/ / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 208530 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/208530

Aabed Mohammed, Maslina Darus, "On New -Valent Meromorphic Function Involving Certain Differential and Integral Operators", Abstract and Applied Analysis, vol. 2014, Article ID 208530, 7 pages, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/208530

# On New -Valent Meromorphic Function Involving Certain Differential and Integral Operators

Revised02 Jan 2014
Accepted05 Jan 2014
Published17 Feb 2014

#### Abstract

We define new subclasses of meromorphic -valent functions by using certain differential operator. Combining the differential operator and certain integral operator, we introduce a general -valent meromorphic function. Then we prove the sufficient conditions for the function in order to be in the new subclasses.

#### 1. Introduction

Let denote the class of meromorphic functions of the form which are analytic and -valent in the punctured unit disc: A function is said to be in the class of meromorphic -valent starlike of order if it satisfies the following inequality:

For , Saif and Kılıçman  introduced the linear operator , as follows: and in general, for , we can write It is easy to see that, for , we have

Meromorphically multivalent functions have been extensively studied by several authors; see, for example, Uralegaddi and Somanatha [2, 3], Liu and Srivastava [4, 5], Mogra [6, 7], Srivastava et al. , Aouf et al. [9, 10], Joshi and Srivastava , Owa et al. , and Kulkarni et al. .

Now, for , we define the following new subclasses.

Definition 1. Let a function be analytic in . Then is in the class if, and only if, satisfies
where ,   ,  ,   .

From (6), one can see that (7) is equivalent to

Remark 2. In Definition 1, if we set(i) and , then we have [14, Definition 1.1];(ii) and , then we have , the class of meromorphic -valent starlike of order ;(iii) and , then we have [14, Definition 1.7].

Definition 3. Let a function be analytic in . Then is in the class if, and only if, satisfies where ,  ,  ,  ,  .

Inequality (9) is equivalent to

Remark 4. In Definition 3, if we set(i) and , then we have [14, Definition 1.3];(ii)for and , then we have [14, Definition 1.8].

Definition 5. Let a function be analytic in . Then is in the class , if, and only if, satisfies where ,  ,  ,  .

Inequality (11) is equivalent to

Remark 6. In Definition 5, if we set(i) and , then we have [14, Definition 1.5];(ii)for and , then we have [14, Definition 1.9].

Recently, Mohammed and Darus  introduced the following -valent meromorphic function: where is the integral operator introduced and studied by the authors [15, 16] and defined by where For we obtain . It is clear that

By using the differential operator given by (4), we introduce the following -valent meromorphic function.

Definition 7. Let ,    and ,  . One defines the -valent meromorphic function :, where and is the differential operator given by (4).

Remark 8. If we set ,   and , then we have the -valent meromorphic function given by (13).

#### 2. Main Results

To prove our main results, we need the following lemma.

Lemma 9. For the -valent meromorphic function given by (18), one has

Proof. From (18), we have Differentiating (20) logarithmically and then by simple computation, we get From (6), we obtain Then using (22) on the right-hand side of (21), one gets Multiplying (23) by yields that or, equivalently, we can write that which is the desired result.

Our first theorem is as follows.

Theorem 10. Let ,   ,   and ,  . Suppose that If   , then the function defined by (18) is in the class , where

Proof. Since   , by (9), we have By (19), we get This is equivalent to From (28) together with (30), we can get Hence, we obtain , where .

Corollary 11. Let ,   ,  ,  , and ,  . Suppose that If   , then the function , defined by (18), is in the class , where is defined as in (27).

Proof. In Theorem 10, we consider .

By Corollary 11, we easily get the following.

Corollary 12. Let ,   ,  ,  , and ,  . Suppose that If   , then the function , defined by (18), is in the class .

Now, we prove a sufficient condition for the function defined by (18) to belong to the class .

Theorem 13. Let ,   ,   , and ,  . Suppose that If   , then the function defined by (18) is in the class .

Proof. Since   , by (9), we have On the other hand, from (19), we obtain the following: Considering (10) with the above equality, we find The proof is complete.

Corollary 14. Let ,   ,   , and . Suppose that If   , then the function defined by (18) is in the class .

Proof. In Theorem 13, we consider that

Next, for the function defined by (18) to belong to the class , we have the following result.

Theorem 15. Let ,   , and . Suppose that If , then the function .

Proof. Since , by (11), we have Combining (12), (30), and the above inequality, we obtain which is and finally Hence, by (12), we have .

Corollary 16. Let and . Suppose that If , then the function defined by (18) is in the class .

Proof. In Theorem 15, we consider .

Finally, we end this paper by the following theorem and its consequence.

Theorem 17. Let ,   , and . Suppose that If , then the function defined by (18) is in the class .

Proof. Since , by (11), we have Considering this inequality and (30), we obtain Hence, we have .

Corollary 18. Let and . Suppose that If , then the function defined by (18) is in the class .

Proof. In Theorem 17, we consider that .

For other work that we can look at regarding differential and integral operators, see [14, 1824].

#### Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

#### Acknowledgment

The work here is fully supported by UKM′s Grants: AP-2013-009 and DIP-2013-001.

1. A. Saif and A. Kılıçman, “On certain subclasses of meromorphically $p$-valent functions associated by the linear operator ${D}_{\lambda }^{n}$,” Journal of Inequalities and Applications, vol. 2011, Article ID 401913, 16 pages, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
2. B. A. Uralegaddi and C. Somanatha, “New criteria for meromorphic starlike univalent functions,” Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 137–140, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
3. B. A. Uralegaddi and C. Somanatha, “Certain classes of meromorphic multivalent functions,” Tamkang Journal of Mathematics, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 223–231, 1992.
4. J.-L. Liu and H. M. Srivastava, “A linear operator and associated families of meromorphically multivalent functions,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 259, no. 2, pp. 566–581, 2001.
5. J.-L. Liu and H. M. Srivastava, “Some convolution conditions for starlikeness and convexity of meromorphically multivalent functions,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 13–16, 2003.
6. M. L. Mogra, “Meromorphic multivalent functions with positive coefficients. I,” Mathematica Japonica, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 1990.
7. M. L. Mogra, “Meromorphic multivalent functions with positive coefficients. II,” Mathematica Japonica, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1089–1098, 1990.
8. H. M. Srivastava, H. M. Hossen, and M. K. Aouf, “A unified presentation of some classes of meromorphically multivalent functions,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 38, no. 11-12, pp. 63–70, 1999.
9. M. K. Aouf and H. M. Hossen, “New criteria for meromorphic $p$-valent starlike functions,” Tsukuba Journal of Mathematics, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 481–486, 1993. View at: Google Scholar | MathSciNet
10. M. K. Aouf and H. M. Srivastava, “A new criterion for meromorphically p-valent convex functions of order alpha,” Mathematical Sciences Research Hot-Line, vol. 1, no. 8, pp. 7–12, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
11. S. B. Joshi and H. M. Srivastava, “A certain family of meromorphically multivalent functions,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 38, no. 3-4, pp. 201–211, 1999.
12. S. Owa, H. E. Darwish, and M. K. Aouf, “Meromorphic multivalent functions with positive and fixed second coefficients,” Mathematica Japonica, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 231–236, 1997.
13. S. R. Kulkarni, U. H. Naik, and H. M. Srivastava, “A certain class of meromorphically $p$-valent quasi-convex functions,” Panamerican Mathematical Journal, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 57–64, 1998. View at: Google Scholar | MathSciNet
14. A. Mohammed and M. Darus, “Integral operators on new families of meromorphic functions of complex order,” Journal of Inequalities and Applications, vol. 2011, article 121, 12 pages, 2011.
15. A. Mohammed and M. Darus, “The order of starlikeness of new $p$-valent meromorphic functions,” International Journal of Mathematical Analysis, vol. 6, no. 25-28, pp. 1329–1340, 2012. View at: Google Scholar | MathSciNet
16. A. Mohammed and M. Darus, “Some properties of certain integral operators on new subclasses of analytic functions with complex order,” Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 2012, Article ID 161436, 9 pages, 2012.
17. A. Mohammed and M. Darus, “A new integral operator for meromorphic functions,” Acta Universitatis Apulensis, no. 24, pp. 231–238, 2010.
18. A. Mohammed and M. Darus, “New properties for certain integral operators,” International Journal of Mathematical Analysis, vol. 4, no. 42, pp. 2101–2109, 2010.
19. A. Mohammed and M. Darus, “Starlikeness properties of a new integral operator for meromorphic functions,” Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 2011, Article ID 804150, 8 pages, 2011.
20. B. A. Frasin, “On an integral operator of meromorphic functions,” Matematichki Vesnik, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 167–172, 2012.
21. N. Breaz, D. Breaz, and M. Darus, “Convexity properties for some general integral operators on uniformly analytic functions classes,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 60, no. 12, pp. 3105–3107, 2010.
22. S. Bulut, “Some properties for an integral operator defined by Al-Oboudi differential operator,” Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 9, no. 4, article 115, 5 pages, 2008. View at: Google Scholar | MathSciNet
23. S. Bulut, “A new general integral operator defined by Al-Oboudi differential operator,” Journal of Inequalities and Applications, vol. 2009, Article ID 158408, 13 pages, 2009.
24. P. Goswami and S. Bulut, “Starlikeness of general integral operator for meromorphic multivalent functions,” Journal of Complex Analysis, vol. 2013, Article ID 690584, 4 pages, 2013.