About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
VLSI Design
Volume 10 (1999), Issue 1, Pages 57-70
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1999/42648

Placement with Incomplete Data

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston 60208, IL, USA

Received 7 September 1998; Accepted 20 November 1998

Copyright © 1999 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Traditional placement problems are studied under a fully specified cell library and a complete netlist. However, in the first, e.g., 2 years of a 2 – 3 year microprocessor design cycle, the detailed netlist is unavailable. For area and performance estimation, layout must nevertheless be done with incomplete information. Another source of incompleteness comes from logic synthesis changes; some instances and their parameters will change as the project evolves. In the re-configurable computing area, sometimes we need to perform quick placement before all information is available. The problem of placement with incomplete data (PID) can be abstracted as having to place a circuit when pc% of the cells and pn% of the nets are missing. The key challenge in PID is how to add missing cells and nets.

In this paper, two “patching-methods” for adding missing nets and cells are proposed. The methods are called abstraction and fusion.

Experimental results are very interesting. First, they show that PID is a difficult problem and an arbitrary (and perhaps intuitively sound) method may not produce highquality results. Experiments verify that the abstraction method is a very good predictor and that fusion is not. Specifically, when a circuit has 10% incompleteness, abstraction can predict the final total wirelength with an error of 5.8% while fusion has a 67.8% error in predicting the wirelength in the same circuit.