|
Reference | Classification | LC + DEA method | Case study | Key aspects |
|
[38] | Environmental | 3-step LCA + DEA | Electronic devices | Comparative ecoefficiency analysis Ecopoint LCA scores used as inputs in the DEA matrix |
|
[29] | Environmental | 5-step LCA + DEA | Mussel rafts | Direct link between operational and environmental efficiency Lower economic expenses and lower environmental impacts |
|
[26] | Environmental | 3-step LCA + DEA | Trawling vessels in Galicia (NW Spain) | Presentation of the 5-step LCA + DEA method Inclusion of discards as bad output in DEA model |
|
[31] | Environmental | 3-step LCA + DEA | Mussel rafts | Joint reduction targets computed for operational inputs and environmental impacts |
|
[32] | Environmental | 5-step LCA + DEA | Dairy farms in Galicia (NW Spain) | Benchmarking of environmental impacts Superefficiency calculation for best-performing farms |
|
[39] | Environmental | 3-step LCA + DEA | Electric and electronic products | Damage indicators provided by Ecoindicator 99 are included as inputs in the DEA matrix |
|
[40] | Environmental | 3-step LCA + DEA | Mahón cheese production (Balearic Islands, Spain) | Analysis of most ecoefficient production techniques Monte Carlo simulations to detect changes in the ecoefficiency ratio due to price fluctuations |
|
[36] | Environmental | 5 -step LCA + DEA | Galician fishing fleets divided by gear type and fishing zone | Intra- and interassessment of fishing fleets Operational inputs with low environmental contributions may still imply important economic savings if minimised |
|
[33] | Environmental | 5 -step LCA + DEA | Viticulture in the Rías Baixas appellation (Galicia, Spain) | 5-step LCA + DEA method including superefficiency analysis to identify best-performers Environmental impacts include USEtox and CML impact categories |
|
[41] | Environmental | 3-step LCA + DEA | Ecoefficiency of construction materials | DEA is used to rank material alternatives, while LCA is used to quantify the environmental impacts |
|
[42] | Environmental | 3-step LCA + DEA | Swiss dairy farms in the Alpine area | DEA matrix made up of environmental impacts as inputs exclusively Description of the relationship between economic and environmental performance |
|
[45] | Environmental | EIO-LCA + DEA | US manufacturing sector | Hierarchical EIO-LCA + DEA method Food, beverages, tobacco, and petroleum identified as drivers of overall environmental impact |
|
[34] | Environmental | 5-step LCA + DEA | Soybean farms in Iran | Identification of bad operational practices and recommendation of improvement actions |
|
[27] | Environmental | 5-step LCA + DEA | 25 wind farms located in southern Spain | Environmental benchmarks for end-of-life applications |
|
[30] | Environmental | 5-step LCA + DEA | Galician fishing fleets | Social indicators (e.g., working hours or crew size) included as inputs in LCA + DEA Discussion of the advantages and drawbacks of these inclusions |
|
[28] | Energy | Em + DEA | 25 wind farms located in southern Spain | Energy-based ecoefficiency methods Em + DEA viewed as an ecocentric perspective rather than an anthropogenic approach represented by CED and CExD |
Energy | CED + DEA |
Energy | CExD + DEA |
|
[37] | Environmental | 5-step LCA + DEA | Peruvian anchoveta fishing fleet segments | Fishing fleet segments as DMUs rather than individual vessels Clustering of LCI items as inputs in the DEA matrix |
|
[35] | Environmental | 5-step LCA + DEA | Rice paddy fields | Distinction between spring/summer rice paddy Superefficiency analysis to identify best-performing entities |
|