Determining Factors and Zootechnical Output of Biosecurity Practices in Fish Farms in the Wouri Division, Cameroon
Table 5
Distribution of the adoption rate in relation to the biosecurity components and administrative location of fish farms.
Biosecurity components
Location of the farms (subdivisions)
Overall (N = 33)
F
Douala I (n = 3)
Douala II (n = 3)
Douala III (n = 11)
Douala IV (n = 9)
Douala V (n = 7)
Isolation
66.67 ± 47.14 (0–100)
76.19 ± 37.09 (0–100)
54.54 ± 25.71 (18.18–100)
57.14 ± 36.53 (11.11–100)
65.30 ± 25.89 (28.57–100)
60.17 ± 25.68 (15.15–96.97)
0.41
0.800
Traffic control
55.56 ± 50.92 (0–100)
77.78 ± 38.49 (33.33–100)
51.51 ± 36.74 (9.09–72.72)
62.96 ± 32.08 (44.44–100)
33.33 ± 45.92 (0–85.71)
53.53 ± 34.86 (18.18–87.88)
0.46
0.762
Sanitation
16.67 ± 17.29 (0–33.33)
19.05 ± 17.12 (0–33.33)
35.05 ± 30.01 (0–81.81)
26.98 ± 31.34(0–77.78)
25.51 ± 29.21 (0–85.71)
29.84 ± 26.00 (0–72.73)
1.10
0.363
Overall
36.11 ± 39.22 (0–100)
43.05 ± 38.67 (0–100)
42.80 ± 29.79 (0–100)
40.28 ± 35.41 (0–100)
38.09 ± 34.14 (0–100)
40.40 ± 30.10 (0–96.97)
0.17
0.953
F
6.08
13.54
1.16
2.76
4.06
3.78
—
—
0.01
0.001
0.332
0.086
0.032
0.040
—
—
Mean ± standard deviation (minimum-maximum); n: number of audited fish farms in the subdivision; N: total number of audited farms in the Wouri division; : significant. Bold values are used to indicate the significant probability of the error i.e., when p is significant.
