Nonexistence Results for the Cauchy Problem for Nonlinear Ultraparabolic Equations
Sebti Kerbal1and Mokhtar Kirane2
Academic Editor: Toka Diagana
Received23 Mar 2011
Revised21 May 2011
Accepted14 Jun 2011
Published04 Aug 2011
Abstract
Nonexistence of global solutions to ultraparabolic equations and systems is presented.
Our results fill a gap in the literature on ultraparabolic equations. The
method of proof we use relies on a choice of a suitable test function in the weak
formulation of the solutions of the problems under-study.
1. Introduction
In this paper, we will present first nonexistence results for the two-time nonlinear equation
posed for , and subject to the initial conditions
Here are real numbers. Then we extend our results to systems of the form
for , subject to the initial conditions
and where , and are real numbers. We take the nonlinearities in (1.1) and in (1.3) as prototypes; we could consider much more general nonlinearities.
Before we present our results, let us dwell a while on the existing literature on nonlinear ultraparabolic parabolic equations known also as pluri-parabolic equations or multitime parabolic equations which we are aware of.These types of equations started in the case of linear equations with Kolmogoroff [1] in 1934; he introduced them in order to describe the probability density of a system with 2d degrees of freedom. A lot of generalizations have been made by a large number of authors since then. Nonlinear ultraparabolic equations arise in the kinetic theory of gases [2, 3]. Some stochastic processes models lead also to ultraparabolic equations [4β7]. The analysis of nonlinear ultraparabolic equations have been studied first by Ugowski [8] who studied differential inequalities of parabolic type with multidimensional time; he established, for example, a maximum principle which is very useful for applications. His results were reformulated, in a less general setting, by Walter in [9]. Many nice works on different aspects on ultraparabolic nonlinear equations have been conducted by Lavrenyuk and his collaborators [10β12], Lanconelli and his collaborators [13, 14], and Citti et al. [15]; see also [16, 17]. In the absence of diffusion, an interesting application is mentioned in [18]. Our equation and system have their applications in diffusion theory in porous media.
For better positioning of our results, let us recall the pioneering results of Fujita [19] and their complementary results by Hayakawa [20], Kobayashi et al. [21], and Samarskii et al. [22] concerning nonexistence results for the equation
which corresponds to (1.1) in the absence of and with .
In his article [19] corresponding to , Fujita proved that(i), then no global positive solutions for any nonnegative initial data exist;(ii), global small data solutions exist while global solutions for large data do not exist.
The borderline case has been decided by Hayakawa [20] for and then by Kobayashi et al. [21] for any ; In case , the exponent is called the critical exponent.
For (1.5), Samarskii et al. [22] showed that the critical exponent is .
The aim of this paper is to obtain the critical exponent in the sense of Fujita for (1.1) and for system (1.3). Moreover, we present critical exponents for systems of two equations.
2. Results
Solutions to (1.1) subject to conditions (1.2) are meant in the following weak sense.
Definition 2.1. A function is called a weak solution to (1.1) if
for any test function ; and ,ββ.
Note that every weak solution is classical near the points where is positive.
Two words about the local existence of solutions are in order: as it is a rule, one regularizes (1.1) by adding first a vanishing diffusion term as follows:
and then by regularizing the degenerate term ; so, the regular equation
is obtained. Consequently, one obtains, for small time , -uniform estimates of solutions, namely, estimates which are independent on the βparabolicityβ constants of the equation as it is clearly explained in [23], see also [10, 24].
Our main first result is dealing with (1.1) subject to (1.2); it is given by the following theorem.
Theorem 2.2. Assume that . If , then Problem (1.1)-(1.2) does not admit global weak solutions.
Proof. Our strategy of proof is to use the weak formulation of the solution with a suitable choice of the test function which we learnt from [25]. Assume is a global solution. If we write
and estimate using the -Young inequality, we obtain
Similarly, we have
where . Now, using (2.5) and (2.6), we obtain
If we choose , then we get the estimate
for some positive constant . Observe that the right-hand side of (2.8) is free of the unknown function . At this stage, we introduce the smooth nonincreasing function such that
Let us take in (2.8)
with and being positive real number. Let us now pass to the new variables
We have
Whereupon
with
where . Now, we want to pass to the limit as in (2.13) under the constraint . We have to consider two cases.(i)Either and in this case, the right-hand side of (2.13) will go to zero while the left-hand side is positive. Contradiction.(ii)Or , and in this case, we get in particular
where . Now, to conclude, we rely on the estimate
which is obtained by using the HΓΆlder inequality. Passing to the limit as in (2.16), we obtain
Contradiction.
Remark 2.3. Notice that the critical exponent for the ultraparabolic equation is smaller than the one of the corresponding parabolic equation.
2.1. The Case of a -System with a 2-Dimensional Time
In this section, we extend the analysis of the previous section to the case of a -system of 2-time equations. More precisely, we consider the system
for , subject to the initial conditions
and where ,ββ, and are real numbers.
To lighten the presentation, let us set
Let us start with the following definition.
Definition 2.4. We say that is a weak solution to system (2.18) if
for any test function .
Note that every weak solution is classical near the points where and are positive.
Let us set
Theorem 2.5. Let ,ββ,ββ,ββ, and assume that
Then system (2.18)-(2.19) admits no global weak solution whenever
Proof. Assume that the solution is global. Using HΓΆlder's inequality, we obtain
for . Similarly, we have
If we set
then, using (2.23), inequalities (2.26) and (2.27) in (2.21), we my write
so
for some positive constant . Whereupon
Using HΓΆlder's inequality, we may write
At this stage, using the scaled variables (2.11), we obtain
Hence, for , we get the estimate
Observe that, following the same lines, we can also obtain the following estimate for :
To conclude, we have to consider two cases.Case 1. If then
A contradiction.Case 2. If , we conclude following the same argument used for one equation.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the referees for their remarks. This work is supported by Sultan Qaboos University under Grant: IG/SCI/DOMS/11/06. This work has been done during a visit of the second named author to DOMAS, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman, which he thanks for its support and hospitality.
References
A. Kolmogoroff, βZufällige Bewegungen (zur Theorie der Brownschen Bewegung),β Annals of Mathematics. Second Series, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 116β117, 1934.
C. Cercignani, The Boltzmann Equation and Its Applications, vol. 67 of Applied Mathematical Sciences, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1988.
P.-L. Lions, βOn Boltzmann and Landau equations,β Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, vol. 346, no. 1679, pp. 191β204, 1994.
F. Antonelli, E. Barucci, and M. E. Mancino, βAsset pricing with a forward-backward stochastic differential utility,β Economics Letters, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 151β157, 2001.
S. Chapman and T. G. Cowling, The Mathematical Theory of Nonuniform Gases: An Account of the Kinetic Theory of Viscosity, Thermal Conduction and Diffusion in Gases, Cambridge Mathematical Library, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 3rd edition, 1990.
S. Chandresekhar, βStochastic problems in physics and astronomy,β Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 15, pp. 1β89, 1943.
W. Walter, βParabolic differential equations and inequalities with several time variables,β Mathematische Zeitschrift, vol. 191, no. 2, pp. 319β323, 1986.
S. P. Lavrenyuk and M. O. Olīskevich, βA mixed problem for a semilinear ultraparabolic equation in an unbounded domain,β Ukraïns'kiĭ Matematichniĭ Zhurnal, vol. 59, no. 12, pp. 1661β1673, 2007.
S. Lavrenyuk and N. Protsakh, βBoundary value problem for nonlinear ultraparabolic equation in unbounded with respect to time variable domain,β Tatra Mountains Mathematical Publications, vol. 38, pp. 131β146, 2007.
N. Protsakh, βMixed problem for degenerate nonlinear ultraparabolic equation,β Tatra Mountains Mathematical Publications, vol. 43, pp. 203β214, 2009.
E. Lanconelli, A. Pascucci, and S. Polidoro, βLinear and nonlinear ultraparabolic equations of Kolmogorov type arising in diffusion theory and in finance,β in Nonlinear Problems in Mathematical Physics and Related Topics, II, vol. 2 of Int. Math. Ser. (N. Y.), pp. 243β265, Kluwer/Plenum, New York, NY, USA, 2002.
A. Pascucci and S. Polidoro, βOn the Cauchy problem for a nonlinear Kolmogorov equation,β SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 579β595, 2003.
G. Citti, A. Pascucci, and S. Polidoro, βRegularity properties of viscosity solutions of a non-Hörmander degenerate equation,β Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées, vol. 80, no. 9, pp. 901β918, 2001.
M. Escobedo, J. L. Vázquez, and E. Zuazua, βEntropy solutions for diffusion-convection equations with partial diffusivity,β Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 343, no. 2, pp. 829β842, 1994.
O. Narayan and J. Roychowdhury, βAnalyzing oscillators using multitime PDEs,β IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems. I, vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 894β903, 2003.
H. Fujita, βOn the blowing up of solutions of the Cauchy problem for ,β Journal of the Faculty of Science. University of Tokyo. Section IA, vol. 13, pp. 109β124, 1966.
K. Hayakawa, βOn nonexistence of global solutions of some semilinear parabolic differential equations,β Proceedings of the Japan Academy, vol. 49, pp. 503β505, 1973.
K. Kobayashi, T. Sirao, and H. Tanaka, βOn the growing up problem for semilinear heat equations,β Journal of the Mathematical Society of Japan, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 407β424, 1977.
A. A. Samarskii, V. A. Galaktionov, S. P. Kurdyumov, and A. P. Mikhailov, Blow-up in Quasilinear Parabolic Equations, vol. 19 of de Gruyter Expositions in Mathematics, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany, 1995.
A. S. Kalashnikov, βSome problems of the qualitative theory of second-order nonlinear degenerate parabolic equations,β Uspekhi Matematicheskikh Nauk, vol. 42, no. 2(254), pp. 135β176, 1987, English translation: Russina Math. Surveys, no. 42, pp. 169–222, 1987.
G. Lu, βExistence and uniqueness of global solution for certain nonlinear degenerate parabolic systems,β Acta Mathematicae Applicatae Sinica. English Series, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 332β336, 1996.
E. Mitidieri and S. N. Pokhozhaev, βA priori estimates and blow-up of solutions to nonlinear partial differential equations and inequalities,β Proceeding of the Steklov Institute of Mathematics, vol. 234, no. 3, pp. 1β362, 2001.