Advances in Astronomy

Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 487606, 4 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/487606

## Incorporation of ^{36}Cl into Calcium-Aluminum-Rich Inclusions in the Solar Wind Implantation Model

^{1}Department of Physics, Purdue University North Central, Westville, IN 46391, USA^{2}PRIMELab, Department of Physics, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA

Received 11 September 2013; Accepted 22 October 2013

Academic Editor: Alberto J. Castro-Tirado

Copyright © 2013 Glynn E. Bricker and Marc W. Caffee. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

We consider the short-lived radionuclide (SLR) ^{36}Cl in calcium-aluminum-rich inclusions (CAIs) found in primitive meteorites with the solar wind implantation model. In this model, SLRs are produced via nuclear reaction with solar energetic particles (SEPs) interacting with gaseous targets in the protosolar atmosphere in T-Tauri stars. These SLRs are captured by the solar wind and then implanted in CAI precursor materials, which have dropped from the funnel flow leading onto the protostar. This method of incorporating SLRs into solar system materials is currently active in our solar system and has been measured with SLRs from the solar wind being implanted on the lunar surface. T-Tauri stars are capable of SEP fluxes *~*10^{5} greater than contemporary SEP fluxes. Here we scale the production rate of ^{36}Cl to the ancient SEP activity. From the enhanced production rates and the refractory mass inflow rate at 0.06 AU from the protosun, we model the ancient ^{36}Cl content in CAIs. We find the initial isotopic ratio of ^{36}Cl/^{35}Cl to range from about 1 × 10^{−5} to 5 × 10^{−5} and the concentration of ^{36}Cl to range from about 3 × 10^{13} to 1.5 × 10^{14} atoms g^{−1}.

#### 1. Introduction

Studies report evidence for the incorporation of the short-lived radionuclide (SLR) (T_{1/2} = 0.3 Myr) ^{36}Cl into early solar system materials, including calcium-aluminum-rich inclusions (CAIs). Lin et al. [1] infer an initial ^{36}Cl/^{35}Cl ratio of ≥ in sodalite from the carbonaceous chondrite Ningqiang based on Al-Mg systematics. Also, relying upon Al-Mg systematics, Jacobsen et al. [2] report that initial ratio of ^{36}Cl/^{35}Cl in wadalite from Allende would have been > had the initial ^{26}Al/^{27}Al ratio been the canonical value of ~.

Clues to the source of the ^{36}Cl can be gleaned from this initial ratio. If the initial ^{36}Cl/^{35}Cl had been ~, the source of ^{36}Cl most likely would not have been from a nearby super nova or AGB star [3]. A remaining mechanism for the production of this radionuclide is local irradiation from solar energeticparticle (SEP) born in the protosolar atmosphere. The initial SLR ratios can be used to constrain early solar system evolution and conditions. This is especially true in terms of solar luminosity and flaring characterization.

Bricker and Caffee [4] proposed a solar wind implantation model for incorporation of ^{10}Be in CAI precursor materials. In this model, ^{10}Be and possibly other SLRs are produced by SEP reactions in the protosolar atmosphere of a more energetic T-Tauri sun, characterized by SEP fluxes many orders of magnitude greater than contemporary particle fluxes. Studies of the Orion Nebulae indicate that premain sequence (PMS) stars exhibit X-ray luminosity and hence SEP fluxes on the order of ~10^{5} over contemporary SEP flux levels [5]. The SLRs are produced through nuclear reactions with these SEPs, and the irradiation produced SLRs are then entrained in the solar wind and subsequently implanted into CAI precursor material. This production mechanism is operational in the contemporary solar system and is responsible for implantation of solar wind nuclei, including ^{10}Be [6] and ^{14}C [7], in lunar material. In this work, we consider ^{36}Cl found in CAIs in primitive carbonaceous meteorites in accordance with a solar wind implantation model. Table 1 characterizes ^{36}Cl found in CAIs.

#### 2. Solar Wind Implantation Model

##### 2.1. Overview

In the solar wind implantation model, SLRs are produced in the solar nebula ~4.6 Gyr ago by the bombardment of target material in the solar atmosphere by solar energetic particles. These SLRs escape the solar atmosphere entrained in the solar wind. Some fraction of these outward flowing SLRs are incorporated into inflowing material which has fallen from the main accretion flow from the protoplanetary accretion disk. In the region in which the inflowing material and outflowing solar wind intersect, SLRs may be incorporated into the precursor CAI material. The fluctuating -wind model of Shu et al. [9–11] provides the basic framework for incorporation of SLRs into CAI-precursor materials and the subsequent transportation of these implanted refractory materials to asteroidal distances. Figure 1 is a cartoon of the basic magnetic field geometry, main accretion flow, and SLRs, including ^{36}Cl outflow.

##### 2.2. Refractory Mass Inflow Rate

The refractory mass inflow rate, that is, the mass that falls from the funnel flow onto the star at the -region, is given by
where is disk mass accretion rate, is the cosmic mass fraction, and is the fraction of material that enters the -region [12]. For , we adopt solar masses year^{−1}. The mass accretion rates can vary from ~10^{−7} to ~10^{−10} solar masses year^{−1} for T-Tauri stars from 1 to 3 Myr [13]. Embedded class 0 and class I PMS stars can have accretion rates from ~10^{−5} to ~10^{−6} solar masses year^{−1} [14]. The value we adopt corresponds to class II or III PMS stars. Following Lee et al. [12], we adopt a cosmic mass fraction, , and fraction of refractory material fraction , of and 0.01, respectively. represents the fraction of material that is refractory and represents the fraction of mass that does not accrete onto the protosun. The choice 0.01 is a maximum for and corresponds to all the mass which comprises the planets falling from the accretion flow. If some of the rocky material accreting towards the proto-Sun never reached the edge of the accretion disk, would be smaller by a factor of 20 at most, but this scenario is unlikely. The choice of is the preferred value of Lee et al. [12] in their model. (See Lee et al. [12] for a detailed discussion of and .) From (1) and the values described above, we find the rate at which this refractory material is carried into the -region, called here the refractory mass inflow rate, , is g s^{−1}. On the extremes, could be two orders of magnitude greater if the PMS star was classes 0 or 1; could also be four orders of magnitude less if the mass accretion rate was to solar masses year^{−1} and .

##### 2.3. Ancient Effective Production Rate

The effective ancient ^{36}Cl outflow rate, in units of s^{−1}, is given by
where is the ancient production rate and is the fraction of the solar wind ^{36}Cl that was captured into the CAI-forming region; . (See Bricker and Caffee [4] for a discussion of factor .) We calculate the ^{36}Cl production rates assuming that solar energetic particles are characterized by a power law relationship:
where ranges from 2.5 to 4. For impulsive flares, that is, , we use ^{3}He/H = 0.1 and ^{3}He/H = 0.3, and for gradual flares, that is, , we use ^{3}He/H = 0. Contemporary SEP fluxes at 1 AU are ~100 protons cm^{−2}s^{−1} for MeV [15]. We assume an increase in ancient particle fluxes over the current particle flux of , yielding an energetic particle flux of protons cm^{−2}s^{−1} for MeV at the surface of the protosun.

The production rates for cosmogenic nuclides can be calculated via
where represents the target elements for the production of the considered nuclide, is the abundance of the target element (g g^{−1}), indicates the energetic particles that cause the reaction, is the cross-section for the production of the nuclide from the interaction of particle with energy from target for the considered reaction (cm^{2}), and is the differential energetic particle flux of particle at energy (cm^{−2} s^{−1}) [15]. We assume gaseous targets, Cl, K, S, and Ca, of solar composition [16].

The cross-sections we use are from Gounelle et al. [17], with the exception of (^{3}He,x)^{36}Cl, which is a new experimental cross-section from Herzog et al. [18]. The Gounelle et al. [17] cross-sections are a combination of experimental data, fragmentation, and Hauser-Feshbach codes. The uncertainty associated with model codes is at best a factor of two. We have used experimental cross-sections, whenever possible, in order to limit uncertainties associated with the calculations. The reactions we have considered here are the primary production pathways. This takes into account both abundance of target material and cross-sections. Any other reaction would add little to the overall ^{36}Cl production rate. Table 2 shows the cross-sections used in the calculations.

#### 3. Results

The concentration of ^{36}Cl found in refractory rock predicted by our model is given by
where is given atoms s^{−1} and is given in g s^{−1}.

From the value of given above from (1) and calculations of from (4), we calculate the concentration of ^{36}Cl in CAIs using (5) and find the associated isotopic ratio for different flare parameters given in Table 3, and we plot the predicted ^{36}Cl content for spallation production from energetic protons in Figure 2.

#### 4. Discussion

From the results above, the isotopic ratio predicted by the solar wind implantation model is from a factor of 4 to a factor of 10 below the inferred initial ^{36}Cl/^{35}Cl ratio of . Given the uncertainties in the parameters, that is, , , and , the model is viable for ^{36}Cl/^{35}Cl initial ratio of . Jacobsen et al. [2] report that, based on Al-Mg systematics, the initial ^{36}Cl/^{35}Cl ratio may have been >. The model calculations underproduce this value by several orders of magnitude for the flare parameters given here. It is not possible to produce an order of magnitude correct ^{36}Cl/^{35}Cl ratio of without overproducing ^{10}Be/^{9}Be, ^{41}Ca/^{40}Ca, and ^{53}Mn/^{55}Mn by several orders of magnitude.

Clearly, some other mechanism is needed to explain to provenance of ^{36}Cl at the levels described by Jacobsen et al. [2]. A possible scenario is that the irradiation of target material occurred in a volatile rich region away from the protosun. This region would contain much more target materials, that is, Cl, S, and K. Greater target material would lead to greater initial ^{36}Cl content in CAIs. This argument for the enhanced ^{36}Cl found in wadalite samples is also invoked by Jacobsen et al. [2].

Evidence suggests that the distribution of ^{26}Al was homogenous in the solar system, but this is not always the case [3]. Marhas and Goswami [19] found several CAIs that had the “canonical” ^{10}Be/^{9}Be ratio, but were devoid of ^{26}Al, demonstrating a decoupling of ^{26}Al from ^{10}Be. If ^{36}Cl is also decoupled from ^{26}Al, it is difficult to infer what the initial ^{36}Cl/^{35}Cl ratios were based solely on Al-Mg systems although Jacobsen et al. [2] do report a canonical initial ^{26}Al/^{27}Al ratio for primary minerals in their sample.

The irradiation origin of ^{26}Al found in CAIs is a matter of considerable debate. The proposed region where the enhanced ^{36}Cl production may have taken place could have already been seeded with ^{26}Al from some nonirradiation origin, that is, supernova. Conversely, the origin of ^{10}Be is likely from SEP irradiation close to the protosun [4, 17]. It would be beneficial to establish a correlation between ^{10}Be and ^{36}Cl to find if the irradiation that most likely produced ^{10}Be also produced ^{36}Cl. More studies are needed in this area to establish this relationship.

#### References

- Y. Lin, Y. Guan, L. A. Leshin, Z. Ouyang, and D. Wang, “Short-lived chlorine-36 in a Ca- and Al-rich inclusion from the Ningqiang carbonaceous chondrite,”
*Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America*, vol. 102, no. 5, pp. 1306–1311, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - B. Jacobsen, J. Matzel, I. D. Hutcheon et al., “Formation of the short-lived radionuclide
^{36}Cl in the protoplanetary disk during late-stage irradiation of a volatile-rich reservoir,”*Astrophysical Journal Letters*, vol. 731, no. 2, pp. L28–L34, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - G. J. Wasserburg, M. Busso, R. Gallino, and K. M. Nollett, “Short-lived nuclei in the early solar system: possible AGB sources,”
*Nuclear Physics A*, vol. 777, pp. 5–69, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - G. E. Bricker and M. W. Caffee, “Solar wind implantation model for
^{10}Be in calcium-aluminum inclusions,”*Astrophysical Journal*, vol. 725, no. 1, pp. 443–449, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar - E. D. Feigelson, G. P. Garmtextre, and S. H. Pravdo, “Magnetic flaring in the pre-main-sequence sun and implications for the early solar system,”
*Astrophysical Journal Letters*, vol. 572, no. 1, pp. 335–349, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - K. Nishiizumtext and M. W. Caffee, “Beryllium-10 from the sun,”
*Science*, vol. 294, no. 5541, pp. 352–354, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - A. J. T. Jull, D. Lal, L. R. McHargue, G. S. Burr, and D. J. Donahue, “Cosmogenic and implanted radionuclides studied by selective etching of lunar soils,”
*Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research B*, vol. 172, no. 1–4, pp. 867–872, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - I. Leya, A. N. Halliday, and R. Wieler, “The predictable collateral consequences of nucleosynthesis by spallation reactions in the early solar system,”
*Astrophysical Journal Letters*, vol. 594, no. 1, pp. 605–616, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - F. H. Shu, H. Shang, and T. Lee, “Toward an astrophysical theory of chondrites,”
*Science*, vol. 271, no. 5255, pp. 1545–1552, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - F. H. Shu, H. Shang, A. E. Glassgold, and T. Lee, “X-rays and fluctuating x-winds from protostars,”
*Science*, vol. 277, no. 5331, pp. 1475–1479, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - F. H. Shu, H. Shang, M. Gounelle, A. E. Glassgold, and T. Lee, “The origin of chondrules and refractory inclusions in chondritic meteorites,”
*Astrophysical Journal Letters*, vol. 548, no. 2, pp. 1029–1050, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - T. Lee, F. H. Shu, H. Shang, A. E. Glassgold, and K. E. Rehm, “Protostellar cosmtextc rays and extinct radioactivities in meteorites,”
*Astrophysical Journal Letters*, vol. 506, no. 2, pp. 898–912, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - N. Calvet, C. Briceño, J. Hernández et al., “Disk evolution in the orion OBI association,”
*Astronomtextcal Journal*, vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 935–946, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - D. Ward-Thompson, “The formation and evolution of low mass protostars,”
*Astrophysics & Space Science*, vol. 239, no. 1, pp. 151–170, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - R. C. Reedy and K. Marti, “Solar-cosmtextc-ray fluxes during the last 10 mtextllion years,” in
*The Sun in Time*, C. P. Sonnet, M. S. Giampapa, and M. S. Mathews, Eds., pp. 260–287, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Ariz, USA, 1991. View at Google Scholar - K. Lodders, “Solar system abundances and condensation temperatures of the elements,”
*Astrophysical Journal Letters*, vol. 591, no. 2, pp. 1220–1247, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - M. Gounelle, F. H. Shu, H. Shang, A. E. Glassgold, K. E. Rehm, and T. Lee, “The irradiation origin of beryllium radioisotopes and other short-lived radionuclides,”
*Astrophysical Journal Letters*, vol. 640, no. 2, pp. 1163–1170, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - G. F. Herzog, M. W. Caffee, T. Faestermann et al., “Cross sections from 5 to 35 MeV for the reactions ${}^{\mathrm{\text{n}}\mathrm{\text{a}}\mathrm{\text{t}}}\mathrm{\text{M}}\mathrm{\text{g}}$(
^{3}He,x)^{26}Al,^{27}Al(^{3}He,x)^{26}Al, ${}^{\mathrm{\text{n}}\mathrm{\text{a}}\mathrm{\text{t}}}\mathrm{\text{Ca}}$(^{3}He,x)^{41}Ca, and ${}^{\mathrm{\text{n}}\mathrm{\text{a}}\mathrm{\text{t}}}\mathrm{\text{C}}\mathrm{\text{a}}$(^{3}He,x)^{36}Cl: implications for early irradiation in the solar system,”*Meteoritics and Planetary Science*, vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 1427–1446, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - K. K. Marhas and J. N. Goswami, “Low energy particle production of short-lived nuclides in the early solar system,”
*New Astronomy Reviews*, vol. 48, no. 1–4, pp. 139–144, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus