8.5 48.5t-47.5 16.5l-28 5l7 29h231z
" id="x1D44A"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,22.042,11.112)"><path d="M535 323h-483v50h483v-50zM535 138h-483v50h483v-50z" id="x3D"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,36.746,11.112)"><path d="M285 378v-2q65 -13 102 -54.5t37 -97.5q0 -57 -30.5 -104.5t-74 -75t-85.5 -42t-72 -14.5q-31 0 -59.5 11t-40.5 23q-19 18 -16 36q1 16 23 33q13 10 24 0q58 -51 124 -51q55 0 88 40t33 112q0 64 -39 96.5t-88 32.5q-29 0 -64 -11l-6 29q77 25 118 57.5t41 84.5
q0 45 -26.5 69.5t-68.5 24.5q-67 0 -120 -79l-20 20l43 63q51 56 127 56h1q66 0 107 -37t41 -95q0 -42 -31 -71q-22 -23 -68 -54z" id="x33"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,44.905,11.112)"><path d="M241 635q53 0 94 -28.5t63.5 -76t33.5 -102.5t11 -116q0 -58 -11 -112.5t-34 -103.5t-63.5 -78.5t-94.5 -29.5t-95 28t-64.5 75t-34.5 102.5t-11 118.5q0 58 11.5 112.5t34.5 103t64.5 78t95.5 29.5zM238 602q-32 0 -55.5 -25t-35.5 -68t-17.5 -91t-5.5 -105
q0 -76 10 -138.5t37 -107.5t69 -45q32 0 55.5 25t35.5 68.5t17.5 91.5t5.5 105t-5.5 105.5t-18 92t-36 68t-56.5 24.5z" id="x30"></path></g>
</svg> kg and (b) <svg height="11.375" id="M97" style="vertical-align:-0.20064pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 53.137501 11.375" width="53.137501" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,11.112)"><path d="M1004 650l-6 -29q-54 -6 -71 -19.5t-51 -74.5l-271 -539h-33l-98 506h-3l-258 -506h-30l-78 532q-10 67 -21.5 80t-66.5 21l6 29h241l-8 -29l-26 -5q-34 -6 -41 -16t-3 -47l59 -425h4l251 510h31l102 -510h2q150 299 198 423q14 40 8.5 48.5t-47.5 16.5l-28 5l7 29h231z
" id="x1D44A"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,22.042,11.112)"><path d="M535 323h-483v50h483v-50zM535 138h-483v50h483v-50z" id="x3D"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,36.746,11.112)"><path d="M447 623l8 -12l-283 -613l-74 -10l-7 11q174 283 297 551h-216q-48 0 -62.5 -12t-33.5 -63h-29q10 60 18 148h382z" id="x37"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,44.905,11.112)"><path d="M153 550l-26 -186q79 31 111 31q90 0 141.5 -51t51.5 -119q0 -93 -89 -166q-85 -69 -173 -71q-32 0 -61.5 11.5t-41.5 23.5q-18 17 -17 34q2 16 22 33q14 9 26 -1q61 -50 124 -50q60 0 93 43.5t33 104.5q0 69 -41.5 110t-121.5 41q-53 0 -102 -20l38 305h286l6 -8
l-26 -65h-233z" id="x35"></path></g>
</svg> kg.</table>

The Scientific World Journal

fig15

Figure 15

Figure 15: Damage Assessment of Two-Way Bending RC Slabs Subjected to Blast Loadings 