Abstract and Applied Analysis

Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 932085, 5 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/932085

## The Solution to the BCS Gap Equation for Superconductivity and Its Temperature Dependence

Division of Mathematical Sciences, Graduate School of Engineering, Gunma University, 4-2 Aramaki-machi, Maebashi 371-8510, Japan

Received 27 May 2013; Accepted 9 August 2013

Academic Editor: Santanu Saha Ray

Copyright © 2013 Shuji Watanabe. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

From the viewpoint of operator theory, we deal with the temperature dependence of the solution to the BCS gap equation for superconductivity. When the potential is a positive constant, the BCS gap equation reduces to the simple gap equation. We first show that there is a unique nonnegative solution to the simple gap equation, that it is continuous and strictly decreasing, and that it is of class with respect to the temperature. We next deal with the case where the potential is not a constant but a function. When the potential is not a constant, we give another proof of the existence and uniqueness of the solution to the BCS gap equation, and show how the solution varies with the temperature. We finally show that the solution to the BCS gap equation is indeed continuous with respect to both the temperature and the energy under a certain condition when the potential is not a constant.

#### 1. Introduction

We use the unit , where stands for the Boltzmann constant. Let and stand for the Debye frequency and the wave vector of an electron, respectively. Let be Planck’s constant, and set . Let and stand for the electron mass and the chemical potential, respectively. We denote by the absolute temperature, and by the kinetic energy of an electron minus the chemical potential; that is, . Note that .

In the BCS model [1, 2] of superconductivity, the solution to the BCS gap equation (1) is called the gap function. The gap function corresponds to the energy gap between the superconducting ground state and the superconducting first excited state. Accordingly, the value of the gap function (the solution) is nonnegative. We regard the gap function as a function of both and and denote it by ; that is, . The BCS gap equation is the following nonlinear integral equation (): where is the potential multiplied by the density of states per unit energy at the Fermi surface and is a function of and . In (1) we introduce , which is small enough and fixed . In the original BCS model, the integration interval is ; it is not . However, we introduce very small for the following mathematical reasons. In order to show the continuity of the solution to the BCS gap equation with respect to the temperature and in order to show that the transition to a superconducting state is a second-order phase transition, we make the form of the BCS gap equation somewhat easier to handle. So we choose the closed interval as the integration interval in (1).

The integral with respect to in (1) is sometimes replaced by the integral over with respect to the wave vector . Odeh [3] and Billard and Fano [4] established the existence and uniqueness of the positive solution to the BCS gap equation in the case . For , Vansevenant [5] determined the transition temperature (the critical temperature) and showed that there is a unique positive solution to the BCS gap equation. Recently, Frank et al. [6] gave a rigorous analysis of the asymptotic behavior of the transition temperature at weak coupling. Hainzl et al. [7] proved that the existence of a positive solution to the BCS gap equation is equivalent to the existence of a negative eigenvalue of a certain linear operator to show the existence of a transition temperature. Moreover, Hainzl and Seiringer [8] derived upper and lower bounds on the transition temperature and the energy gap for the BCS gap equation.

Since the existence and uniqueness of the solution were established for each fixed in the previous literature, the temperature dependence of the solution is not covered. It is well known that studying the temperature dependence of the solution to the BCS gap equation is very important in condensed matter physics. This is because, by dealing with the thermodynamical potential, this study leads to a mathematical proof of the statement that the transition to a superconducting state is a second-order phase transition. So, in condensed matter physics, it is highly desirable to study the temperature dependence of the solution to the BCS gap equation.

When the potential in (1) is a positive constant, the BCS gap equation reduces to the simple gap equation (3). In this case, one assumes in the BCS model that there is a unique nonnegative solution to the simple gap equation (3) and that the solution is of class with respect to the temperature (see e.g., [1] and [9, (11.45), page 392]). In this paper, applying the implicit function theorem, we first show that this assumption of the BCS model indeed holds true; we show that there is a unique nonnegative solution to the simple gap equation (3) and that the solution is of class with respect to the temperature . We next deal with the case where the potential is not a constant but a function. In order to show how the solution varies with the temperature, we then give another proof of the existence and uniqueness of the solution to the BCS gap equation (1) when the potential is not a constant. More precisely, we show that the solution belongs to the subset (see (12)). Note that the subset depends on . We finally show that the solution to the BCS gap equation (1) is indeed continuous with respect to both and when satisfies (20) when the potential is not a constant.

Let where is a constant. Then the gap function depends on the temperature only. So we denote the gap function by in this case; that is, . Then (1) leads to the simple gap equation The following is the definition of the temperature .

*Definition 1 (see [1]). *Consider

#### 2. The Simple Gap Equation

Set

Proposition 2 (see [10, Proposition 2.2]). *Let be as in (5). Then there is a unique nonnegative solution to the simple gap equation (3) such that the solution is continuous and strictly decreasing on the closed interval :
**
Moreover, the solution is of class on the interval and satisfies
*

*Proof. *Setting turns (3) into
Note that the right side is a function of the two variables and . We see that there is a unique function defined by (8) implicitly, that the function is continuous and strictly decreasing on , and that at . We moreover see that the function is of class on the closed interval .

*Remark 3. *We set for .

*Remark 4. *In Proposition 2, is nothing but in [10, Proposition 2.2].

We introduce another positive constant . Let . We assume the following condition on : When at all , an argument similar to that in Proposition 2 gives that there is a unique nonnegative solution to the simple gap equation Here, is defined by We again set for . A straightforward calculation gives the following.

Lemma 5 ([11, Lemma 1.5]). *
(a) The inequality holds. (b) If, then . If , then .*

Note that Proposition 2 and Lemma 5 point out how and depend on the temperature and how and vary with the temperature; see Figure 1.

*Remark 6. *On the basis of Proposition 2, the present author [10, Theorem 2.3] proved that the transition to a superconducting state is a second-order phase transition under the restriction (2).

#### 3. The BCS Gap Equation

Let and fix , where is that in (11). We consider the Banach space consisting of continuous functions of only and deal with the following subset :

*Remark 7. *The subset depends on . So we denote each element of by ; see Figure 1.

As it is mentioned in the introduction, the existence and uniqueness of the solution to the BCS gap equation were established for each fixed in the previous literature, and the temperature dependence of the solution is not covered. We therefore give another proof of the existence and uniqueness of the solution to the BCS gap equation (1) so as to show how the solution varies with the temperature. More precisely, we show that the solution belongs to .

Theorem 8 (see [11, Theorem 2.2]). *Assume condition (9) on . Let be fixed. Then there is a unique nonnegative solution to the BCS gap equation (1) :
**
Consequently, the solution is continuous with respect to and varies with the temperature as follows:
*

*Proof. *We define a nonlinear integral operator on by
where . Clearly, is a bounded, closed, and convex subset of the Banach space . A straightforward calculation gives that the operator is compact. Therefore, the Schauder fixed point theorem applies, and hence the operator has at least one fixed point . Moreover, we can show the uniqueness of the fixed point; see Figure 2.

The existence of the transition temperature is pointed out in the previous papers [5–8]. In our case, it is defined as follows.

*Definition 9. *Let be as in Theorem 8. The transition temperature stemming from the BCS gap equation (1) is defined by

*Remark 10. *Combining Definition 9 with Theorem 8 implies that . For , we set at all .

#### 4. Continuity of the Solution with respect to the Temperature

Let be a constant satisfying . An argument similar to that in Proposition 2 gives that there is a unique nonnegative solution to the simple gap equation Here, is defined by We set for . A straightforward calculation gives the following.

Lemma 11. * (a).** (b) If , then .** (c) If , then .** (d) If , then .** (e) If , then .*

*Remark 12. *Let the functions be as above. For each , there is the inverse . Here,
and .

We introduce another temperature. Let satisfy and

*Remark 13. *Numerically, the temperature is very small.

Consider the following subset of the Banach space consisting of continuous functions of both the temperature and the energy :

Theorem 14 (see [12, Theorem 1.2]). *Assume (9). Let be as in Theorem 8 and as in (21). Then . Consequently, the gap function is continuous on .*

*Proof. *We define a nonlinear integral operator on by
where .

Clearly, is a closed subset of the Banach space . A straightforward calculation gives that the operator is contractive as long as (20) holds true. Therefore, the Banach fixed-point theorem applies, and hence the operator has a unique fixed point . The solution to the BCS gap equation is thus continuous both with respect to the temperature and with respect to the energy ; see Figure 3.

#### Acknowledgment

Shuji Watanabe is supported in part by the JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) 24540112.

#### References

- J. Bardeen, L. N. Cooper, and J. R. Schrieffer, “Theory of superconductivity,”
*Physical Review*, vol. 108, pp. 1175–1204, 1957. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - N. N. Bogoliubov, “A new method in the theory of superconductivity. I,”
*Soviet Physics*, vol. 34, pp. 41–46, 1958. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet - F. Odeh, “An existence theorem for the BCS integral equation,”
*Journal of Research and Development*, vol. 8, pp. 187–188, 1964. View at Google Scholar - P. Billard and G. Fano, “An existence proof for the gap equation in the superconductivity theory,”
*Communications in Mathematical Physics*, vol. 10, pp. 274–279, 1968. View at Google Scholar - A. Vansevenant, “The gap equation in superconductivity theory,”
*Physica D*, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 339–344, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet - R. L. Frank, C. Hainzl, S. Naboko, and R. Seiringer, “The critical temperature for the BCS equation at weak coupling,”
*The Journal of Geometric Analysis*, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 559–567, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - C. Hainzl, E. Hamza, R. Seiringer, and J. P. Solovej, “The BCS functional for general pair interactions,”
*Communications in Mathematical Physics*, vol. 281, no. 2, pp. 349–367, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - C. Hainzl and R. Seiringer, “Critical temperature and energy gap for the BCS equation,”
*Physical Review B*, vol. 77, Article ID 184517, 2008. View at Google Scholar - J. M. Ziman,
*Principles of the Theory of Solids*, Cambridge University Press, London, UK, 1972. View at MathSciNet - S. Watanabe, “A mathematical proof that the transition to a superconducting state is a second-order phase transition,”
*Far East Journal of Mathematical Sciences*, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 37–57, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - S. Watanabe, “The solution to the BCS gap equation and the second-order phase transition in superconductivity,”
*Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*, vol. 383, no. 2, pp. 353–364, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - S. Watanabe, “Addendum to ‘The solution to the BCS gap equation and the second-order phase transition in superconductivity’,”
*Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*, vol. 405, no. 2, pp. 742–745, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet