About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Abstract and Applied Analysis
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 124145, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/124145
Research Article

The Stability of Solutions for a Fractional Predator-Prey System

1School of Mathematics, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China
2Department of Mathematics, Jilin Agriculture Science and Technology College, Jilin 132101, China

Received 6 January 2014; Accepted 31 March 2014; Published 16 April 2014

Academic Editor: Changbum Chun

Copyright © 2014 Yingjia Guo. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

We study a class of fractional predator-prey systems with Holling II functional response. A unique positive solution of this system is obtained. In order to prove the asymptotical stability of positive equilibrium for this system, we study the Lyapunov stability theory of a fractional system.

1. Introduction

We consider the following fractional predator-prey model with Holling Type II functional response: where and represent the population densities of prey and predator at time , respectively. The parameters , , , , , and are positive constants that stand for prey intrinsic growth rate, carrying capacity, the maximum ingestion rate, half-saturation constant, predator death rate, and the conversion factor, respectively. One of the most popular predator-prey models with Holling Type II functional response is established in [1, 2]. The asymptotic behavior of a stochastic predator-prey system with Holling Type II functional response is studied in [3]. The existence and asymptotical stability of equilibria and limit cycles for predator-prey systems with Holling II are obtained in [4]. A more complicated case about predator-prey systems is studied in [5, 6]. White noise is always present in natural world; Liu et al. studied the asymptotic behavior of a stochastic predator-prey system with Holling II functional response.

However, in the real world, there are still many problems that cannot be solved by usual prey-predator model. Some complexity on multiscale analysis can be simplified by the fractional order calculus. Fractional differential equations have been studied in many other fields, for example, economic [7], physics [810], material [11], and so forth. In this paper, we present a fractional prey-predator model (1) to describe the ecosystem which performs well in the practical problem.

We will study long time behavior of system (1). If , then system (1) has a unique positive equilibrium: The positive equilibrium is asymptotically stable, which is proved in Section 5. The fractional derivative of (1) is modified Riemann-Liouville derivative, which is established in [12, 13]. There are some good properties on the fractional derivative to study fractional system, such as the chain rule and fractional Taylor series. The details of modified Riemann-Liouville derivative are given in Section 2. We show that there is a unique nonnegative solution of (1) in Section 3. In order to prove that the positive equilibrium is stable, we give a Lyapunov stability theorem of the fractional system in Section 4.

2. Preliminaries

2.1. Fractional Derivative via Fractional Difference

For an introduction to the classical fractional calculus we refer the reader to [1417].

Definition 1. Let , , be a continuous function, and let be a constant discretization span. Define the forward operator ; that is, (the symbol := means that the left side is defined by the right one) Then the fractional difference of order , , of is defined by the expression and its derivative of fractional order is defined by the expression

2.2. Modified Riemann-Liouville Derivative

In this section we briefly review the main notions and results from the recent fractional calculus proposed by Jumarie [12, 18, 19].

Definition 2 (Riemann-Liouville definition revisited). Refer to the function of Definition 1. Then its fractional derivative of order is defined by the expression
For positive , one will set

2.3. Useful Relations

Here we give some properties of the modified Riemann-Liouville derivative (see [13]) which are used further in this paper.(i)Consider (ii)Useful differential relation: (iii)Consider (iv)The chain rule:

2.4. Integration with respect to

The solution of the equation is defined by the following result (see [13]).

Lemma 3. Let denote a continuous function; then the solution of (12) is defined by the equality

3. Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Solution

Theorem 4. For any initial value , there is a unique global solution of system (1) on .

Proof. Note that the coefficients of system (1) are locally Lipschitz continuous for the given initial value ; there is a unique local solution on , where is the explosion time. Hence, we know that , is a unique positive local solution of system (1). To show that this solution is global, we need to show that . Let be sufficiently large so that , all lie within the interval . For each integer , define
Clearly, is increasing as . Set , where . If we can show that , then and for all . In other words, to complete the proof all we need to show is that . If this statement is false, then there is a constant such that Hence there is an integer such that Define a -function by where is a positive constant to be determined later. Using the chain rule, we get Choose such that ; then where is a positive constant. Then
Therefore, on the one hand, Using the equality (13), we have which implies that
On the other hand, using the differential relation (9), Therefore, Set for . Note that there is at least one of and that equals either or ; then Hence, Let lead to the contradiction that , . So we must therefore have .

4. Lyapunov Stability Theory

Consider the equation Here, and are -dimensional column vectors. Suppose that and is continuous in and satisfies local Lipschitz condition.

Definition 5 (Lyapunov Stability). is said to be stable (or Lyapunov stable) if, given , there exists a such that, for any satisfying , the solution of (28) is defined for and has the following inequality:

We remark that a solution which is not stable is said to be unstable.

Definition 6 (asymptotic stability). is said to be asymptotically stable if it is Lyapunov stable and there exists such that, for any satisfying , .

Define a -scalar function in

Using the chain rule, we have

Theorem 7. Let be function satisfying , .(i)If , then system (28) has a stable null solution;(ii)if , then system (28) has an asymptotically stable null solution;(iii)the null solution of system (28) is unstable provided that .

Proof. Consider the following.
Case1. Consider Obviously, Let ; then .
Let ; the right maximal interval of existence of for (30) is .
That is to say, for , Then .
Using (9), Therefore, Thus, from (32), we obtain
Case  2. We can easily know that the system (28) has a stable null solution. We will consider that there exists such that for any satisfying then .
Let ; then for , . is bounded for ; then there exists increasing which converges to such that Suppose . One obtains Since , then Using (9) yields Therefore, we have Besides, for any satisfying , which implies that Then according to (38), It is easy to verify that, for any , Note that when , which implies that Let and note that is continuous and is continuous for initial value; we have which contradicts (45).
Thus, .
Case3. Suppose system (28) has a stable null solution; then , , ; we have , .
Let , ; according to condition (iii) in Theorem 7, we know Then there exists satisfying .
Next, we show ; then there exists , such that Thus, Noting that is bounded and is unbounded when , this contradiction shows that the null solution of system (28) is unstable when .

Example 8. Consider the stability of the null solution of system: where . Define a function . Then , , , . Here by Theorem 7 the system has a stable solution.

Example 9. Consider the stability of the null solution of system: Define a function , where . Obviously, , , , ; we can choose the constants such that , . Then and by Theorem 7 the system has an asymptotically stable null solution.

5. The Stability of the Solution

Since , then there is a positive equilibrium of system (1), and Let where is a positive constant to be determined later. Then using the chain rule, we have Choose such that yields

Let

Note that Then Note that Then

Consider a Lyapunov function defined by where is a positive constant to be determined later. Then Choose such that Then it follows from (65) that According to (66), Thus,

Hence, from these arguments, we get the following result.

Theorem 10. If such that system (1) has a positive equilibrium and is defined as in the proof, then system (1) is asymptotically stable.

Conflict of Interests

The author declares that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgment

The author thanks Professor Y. Li for his valuable discussion.

References

  1. H. I. Freedman, Deterministic Mathematical Models in Population Ecology, vol. 57 of Monographsand Textbooks in Pure and Applied Mathematics, Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, USA, 1980. View at MathSciNet
  2. C. S. Holling, “The components of predation as revealed by a study of small-mammal predation of the european pine sawy,” Canadian Entomologist, vol. 91, no. 5, pp. 293–320, 1959. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. Z. W. Liu, N. Z. Shi, D. Q. Jiang, and C. Y. Ji, “The asymptotic behavior of a stochastic predator-prey system with Holling II functional response,” Abstract and Applied Analysis, vol. 2012, Article ID 801812, 14 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  4. L. S. Chen and Z. J. Jing, “Existence and uniqueness of limit cycles for the differential equations of predator-prey interaction,” Kexue Tongbao, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 521–523, 1984 (Chinese). View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  5. X. N. Liu and L. S. Chen, “Complex dynamics of Holling type II Lotka-Volterra predator-prey system with impulsive perturbations on the predator,” Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 311–320, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  6. S. W. Zhang and L. S. Chen, “A Holling II functional response food chain model with impulsive perturbations,” Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1269–1278, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  7. L. N. Song and W. G. Wang, “Solution of the fractional Black-Scholes option pricing model by finite difference method,” Abstract and Applied Analysis, vol. 2013, Article ID 194286, 10 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  8. A. Atangana and A. Secer, “The time-fractional coupled-Korteweg-de-Vries equations,” Abstract and Applied Analysis, vol. 2013, Article ID 947986, 8 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  9. I. Karatay and S. R. Bayramoglu, “A characteristic difference scheme for time-fractional heat equations based on the Crank-Nicholson difference schemes,” Abstract and Applied Analysis, vol. 2012, Article ID 548292, 11 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  10. A. Golbabai and K. Sayevand, “Solitary pattern solutions for fractional Zakharov-Kuznetsov equations with fully nonlinear dispersion,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 757–766, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  11. H. Jafari, H. Tajadodi, N. Kadkhoda, and D. Baleanu, “Fractional subequation method for Cahn-Hilliard and Klein-Gordon equations,” Abstract and Applied Analysis, vol. 2013, Article ID 587179, 5 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  12. G. Jumarie, “Modified Riemann-Liouville derivative and fractional Taylor series of nondifferentiable functions further results,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 51, no. 9-10, pp. 1367–1376, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  13. G. Jumarie, “The Minkowski's space-time is consistent with differential geometry of fractional order,” Physics Letters A, vol. 363, no. 1-2, pp. 5–11, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  14. A. A. Kilbas, H. M. Srivastava, and J. J. Trujillo, Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations, vol. 204, Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006. View at MathSciNet
  15. K. S. Miller and B. Ross, An Introduction to the Fractional Calculus and Fractional Differential Equations, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1993. View at MathSciNet
  16. I. Podlubny, Fractional Differential Equations, vol. 198, Academic Press, San Diego, Calif, USA, 1999. View at MathSciNet
  17. S. G. Samko, A. A. Kilbas, and O. I. Marichev, Fractional Integrals and Derivatives, Translated from the 1987 Russian Original, Gordon and Breach, Yverdon, Switzerland, 1993. View at MathSciNet
  18. G. Jumarie, “Fractional Hamilton-Jacobi equation for the optimal control of nonrandom fractional dynamics with fractional cost function,” Journal of Applied Mathematics & Computing, vol. 23, no. 1-2, pp. 215–228, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  19. G. Jumarie, “Table of some basic fractional calculus formulae derived from a modified Riemann-Liouville derivative for non-differentiable functions,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 378–385, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet