Research Article
Framework for Simulation of Heterogeneous MpSoC for Design Space Exploration
Table 2
Comparison of task execution times, processor utilization, and throughput of EDF-SA and PDS scheduling algorithms.
| | ETIME (μs) | UTL | THR (B/ns) | Std. SA Cost |
| RAND-50 | | | | | EDF-SA | 204.26 | 0.46 | 0.03 | 0.16 | PDS | 220.03 | 0.55 | 0.03 | 0.19 | SPARSE-96 | | | | | EDF-SA | 616.51 | 0.44 | 0.02 | 0.15 | PDS | 637.89 | 0.49 | 0.02 | 0.17 | RAND-100 | | | | | EDF-SA | 418.67 | 0.47 | 0.03 | 0.17 | PDS | 432.17 | 0.60 | 0.03 | 0.21 | RAND-300 | | | | | EDF-SA | 1299.45 | 0.49 | 0.03 | 0.17 | PDS | 1296.95 | 0.56 | 0.03 | 0.19 | FPPP-334 | | | | | EDF-SA | 2238.36 | 0.42 | 0.02 | 0.15 | PDS | 2337.36 | 0.47 | 0.02 | 0.16 | RAND-500 | | | | | EDF-SA | 1432.79 | 0.48 | 0.02 | 0.16 | PDS | 2125.33 | 0.66 | 0.03 | 0.23 | RAND-1000 | | | | | EDF-SA | 4163.73 | 0.52 | 0.03 | 0.18 | PDS | 4324.58 | 0.58 | 0.03 | 0.20 |
|
|