/ / Article
Special Issue

## Advance in Nonlinear Analysis: Algorithm, Convergence and Applications

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 643602 | 7 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/643602

# Iterative Methods for Pseudocontractive Mappings in Banach Spaces

Accepted03 Mar 2013
Published27 Mar 2013

#### Abstract

Let a reflexive Banach space having a uniformly Gâteaux differentiable norm. Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of , a continuous pseudocontractive mapping with , and a continuous bounded strongly pseudocontractive mapping with a pseudocontractive constant . Let and be sequences in satisfying suitable conditions and for arbitrary initial value , let the sequence be generated by If either every weakly compact convex subset of has the fixed point property for nonexpansive mappings or is strictly convex, then converges strongly to a fixed point of , which solves a certain variational inequality related to .

#### 1. Introduction and Preliminaries

Throughout this paper, we denote by the norm and a real Banach space and the dual space of , respectively. Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of . For the mapping , we denote the fixed point set of by ; that is, .

Let denote the normalized duality mapping from into defined by where denotes the generalized duality pair between and . Recall that the norm of is said to be Gâteaux differentiable if exists for each in its unit sphere . Such an is called a smooth Banach space. The norm is said to be uniformly Gâteaux differentiable if for , the limit is attained uniformly for . The space is said to have a uniformly Fréchet differentiable norm (and is said to be uniformly smooth) if the limit in (2) is attained uniformly for . It is known that is smooth if and only if the normalized duality mapping is single valued. It is well known that if is uniformly smooth, then the duality mapping is norm-to-norm uniformly continuous on bounded subsets of , and that if has a uniformly Gâteaux differentiable norm, then is norm-to-weak* uniformly continuous on each bounded subsets of [1, 2].

It is relevant to the results of this paper to note that while every uniformly smooth Banach space is a reflexive Banach space having a uniformly Gâteaux differentiable norm, the converse does not hold. To see this, consider to be the direct sum , the class of all those sequences with and (see ). If for , where either or , then is a reflexive Banach space with a uniformly Gâteaux differentiable norm but is not uniformly smooth (see ). We also observe that the spaces which enjoy the fixed point property (shortly, F.P.P) for nonexpansive mappings are not necessarily spaces having a uniformly Gâteaux differentiable norm. On the other hand, the converse of this fact appears to be unknown as well.

A Banach space is said to be strictly convex if A Banach space is said to be uniformly convex if for all , where is the modulus of convexity of defined by It is well known that a uniformly convex Banach space is reflexive and strictly convex  and satisfies the F.P.P. for nonexpansive mappings. However, it appears to be unknown whether a reflexive and strictly convex space satisfies the F.P.P. for nonexpansive mappings.

Recall that a mapping with domain and range in is called pseudocontractive if the inequality holds for each, and for all . From a result of Kato , we know that (5) is equivalent to (6) below; there exists such that for all . The mapping is said to be strongly pseudocontractive it there exists a constant and such that for all .

The class of pseudocontractive mappings is one of the most important classes of mappings in nonlinear analysis and it has been attracting mathematician’s interest. In addition to generalizing the nonexpansive mappings (the mappings for which , for all ), the pseudocontractive ones are characterized by the fact that is pseudocontractive if and only if is accretive, where a mapping with domain and range in is called accretive if the inequality holds for every and for all .

Within the past 40 years or so, many authors have been devoting their study to the existence of zeros of accretive mappings or fixed points of pseudocontractive mappings and iterative construction of zeros of accretive mappings and of fixed points of pseudocontractive mappings (see [5, 710]). Also, several iterative methods for approximating fixed points (zeros) of nonexpansive and pseudocontractive mappings (accretive mappings) in Hilbert spaces and Banach spaces have been introduced and studied by many authors. We can refer to  and the references in therein.

In 2007, Rafiq  introduced a Mann-type implicit iterative method (9) for a hemicontractive mapping as where is a compact convex subset of a real Hilbert space and for some , and proved that converges strongly to a fixed point of .

In 2007, Yao et al.  introduced an iterative method (10) below for approximating fixed points of a continuous pseudocontractive mapping without compactness assumption on its domain in a uniformly smooth Banach space: for arbitrary initial value and a fixed anchor , where , , and are three sequences in satisfying some appropriate conditions. By using the Reich inequality  in uniformly smooth Banach spaces where is a nondecreasing continuous function, they proved that the sequence generated by (10) converges strongly to a fixed point of . In particular, in 2007, by using the viscosity iterative method studied by [18, 19], Song and Chen  introduced a modified implicit iterative method (12) below for a continuous pseudocontractive mapping without compactness assumption on its domain in a real reflexive and strictly convex Banach space having a uniformly Gâteaux differentiable norm: for arbitrary initial value , where and are two sequences in satisfying some appropriate conditions and is a contractive mapping, and proved that the sequence generated by (12) converges strongly to a fixed point of , which is the unique solution of a certain variational inequality related to .

In this paper, inspired and motivated by the above-mentioned results, we introduce the following the iterative method for a continuous pseudocontractive mapping : for arbitrary initial value , where and are two sequences in and is a bounded continuous strongly pseudocontractive mapping with a pseudocontractive constant . Whether a reflexive Banach space has a uniformly Gâteaux differentiable norm such that every weakly compact convex subset of has the fixed point property for nonexpansive mappings, or a reflexive and strict convex Banach space has a uniformly Gâteaux differentiable norm, we establish the strong convergence of the sequence generated by proposed iterative method (13) to a fixed point of the mapping, which solves a certain variational inequality related to . The main result generalizes, improves, and develops the corresponding results of Yao et al.  and Song and Chen  as well as Rafiq .

We need the following well-known lemmas for the proof of our main result.

Lemma 1 (see [1, 2]). Let be a Banach space and let be the normalized duality mapping on . Then for any , the following inequality holds:

Lemma 2 (see ). Let be a sequence of nonnegative real numbers satisfying where and satisfy the following conditions: (i) and or, equivalently, ,(ii) or .
Then .

#### 2. Iterative Methods

We need the following result which was given in .

Proposition 3. Let be a closed convex subset of a Banach space . Suppose that are two continuous mappings from into itself, which are pseudocontractive and strongly pseudocontractive, respectively. Then there exists a unique path ,  , satisfying Further, the following hold.(i)Suppose that there exists a bounded sequence in such that , while is bounded. Then the path is bounded. (ii)In particular, if has a fixed point in , then the path is bounded. (iii)If is a fixed point of , there exists such that

We prepare the following result for the existence of a solution of the variational inequality related to .

Theorem 4. Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of a Banach space and let be a continuous pseudocontractive mapping from into itself with and let be a continuous bounded strongly pseudocontractive mapping with a pseudocontractive coefficient . For each , let be defined by If one of the following assumptions holds: (H1) is a reflexive Banach space, the norm of is uniformly Gâteaux differentiable, and every weakly compact convex subset of has the fixed point property for nonexpansive mappings; (H2) is a reflexive and strictly convex Banach space and the norm of is uniformly Gâteaux differentiable,
then the path converges strongly to a point in , which is the unique solution of the variational inequality

Proof. In case of (H1), the result follows from Theorem 2 of . So, we prove only the case of (H2). We follow the method of proof in [5, 10].
By Proposition 3, the path exists. It remains to show that it converges strongly to a fixed point of as . As a consequence of Theorem 6 of , the mapping has a nonexpansive inverse, denoted by , which maps into itself with . By Proposition 3(ii), is bounded. Since is a bounded mapping, is bounded. From (18), we have and so is bounded (as ). Since we derive that Let be a sequence in such that as and let . Since is bounded, we may define by . Since is reflexive, as , and is continuous and convex, and the set is a nonempty (due to Theorem 1.2 of ). Since , let . Then, since is strict convex, the set is singleton. Let for some . We also know that and Therefore, . Since is pseudocontractive and is a fixed point of , we derive from Proposition 3(iii) that Now let and . Then by Lemma 1, we have Let . Then by the assumption on , there exists such that and for all . Consequently, Therefore, we may choose a subsequence of such that From (26) and the fact that is strongly pseudocontractive, we have which implies that . Thus, by (30), we conclude that converges strongly to . To prove that actually the net converges strongly to , let be another subsequence of such that , as and , where . Then Proposition 3(iii) implies that and . This implies that Since is strongly pseudocontractive, and the strong exists. This same argument may be used to conclude that is the only solution of the variational inequality (19). This completes the proof.

Using Theorem 4, we establish our second main result.

Theorem 5. Let be a Banach space and let be a nonempty closed convex subset of . Let be a continuous pseudocontractive mapping such that , and let be a continuous bounded strongly pseudocontractive mapping with a pseudocontractive constant . Let and be sequences in satisfying the following conditions:(C1) and ;(C2).
For arbitrary initial value , let the sequence be defined by If one of the following assumptions holds: (H1) is a reflexive Banach space, the norm of is uniformly Gâteaux differentiable, and every weakly compact convex subset of has the fixed point property for nonexpansive mappings; (H2) is a reflexive and strictly convex Banach space and the norm of is uniformly Gâteaux differentiable,
then converges strongly to a fixed point of , which is the unique solution of the variational inequality

Proof. We divide the proof into several steps as follows.
Step  1. We show that is bounded. To this end, let . Then, noting that we have which implies So, we obtain By induction, we have Hence, is bounded. Since is a bounded mapping, is bounded. From (33), it follows that and so is bounded (as ).
Step  2. We show that . In fact, by (33) and the condition (C1), we have
Step  3. We show that where with being defined by . To this end, we note that Then, it follows that which implies that From Proposition 3, we know that , and , are bounded. Since and are also bounded and by Step 2, taking the upper limit as in (45), we get where is a constant such that for all and . Taking the as in (46) and noticing the fact that the two limits are interchangeable due to the fact that is norm-to-weak* uniformly continuous on each bounded subsets of , we have
Step  4. We show that , where with being defined by and is the unique solution of the variational inequality (34) by Theorem 4. First, from (33) and (35), we have This implies that where and . We observe that and . From the condition (C2) and Step 3, it is easily seen that and . Thus, applying Lemma 2 to (49), we conclude that . This completes the proof.

Corollary 6. Let be a uniformly smooth Banach space and let be a nonempty closed convex subset of . Let be a continuous pseudocontractive mapping such that and let be a continuous bounded strongly pseudocontractive mapping with a pseudocontractive constant . Let and be two sequences in satisfying the conditions (C1) and (C2) in Theorem 5. For arbitrary initial value , let the sequence be generated by (33) in Theorem 5. Then converges strongly to a fixed point of , which is the unique solution of the variational inequality (34).

Corollary 7 (see [16, Theorem 3.1]). Let be a uniformly smooth Banach space and let be a nonempty closed convex subset of . Let be a continuous pseudocontractive mapping such that . Let , and be three sequences in satisfying the conditions (C1) and (C2) in Theorem 5 and   for . For arbitrary initial value and a fixed anchor , let the sequence be generated by Then converges strongly to a fixed point of , which is the unique solution of the variational inequality

Proof. Taking ,  for  all   as a constant function, the result follows from Corollary 6.

Corollary 8. Let be a uniformly convex Banach space has a uniformly Gâteaux differentiable norm and let be a nonempty closed convex subset of . Let be a continuous pseudocontractive mapping such that and let be a continuous bounded strongly pseudocontractive mapping with a pseudocontractive constant . Let and be two sequences in satisfying the conditions (C1) and (C2) in Theorem 5. For arbitrary initial value , let the sequence be generated by (33) in Theorem 5. Then converges strongly to a fixed point of , which is the unique solution of the variational inequality (34).

Remark 9. (1) Theorem 5 extends and improves Theorem 3.1 of Yao et al.  in the following aspects.(a) is replaced by a continuous bounded strongly pseudocontractive mapping .  (b) The uniformly smooth Banach space is extended to a reflexive Banach space having a uniformly Gâteaux differentiable norm. (c) The condition in  is weakened to and as . (2)It is worth pointing out that in Corollaries 6 and 7, we do not use the Reich inequality (11) in comparison with Theorem 3.1 of Yao et al. .(3)Theorem 5 and Corollary 8 also develop and complement Theorem 3.1 and Corollary 3.2 of Song and Chen  by replacing the contractive mapping with a continuous bounded strongly pseudocontractive mapping in the iterative scheme in .(4)The assumption (H1) in Theorems 4 and 5 appears to be independent of the assumption (H2).(5)We point out that the results in this paper apply to all spaces, .

#### Acknowledgment

This study was supported by research funds from Dong-A University.

1. R. P. Agarwal, D. O'Regan, and D. R. Sahu, Fixed Point Theory for Lipschitzian-Type Mappings with Applications, vol. 6, Springer, 2009.
2. I. Cioranescu, Geometry of Banach Spaces, Duality Mappings and Nonlinear Problems, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1990.
3. M. M. Day, “Reflexive Banach spaces not isomorphic to uniformly convex spaces,” Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 47, pp. 313–317, 1941.
4. V. Zizler, “On some rotundity and smoothness properties of Banach spaces,” Dissertationes Mathematicae, vol. 87, pp. 5–33, 1971.
5. C. H. Morales and J. S. Jung, “Convergence of paths for pseudocontractive mappings in Banach spaces,” Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 128, no. 11, pp. 3411–3419, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
6. T. Kato, “Nonlinear semigroups and evolution equations,” Journal of the Mathematical Society of Japan, vol. 19, pp. 508–520, 1967.
7. K. Deimling, “Zeros of accretive operators,” Manuscripta Mathematica, vol. 13, pp. 365–374, 1974.
8. R. H. Martin, “Differential equations on closed subsets of Banach spaces,” Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 179, pp. 399–414, 1975. View at: Google Scholar
9. S. Reich, “An iterative procedure for constructing zeros of accretive sets in Banach spaces,” Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Method, & Applications,, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 85–92, 1978.
10. C. H. Morales, “Strong convergence of path for continuous pseudo-contractive mappings,” Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 135, no. 9, pp. 2831–2838, 2007.
11. C. E. Chidume, “Global iteration schemes for strongly pseudo-contractive maps,” Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 126, no. 9, pp. 2641–2649, 1998.
12. C. E. Chidume and M. O. Osilike, “Nonlinear accretive and pseudo-contractive operator equations in Banach spaces,” Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 779–789, 1998.
13. C. H. Morales and C. E. Chidume, “Convergence of the steepest descent method for accretive operators,” Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 127, no. 12, pp. 3677–3683, 1999.
14. S. Reich, “Strong convergence theorems for resolvents of accretive operators in Banach spaces,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 287–292, 1980.
15. A. Rafiq, “On Mann iteration in Hilbert spaces,” Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications, vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 2230–2236, 2007.
16. Y. Yao, Y.-C. Liou, and R. Chen, “Strong convergence of an iterative algorithm for pseudocontractive mapping in Banach spaces,” Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications, vol. 67, no. 12, pp. 3311–3317, 2007.
17. Y. Song and R. Chen, “Convergence theorems of iterative algorithms for continuous pseudocontractive mappings,” Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 486–497, 2007.
18. A. Moudafi, “Viscosity approximation methods for fixed-points problems,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 241, no. 1, pp. 46–55, 2000.
19. H.-K. Xu, “Viscosity approximation methods for nonexpansive mappings,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 298, no. 1, pp. 279–291, 2004.
20. H.-K. Xu, “Iterative algorithms for nonlinear operators,” Journal of the London Mathematical Society, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 240–256, 2002.
21. R. H. Martin,, “Differential equations on closed subsets of a Banach space,” Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 179, pp. 399–414, 1973.
22. V. Barbu and Th. Preocupanu, Convexity and Optimization in Banach Spaces, Editura Academiei R.S.R., Bucharest, Romania, 1978.