Research Article

Postural Stability Characteristics of Transtibial Amputees Wearing Different Prosthetic Foot Types When Standing on Various Support Surfaces

Table 2

The average and standard deviation of each prosthetic foot and control group during standing on different support surface configurations.

GroupsOSIAPSIMLSI
FoamFirmUnstableFoamFirmUnstableFoamFirmUnstable

SACH11.88 (1.55)1.71 (1.25)2.01 (1.29)0.95 (0.68)1.08 (1.02)1.24 (0.77)1.31 (1.29)1.09 (0.92)1.35 (1.19)
SA22.28 (1.82)1.9 (1.99)1.81 (1.07)1.26 (0.81)0.80 (0.68)1.09 (0.86)1.68 (1.74)1.58 (1.94)1.22 (0.77)
ESAR32.55 (1.84)1.86 (1.34)2.29 (2.52)1.48 (1.38)0.65 (0.34)1.12 (0.99)1.88 (1.39)1.59 (1.35)1.82 (2.30)
Able-bodied41.13 (0.92)1.1 (0.94)1.52 (0.66)1.02 (0.95)0.91 (0.79)1.11 (0.62)0.33 (0.16)0.49 (0.53)0.76 (0.42)

Sig. two tailed ( )1,3 1,4*
3,4*2,4*
3,4*

(1,4), (2,4), and (3,4) indicate significant difference between able-bodiedand prosthetic foot based on the independent samples -test.
(1,3) indicates significant difference between SACH and ESAR foot based on the post hoc analysis.