About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 825370, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/825370
Research Article

Evaluation of In Vitro Antimalarial Activity of Different Extracts of Artemisia aucheri Boiss. and A. armeniaca Lam. and Fractions of the Most Potent Extracts

1Novel Drug Delivery Research Center, School of Pharmacy, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah 67346-67149, Iran
2Student Research Committee, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah 67346-67149, Iran
3Drug Applied Research Centre, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz 51656-65811, Iran
4Medical Philosophy and History Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz 371-51665, Iran

Received 7 August 2013; Accepted 24 October 2013; Published 14 January 2014

Academic Editors: Z. Liu and H. Verhoeven

Copyright © 2014 Mahdi Mojarrab et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Ten extracts with different polarity from two Iranian Artemisia species, A. armeniaca Lam. and A. aucheri Boiss, were screened for their antimalarial properties by in vitro  β-hematin formation assay. Dichloromethane (DCM) extracts of both plants showed significant antimalarial activities with IC50 values of 1.36 ± 0.01 and 1.83 ± 0.03 mg/mL and IC90 values of 2.12 ± 0.04 and 2.62 ± 0.09 mg/mL for A. armeniaca and A. aucheri, respectively. Bioactivity-guided fractionation of DCM extracts of both plants by vacuum liquid chromatography (VLC) over silica gel with solvent mixtures of increasing polarities afforded seven fractions. Two fractions from DCM extract of A. armeniaca and four fractions from DCM extract of A. aucheri showed potent antimalarial activity with reducing IC50 and IC90 values compared to extracts. The most potent fraction belonged to DCM extract of A. armeniaca with IC50 and IC90 values of 0.47 ± 0.006 and 0.71 ± 0.006 mg/mL, respectively.

1. Introduction

Malaria is one of the most common infectious diseases that are caused by parasites of the genus Plasmodium and kills more than one million individuals in the tropical and subtropical zones annually [1, 2]. This situation has been complicated by the appearance of drug-resistant parasites especially to the existing cheap drugs like chloroquine [3]; hence, there has been increasing attempts to identify other alternatives especially plant-derived antimalarial drugs. The genus Artemisia (Compositae) is one of the most popular herbs in traditional medicines and mostly used for the treatment of diseases like malaria, hepatitis, cancers, and inflammations [4]. It is a large genus with about 400 species, predominately distributed in the world (especially in Europe, North America, Asia, and South Africa) and 34 species are documented in the flora of Iran [5, 6]. There has been growing attention to this genus since the isolation of Artemisinin, obtained from A. annua, and its distinguished clinical effects as a potent antimalarial drug [7]. Artemisinin with an endoperoxide sesquiterpene lactone structure is unlike those of any other known antimalarials (mefloquine, amodiaquine, and chloroquine) that kills all stages of the parasite by a reductive interaction with free heme, resulting in generation of some types of free radicals that could alkylate parasite proteins and damage membranes [8]. Artemisinin also acts by blocking free heme biocrystallization (like 4-aminoquinolines) and hemoglobin degradation [9]. In the last few years, artemisinin and its derivatives were the top of the list of antimalarial drugs against drug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum strains, but recently, the emergence of artemisinin-resistant parasites in some regions [10, 11] has led researchers to search for new sources of alternative therapies. In our previous study, dichloromethane extracts of Artemisia scoparia and A. spicigera were shown to possess antimalarial activity in β-hemation formatin assay [12]. As a continuation of our research on Iranian Artemisia spp., we have now evaluated antimalarial effect of different extracts and fractions of Artemisia aucheri and A. armeniaca. In various studies, hypocholesterolemic and antiatherosclerotic effects of Artemisia aucheri in rabbits were confirmed [1316]. Likewise, different extracts of A. aucheri have been reported to possess wound healing [17], leishmanicidal [18, 19] and antifungal [20] effects. In the case of A. armeniaca, phytochemical evaluations on extracts and essential oil have been carried out and the presence of two new coumarin-hemiterpene ether glycosides [21], four prenylated coumarins, and some known flavonoids [22, 23] was reported. The main constituent of the oil extracted from the aerial parts of A. armeniaca was found to be α-pinene [24, 25]. The objectives of this study were to investigation of the antimalarial activity of different extracts of these Artemisia species (I), fractionation of the most potent extract (II), and determination of the most potent fractions (III).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

Hematin porcine, chloroquine diphosphate, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), sodium acetate, magnesium sulfate, sodium hydrogen phosphate, sodium chloride, potassium chloride, sodium hydroxide, glucose, and sodium bicarbonate were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Company, oleic acid from Fluka, dimethylsulfoxide, hydrochloric acid, and silica gel 60 (0.040–0.063 mm) from Merck, and all the solvents used for extraction and fractionation from Caledon and Scharlau.

2.2. Plant Material

The aerial parts of Artemisia armeniaca Lam. were collected from Arasbaran, East Azarbaijan province (Iran), in August 2008. The identity of the plant was confirmed by morphological examination in comparison to the herbarium specimens. Voucher number TBZfph 528 is retained in the School of Pharmacy, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. Aerial parts of Artemisia aucheri Boiss. were collected from Chahar Bagh region, Golestan province (Iran), in December 2011 and authenticated by Mr. S. A. Hosseini, Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center of Golestan Province, Gorgan, Iran. A voucher specimen (number 2383) is deposited in the herbarium.

2.3. Extract Preparation

The plant samples were air-dried at room temperature under shade, finely ground, and extracted by cold maceration method. 100 g of each plant sample was extracted successively with petroleum ether (PE), dichloromethane (DCM), ethyl acetate (EtOAC), ethanol, and ethanol-water (1 : 1 v/v) at room temperature (sequential maceration with ca. 3 × 1 L of each solvent). All the extracts were separately concentrated using a rotary evaporator at a maximum temperature of 45°C.

2.4. Fractionation

DCM extracts of plants (1.54 g of A. armeniaca and 1.56 g of A. aucheri) were fractionated by vacuum liquid chromatography (VLC) over silica gel (20 g for each) with solvent mixtures of increasing polarities: EtOAC/PE (10 : 90), EtOAC/PE (20 : 80), EtOAC/PE (40 : 60), EtOAC/PE (60 : 40), EtOAC/PE (80 : 20), EtOAC/PE (100 : 0), and methanol. All the fractions were fully dried using a rotary evaporator at a maximum temperature of 45°C.

2.5. TLC Analysis of Extracts and Fractions

The identification of main chemical groups was carried out by TLC on silica gel 60 F254 Merck (layer thickness 0.25 mm) as follows: for methoxylated flavonoids, chloroform/ethylacetate (60 : 4) and for methylated coumarins, toluene/ether (1 : 1/saturated with 1% acetic acid) were used as solvent system. They were detected under UV 366 nm.

2.6. In Vitro  β-Hematin Formation Assay

The potential antimalarial activity of plant extracts was evaluated by the method described by Afshar et al. [12] with some modifications. Briefly, varying concentrations (0–2 mg/mL in DMSO) of the extracts and fractions were incubated with 3 mM of hematin, 10 mM oleic acid, and 1 M HCl. The final volume was adjusted to 1 mL using sodium acetate buffer, pH 5. Chloroquine diphosphate was used as a positive control. The reaction mixtures were incubated overnight at 37°C with constant gentle shaking. After incubation, samples were centrifuged (14,000 rpm, 10 min, at 21°C) and the hemozoin pellet was repeatedly washed with incubation (15 min at 37°C with regular shaking) in 2.5% (w/v) SDS in phosphate buffered saline followed by a final wash in 0.1 M sodium bicarbonate until the supernatant was clear (usually 3–8 washes). After the final wash, the supernatant was removed and the pellets were dissolved in 1 mL of 0.1 M NaOH before determining the hemozoin content by measuring the absorbance at 400 nm (Beckman DU640 spectrophotometer). The results were recorded as %inhibition (I%) of heme crystallization compared to negative control (DMSO) using the following equation: , where AN: absorbance of negative control and AS is absorbance of test samples.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were conducted in triplicate measurements and presented as the Mean ± SD. Data were analyzed by Excel 2010 Microsoft. The IC50 and IC90 values were calculated from nonlinear regression analysis.

3. Results

The results from the in vitro  β-hematin formation assay of five different extracts from A. armeniaca and A. aucheri and seven fractions of their respective DCM extracts as well as the extraction and fractionation yields are listed in Table 1. The inhibition of β-hematin formation expressed as percentage (I%) and standard deviations ( ) are given for each extract/fraction. IC50 and IC90 values were measured graphically by plotting concentrations versus percentage of inhibition. Three extracts (EtOAC, ethanol, and hydroethanol) of both plants had no anti-malarial activity at all while the DCM extracts of A. armeniaca and A. aucheri compared to the standard anti-malarial compound, chloroquine (IC50 = 0.04 ± 0.002, IC90 = 0.35 ± 0.006), showed the most potent anti-malarial activity with IC50 values of 1.36 ± 0.01 and 1.83 ± 0.03 mg/mL and IC90 values of 2.12 ± 0.04, 2.62 ± 0.09 mg/mL, respectively. PE extracts possessed a weak activity with IC50 values of 3.51 ± 0.11 and 4.79 ± 0.92 mg/mL and IC90 values of 7.96 ± 0.17, 10.25 ± 2.91 mg/mL for A. armeniaca and A. aucheri, respectively. Among the seven different polarity fractions obtained from the DCM extract of A. armeniaca, 80% EtOAC/PE and 100% EtOAC fractions showed considerable anti-malarial activity with IC50 values of 0.47 ± 0.006 and 0.94 ± 0.006 mg/mL and IC90 values of 0.71 ± 0.006, 1.26 ± 0.02 mg/mL, respectively. In the case of fractions separated from DCM extract of A. aucheri four polar fractions (60% EtOAC/PE, 80% EtOAC/PE, 100% EtOAC, and 100% MeOH fractions) showed remarkable anti-malarial effects with close IC50 and IC90 values (Table 1 and Figure 1).

tab1
Table 1: The 50% and 90% inhibition concentrations (mg/mL) of different extracts and fractions of A. armeniaca and A. aucheri in -hematin formation assay.
825370.fig.001
Figure 1: Comparison of IC50 and IC90 values (mg/mL) of active extracts and fractions of A. armeniaca and A. aucheri and chloroquine solution in β-hematin formation assay. The values were reported as Mean ± SD.

4. Discussion

The malaria parasite, Plasmodium, degrades hemoglobin within the infected erythrocytes to use the catabolic products as the chief source of nutrition for its development and proliferation [26, 27]. Free heme is released as a toxic by-product of this process which could affect cellular metabolism by peroxidizing membranes and inhibiting a variety of enzymes [28]. To protect itself, the malaria parasite uses several detoxification pathways to get rid of excess heme. Polymerization of heme into an insoluble, nontoxic crystalline compound, hemozoin (also called malaria pigment) is believed to be the prominent way of detoxification [29]. Thus, the inhibition of hemozoin formation is an attractive target for development of several antimalarial drugs such as 4-aminoquinolines (quinine, mefloquine, and chloroquine) and is therefore considered as a suitable target for drug screening programs [30]. Many in vitro assays based on spectral characteristics and differential solubility of monomeric heme and β-hematin (synthetic analogue of hemozoin) have been described and used for screening of novel synthetical [31, 32] and natural [33] antimalarial compounds. In this study, 10 extracts and 14 fractions of A. armeniaca and A. aucheri were evaluated for their antimalarial activity by an in vitro  β-hematin formation assay developed by Afshar et al. [12]. As shown from the results presented in Table 1 and Figure 1, among the different polarity extracts of A. armeniaca, DCM extract showed the most potent activity (IC50 = 1.36 ± 0.01 and IC90 = 2.12 ± 0.04 mg/mL) and indicated that compounds with strongest antimalarial activity have medium polarity. Subsequent bioactivity-guided fractionation of DCM extract by VLC over silica gel with solvent mixtures of increasing polarities afforded seven fractions. The activity of 80% EtOAC/PE and 100% EtOAC fractions was observed to be significantly higher than that of DCM extract and 80% EtOAC/PE fraction was determined the most active fraction. The inhibitory activity of these two fractions was comparable with that of standard drug chloroquine (IC50 = 0.04 ± 0.002 and IC90 = 0.35 ± 0.006 mg/mL) while the remaining fractions were considered inactive. TLC analysis of the DCM extract and its fractions indicated the presence of terpenes, fatty acids, methylated coumarins, and methoxylated flavonoids as major constituents. Previous investigations showed that methoxylated flavonoids [34], terpens, steroids [35], saponins [36], and methylated coumarins [37] exhibited antiplasmodial activity in different antimalarial assays. In 80% EtOAC/PE and 100% EtOAC fractions, methoxylated flavonoids and methylated coumarins were identified by TLC analysis and could be considered as the major active constituents. Therefore, it seems that the potent antimalarial activity of A. armeniaca DCM extract and its active fractions might be related to the presence of these compounds. As observed in Table 1, similar findings were illustrated in case of A. aucheri extracts and fractions. DCM extract was found to be more potent (IC50 = 1.83 ± 0.03, IC90= 2.62 ± 0.09 mg/mL) than the corresponding PE extract (IC50 = 4.79 ± 0.92, IC90 = 10.25 ± 2.91 mg/mL) while the other three polar extracts were inactive. The DCM extract was selected for further investigation because of its potent activity and subjected to fractionation by the above-mentioned procedure. Among the seven different polarity fractions, 10% EtOAC/PE, 20% EtOAC/PE, and 40% EtOAC/PE fractions revealed no activity in this assay system, while the last four polar fractions showed the potent activity with close IC50 and IC90 values (Table 1). Methoxylated flavonoids and methylated coumarins were identified by TLC analysis from 60% EtOAC/PE, 80% EtOAC/PE, 100% EtOAC, and 100% MeOH fractions. Furthermore, in previous phytochemical study, two endoperoxide derivatives were isolated from the aerial parts of A. aucheri [38] that structurally similar to artemisinin. Additionally, in recent study, the presence of amorpha-4,11-diene synthase, a key enzyme in artemisinin production, was demonstrated in A. aucheri [39]. Therefore, the possibility that the antimalarial activity displayed by DCM extract and its active fractions reported here would be due to the presence of these types of compounds could not be excluded. Overall, the results from this investigation showed that both DCM extracts of these Artemisia species act as inhibitors of heme crystallization pathway and A. armeniaca illustrated more potent activity than A. aucheri. A comparison of DCM fractions of two tested plants based on IC50 and IC90 values (Figure 1) revealed that 80% EtOAC/PE fraction of A. armeniaca were about 3-fold and 4-fold more potent than 80% EtOAC/PE fraction of A. aucheri, respectively. This difference might have been derived from the high concentration of antimalarial components in this fraction and removing as much the lipid-like compounds from it. As shown in Figures 2 and 3, at lower concentrations of the active extracts and fractions, the observed absorbance was higher than the negative control which might be due to the presence of other fatty acids and lipids causing synergistic effect with oleic acid in the assay. It was demonstrated that the IC50 and IC90 values could be reduced by completely removing the lipids and purifying the active antimalarial principles.

825370.fig.002
Figure 2: Comparison of % inhibition of heme crystallization between active extracts and fractions of A. armeniaca and chloroquine solution in β-hematin formation assay. The values were reported as Mean ± SD.
825370.fig.003
Figure 3: Comparison of %inhibition of heme crystallization between active extracts and fractions of A. aucheri and chloroquine solution in β-hematin formation assay. The values were reported as Mean ± SD.

5. Conclusion

From the selection of 10 extracts with different polarity, results showed that the DCM extract of A. armeniaca was the most active extract in β-hematin formation assay followed by the DCM extract of A. aucheri. This preliminary study and its data persuade us to focus on purifying the active components of these extracts and investigating further on animal models for in vivo evaluation.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgment

This work was performed in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Pharm. D. of Ali Shiravand, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.

References

  1. A. R. Bilia, D. Lazari, L. Messori, V. Taglioli, C. Temperini, and F. F. Vincieri, “Simple and rapid physico-chemical methods to examine action of antimalarial drugs with hemin: its application to Artemisia annua constituents,” Life Sciences, vol. 70, no. 7, pp. 769–778, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. Rathore, D. Jani, R. Nagarkatti, and S. Kumar, “Heme detoxification and antimalarial drugs—known mechanisms and future prospects,” Drug Discovery Today, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 153–158, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. Ishih, C. Ikeya, M. Yanoh, H. Takezoe, T. Miyase, and M. Terada, “A potent antimalarial activity of Hydrangea macrophylla var. Otaksa leaf extract against Plasmodium yoelii 17XL in mice,” Parasitology International, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 33–39, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. K. D. Yoon, Y.-W. Chin, M. H. Yang, and J. Kim, “Separation of anti-ulcer flavonoids from Artemisia extracts by high-speed countercurrent chromatography,” Food Chemistry, vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 679–683, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. A. Mahmoud and A. A. Ahmed, “α-Pinene-type monoterpenes and other constituents from Artemisia suksdorfii,” Phytochemistry, vol. 67, no. 19, pp. 2103–2109, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. V. Mozaffarian, A Dictionary of Iranian Plant Names, Farhang Moaser, Tehran, Iran, 2007.
  7. L. Ferchichi, J. Merza, A. Landreau et al., “Occurrence of isocoumarinic and phenolic derivatives in Artemisia campestris L. subsp. campestris,” Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 829–832, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. de Ridder, F. van der Kooy, and R. Verpoorte, “Artemisia annua as a self-reliant treatment for malaria in developing countries,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 302–314, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. K. Borstnik, I. H. Paik, T. A. Shapiro, and G. H. Posner, “Antimalarial chemotherapeutic peroxides: artemisinin, yingzhaosu A and related compounds,” International Journal for Parasitology, vol. 32, no. 13, pp. 1661–1667, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. M. Dondorp, F. Nosten, P. Yi et al., “Artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 361, no. 5, pp. 455–467, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. F. Astelbauer, M. Gruber, B. Brem et al., “Activity of selected phytochemicals against Plasmodium falciparum,” Acta Tropica, vol. 123, no. 2, pp. 96–100, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. F. H. Afshar, A. Delazar, O. Janneh et al., “Evaluation of antimalarial, free-radicalscavenging and insecticidal activities of Artemisia scoparia and A. spicigera, Asteraceae,” Brazilian Journal of Pharmacognosy, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 986–990, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. N. Jafari Dinani, S. Asgary, H. Madani, G. H. Naderi, and P. Mahzoni, “Hypocholesterolemic and antiatherosclerotic effect of Artemisia aucheri in hypercholesterolemic rabbits,” Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 321–325, 2010. View at Scopus
  14. N. Jafari Dinani, S. Asgari, H. Madani, G. H. A. Naderi, and P. Mahzuni, “Effect of Artemisia aucheri on regression of atherosclerotic plaque in rabbits,” Journal of Medicinal Plants, vol. 8, no. 29, pp. 72–79, 2009. View at Scopus
  15. S. Asgary, N. Jafari Dinani, H. Madani, and P. Mahzouni, “Ethanolic extract of Artemisia aucheri induces regression of aorta wall fatty streaks in hypercholesterolemic rabbits,” Pharmazie, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 394–397, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. D. N. Jafari, S. Asgary, H. Madani, P. Mahzoni, and G. Naderi, “Effect of Artemisia aucheri extract on atherogenic lipids and atherogenesis in hypercholesterolemic rabbits,” Journal of Medicinal Plants, vol. 6, no. 23, pp. 20–28, 2007. View at Scopus
  17. M. Allahtavakoli, F. A. B. Asad, M. Mahmoudi et al., “Effect of hydro-alcoholic extract of Artemisia aucheri on healing of skin wound in rat,” Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, vol. 20, no. 77, pp. 69–76, 2010. View at Scopus
  18. M. Sharif, A. Daryani, M. Rostami, H. Nahrevanian, and M. Azadbakht, “Evaluation of anti-leishmanial efficacy by in vivo administration of herbal extract artemisia auchery on leishmania major in Balb/c mice,” Pharmacologyonline, vol. 2, pp. 1136–1144, 2009. View at Scopus
  19. M. Sharif, H. Ziaei, M. Azadbakht, A. Daryani, A. Ebadattalab, and M. Rostami, “Effect of methanolic extracts of Artemisia aucheri and Camellia sinensis on Leishmania major (in vitro),” Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 365–369, 2006. View at Scopus
  20. G. Amin, A. Dehmoobed-Sharifabadi, M. H. Salehi Surmaghi et al., “Screening of Iranian plants for antifungal activity: part 1,” Daru, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 38–48, 2002. View at Scopus
  21. M. Mojarrab, A. Delazar, M. Hamburger, and O. Potterat, “New coumarin-hemiterpene ether glucosides and a structurally related phenylpropanoic acid derivative from Artemisia armeniaca,” Natural Product Communications, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 1619–1622, 2010. View at Scopus
  22. M. Mojarrab, A. Delazar, S. B. Moghadam et al., “Armenin and isoarmenin—two prenylated coumarins from the aerial parts of Artemisia armeniaca,” Chemistry and Biodiversity, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 2097–2103, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. K. S. Rybalko, O. A. Konovalova, V. I. Sheichenko, and P. I. Zakharov, “Armin—a new coumarin from Artemisia armeniaca,” Chemistry of Natural Compounds, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 262–265, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. Mojarrab, A. Delazar, S. Asnaashari, and F. H. Afshar, “Chemical composition and general toxicity of essential oils extracted from the aerial parts of Artemisia armeniaca Lam. and A. incana (L.) Druce growing in Iran,” Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 65–69, 2013.
  25. M. Kazemi, M. R. Zand, K. Roshanaei, M. Mehrzad, and A. Rustaiyan, “Composition of the volatile oils of Artemisia armenica lan. and Artemisia splendens willd. from Iran,” Journal of Essential Oil Research, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 126–128, 2010. View at Scopus
  26. T. J. Egan, “Haemozoin formation,” Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology, vol. 157, no. 2, pp. 127–136, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. N. T. Huy, D. T. Uyen, M. Sasai et al., “A simple and rapid colorimetric method to measure hemozoin crystal growth in vitro,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 354, no. 2, pp. 305–307, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. K. V. Sashidhara, S. P. Singh, S. V. Singh et al., “Isolation and identification of b-hematin inhibitors from Flacourtia indica as promising antiplasmodial agents,” European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 60, pp. 497–502, 2013.
  29. P. Sonnet and C. Mullié, “In vitro antimalarial activity of ICL670: a further proof of the correlation between inhibition of β-hematin formation and of peroxidative degradation of hemin,” Experimental Parasitology, vol. 128, no. 1, pp. 26–31, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. A. Alam, M. Goyal, M. S. Iqbal et al., “Novel antimalarial drug targets: hope for new antimalarial drugs,” Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 469–489, 2009.
  31. K. Tóth, N. I. Wenzel, N. Chavain et al., “Antimalarial versus cytotoxic properties of dual drugs derived from 4-aminoquinolines and mannich bases: interaction with DNA,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 3214–3226, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. B. L. Tekwani and L. A. Walker, “Targeting the hemozoin synthesis pathway for new antimalarial drug discovery: technologies for in vitro β-hematin formation assay,” Combinatorial Chemistry and High Throughput Screening, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 63–79, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. S. Vargas, K. Ndjoko Ioset, A.-E. Hay, J.-R. Ioset, S. Wittlin, and K. Hostettmann, “Screening medicinal plants for the detection of novel antimalarial products applying the inhibition of β-hematin formation,” Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 880–886, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. L. Tona, R. K. Cimanga, K. Mesia et al., “In vitro antiplasmodial activity of extracts and fractions from seven medicinal plants used in the Democratic Republic of Congo,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 27–32, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. C. Kraft, K. Jenett-Siems, K. Siems et al., “In vitro antiplasmodial evaluation of medicinal plants from Zimbabwe,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 123–128, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. F. Traore, R. Faure, E. Ollivier et al., “Structure and antiprotozoal activity of triterpenoid saponins from Glinus oppositifolius,” Planta Medica, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 368–371, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. F. W. Muregi, A. Ishih, T. Miyase et al., “Antimalarial activity of methanolic extracts from plants used in Kenyan ethnomedicine and their interactions with chloroquine (CQ) against a CQ-tolerant rodent parasite, in mice,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 111, no. 1, pp. 190–195, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. A. Rustaiyan, A. Bamonieri, M. Raffatrad, J. Jakupovic, and F. Bohlmann, “Eudesmane derivatives and highly oxygenated monoterpenes from Iranian Artemisia species,” Phytochemistry, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 2307–2310, 1987. View at Scopus
  39. R. Hosseini, N. Yazdani, and G. A. Garoosi, “The presence of amorpha-4, 11-diene synthase, a key enzyme in artemisinin production in ten Artemisia species,” DARU, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 332–337, 2011. View at Scopus