Table 10: Comparison between our approach and approach of [10]— and .

Case studyOur approachApproach of [10]
Difference (ns) Difference (ns)

1 5.0674 5.2532 0.1858 2.7083 8.9890 6.2807
2 10.620 9.8351 0.7849 3.1583 10.749 7.5907
3 5.0535 5.3356 0.2821 2.6573 8.8727 6.2154
4 5.0398 5.4025 0.3627 3.3978 11.1474 7.7496
5 8.6485 8.5699 0.0786 3.4920 11.863 8.371
6 5.2171 5.6551 0.438 1.4841 4.7308 3.2467
7 5.2649 5.6741 0.4092 1.7170 5.0863 3.3693