#### Abstract

We study the problem of self-intersection local time of -dimensional subfractional Brownian motion based on the property of chaotic representation and the white noise analysis.

#### 1. Introduction

As an extension of Brownian motion, Bojdecki et al. [1] introduced and studied a rather special class of self-similar Gaussian process. This process arises from occupation time fluctuations of branching particles with Poisson initial condition. It is called the * subfractional Brownian motion*. The so-called subfractional Brownian motion with index is a mean zero Gaussian process with the covariance function
for all . For , coincides with the standard Brownian motion. is neither a semimartingale nor a Markov process unless , so many of the powerful techniques from classical stochastic analysis are not available when dealing with . The subfractional Brownian motion has properties analogous to those of fractional Brownian motion, such as self-similarity, Hölder continuous paths, and so forth. But its increments are not stationary, because, for , we have the following estimates:

Let be a -dimensional subfractional Brownian motion with multiparameters . Suppose that , we are interested in, when it exists, the self-intersection local time of subfractional Brownian motion which is formally defined as where is the Dirac delta function. It measures the amount of time that the processes spend intersecting itself on the time interval and has been an important topic of the theory of stochastic process.

More precisely, we study the existence of the limit when tends to zero, of the following sequence of processes where

For , the process is a classical Brownian motion. The self-intersection local time of the Brownian motion has been studied by many authors such as Albeverio et al. [2], Calais and Yor [3], He et al. [4], Hu [5], Varadhan [6], and so forth. In the case of planar Brownian motion, Varadhan [6] has proved that does not converge in but it can be renormalized so that converges in as tends to zero. The limit is called the renormalized self-intersection local time of the planar Brownian motion. This result has been extended by Rosen [7] to the (planar) fractional Brownian motion, where it is proved that for , converges in as tends to zero, where is a constant depending only on . Hu [8] showed that, under the condition , the (renormalized) self-intersection local time of fractional Brownian motion is in the Meyer-Watanabe test functional space, that is, the space of “differentiable” functionals. In 2005, Hu and Nualart [9] proved that the renormalized self-intersection local time of -dimensional fractional Brownian motion exists in if and only if , which generalizes the Varadhan renormalization theorem to any dimension and with any Hurst parameter. They also showed that in the case , converges in distribution to a normal law , as tends to zero, and if , and if . Wu and Xiao [10] proved the existence of the intersection local times of -fractional Brownian motions, and had a continuous version. They also established Hölder conditions for the intersection local times and determined the Hausdorff and packing dimensions of the sets of intersection times and intersection points. They extended the results of Nualart and Ortiz-Latorre [11], where the existence of the intersection local times of two independent -fractional Brownian motions with the same Hurst index was studied by using a different method. Moreover, Wu and Xiao [10] also showed that anisotropy brings subtle differences into the analytic properties of the intersection local times as well as rich geometric structures into the sets of intersection times and intersection points. Oliveira et al. [12] presented expansions of intersection local times of fractional Brownian motions in , for any dimension , with arbitrary Hurst coefficients in . The expansions are in terms of Wick powers of white noises (corresponding to multiple Wiener integrals), being well-defined in the sense of generalized white noise functionals. As an application of their approach, a sufficient condition on for the existence of intersection local times in was also derived. For the case of subfractional Brownian motion, Yan and Shen [13] studied the so-called collision local time of two independent subfractional Brownian motion with respective indices . By an elementary method, they showed that is smooth in the sense of Meyer-Watanabe if and only if .

Motivated by all these results, we will study the self-intersection local time of the so-called subfractional Brownian motion (see below for a precise definition), which has been proposed by Bojdecki et al. [1]. Recently, the long-range dependence property has become an important aspect of stochastic models in various scientific area including hydrology, telecommunication, turbulence, image processing, and finance. It is well known that fractional Brownian motion (fBm in short) is one of the best known and most widely used processes that exhibits the long-range dependence property, self-similarity, and stationary increments. It is a suitable generalization of classical Brownian motion. On the other hand, many authors have proposed to use more general self-similar Gaussian process and random fields as stochastic models. Such applications have raised many interesting theoretical questions about self-similar Gaussian processes and fields in general. However, in contrast to the extensive studies on fractional Brownian motion, there has been little systematic investigation on other self-similar Gaussian processes. The main reason for this is the complexity of dependence structures for self-similar Gaussian processes which does not have stationary increments. The subfractional Brownian motion has properties analogous to those of fractional Brownian motion (self-similarity, long-range dependence, Hölder paths, the variation, and the renormalized variation). However, in comparison with fractional Brownian motion, the subfractional Brownian motion has nonstationary increments and the increments over nonoverlapping intervals are more weakly correlated and their covariance decays polynomially as a higher rate in comparison with fractional Brownian motion (for this reason in Bojdecki et al. [1] is called subfractional Brownian motion). The above mentioned properties make subfractional Brownian motion a possible candidate for models which involve long-range dependence, self-similarity, and nonstationary. Therefore, it seems interesting to study the self-intersection local time of subfractional Brownian motion. And we need more precise estimates to prove our results because of the nonstationary increments. We will view the self-intersection local time of subfractional Brownian motion as the generalized white noise functionals. Furthermore, we discuss the existence and expansions of the self-intersection local times in . We have organized our paper as follows: Section 2 contains the notations, definitions, and results for Gaussian white noise analysis. In Section 3, we present the main results and their demonstrations.

Most of the estimates of this paper contain unspecified constants. An unspecified positive and finite constant will be denoted by , which may not be the same in each occurrence. Sometimes we will emphasize the dependence of these constants upon parameters.

#### 2. Gaussian White Noise Analysis

In this section, we briefly recall the concepts and results of white noise analysis used through out this work, and for details, see Kuo [15], Obata [16], and so forth.

##### 2.1. Subfractional Brownian Motion

The starting point of white noise analysis for the construction of -dimensional, , subfractional Brownian motion is the real Gélfand triple where is the real Hilbert space of all vector-valued square integrable functions with respect to Lebesgue measure on and are the Schwartz spaces of the vectors valued test functions and tempered distributions, respectively. Denote the norm in by or if there is no risk of confusion simply by and the dual pairing between and by , which is defined as the bilinear extension of the inner product on , that is for all and all . By the Minlos theorem, there is a unique probability measure on the -algebra generated by the cylinder sets on with characteristic function given by In this way, we have defined the white noise measure space . Then a realization of vector of independent subfractional Brownian motion , is given by We recall the explicit formula for the kernel of a one-dimensional subfractional Brownian motion with parameter Especially, for , we have

We refer to Bojdecki et al. [1, 17–19], Dzhaparidze and van Zanten [20], Liu and Yan [21], Liu et al. [22], Shen and Yan [23], Tudor [24–27], Yan and Shen [13, 14], and the references therein for a complete description of subfractional Brownian motion.

##### 2.2. Hida Distributions and Characterization Results

Let us now consider the complex Hilbert space . This space is canonically isomorphic to the symmetric Fock space of symmetric square integrable functions leading to the chaos expansion of the elements in with kernel functions in the Fock space, that is, square integrable functions of the arguments and symmetric in each -tuple.

For simplicity, in the sequel, we will use the notations which reduces expansion (2.8) to The norm of is given by where is the norm in .

To proceed further, we have to consider a Gelfand triple around the space . We will use the space of Hida distributions (or generalized Brownian functionals) and the corresponding Gelfand triple . Here is the space of white noise test functions such that its dual space (with respect to ) is the space . Instead of reproducing the explicit construction of in Theorem 2.2 below we characterize this space through its -transform. We recall that given a , let us consider the Wick exponential We define the -transform of a by Here denotes the dual pairing between and which is defined as the bilinear extension of the sesquilinear inner product on . We observe that the multilinear expansion of (2.13) extends the chaos expansion to with distribution valued kernels such that for every generalized test function with kernel function .

In order to characterize the space through its -transform, we need the following definition:

*Definition 2.1. *A function is called a -functional whenever(1)for every and , the mapping has an entire extension to ,(2)there are constants such that
for some continuous norm on .

We are now ready to state the aforementioned characterization result.

Theorem 2.2. *The -transform defines a bijection between the space and the space of -functionals. *

As a consequence of Theorem 2.2, one may derive the next two statements. The first one concerns the convergence of sequences of Hida distributions and the second one the Bochner integration of families of distributions of the same type.

Corollary 2.3. *Let be a sequence in such that*(1)*for all , is Cauchy sequence in ;*(2)*there are such that for some continuous norm on one has
**then converges strongly in to a unique Hida distribution. *

Corollary 2.4. *Let be a measure space and be a mapping from to . We assume that the -transform of fulfills the following two properties:*(1)*the mapping is measurable for every ,*(2)*the obeys a -estimate
**for some continuous on and for , . Then
*

#### 3. Self-Intersection Local Time

Let us now consider the -dimensional subfractional Brownian motion with parameter . In view of (2.4), for , with .

Proposition 3.1. *For each and strictly positive real numbers, the Bochner integral
**
is a Hida distribution with -transform given by
**
for all and .*

*Proof. *The proof of this result follows from an applications of Corollary 2.4 to the -transform of the integrand function
With respect to the Lebesgue measure on . By symmetry, we assume that . For this purpose, we begin by observing that, for , and all , one has
The last equality was obtained by the definition of . Then we obtain
which clearly fulfills the measurability condition. Moreover, for all , we find
where, for each , the corresponding term in the second product is bounded by
because
As a result
where, as a function of , the first exponential is integrable on and the second exponential is constant.

An application of the result mentioned above completes the proof. In particular, it yields (3.2) by integrating (3.5) over .

For the sequence of processes given by (1.4) and (3.5), combining and the elementary equality then we have the following.

Corollary 3.2. *For each and strictly positive real numbers,
**
is a Hida distribution with -transform given by
**
for all and . *

Theorem 3.3. *For , every positive integer , and , the self-intersection local time has the following chaos expansion:
**
where
*

*Proof. *For every , we calculate the -transform of as follows:
Comparing with the general form of the chaos expansion, we find that the kernel functions are equal to

For simplicity, we assume that the notation means that there are positive constants and such that in the common domain of definition for and .

Let us now compute the expectation of the self-intersection local time of the subfractional Brownian motion, , it is just the first chaos. So in view of Theorem 3.3 Moreover, for all , the second moment of increments satisfying the following estimate: with . As the integrand in is always positive, we have We use the change of variables with , We divide the integral in two parts The first integral in braces is bounded. Set the second integral in braces, so

Proposition 3.4. *Denote by . Let and , then if ,
**
Moreover if ,
**
If **
If , there is no blow up, that is,
*

In particular, we have

Proposition 3.5. *Suppose that all , let and .*(1)If , then .(2)If , then .

From the above results, if , the self-intersection local time is well defined in . This is same as the case of fractional Brownian motion mainly because the covariance structure and the property (1.2) of the increments of the subfractional Brownian motion. Suppose now that . The idea is that if we subtract some of the first term in the expansion of the exponential function in the expression of the -transform of , we could obtain an integrable function in factor of the remaining part, then the second condition of Corollary 2.4 will be satisfied. And so we could define a renormalization of the self-intersection local time in .

Let us denote the truncated exponential series by It follows from (3.2) that the -transform of is given by so We need to estimate the -norm of , for fixed .

We will treat the case when all . For the case all , we do not have a good estimation of and so we do not have a result. Let , in view of (2.8) We obtain For , we obtain For , we obtain So Suppose is small enough, we get with . Then we have.

Theorem 3.6. *Let and , suppose that
**
then
**
is well defined as an element of and
*

Theorem 3.7. * For , every positive integer , and , suppose that (3.38) holds, then the truncated self-intersection local time has the following chaos expansion:
**
where
**
for each and . All other kernel functions are identically equal to zero. *

*Proof. *By Corollary 2.4, the -transform of the truncated self-intersection local time is given as an integral over (3.30). Then given , we have
Comparing with the general form of chaos expansion, the result is proved.

Next we will estimate the -norm of the chaos of the self-intersection local time of subfractional Brownian motion. Now we state the result.

Theorem 3.8. *Suppose all , let , and . *(1)*If , then
exists.*(2)*If , then
exists.*(3)*If , then exists. *

*Proof. *For , the th chaos is given by
where
So
In view of (3.48), we need to estimate , where
By using Fubini theorem, we first get
with . Moreover denote by with a fractional Brownian motion with Hurst index . Then, from Bojdecki et al. [1], we know that
So
In view of the symmetry of the domain and integrand function, it suffices to integrate only on
where , , . Let us first integrate over . We make the following change of variables and , where is considered as a parameter. Set the integral over .*Step* *1*. For , we obtain
It is almost possible to compute the integral when all are different, so let us suppose that all are equal to some .

Denote by and make the following change of variables , we get
Denote by
and by
First note that and for ,
This implies that for every ,
is finite. On the other hand, for , decreases to zero when tends to zero, then
and so that
Therefore, we obtain, if ,
and if ,
Suppose now ,
with
and then
where
So we obtain
*Step* *2*. Let us now treat .
where
where
We have that and so
is well defined on and for , one can choose such that when
And then
So that
Suppose , the same computations as in the case of leads to
Suppose now , we have
Then
We know that , then exists. Let us suppose that ,
with