Research Article

Economic Development Perspective and City Leadership

Table 3

Mean economic development—public versus private-sector city leaders.
(a) Category Scores by City Socioeconomic Indicators

% BachelorsMedian Family IncomeUnemployment
25th P 75th P 25th P 75th P 25th P 75th P
≤4.96%≥11.05%≤$33,919≥$54,253≤2.5%≥4.8%

Traditionaldiff.a1.26−0.151.38−0.59−0.440.95
t-score3.13*−0.322.59***−1.24−0.772.43***
Quality of Lifediff.−0.890.33−1.080.67−0.44−0.06
t-score−1.5***0.57−1.72**1.28−0.5−0.12
Regional Impactdiff.−2.29−1.27−2.06−1.450.26−0.63
t-score−3.02*−1.59*−2.61***−1.74**0.27−0.99
Planningdiff.1.040.730.480.96−1.7331.12
t-score0.950.740.410.89−1.41*1.2

N445238514458

(b) Leader Attributes

Years in OfficeEducation Level
10th P 90th P 10th P 90th P
≤1≥15≤Some Coll.≥Masters

Traditionaldiff.1.060.580.45−0.02
t-score1.87**2.4***0.74−0.06
Quality of Lifediff.−0.260.60−0.220.22
t-score−0.360.79−0.340.43
Regional Impactdiff.−0.86−2.39−2.74−2.74
t-score−0.96−2.88***−2.79***−4.19***
Planningdiff.2.21.380.461.95
t-score1.62*0.990.452.04**

N39343485

aDifference = Public – Private.
*** 𝑃 < . 0 1 , ** 𝑃 < . 0 5 , * 𝑃 < . 1 0 .