Contactless Electric Igniter for Vehicle to Lower Exhaust Emission and Fuel Consumption

Table 1

Physical exhaust emission comparison between the installations of traditional igniter and proposed igniter.

The comparison of exhaust HC and CO for a 125 CC motor at 1500 rpm
Using traditional igniter		Using the proposed igniter		Comparison results
The 1st measurement of exhaust gas		The 1st measurement of exhaust gas		HC: 187−108187×100%=42.25% reduced; CO: 1.61−1.301.61×100%=19.25% reduced
HC (ppm)	181	HC (ppm)	151
CO (%)	1.69	CO (%)	1.52
The 2nd measurement of exhaust gas		The 2nd measurement of exhaust gas		HC: 181−151181×100%=16.57% reduced; CO: 1.69−1.521.69×100%=10.06% reduced
HC (ppm)	181	HC (ppm)	151
CO (%)	1.69	CO (%)	1.52
The 3rd measurement of exhaust gas		The 3rd measurement of exhaust gas		HC: 196−148196×100%=24.49% reduced; CO: 1.83−1.551.83×100%=15.30% reduced
HC (ppm)	196	HC (ppm)	148
CO (%)	1.83	CO (%)	1.55