A Comparison of Bullwhip Effect under Various Forecasting Techniques in Supply Chains with Two Retailers

<table>Impact of <svg height="16.9" id="M162" style="vertical-align:-4.0404pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 16.0625 16.9" width="16.0625" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,11.812)"><path d="M542 242q0 -106 -80 -176.5t-192 -72.5l-55 -251l-6 -3q-18 7 -28 38t1 91l23 124q-85 16 -133.5 72.5t-48.5 137.5q0 95 62.5 159.5t166.5 97.5l14 -31q-77 -32 -115 -82.5t-38 -128.5q0 -63 31.5 -107t74.5 -59l125 597l56 43l16 -10l-40 -168q-9 -40 3 -45
q77 -33 120 -85.5t43 -140.5zM469 232q0 67 -37 115t-77 62l-76 -370q89 -4 139.5 52.5t50.5 140.5z" id="x1D719"></path></g>
<g transform="matrix(.012,-0,0,-.012,9.663,16.837)"><path d="M384 0h-275v27q67 5 81.5 18.5t14.5 68.5v385q0 38 -7.5 47.5t-40.5 10.5l-48 2v24q85 15 178 52v-521q0 -55 14.5 -68.5t82.5 -18.5v-27z" id="x31"></path></g>
</svg> on bullwhip effect for different <svg height="15.25" id="M163" style="vertical-align:-3.276pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 16.1625 15.25" width="16.1625" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,11.112)"><path d="M559 163q-23 -66 -68 -163h-474l6 26q62 4 79.5 19.5t28.5 75.5l78 409q7 35 8.5 49t-8 25t-24 13t-51.5 5l5 28h266l-6 -28q-65 -5 -79.5 -18t-25.5 -74l-76 -406q-10 -57 14 -75q12 -13 96 -13q93 0 126 29q41 40 76 109z" id="x1D43F"></path></g>
<g transform="matrix(.012,-0,0,-.012,9.763,15.187)"><path d="M384 0h-275v27q67 5 81.5 18.5t14.5 68.5v385q0 38 -7.5 47.5t-40.5 10.5l-48 2v24q85 15 178 52v-521q0 -55 14.5 -68.5t82.5 -18.5v-27z" id="x31"></path></g>
</svg> under the MA.</table>

Abstract and Applied Analysis

fig4

Figure 4

Figure 4: A Comparison of Bullwhip Effect under Various Forecasting Techniques in Supply Chains with Two Retailers 