Review Article

Meta-Analysis of Oral Implant Fracture Incidence and Related Determinants

Table 1

Details of the 69 included publications on dental implant fracture: study design (prospective study, retrospective study, case series, and case report), number of implants investigated, and number (incidence) of implant fractures observed.

Study Study design Number of implantsImplant fractures

Adell et al. 1981 [5]prospective 276869 (2.5%)
Adell et al. 1990 [6]prospective 4636334 (7.2%)
Anneroth et al. 1990 [7]case report11
Bahat 2000 [8]prospective 6604 (0.6%)
Balshi 1996 [9]retrospective 40458 (0.2%)
Bianchi et al. 1997 [10]case report11
Brägger et al. 2001 [11]prospective 1052 (1.9%)
Brånemark et al. 1977 [12]retrospective 161813 (0.8%)
Brocard et al. 2000 [13]prospective 10228 (0.8%)
Brunel et al. 2000 [14]case report11
Buser et al. 1997 [15]prospective 23593 (0.1%)
Conrad et al. 2008 [16]case series21
Corpe et al. 1999 [17]case series115
Covani et al. 2006 [18]case series99
Cranin et al. 1990 [19]case series2214
Eckert and Wollan 1998 [20]retrospective 117015 (1.3%)
Eckert et al. 2000 [21]retrospective 493728 (0.6%)
Gargallo-Albiol et al. 2008 [22]prospective 150021 (0.1%)
Gibney 2004 [23]case report11
Gunne et al. 1994 [24]prospective 5583 (0.5%)
Henry et al. 1995 [25]retrospective 831 (1.2%)
Iezzi et al. 2008 [26]case series21
Ivanoff et al. 1999 [27]retrospective 2991 (0.3%)
Ivanoff et al. 2000 [28]retrospective 20715 (7.2%)
Laine et al. 2005 [29]retrospective 301 (3.3%)
Lekholm et al. 1994 [30]prospective 5585 (0.9%)
Lekholm et al. 1999 [31]prospective 4618 (1.7%)
Lekholm et al. 2006 [32]retrospective 1124 (3.6%)
Levine et al. 1999 [33]retrospective 1743 (1.7%)
Malmqvist and Sennerby 1990 [34]prospective 472 (4.3%)
Mau et al. 2003 [35]case series66
Mericske-Stern et al. 1994 [36]prospective 661 (1.5%)
Mericske-Stern et al. 2001 [37]retrospective 1327 (5.3%)
Morgan et al. 1993 [38]case series55
Muroff 2003 [39]case report11
Naert et al. 1992 [40]prospective 5893 (0.5%)
Naert et al. 1992 [41]prospective 5095 (1.0%)
Naert et al. 2001 [42]retrospective 3395 (1.5%)
Noack et al. 1999 [43]retrospective 196414 (0.7%)
Örtorp and Jemt 2006 [44]retrospective 10286 (0.6%)
Piattelli et al. 1998 [45]case series44
Piattelli et al. 1998 [46]case report11
Piattelli et al. 1998 [47]case series74
Piattelli et al. 1998 [48]retrospective 23060 (26.1%)
Polizzi et al. 1999 [49]prospective 301 (3.3%)
Proussaefs et al. 2001 [50]case series31
Pylant et al. 1992 [51]retrospective 1021 (1.0%)
Quirynen et al. 1992 [52]retrospective 5095 (1.0%)
Rangert et al. 1995 [53]case series4141
Romanos and Nentwig 2000 [54]retrospective 581 (1.7%)
Romeo et al. 2004 [55]prospective 7593 (0.4%)
Rosenberg and Torosian 1998 [56]prospective 95818 (1.9%)
Saadoun and Le Gall 1996 [57]prospective 14997 (0.5%)
Scholander 1999 [58]retrospective 2591 (0.4%)
Sennerby et al. 1991 [59]case series71
Snauwaert et al. 2000 [60]prospective 497121 (0.4%)
Steflik et al. 1994 [61]case series502
Tagger Green et al. 2002 [62]case report11
Takeshita et al. 1996 [63]case series91
Tawil et al. 2006 [64]retrospective 2621 (0.4%)
Tolman and Laney 1992 [65]retrospective 17783 (0.2%)
Traini et al. 2006 [66]case report11
Uehara et al. 2004 [67]case series42
Vantaggiato et al. 2008 [68]case series 133
Velásquez-Plata et al. 2002 [69]case report 11
Virdee and Bishop 2007 [70]case report 11
Weber et al. 2000 [71]prospective 1123 (2.7%)
Weibrich et al. 2001 [72]prospective 5151 (0.2%)
Zinsli et al. 2004 [73]prospective 2982 (0.7%)

Total22 prospective
21 retrospective
16 case series
10 case reports
44394787