Institut für Nachrichtentechnik, Universität Karlsruhe (TH), 76128 Karlsruhe, Germany
Networking and Network Management Research, Wireless Network Elements Research, Alcatel-Lucent Bell Labs, NJ 07733-3030, USA
Division of Physics, Electrical & Computer Engineering, Yokohama National University, Yokohama 240-8501, Japan
The vision behind software radio (SR) is to realize the communication specific
signal processing of a radio as far as possible on programmable hardware. An
ideal SR samples the received signal directly at the antenna, and its hardware
consists of a general purpose processor that is connected with
analog-to-digital and with digital-to-analog converters. A radio that uses an
analog radio frontend for signal conditioning and employs digital signal
processors as well as field programmable gate arrays is referred to as software
defined radios (SDRs). Cognitive radios (CRs) are self-learning, intelligent
SDRs that are able to monitor their environment and to adapt to actual conditions
like available base stations (standards) or channel properties. Most important CR
properties are, for example, self-location, spectrum awareness, transmission
power control, or radio signal analysis. By extending cognitive radio principles
to a network layer, a concept of cognitive networks arises. Cognitive networks
can adapt their topology and parameters in self-configurable and dynamic manner
according to the any sort of relevant changes.
With an increased demand for mobile communications and new wireless applications, the
efficient usage of the available spectrum resources gains importance. Due to
the currently practiced static assignment of spectrum to specific users by
regulatory bodies, the actual demand for transmission resources often exceeds
the available bandwidth. Promising approaches to overcome static spectrum
assignments are given by dynamic spectrum sharing systems. Important examples
of these technologies are overlay systems in which the spectral resources left
idle by the primary (licensed) users are offered to secondary users. Obviously,
the terminals in the secondary systems must be able to detect an emerging
primary user immediately as well as reliably. At this point, the strong connection
between cognitive radio and dynamic spectrum sharing systems becomes apparent.
With this relation in mind, the present special issue presents twelve papers
written by well-known experts from academia and industry.
The first (invited) paper “Achievable rates and scaling laws for cognitive radio
channels,” by N. Devroye et al. outlines recent information theoretic results
on the limits of possible primary and cognitive user communication in single
and multiple cognitive user scenarios. The authors first consider the
achievable rate and capacity regions of single user cognitive channels and then consider a different information theoretic
measure: the multiplexing gain. Furthermore, a cognitive network setting with a
single primary user and multiple cognitive users is studied and it is shown that,
with single-hop transmission, the sum capacity of the cognitive users scales linearly with the number of
users.
In the second paper “Maximising the system spectral efficiency in a decentralised
2-link wireless network,” S. Sinanovic et al. analyze the system spectral efficiency
of a 2-link wireless network. The authors analytically show that transmitting
with maximum power always maximizes the system spectral efficiency; either both
links transmit simultaneously, or only the link with the better channel
conditions transmits. The impact of the scheduling policy on the system
spectral efficiency is also studied. It is shown that in terms of spectral
efficiency per Watt, sequential transmission is always preferable to
simultaneous transmission for power-constrained wireless networks. Furthermore,
a scenario that reflects a situation with multiple links and one dominant interferer
is studied.
The third paper “Interference mitigation technique for coexistence of pulse based UWB
and OFDM,” by K. Ohno and T. Ikegami studies the effect of interference from
pulse-based ultra wideband (UWB) on orthogonal frequency division multiplexing
(OFDM) signals. To mitigate this interference, the authors propose to set the
pulse repetition interval of UWB the same or half the period of the OFDM symbol
excluding the guard interval. Furthermore, this interference mitigation
technique is expanded for direct sequence UWB (DS-UWB) systems by considering
how the symbol repetition interval in DS-UWB can be set to mitigate
interference on OFDM and to reduce the UWB peak power.
An overlay system in which narrowband AM signals interfere with a broadband
multicarrier system is considered in the fourth paper “Narrowband AM interference
cancellation for broadband multicarrier systems,” by D. Van Welden and H.
Steendam. The authors propose two AM signal estimators, that is, the sliding
window estimator and the successive interference cancellation algorithm, to
reduce the effect of the AM interference in an overlay multicarrier system. It
is shown that the proposed estimators are able to produce accurate estimates of
the frequencies, and track the time-varying amplitudes of the AM signals
significantly reducing interfering impact of AM signal on multicarrier system.
The fifth paper “Non-parametric interference suppression using cyclic Wiener
filtering: pulse shape design and performance evaluation,” by A. Benjebbour et
al. investigates a flexible spectrum sharing scenario where a wideband
single-carrier modulated signal is jammed by unknown narrowband interference (NBI).
The authors utilize a cyclic Wiener filter to exploit the cyclostationarity
property of the wideband signal for nonparametric suppression of NBI. To
improve the NBI suppression capability of cyclic Wiener filter, pulse shape
designs that outperform existing raised cosine pulse shaping schemes even for
the same amount of excess bandwidth are proposed.
P. Jallon proposes a DVB-T signal detection algorithm based on a cost function
that tests the cyclostationary property of the OFDM signals in the sixth paper “An
algorithm for detection of DVB-T signals based on their second order statistics.”
Furthermore, a theoretical analysis is used to evaluate the impact of the noise
and multipath channel on the proposed cost function. The author exploits the
obtained asymptotic results to propose a detection test based on the false
alarm probability.
In the seventh paper “Cyclostationarity-inducing transmission methods for recognition
among OFDM-based systems,” K. Maeda et al. present two
cyclostationarity-inducing transmission methods that enable the receiver to
distinguish among different systems that use a common OFDM-based air interface.
In the first method, a specific preamble is inserted in which only a selected
subset of subcarriers is used for transmission. In the second method, a few
subcarriers in the OFDM frame are dedicated to transmit specific signals
designed so that the whole frame exhibits cyclostationarity at certain cycle frequencies.
Challenges unique to the design of programmable wireless radio (PWR) unit of a dynamic spectrum
access capable CR are focused in the eight paper “Efficient design of OFDMA based
programmable wireless radios,” by S. F. Shah and A. H. Tewfik. The authors provide
complete design architecture of OFDMA-based PWR that includes RF/analog
frontend with data converters and digital baseband processor. Also, efficient
IFFT/FFT modules based on a modified Cooley-Tukey decomposition, data recovery
during filter transition bands, and a specific example of low-complexity PWR
based on the IEEE 802.22 draft standard are considered.
The ninth paper “Opportunistic scheduling for OFDM systems with fairness constraints,”
by Z. Zhang et al. deals with the opportunistic scheduling for downlink multiuser
OFDM systems. The authors derive optimal opportunistic scheduling policies
under three QoS/fairness constraints for multiuser OFDM systems: temporal
fairness, utilitarian fairness, and minimum-performance guarantees. To address
the implementation complexity of the optimal policies, a modified Hungarian
algorithm and a simple suboptimal algorithm are applied.
A. Motamedi and A. Bahai investigate the problem of optimal channel selection for
spectrum-agile low-powered wireless networks in unlicensed bands in the tenth
paper “Optimal channel selection for spectrum-agile low-power wireless packet
switched networks in unlicensed band.” In the paper, the channel selection
problem is formulated as a reinforcement learning problem and further reduced
to a multiarmed bandit problem enabling to derive the optimal selection rules. Such
problem formulation allows spectrum agile node to achieve the optimal tradeoff
between determination of interference patterns in each channel and use of
channel that is optimal so far. By using traffic measurement of an 802.11-based
network, as an example of a packet-switched network in the unlicensed band, the
authors show validity of the underlying assumptions on the interfering traffic model.
The eleventh paper “Resource distribution approaches in spectrum sharing systems,”
by T. Yamada et al. considers a centralized and a decentralized resource
allocation approach. The proposed centralized approach is based on hierarchical
spectrum trading model that associates each level of hierarchy with a trading
occurrence frequency and a set of nonoverlapping spatial areas, whereas trading
occurrence frequency and area size depend on the hierarchy level. The proposed
decentralized approach is based on a game-theoretical framework in which
operators act aversely to unequal payoffs. The authors also consider a hybrid
of centralized and decentralized approach that exploits the benefits of both.
In the twelfth paper “Examining the viability of broadband wireless access under alternative licensing
models in the TV broadcast bands,” T. Brown and D. C. Sicker focus on viability
of broadband wireless access (BWA) transmission in the licensed TV bands on a
secondary access basis. The authors develop a general BWA efficiency and
economic analysis tool and provide examples corresponding to different
demographic (urban, rural) and licensing regimes (unlicensed, nonexclusive
licensed, exclusive licensed). It is shown that significant differences in considered
regimes exist, for example, in rural areas an unlicensed model is the most
viable, whereas in the densest urban areas no model is economically viable.
Acknowledgments
The guest editors wish to express their gratitude to all the authors who submitted regular papers and to
all the reviewers who generously helped decision-making process and ensured the
high quality of this special issue. They are
also grateful to the authors of the invited paper: Natasha Devroye, Mai Vu, and
Vahid Tarokh. Furthermore, their thanks go to the previous Editor-in-Chief Phil
Regalia and the current Luc Vandendorpe who
provided them with both the opportunity and the support in realization of this
special issue. Finally, they acknowledge the precious support of the editorial
staff from Hindawi Publishing Corp.
Ivan Cosovic
Friedrich K. Jondral
Milind M. Buddhikot
Ryuji Kohno