Table 11: Comparison between our approach and approach of [10]— and .

Case studyOur approachApproach of [10]
Difference (ns) Difference (ns)

1 2.6455 2.4367 0.2088 4.6379 1.3758 3.2621
2 4.9417 4.9256 0.0161 5.5482 1.5727 3.9755
3 2.8366 2.4292 0.4074 4.5841 1.3535 3.2306
4 2.5157 2.4210 0.0947 5.7678 1.6712 4.0966
5 4.7861 4.5264 0.2597 5.9667 1.7114 4.2553
6 2.5771 2.4957 0.0814 2.2657 0.7583 1.5074
7 2.8629 2.6367 0.2262 2.6839 0.8558 1.8281