Karyotype Patterns of <i>Hypsolebias antenori</i> (Cyprinodontiformes: Rivulidae): An Endangered Killifish of the Semiarid Region of Brazil

Nascimento, Wallace Silva do; Bezerra, Juliana Galvão; Lima-Filho, Paulo Augusto; Yamamoto, Maria Emília; Chellappa, Sathyabama; Molina, Wagner Franco

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/862434

The Scientific World Journal

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 | Article ID 862434 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/862434

Karyotype Patterns of Hypsolebias antenori (Cyprinodontiformes: Rivulidae): An Endangered Killifish of the Semiarid Region of Brazil

Wallace Silva do Nascimento,¹Juliana Galvão Bezerra,²Paulo Augusto Lima-Filho,³Maria Emília Yamamoto,¹Sathyabama Chellappa,¹and Wagner Franco Molina²

Academic Editor: W. Oetting, I. V. Sharakhov

Received23 Nov 2013

Accepted31 Dec 2013

Published11 Feb 2014

Abstract

Annual fish which belong to the order Cyprinodontiformes constitute an excellent model for evolutionary studies. their short life cycle, distribution in ecologically dynamic environments, and low agility make them favorable for genetic analyses. The species Hypsolebias antenori (Rivulidae), encountered in seasonal pools located in the semiarid region of Northeastern Brazil, has been the object of surveys with a view to study its ecological and behavioral aspects. This study reports on the karyotype patterns of this species, which represents the first contribution to the cytogenetics of this genus. The karyotype of this species is composed of 2n = 48 chromosomes (6m + 4sm + 36st; NF = 96); the heterochromatic regions are located in centromeric or pericentromeric position and are more pronounced in the nucleolar organizer regions. Two sites Ag-NORs/CMA+/DAPI were identified in the short arms of pairs 2 (metacentric) and 21 (subtelocentric). Unlike the other species of this family which show an evolution modulated by events of centric fusions, H. antenori shows the maintenance of a basal diploid number and the large number of bibrachial elements indicates karyotypic diversification derived by pericentric inversions. Cytogenetic analyzes in this species will provide new taxonomic markers capable of being utilized in conservation issues and systematics.

1. Introduction

The family Rivulidae, pertaining to the order Cyprinodontiformes, is one of the largest families of freshwater fish of the Neotropical region. It is a diverse group of annual fish, most popularly known as “killifish,” which occur in seasonal freshwater pools of tropical and subtropical areas of South America. This group of fish exhibit short life cycles, thus limiting the process of sexual maturation and completion of reproductive cycle between specific seasons of a year. To survive under these extreme conditions, the fish eggs are deposited in the sediment of the pools, which go through diapause stages, during which the embryonic development becomes temporarily arrested. With the onset of the next rainy season, these eggs hatch out and a new generation is formed [1, 2]. The suborder Aplocheiloidei is represented by many species whose distribution extends over vast geographic areas covering the southeastern, central, and northeastern South America [3]. It has been suggested that, from an evolutionary point of view, that annualism in the suborder Aplocheiloidei originated and was later lost, however, it was subsequently regained [4]. Thus it demonstrates to be more plastic than it was thought previously [5].

The family Rivulidae is taxonomically composed of 30 genera and 350 valid species, with many more to be identified and described [3, 6, 7]. In the semiarid region of Brazil, they are found in the seasonal freshwater pools [2, 3]. Hypsolebias antenori [8] was first collected in 1945 from Ceará state in the Northeastern Brazil and was described in the genus Simpsonichthys [9].

A recent ecological study has included H. antenori in the group of endangered organisms. This species is currently under severe anthropogenic pressure, due to environmental degradation, urbanization, agricultural and ceramic production activities, and absence of conservation measures [2]. Though many species of the family Rivulidae in South America are not necessarily real evolutionary units, they demonstrate a clear pattern of morphometric and meristic differentiation [10].

Small populations are particularly subjected to constant anthropogenic changes of the environment [11]. Their biological characteristics, such as small populations, lentic habits, low vagility, and hence reduced gene flow, render them as excellent models for chromosome studies among fish.

Cytogenetic analyses in Neotropical freshwater fishes have been increasingly employed in the elucidation of taxonomic questions, phylogenetic identification of cryptic species, and delineation of populations [12, 13]. However, chromosome analysis in the Neotropical fish species of Rivulidae is scarce [14] and largely limited to species with more northerly distribution, including Colombia, Venezuela, and French Guyana [15–18], or to south of the continent covering areas of southern Brazil and Uruguay [19, 20]. Besides the deficiency of sampled species analyzed, much of the chromosome information available is mainly derived from classical cytogenetic techniques, which limit the understanding of structural aspects of the chromosomes of the species. Cytogenetic data for H. antenori of the semiarid regions of Northeastern Brazil are unknown.

In order to contribute to a better understanding of chromosomal evolution of Neotropical Rivulidae, this work presents cytogenetic data for the first time for a representative of the genus Hypsolebias. The fish species H. antenori, was analyzed by Giemsa staining, C-banding, silver impregnation technique of argentophilic ribosomal sites (Ag-NORs), and AT and GC base-specific fluorochromes. The results help to establish cytotaxonomic markers, which are useful as subsidies for the recognition of several evolutionary units and the biological conservation of species.

2. Material and Methods

Cytogenetic analyses were performed on 16 specimens of males and females of H. antenori, captured from temporary pools, located in the municipality of Russas, Ceará (04°57′39.8′′ S and 37°54′26.2′′ W), Northeastern Brazil (Figure 1). Fish were captured utilizing small hand trawl nets (50 × 150 cm) and sieves (60 × 60 cm) of 2 mm mesh size. The fish captured were transported to the laboratory under intense aeration. The sex was identified by macroscopic and microscopic examination of the fresh gonads. The medial portion of the gonad was placed with two drops of distilled water on a slide, covered with cover slip and lightly pressed, and immediately analyzed by an optical microscope at 200x magnification. The taxonomical identification of the fish species was verified and confirmed [8].

Adult specimens were subjected to mitotic stimulation overnight, by intraperitoneal and intramuscular injection of antigens complex, according to the methodology proposed by Molina [21] and Molina et al. [22]. After this period, the specimens were anesthetized with clove oil (1 mL/15 L water) and sacrificed for removal of the anterior kidney. Chromosome preparations were obtained by cell cycle arrest in vitro, according to Gold et al. [23]. The heterochromatin and nucleolar organizer regions (NORs) were identified, respectively, by using the techniques of Sumner [24] and Howell and Black [25].

In addition to the conventional staining, the chromosome preparations were also stained with chromomycin (CMA₃) and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) fluorochromes [26] in order to identify regions rich in GC-or AT-, respectively. Briefly, slides were aged for three days and stained with CMA₃ (0.1 mg/mL) for 1 h and restained with DAPI (1 μg/mL), for 30 min. The slides were then mounted in glycerol : McIlvaine buffer pH 7.0 (1 : 1) and examined under epifluorescence light microscope (Olympus TM BX50), together with appropriate filters, coupled to an image capture digital system (Olympus DP73). Images of the same metaphase sequentially stained with fluorochromes CMA₃ and DAPI were superimposed using Adobe Photoshop CS5.

The diploid number was established by analysis of thirty metaphases for each individual. The best metaphases were photographed and used in the construction of the karyotype. The chromosome morphology was determined in accordance with chromosome arms ratio [27].

3. Results

Males and females of H. antenori presented 2n = 48 chromosomes, with a karyotype composed of 6 metacentrics, 4 submetacentrics, and 36 subtelocentrics (NF = 96, number of chromosome arms). The chromosomes show little difference in size between the larger and smaller pairs and there is no evidence of structural or numerical differentiation indicative of the existence of sex chromosomes for this species.

The distribution of heterochromatin in the chromosomes showed asymmetry. Thus, while few chromosome pairs (1, 2, 4, 20, 21) showed conspicuous heterochromatic blocks, in most of them, heterochromatin is reduced and is distributed preferentially in centromeric portions of chromosomes. In the pairs 2, 20, and 21 the short arms are entirely heterochromatic (Figure 2).

(a)

(b)

(c)

Analysis of double staining with CMA₃ and DAPI fluorochromes revealed GC-rich regions, coincident with Ag-NORs sites, located on the short arms of pairs 2, metacentric, and 21, subtelocentric (Figure 2, boxes).

4. Discussion

Morphological features based on analyses of osteological characters, scales, color patterns, behavior, ecology, and the surface characteristics of the chorion have been used as characters useful in the diagnosis of clades in Rivulidae [28–34]. Phylogenetic analyses of South American Rivulidae species, based on molecular data, have produced inconsistent hypotheses in many cases with those based on morphological aspects [9]. Sources of additional characters may provide important insights to elucidate evolutionary aspects and kinship relations in this family.

Cytogenetic data has been widely used as a tool for understanding relationships of differentiation in groups of Neotropical fishes [12, 13, 35, 36]. In this aspect, the annual fish H. antenori presents a karyotype with 2n conserved, in relation to considered basal karyotype for Cyprinodontiformes (2n = 48, NF = 48) [37]. However, the high number of chromosome arms (NF = 96), involving all chromosomes of the karyotype, suggests the occurrence of evolutionary genomic reorganization for this species.

In some genera of South American Cyprinodontiformes, like Austrolebias, the species may present from low karyotypic diversification, as suggested by the occurrence of karyotypes with 2n = 48 and large numbers of acrocentric elements, up to more diversified, with low chromosome numbers over that considered as basic to the order, or exhibiting large structural changes evidenced by a large variation in the number of chromosome arms between species [19, 38]. Unlike other Cyprinodontiformes, H. antenori showed no evidence of AT-rich regions in the karyotype, as hypothesized due to intense structural rearrangements occurring in chromosomes of some species [39]. This condition, associated with the occurrence of two GC-rich regions, coincident with nucleolar organizer regions, suggests lower participation of Robertsonian translocation events, frequent in several species [15, 19, 38–40]. The chromosomal variability in annual fish corresponds to the most extreme conditions observed among the various groups of fish. The killifishes of the genus Aphyosemion, appear to be one of the most remarkable examples known of variability and inter-and intraspecific chromosome diversification. In this genus, reduction in the chromosome number is not entirely restricted phylogenetically [41]. This condition supports the idea suggested for other groups of fish [42], the occurrence of orthoselection karyotype process [43], where the propensity to karyotypes with Robertsonian translocations has favored its appearance multiple times through independent events. On the other hand, superposition of the cytogenetic data with molecular phylogeny available for some species of Aphyosemion demonstrated support to the hypothesis of Scheel [41]. In fact, as pointed out by the hypothesis, basal karyotypes, in general, have a greater number of chromosomes and high number of acrocentric chromosomes, whereas more derived species show a reduction in the number of chromosomes resulting from Robertsonian translocation events [5, 44].

More recently, extreme evolutionary dynamics involving chromosomal rearrangements has also been identified in annual African fish species of the genus Chromaphyosemion, where substantial cytogenetic changes related to chromosome morphology, besides banding patterns and/or diploid number between analyzed populations, were observed [39]. The karyotypic diversification among populations and species of this genus is strongly modeled by mechanisms of Robertsonian translocation, as well as other complementary processes including heterochromatinization [40]. Völker et al. [39] suggest that fixation of high cytogenetics variability in species of Chromaphyosemion could be due to high rate of chromosomal mutations, as well as ecological characteristics and the reproductive system of this group. In H. antenori pericentric inversions modulate primarily the karyotypic diversification. In this family, the pericentric inversions, along with Robertsonian translocations, represent the main mechanisms that have been operating in the karyotype evolution [15, 19].

Despite the evolutionary dynamics that exist among the killifishes, H. antenori appears to have a karyotype with predominantly basal traits, highlighted by the diploid number and frequency of major ribosomal genes. Yet for all, the karyotype composed entirely of bibrachial chromosomes constitutes a derived condition, apparently originated by pericentric inversions and heterochromatinization processes in some pairs. This chromosome morphology, considered structurally divergent from the basal pattern, in which acrocentric chromosomes prevail, appear to have contributed towards the reduction of the karyotypic diversification, frequently found in other species of Rivulidae.

Phylogenetic relationships derived from molecular data for Rivulidae suggest greater proximity of some species of the genus Hypsolebias (previously Simpsonichthys), with Austrolebias [45]. From the phylogenetic perspective, a more pronounced degree of karyotypic similarity would be expected, between H. antenori and Austrolebias species. In fact, the cytogenetic data of the species, as basal diploid value with 48 chromosomes, heterochromatin distribution largely restricted to centromeric regions, and the presence of a pair of chromosomes bearing ribosomal sites, shared with several species of Austrolebias, seem to support a close phylogenetic relationship with the genus [19, 38].

Despite the predictable shortcomings of cytogenetic information for some genera of the New World, the karyotypic survey for the species pertaining to 12 genera of South America reveals some common chromosomal patterns among them [14]. Thus, diploid values with 2n = 48 are present in most species of Austrolebias and Kriptolebias. Modal diploid numbers with >48 chromosomes appear to be a rare condition and are only found in one species of the genus Aphyolebias (2n = 54). Other genera reveal few species with 2n = 48 and most with 2n < 48, or just 2n < 48 fixed within their species.

The exclusive presence of bibrachial chromosomes in H. antenori should have possibly contributed to preventing numerical karyotypic changes and a low detectable change involving Ag-NORs sites. In fact, numeric polymorphisms or position of the inter or intraindividual Ag-NOR sites was not identified in this population. This contrasts with the high level of polymorphism of these chromosomal regions found in some species of Aplocheiloidei [39].

Cytogenetic analysis on eight putative species of Austrolebias identified a range between 3 and 6 active Ag-NORs sites. The heterochromatic regions in these species have been identified in telomeric, centromeric, and interstitial positions [19]. The absence of extensive translocation mechanisms as in some species of Austrolebias can contribute to the last position being absent in the chromosomes of H. antenori and also interstitial NORs. The combination of cytogenetic characteristics of H. antenori and species of Austrolebias suggest about ancestral states of some characters in chromosomes of the species/family. The extensive occurrence of multiple NORs present in two or three chromosome pairs seems to indicate that this is a symplesiomorphic condition for the family.

The data presented for H. antenori represent the first known information for this species in South America. Although the ribosomal sites are not polymorphic in H. antenori, the data available for several species of Rivulidae [14, 19, 38] indicate polymorphic condition and diversified sites, which are potentially useful as cytotaxonomic markers of populations.

Evolutionarily, karyotypic variations can represent efficient postzygotic barriers in killifish. Experiments of cross breeding between populations and species showed partial or complete reproductive isolation between cytogenetically different populations and species [41]. Chromosomal rearrangements, such as pericentric inversions, can cause cladogenesis events in populations of highly polymorphic killifish. Pattern recognition of cytogenetically divergent South American killifishes has been used to propose models of conservation in threatened species Austrolebias [38]. Analyses in new populations of H. antenori, as well as in other species of the genus, could establish the level of karyotypic divergence, as well as contributing information for biological conservation of this peculiar group of fish.

5. Conclusion

Killifishes are considered as intriguing biological models, due to their adaptive and ontogenetic peculiarities. Several groups within the suborder Aplocheiloidei have shown surprising karyotype diversification due to allopatric factors and possibly intrinsic characteristics of the karyotype. Hypsolebias antenori, an endemic fish from the semiarid region of Northeastern Brazil, presents a mixture of karyotypic patterns considered basal and derivative. Considering the extensive karyotype diversity in the family Rivulidae, the peculiar karyotypic data identified for the species, which constitute the first cytogenetic records for the genus, may provide a useful tool in the interpopulational analysis of variation and karyotype evolution of this group.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development of the Ministry of Science and Technology of Brazil (CNPq/MCT) in the form of research grants and by the Postgraduate Federal Agency of the Ministry of Education and Culture of Brazil (CAPES/MEC).

References

J. P. Wourms, “Developmental biology of annual fishes. I. Stages in the normal development of Austrofundulus myersi Dahl,” The Journal of Experimental Zoology, vol. 182, no. 2, pp. 143–167, 1972.
View at: Google Scholar
W. S. Nascimento, M. E. Yamamoto, and S. Chellappa, “Proporção sexual e Relação peso-comprimento do peixe anual Hypsolebias antenori (Cyprinodontiformes: Rivulidae) de poças temporárias do Semiárido brasileiro,” Biota Amazônia, vol. 2, pp. 37–44, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
W. J. E. M. Costa, “Family Rivulidae (South American annual fishes),” in Check List of the Freshwater Fishes of South and Central America, R. E. Reis, S. O. Kullander, and C. J. Ferraris Jr., Eds., pp. 526–548, Edipucrs, Porto Alegre, Brazil, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
W. J. Murphy and G. E. Collier, “Phylogenetic relationships within the aplocheiloid fish genus Rivulus (Cyprinodontiformes, Rivulidae): implications for Caribbean and Central American biogeography,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 642–649, 1996.
View at: Google Scholar
W. J. Murphy and G. E. Collier, “Phylogenetic relationships of African killifishes in the genera Aphyosemion and Fundulopanchax inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences,” Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 351–360, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. J. E. M. Costa, “Comparative morphology, phylogenetic relationships, and historical biogeography of plesiolebiasine seasonal killifishes (Teleostei: Cyprinodontiformes: Rivulidae),” Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, vol. 162, no. 1, pp. 131–148, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Fricke and W. N. Eschmeyer, A Guide to Fish Collections in the Catalog of Fishes Database, 2012.
W. J. E. M. Costa, “Taxonomic revision of the seasonal South American killifish genus Simpsonichthys (Teleostei: Cyprinodontiformes: Aplocheiloidei: Rivulidae),” Zootaxa, no. 1669, pp. 1–134, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
W. J. E. M. Costa, Peixes anuais brasileiros: diversidade e conservação, UFPR, Curitiba, Brazil, 2002.
T. Hrbek, D. C. Taphorn, and J. E. Thomerson, “Molecular phylogeny of Austrofundulus Myers (Cyprinodontiformes: Rivulidae), with revision of the genus and the description of four new species,” Zootaxa, no. 825, pp. 1–39, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
A. A. Agostinho, S. M. Thomaz, and L. C. Gomes, “Conservação da biodiversidade em águas continentais do Brasil,” Megadiversidade, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 70–78, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
L. A. C. Bertollo, C. Oliveira, W. F. Molina et al., “Chromosome evolution in the erythrinid fish, Erythrinus erythrinus (Teleostei: Characiformes),” Heredity, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 228–233, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. B. Cioffi, W. F. Molina, R. F. Artoni, and L. A. C. Bertollo, “Chromosomes as tools for discovering biodiversity—the case of Erythrinidae fish family,” in Recent Trends in Cytogenetic Studies—Methodologies and Applications, P. Tirunilai, Ed., pp. 125–146, InTech, Rijeka, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Arai, Fish Karyotypes: A Check List, Springer, Tokyo, Japan, 2011.
J. J. Scheel, “Rivuline karyotypes and their evolution (Rivulinae, Cyprinodontidae, Pisces),” Zeitschrift für Zoologische Systematik und Evolutionsforschung, vol. 10, pp. 180–209, 1972.
View at: Google Scholar
P. K. Zoch, B. G. Hanks, and J. R. Gold, “The standard and NOR-stained karyotype of Rivulus agilae (Rivulidae: Teleostei),” Texas Journal of Science, vol. 41, pp. 104–106, 1989.
View at: Google Scholar
J. F. Elder Jr., B. J. Turner, J. E. Thomerson, and D. C. Taphorn, “Chromosomal divergence and heterogameity in two annual killifishes of the genus Pterolebias,” Genome, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 674–676, 1991.
View at: Google Scholar
J. F. Elder Jr., B. J. Turner, J. E. Thomerson, and D. C. Taphorn, “Karyotypes of nine Venezuelan annual killifishes (Cyprinodontidae), with comments on karyotype differentiation in annual killifishes,” Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 261–268, 1993.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Garcia, E. Scvortzoff, M. C. Máspoli, and R. Vaz-Ferreira, “Analysis of karyotypic evolution in natural populations of Cynolebias (Pisces: Cyprinodontiformes, Rivulidae) using banding techniques,” Cytologia, vol. 58, pp. 85–94, 1993.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Garcia, E. Scvortzoff, and A. Hernandez, “Karyotypic heterogeneity in South American annual killifishes of the genus Cynolebias (Pisces, Cyprinodontiformes, Rivulidae),” Cytologia, vol. 60, pp. 103–110, 1995.
View at: Google Scholar
W. F. Molina, “An alternative method of mitotic stimulation in fish cytogenetics,” Chromosome Science, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 149–152, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
W. F. Molina, D. E. Alves, W. C. Araújo, P. A. Martinez, M. F. Silva, and G. W. Costa, “Performance of human immunostimulating agents in the improvement of fish cytogenetic preparations,” Genetics and Molecular Research, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1807–1814, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
J. R. Gold, C. Lee, N. S. Shipley, and P. K. Powers, “Improved methods for working with fish chromosomes with a review of metaphase chromosome banding,” Journal of Fish Biology, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 563–575, 1990.
View at: Google Scholar
A. T. Sumner, “A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 304–306, 1972.
View at: Google Scholar
W. M. Howell and D. A. Black, “Controlled silver-staining of nucleolus organizer regions with a protective colloidal developer: a 1-step method,” Experientia, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 1014–1015, 1980.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Schweizer, “Simultaneous fluorescent staining of R bands and specific heterochromatic regions (DA-DAPI bands) in human chromosomes,” Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics, vol. 27, no. 2-3, pp. 190–193, 1980.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Levan, K. Fredga, and A. A. Sandberg, “Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes,” Hereditas, vol. 52, pp. 201–220, 1964.
View at: Google Scholar
W. J. E. M. Costa, “Análise filogenética da família Rivulidae (Cyprinodontiformes, Aplocheiloidei),” Revista Brasileira de Biologia, vol. 50, pp. 65–82, 1990.
View at: Google Scholar
W. J. E. M. Costa, “Phylogeny and classification of Rivulidae revisited: origin and evolution of annualism and miniaturization in rivulid fishes (Cyprinodontiformes: Aplocheiloidei),” Journal of Comparative Biology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 33–92, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
W. J. E. M. Costa, “Relationships and redescription of Fundulus brasiliensis (Cyprinodontiformes; Rivulidae), with description of a new genus and notes on the classification of the Aplocheiloidei,” Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters, vol. 15, pp. 105–120, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
W. J. E. M. Costa, “Taxonomy and phylogenetic relationships among species of the seasonal, internally inseminating, South American killifish genus Campellolebias (Teleostei: Cyprinodontiformes: Rivulidae), with the description of a new species,” Zootaxa, no. 1227, pp. 31–55, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
W. J. E. M. Costa, “Descriptive morphology and phylogenetic relationships among species of the Neotropical annual killifish genera Nematolebias and Simpsonichthys (Cyprinodontiformes: Aplocheiloidei: Rivulidae),” Neotropical Ichthyology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–26, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
D. F. Belote and W. J. E. M. Costa, “Reproductive behavior patterns in the Neotropical annual fish genus Simpsonichthys Carvalho, 1959 (Cyprinodontiformes, Rivulidae): description and phylogenetic implications,” Boletim do Museu Nacional, vol. 489, pp. 1–10, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Fava and M. Toledo-Piza, “Egg surface structure in the annual fishes Simpsonichthys (subgenera Ophthalmolebias and Xenurolebias) and Nematolebias (Teleostei: Cyprinodontiformes: Rivulidae): Variability and phylogenetic significance,” Journal of Fish Biology, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 889–907, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. A. C. Bertollo, G. G. Born, J. A. Dergam, A. S. Fenocchio, and O. Moreira-Filho, “A biodiversity approach in the neotropical Erythrinidae fish, Hoplias malabaricus. Karyotypic survey, geographic distribution of cytotypes and cytotaxonomic considerations,” Chromosome Research, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 603–613, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. A. C. Bertollo, “Chromosome evolution in the Neotropical Erythrinidae fish family: an overview,” in Fish Cytogenetics, E. Pisano, C. Ozouf-Costaz, F. Foresti, and B. G. Kapoor, Eds., pp. 195–211, Enfield, Conn, USA, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
A. W. Ebeling and T. R. Chen, “Heterogamety in teleostean fishes,” Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, vol. 99, pp. 131–136, 1970.
View at: Google Scholar
G. García, “Multiple simultaneous speciation in killifishes of the Cynolebias adloffi species complex (Cyprinodontiformes, Rivulidae) from phylogeography and chromosome data,” Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 75–87, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Völker, R. Sonnenberg, P. Ráb, and H. Kullmann, “Karyotype differentiation in Chromaphyosemion killifishes (Cyprinodontiformes, Nothobranchiidae). II: Cytogenetic and mitochondrial DNA analyses demonstrate karyotype differentiation and its evolutionary direction in C. riggenbachi,” Cytogenetic and Genome Research, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 70–83, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Völker, R. Sonnenberg, P. Ráb, and H. Kullmann, “Karyotype differentiation in Chromaphyosemion killifishes (Cyprinodontiformes, Nothobranchiidae). III: Extensive karyotypic variability associated with low mitochondrial haplotype differentiation in C. bivittatum,” Cytogenetic and Genome Research, vol. 116, no. 1-2, pp. 116–126, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. J. Scheel, Atlas of Killifishes of the Old World, TFH Publications, New Jersey, 1990.
W. F. Molina, “Chromosomal changes and stasis in marine fish groups,” in Fish Cytogenetics., E. Pisano, C. Ozouf-Costaz, F. Foresti, and B. G. Kapoor, Eds., pp. 69–110, Science Publishers, Enfield, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
M. J. D. White, Animal Cytology and Evolution, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 3rd edition, 1973.
W. J. Murphy, J. E. Thomerson, and G. E. Collier, “Phylogeny of the Neotropical Killifish Family Rivulidae (Cyprinodontiformes, Aplocheiloidei) Inferred from Mitochondrial DNA Sequences,” Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 289–301, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Hrbek and A. Larson, “The evolution of diapause in the killifish family Rivulidae (Atherinomorpha, Cyprinodontiformes): A molecular phylogenetic and biogeographic perspective,” Evolution, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 1200–1216, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2014 Wallace Silva do Nascimento et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1474

Downloads

1384

Citations