Research Article  Open Access
State Estimation for FractionalOrder Complex Dynamical Networks with Linear Fractional Parametric Uncertainty
Abstract
This paper deals with state estimation problem for a class of fractionalorder complex dynamical networks with parametric uncertainty. The parametric uncertainty is assumed to be of linear fractional form. Firstly, based on the properties of Kronecker product and the stability of fractionalorder system, a sufficient condition is derived for robust asymptotic stability of linear fractionalorder augmented system. Secondly, state estimation problem is then studied for the same fractionalorder complex networks, where the purpose is to design a state estimator to estimate the network state through available output measurement, the existence conditions of designing state estimator are derived using matrix's singular value decomposition and LMI techniques. These conditions are in the form of linear matrix inequalities which can be readily solved by applying the LMI toolbox. Finally, two numerical examples are provided to demonstrate the validity of our approach.
1. Introduction
Complex networks have become a focus of research and have been paid much attention from various fields of the science of engineering during the past few years, due to many realworld systems can be described by complex networks, such as the World Wide Web, neural networks, social networks, cooperate networks, and food webs, electrical power grids [1–12]. In particular, stability and synchronization of complex dynamical networks have received great attention and many profound results have been established [13–20].
Owing to the complexity of largescale networks, state of the node is not often fully available in the network outputs; moreover, in many practical applications, one needs to know the state’s information and then use it to achieve certain objectives; therefore, it becomes necessary to estimate state of the key node through available measurements; state estimation problem of complex dynamical networks became an important topic recently [21–28], which employ the stochastic analysis techniques and the properties of Kronecker product to establish delaydependent criteria that ensure the existence of desired estimator gains. Particularly, [21] investigates state estimation problem for delayed neural networks and derives some delayindependent sufficient conditions for the existence of an estimator. It is noticed that discretetime networks have a better position to model digital transmitted signals in a dynamical way than continuoustime networks. Recently, state estimation problem for discretetime networks has received some research interests, such as synchronization and state estimation being investigated in [22] for discretetime complex networks with distributed delays, and an LMI approach is developed to design state estimator. In [25], a novel synchronization problem has been discussed for a class of discrete timevarying stochastic complex networks over a finite horizon, and the bounded synchronization criteria have been established in terms of a set of recursive linear matrix inequalities. Although, most of the studies focus on synchronization and state estimation of integerorder complex networks, many phenomena in nature cannot be explained in the framework of integerorder dynamics, for example, the synchronized motion of agents in fractional circumstances, such as molecule fluids and porous media; the stressstrain relationship demonstrates nonintegerorder dynamics rather than integerorder dynamics [29]. For the fractionalorder dynamical systems [30–32], it is very difficult and inconvenient to construct Lyapunov functions because there exist substantial differences between fractionalorder differential systems and integerorder differential ones. As a way of efficiently solving the robust stability and stabilization problem, linear matrix inequality approach is presented [33–36], which provides sufficient condition and designing method of state feedback controllers for fractionalorder systems. As an extension of their application, recently, the collective dynamics analysis of fractionalorder complex networks has led to a host of interesting effects [37–39]. In [37], the pinning control problem of fractionalorder weighted complex dynamical networks is considered for the first time; some local stability properties of such pinned fractionalorder networks are derived and the valid stability regions are estimated. Based on the stability theory of fractionalorder system, [38] derives the sufficient criteria for outer synchronization by applying the nonlinear control and the bidirectional coupling methods. It is noticed that uncertainty is unavoidable because it is very difficult to obtain an exact mathematical model due to environmental noise. Reference [39] investigates robust synchronization of fractionalorder complex dynamical networks with parametric uncertainties, some robust synchronization criteria are derived by applying the nonlinear control, and the above uncertainty is described by the norm bounded uncertainty. Recently, a new type of uncertainty, namely, linear fractional form is considered in [40–42], which can include the normbounded uncertainties as a special case. Comparing with normbounded uncertainties, the formulation of linear fractional uncertainties can obtain less conservative results. To the best of our knowledge, no result has been reported on state estimation for fractionalorder complex dynamical networks with linear fractional parametric uncertainty, which is very important in both theories and applications and is also a very challenging problem. The main purpose of this paper is to address these shortcomings.
Motivated by the above discussion, this paper focuses on state estimation for fractionalorder complex dynamical networks with linear fractional parametric uncertainty. Firstly, based on the properties of Kronecker product and stability of the fractionalorder system, a sufficient condition is derived for robust asymptotic stability of linear fractionalorder augmented system. Secondly, state estimation problem is then studied for the same fractionalorder complex networks; the existence condition and method of designing state estimator are derived by using matrix’s singular value decomposition and LMI techniques. These conditions are in the form of linear matrix inequalities, which can be readily solved by applying the LMI toolbox.
The main novelty of this paper can be summarized as follows: state estimation problem for fractionalorder complex dynamical networks with parametric uncertainty is considered in this paper, where the parametric uncertainty is assumed to be of linear fractional form. A novel state estimator is constructed, in addition to estimator matrix to be designed; an unknown estimator state matrix is also involved. The existence condition and method of designing state estimator are derived by using matrix’s singular value decomposition and LMI techniques.
Notation. The notation used here is fairly standard. denotes the dimensional Euclidean space, and is the set of real matrices. The superscript represents the transpose of matrix (or vector). denotes the identity matrix of compatible dimensions. In symmetric block matrices, is used as an ellipsis for terms induced by symmetry. stands for a blockdiagonal matrix. The notation () means that is positive semidefinite (positive definite). denotes the expression . The Kronecker product of an matrix and a matrix is defined by an matrix . If they are not explicitly specified, arguments of a function or a matrix will be omitted in the analysis when no confusion can arise.
2. Problem Formulation and Preliminaries
Consider the following fractionalorder complex dynamical networks consisting of nodes: where is the fractional order. is state vector of the th node, and is the output vector, is coupled configuration matrix of the networks with , the diagonal elements of coupling configuration matrix are defined as , and is an innercoupling matrix. and are system matrices with appropriate dimensions. Further, , where denotes the timevarying, and linear fractional normbounded uncertainty is described by where and are two known constant matrices; the parametric uncertainty satisfies where is a constant matrix satisfying , and is an uncertain matrix satisfying .
Remark 1. The linear fractional parametric uncertainty has been studied in [40–42]; it can be verified that guarantees that is invertible for all satisfying ; the class of parametric uncertainty has been selected because it is very general and includes other classes of uncertainties studied in the literature. Such as when , the parametric uncertainty of linear fractional form reduces to normbounded parametric uncertainty. So, the results can be easily particularized for this kind of uncertainty.
In fractional differential systems, three kinds of fractional derivatives (i.e., the GrnwaldLetnikov fractional derivative, RiemannLiouville fractional derivative, and Caputo fractional derivative) have been often used [43–45]; we briefly introduce these three definitions of fractional derivatives as follows.
Definition 2. The GrünwaldLetnikov fractional derivative with order of function is defined below: where and is a real constant, which expresses a limit value. means the integer part of . is a gamma function given by .
Definition 3. The RiemannLiouville fractional derivative with order of function is defined below: where is the initial time, .
Definition 4. The Caputo derivative with order of function is defined below: where .
Remark 5. The RiemannLiouville derivative and Caputo derivative have been often used in fractional differential systems. But the Laplace transform of Caputo derivative allows utilization of initial values of integerorder derivatives with clear physical interpretations. Moreover, the Caputo definition is more appropriate for describing the initial value problem of fractional differential equations. Therefore, the Caputo derivative definition is adopted in this paper.
Based on output measurement , the following state estimator is constructed as
where is an estimate vector of the network state , and is an estimate vector of the output , is the estimator matrix to be designed, and is a unknown system matrix.
Remark 6. As discussed in [36], in addition to estimator matrix , an unknown matrix is involved in the dynamic of state estimator, which may give a opportunity to better adjust the dynamic characteristics of state estimator.
By using Kronecker product, (1) and (8) can be rewritten in the following compact form:
where
Setting , where , the error dynamics can be obtained from (9) and (10), it follows that
Let , and the following augmented system can be obtained as follows from (10) and (12):
where
The estimation problem can be transformed to the robust stabilization problem of linear fractionalorder system with parametric uncertainty.
Remark 7. As we know, the existing result [46] cannot be applied directly to fractionalorder uncertain system (13), as it is hard to compute all eigenvalues of in (13); the paper can effectively avoid this difficulty: two unknown matrices and can be obtained by using linear matrix inequality technique.
Before giving the main results, the following Lemmas are important and will be used later.
Lemma 8 (see [47]). Let , and let , and be matrices with appropriate dimensions. By the definition of Kronecker product, the following properties can be proved:
Lemma 9 (see [48]). Let be a deterministic real matrix, and then , where , if and only if there exists such that where .
Lemma 10 (see [49]). Suppose that is given in (2)(3), with matrices , , and of appropriate dimensions, the inequality holds if and only if for some
Similar to [35], for any matrix with full row rank, there exists a singular value decomposition of as follows: where is a diagonal matrix with positive elements in decreasing order; , , and are unitary matrices, then the following lemma holds.
Lemma 11 (see [35]). Given matrix with , assume that is a symmetric matrix, there exists a matrix satisfying if and only if can be expressed as where and .
3. Main Results
In this section, firstly, we focus on robust asymptotic stability of uncertain augmented system (13). Secondly, the obtained results will further be extended to design the desired state estimator.
Theorem 12. For given matrices and , the uncertain fractionalorder augmented system (13) with is asymptotically stable if there exist positive symmetrical matrices , and a positive scalar such that the following linear matrix inequality holds: where
Proof. If there exist two positive symmetrical matrices and , such that the following matrix inequality holds:
where , then it can be derived from Lemma 9 that uncertain fractionalorder augmented system (13) is asymptotically stable.
By some simple computation, we can obtain
Substituting (24) into (23), it yields
where
According to (25), one has
where
Combining (25) with (27), one has
By applying Lemma 10, we can obtain that (29) holds, if and only if the following matrix inequality holds
that is,
where .
The above LMI (31) is just as LMI (21), that is, if (21) holds, it follows from Lemma 9 that uncertain fractionalorder system (13) is asymptotically stable. This completes the proof.
Remark 13. Theorem 12 presents a sufficient condition for asymptotically stable of uncertain fractionalorderaugmented system, which is an LMI condition when matrices and are given. If and are variables to be determined, owing to the existence of nonlinear terms such as and , the matrix inequality (21) in Theorem 12 is not an LMI, and thus Theorem 12 cannot be used for the estimator’s design directly. Our objective hereafter is to provide a design method.
Theorem 14. For the fractionalorder complex dynamical networks with linear fractional parametric uncertainty (1), assume that the singular value decomposition of output matrix with full row rank is then uncertain fractionalorder augmented system (13) with is asymptotically stable if there exist symmetrical matrices , , and , with appropriate dimensions and a scalar , such that the following linear matrix inequality holds: where Moreover, two unknown estimator gain matrices are given as
Proof. Since
From Lemma 11, there exists , such that ; it is easily obtained that . Setting and , then matrix inequality (21) is equivalent to (33). Moreover, estimator gain matrices can be obtained as follows:
In particular, setting in (8), then the state estimator will reduce to
The corresponding augmented system is described as
where
The unknown estimator matrix can be solved from the following corollary.
Corollary 15. For the fractionalorder complex dynamical networks with linear fractional parametric uncertainty (1), assume that the singular value decomposition of output matrix with full row rank is then uncertain fractionalorder augmented system (39) with is asymptotically stable if there exist symmetrical matrices , , and with appropriate dimensions and a scalar , such that the following linear matrix inequality holds: where The desired estimator gain matrix is given as
Remark 16. The state estimation discussed in this paper is fairly comprehensive; our results can readily specialize to many special cases, such as, when , it implies that with ; that is, the parametric uncertainty of linear fractional form reduces to normbounded parametric uncertainty; the corresponding result can be easily derived from Theorem 14. Let and in (2) and (8), respectively, the problem will reduce state estimation for a class of fractionalorder complex dynamical networks with normbounded parametric uncertainty; the corresponding result can be obtained from Corollary 15. The specialized results are still believed to be new and have not been fully researched yet. For presentation, we omit the corresponding corollaries here.
4. Numerical Examples
In this section, two different fractionalorder systems are given as examples to verify the effectiveness of the control scheme described in the preceding section.
Example 17. Consider the fractionalorder complex dynamical networks (1) and the state estimator (8), the relevant parameters are given as follows:
It is easy to verify that is full row rank; by using matrix’s singular value decomposition, we can obtain
In Theorem 14, setting fractionalorder , a set of feasible solutions can be obtained using the Matlab Control Toolbox as follows:
then two unknown estimator gain matrices are given as
Therefore, it follows from Theorem 14 that uncertain fractionalorder augmented system (13) is asymptotically stable. The response of error dynamics converges to zero asymptotically, which is given in Figure 1; it can be seen that the simulation has confirmed that the designed estimators perform very well. Two unknown estimator gain matrices are listed in Table 1 for different fractional orders.
Example 18. If in estimator (8), the relevant parameters are given in Example 17. Setting fractionalorder , using the Matlab LMI toolbox to solve the LMI in Corollary 15, we can obtain the following matrices:
then the estimator gain matrix is given as
It is not difficult to verify that, with the obtained estimator gain , the response of error dynamics converges to zero asymptotically; the corresponding simulation result is shown in Figure 2. The estimator gain matrix is given in Table 2 for different fractional orders.

5. Conclusions
State estimation problem is investigated for a class of fractionalorder complex dynamical networks with parametric uncertainty. By using matrix’s singular value decomposition and LMI techniques, the existence conditions of designing state estimator derived are in the form of linear matrix inequalities which can be readily solved using the LMI toolbox. Finally, two numerical examples are provided to demonstrate the validity of this approach.
Acknowledgments
This work was jointly supported by the National Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 61272034, 61074024, and 60874113), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China (Grant no. BK2010543), the Education Department Research Project of Zhejiang Province of China (Grant no. Y201019013), and the Outstanding Young Teacher Project of Zhejiang Province of China.
References
 M. E. Crovella and A. Bestavros, “Selfsimilarity in world wide web traffic: evidence and possible causes,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 835–846, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
 J. W. Moon and Y. G. Kim, “Extending the TAM for a worldwideweb context,” Information and Management, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 217–230, 2001. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Wang, Y. Liu, and X. Liu, “State estimation for jumping recurrent neural networks with discrete and distributed delays,” Neural Networks, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 41–48, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Cao and L. Li, “Cluster synchronization in an array of hybrid coupled neural networks with delay,” Neural Networks, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 335–342, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. Robins, P. Pattison, and P. Wang, “Closure, connectivity and degree distributions: exponential random graph (p*) models for directed social networks,” Social Networks, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 105–117, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Clifton, E. Turkheimer, and T. F. Oltmanns, “Personality disorder in social networks: Network position as a marker of interpersonal dysfunction,” Social Networks, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 26–32, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Han, T. Himsoon, W. P. Siriwongpairat, and K. J. R. Liu, “Resource allocation for multiuser cooperative OFDM networks: who helps whom and how to cooperate,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 2378–2391, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Canipari, V. Cellini, and S. Cecconi, “The ovary feels fine when paracrine and autocrine networks cooperate with gonadotropins in the regulation of folliculogenesis,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 245–255, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Jarosz, “The city in the country: growing alternative food networks in Metropolitan areas,” Journal of Rural Studies, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 231–244, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Lockie, “Responsibility and agency within alternative food networks: assembling the ‘citizen consumer’,” Agriculture and Human Values, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 193–201, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. B. Amar and R. Dhifaoui, “Study of the periodic ferroresonance in the electrical power networks by bifurcation diagrams,” International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 61–85, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Dangalchev, “Generation models for scalefree networks,” Physica A, vol. 338, no. 34, pp. 659–671, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 X. Wang and G. Chen, “Synchronization in complex dynamical networks,” Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 358–371, 2003. View at: Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 X. Li, X. Wang, and G. Chen, “Pinning a complex dynamical network to its equilibrium,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I, vol. 51, no. 10, pp. 2074–2087, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 Z. Li and G. Chen, “Global synchronization and asymptotic stability of complex dynamical networks,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 28–33, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Liang, Z. Wang, and X. Liu, “Exponential synchronization of stochastic delayed discretetime complex networks,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 53, no. 12, pp. 153–165, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 H. Gao, J. Lam, and G. Chen, “New criteria for synchronization stability of general complex dynamical networks with coupling delays,” Physics Letters A, vol. 360, no. 2, pp. 263–273, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. Liu and T. Chen, “Exponential synchronization of nonlinear coupled dynamical networks with a delayed coupling,” Physica A, vol. 381, no. 12, pp. 82–92, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Cao and J. Lu, “Adaptive synchronization of neural networks with or without timevarying delay,” Chaos, vol. 16, no. 1, Article ID 013133, 6 pages, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 Z. Duan, G. Chen, and L. Huang, “Synchronization of weighted networks and complex synchronized regions,” Physics Letters A, vol. 372, no. 21, pp. 3741–3751, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 Z. Wang, D. W. C. Ho, and X. Liu, “State estimation for delayed neural networks,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 279–284, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Liu, Z. Wang, J. Liang, and X. Liu, “Synchronization and state estimation for discretetime complex networks with distributed delays,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics B, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 1314–1325, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Liang, Z. Wang, and X. Liu, “State estimation for coupled uncertain stochastic networks with missing measurements and timevarying delays: the discretetime case,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 781–793, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Liang, Z. Wang, and X. Liu, “Distributed state estimation for discretetime sensor networks with randomly varying nonlinearities and missing measurements,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 486–496, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 B. Shen, Z. Wang, and X. Liu, “Bounded H_{∞} synchronization and state estimation for discrete timevarying stochastic complex networks over a finite horizon,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 145–157, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 P. Balasubramaniam, S. Lakshmanan, and S. J. S. Theesar, “State estimation for Markovian jumping recurrent neural networks with interval timevarying delays,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 661–675, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 P. Balasubramaniam, V. Vembarasan, and R. Rakkiyappan, “Delaydependent robust exponential state estimation of Markovian jumping fuzzy Hopfield neural networks with mixed random timevarying delays,” Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 2109–2129, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 P. Balasubramaniam, V. Vembarasan, and R. Rakkiyappan, “Delaydependent robust asymptotic state estimation of TakagiSugeno fuzzy Hopfield neural networks with mixed interval timevarying delays,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 472–481, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Bagley and P. Torvik, “On the fractional calculus model of viscoelastic behavior,” Journal of Rheology, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 133–155, 1986. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. A. Stanislavsky, “The peculiarity of selfexcited oscillations in fractional systems,” Acta Physica Polonica B, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 319–329, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
 V. E. Tarasov and M. Edelman, “Fractional dissipative standard map,” Chaos, vol. 20, no. 2, Article ID 023127, 7 pages, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 C. P. Li and Z. G. Zhao, “Introduction to fractional integrability and differentiability,” The European Physical JournalSpecial Topics, vol. 193, no. 1, pp. 5–26, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. G. Lu and G. Chen, “Robust stability and stabilization of fractionalorder interval systems: an LMI approach,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 1294–1299, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 J. G. Lu and Y. Q. Chen, “Robust stability and stabilization of fractionalorder interval systems with the fractional order α: the $0\ll \alpha \ll 1$ case,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 152–158, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 Y.H. Lan and Y. Zhou, “LMIbased robust control of fractionalorder uncertain linear systems,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 1460–1471, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 Y. H. Lan, H. X. Huang, and Y. Zhou, “Observerbased robust control of $a$$(1\le a<2)$ fractionalorder uncertain systems: a linear matrix inequality approach,” IET Control Theory and Applications, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 229–234, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 Y. Tang, Z. Wang, and J. A. Fang, “Pinning control of fractionalorder weighted complex networks,” Chaos, vol. 19, no. 1, Article ID 013112, 9 pages, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 X. J. Wu and H. T. Lu, “Outer synchronization between two differentfractionalorder general complex dynamical networks,” Chinese Physics B, vol. 19, no. 7, Article ID 070511, 12 pages, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
 W. K. Wong, H. Li, and S. Y. S. Leung, “Robust synchronization of fractionalorder complex dynamical networks with parametric uncertainties,” Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 4877–4890, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Guo, “${H}_{\infty}$ output feedback control for delay systems with nonlinear and parametric uncertainties,” IEE Proceedings Control Theory and Applications, vol. 149, no. 3, pp. 226–236, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 W. Qian, T. Li, S. Cong, and S. Fei, “Improved stability analysis on delayed neural networks with linear fractional uncertainties,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 217, no. 7, pp. 3596–3606, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 X. Li, H. Gao, and X. Yu, “A unified approach to the stability of generalized static neural networks with linear fractional uncertainties and delays,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics B, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1275–1286, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. B. Oldham and J. Spanier, The Fractional Calculus, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1974. View at: MathSciNet
 J. Sabatier, O. P. Agrawal, and J. A. Machado, Advances in Fractional Calculus: Theoretical Developments and Applications in Physics and Engineering, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  MathSciNet
 C. P. Li and F. R. Zhang, “A survey on the stability of fractional differential equations,” The European Physical JournalSpecial Topics, vol. 193, no. 1, pp. 27–47, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Moze, J. Sabatier, and A. Oustaloup, “LMI tools for stability analysis of fractional systems,” in Proceedings of the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (IDETC/CIE'05), pp. 1611–1619, Long Beach, Calif, USA, September 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Li, “Cluster synchronization stability for stochastic complex dynamical networks with probabilistic interval timevarying delays,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 44, no. 10, Article ID 105101, 24 pages, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 M. Chilali, P. Gahinet, and P. Apkarian, “Robust pole placement in LMI regions,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 2257–2270, 1999. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 S. Zhou and J. Lam, “Robust stabilization of delayed singular systems with linear fractional parametric uncertainties,” Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 579–588, 2003. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 Hongjie Li. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.