- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Annual Issues ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents

Abstract and Applied Analysis

Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 268230, 6 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/268230

## Ulam-Hyers Stability and Well-Posedness of Fixed Point Problems for *α*-*λ*-Contraction Mapping in Metric Spaces

^{1}Department of Mathematics, King Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 80203, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia^{2}Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science and Technology, Thammasat University, Rangsit Center, Pathum Thani 12121, Thailand

Received 13 January 2014; Revised 27 April 2014; Accepted 22 May 2014; Published 12 June 2014

Academic Editor: Adrian Petrusel

Copyright © 2014 Marwan Amin Kutbi and Wutiphol Sintunavarat. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

We study Ulam-Hyers stability and the well-posedness of the fixed point problem for new type of generalized contraction mapping, so called --contraction mapping. The results in this paper generalize and unify several results in the literature such as the Banach contraction principle.

#### 1. Introduction and Preliminaries

In 1940, the stability problem of functional equations, first initial from a question of Ulam. Among those was the following question concerning the stability of group homomorphisms [1].

*Question 1. *Let be a group and let be a metric group with a metric . Given , does there exist a such that if a function satisfies the inequality
for all , then there is a homomorphism with
for all ?

If the answer of this equation is affirmative, we say that the functional equation for group homomorphism is stable.

Next year, some partial answer of Ulam's question about Banach spaces was first given by Hyers [2] which opened an avenue for further development of analysis in this field.

Theorem 1 (see [2]). *Let be two Banach spaces and let be a function such that
**
for some and for all . Then the limit
**
exists for each , and is the unique additive function such that
**
for all . Moreover, if is continuous in for each fixed , then the function is linear.*

Taking this result into consideration, the additive Cauchy equation is said to have the Ulam-Hyers stability on if, for each function satisfying inequality (3) for some and for all , there exists an additive function such that is bounded on .

There are a number of results studied and extended Ulam-Hyers stability in many directions. In particular, Ulam-Hyers stability for fixed point problems has been studied by many researchers such as Bota et al. [3], Bota-Boriceanu and Petruşel [4], Lazr [5], Rus [6, 7], and F. A. Tişe and I. C. Tişe [8]. Furthermore, there are several remarkable results on the stability of certain classes of functional equations via fixed point approach. Some interesting results in this direction are presented by several mathematicians such as Brzdȩk et al. [9], Brzdek and Ciepliski [10], Brzdȩk and Ciepliński [11], and Cadariu et al. [12].

On the other hand, the concept of well-posedness of a fixed point problem has been of great interest to several researchers, for example, de Blasi and Myjak [13], Reich and Zaslavski [14], Lahiri and Das [15], and Popa [16, 17].

Recently, Samet et al. [18] introduced the concept of -admissible mapping as follows.

*Definition 2 (see [18]). *Let be a nonempty set and let be a mapping. A mapping is said to be -admissible if it satisfies the following condition:

*Example 3. *Let . Define and by for all and
Then, is -admissible.

*Example 4. *Let . Define and by for all and
Then, is -admissible.

*Remark 5. *In the setting of Examples 3 and 4 every nondecreasing self-mapping is -admissible.

They also introduced the new type of extension of Banach contraction and proved a fixed point theorem for such mapping via the concept of -admissible mapping. As application, they showed that these results can be utilized to derive fixed point theorems in partially ordered spaces. Furthermore, they apply the main results to the ordinary differential equations. Subsequently, there are a number of results proved for generalized contraction mappings via the concept of -admissible mapping in metric spaces and other spaces (see [19–26] and references therein).

With this work we have two purposes. The first aim of this work is to present new type of contraction mapping. We also establish some existence and uniqueness of fixed point theorems for such mappings in metric spaces via the concept of -admissible mapping. Our second purpose is to present Ulam-Hyers stability and well-posedness of a fixed point problem for this mapping in metric spaces.

#### 2. Main Results

For nonempty set and self-mapping , let be the class of functions for which for all .

First we give the following definition as a generalization of Banach contraction mappings.

*Definition 6. * Let be a metric space and let be a given mapping. One says that is an --contraction mapping if there exist two functions and such that

*Remark 7. *It is easy to check that an --contraction mapping is reduced to a Banach contraction mapping if for all and for all , where .

Now, we give some examples which show that the concept of an --contraction mapping is real generalization of Banach contraction mapping.

*Example 8. *Let , and the metric is defined by
for all . Define and by
We obtain that
Therefore, is not a Banach contraction. It is easy to see that is an --contraction mapping, where is defined by for all .

Next, we give nontrivial example of an --contraction mapping.

*Example 9. *Let , and the metric is defined by
for all . Define and by
We obtain that
This implies that is not a Banach contraction. Next, we show that is an --contraction mapping, where is defined by
Firstly, we show that . For , we get
Also, we get
From (17) and (18), we conclude that .

Secondarily, we claim that inequality (9) holds. For , we have
Otherwise, we see that inequality (9) holds. Therefore, is an --contraction mapping.

Our first main result is the following.

Theorem 10. *Let be a complete metric space and let be an --contraction mapping satisfying the following conditions: *(i)*is -admissible;*(ii)*there exists such that ;*(iii)* is continuous.**Then the fixed point problem of has a solution; that is, there exists such that .*

*Proof. *Let such that (such a point exists from condition (ii)). Define the sequence in by
If for some , then is a fixed point for and the proof finishes. Therefore, we may assume that
Since is -admissible and , we get . By induction, we get
Applying inequality (9) with and and using (22), we have
Again, applying inequality (9) with and and using (22) and the property of function , we get
By the same procedure, we get
Since , we obtain that is a Cauchy sequence in metric spaces . By the completeness of , we get for some . Since is continuous,
that is, is a fixed point of and thus the fixed point problem of has a solution. This completes the proof.

*Example 11. *Let , and the metric is defined by
for all . Define and by
We observe that is an --contraction mapping, where is defined by for all . Also, is -admissible and continuous. It is easy to see that there exist such that . Therefore, all hypotheses of Theorem 10 hold. Then we can apply Theorem 10. Indeed, the fixed points of are and .

In the following theorem, we will omit the continuity hypothesis of by adding a new condition.

Theorem 12. *Let be a complete metric space and let be an --contraction mapping satisfying the following conditions: *(i)* is -admissible;*(ii)*there exists such that ;*(iii)*if is a sequence in such that for all and as , then for all .**Then the fixed point problem of has a solution; that is, there exists such that .*

*Proof. *Following the proof of Theorem 10, we know that is a Cauchy sequence in the complete metric space . Then, there exists such that as .

On the other hand, from (22) and hypothesis (iii), we have
Now, using the triangular inequality, (9) and (30), we get
for all . According to the proof of Theorem 10, we obtain that for all . Therefore, we have
for all . Letting in above relation, we obtain that ; that is, . Therefore, the fixed point problem of has a solution. This completes the proof.

*Example 13. *Let , and the metric is defined by
for all . Define and by
We can prove that is an --contraction mapping, where is defined by for all and is also -admissible. It is easy to see that there exist such that . Moreover, condition (iii) in Theorem 12 holds. Therefore, all hypotheses of Theorem 12 hold and thus Theorem 12 assures the existence of fixed points of which are points and .

*Remark 14. *Theorem 10 cannot be used in case of Example 13 because is not continuous. Also, the Banach contraction principle cannot be used since does not satisfy Banach contractive condition.

We obtain that Theorems 10 and 12 do not claim the uniqueness of fixed point. To assure the uniqueness of the fixed point, we will consider the following hypotheses.: for all fixed points of mapping .: for all there exists such that and .

Theorem 15. *Adding condition or to the hypotheses of Theorem 10 (resp., Theorem 12) we obtain uniqueness of the fixed point of .*

*Proof. *Suppose that and are two fixed points of . If condition holds, then we get the uniqueness of the fixed point of from (9). So we only show that the case of holds. From condition , there exists such that
Since is -admissible, from (35), we get
for all . From (36) and (9), we have
for all . Proceeding inductively, we get
for all . Letting in previous inequality, we get
Similarly, using (36) and (9), we get
By the uniqueness of the limit of a sequence , we have . This finishes the proof.

*Remark 16. *Since a Banach contraction mapping is an --contraction mapping, the Banach contraction principle can be considered as a corollary of our main results.

#### 3. Ulam-Hyers Stability and Well-Posedness Results through the Fixed Point Problems

First we give the notion of Ulam-Hyers stability and well-posedness in sense of a fixed point problem (see also [7]).

*Definition 17. *Let be a metric space and let be a mapping. The fixed point problem
is called Ulam-Hyers stable if and only if there exists such that, for each and for each called an -solution of the fixed point equation (41), that is, satisfies the inequality
there exists a solution of (41) such that

*Definition 18. *Let be a metric space and let be a mapping. The fixed point problem of is said to be well-posed if it satisfies the following conditions: (i) has a unique fixed point in ;(ii)for any sequence in such that , one has .

Theorem 19. *Let be a complete metric space. Suppose that all the hypotheses of Theorem 15 hold. Then the following assertion holds: *(a)*if for all -solutions of the fixed point equation (41), then the fixed point problem is Ulam-Hyers stable;*(b)*if for all , where with and is a fixed point of , then the fixed point problem is well-posed.*

*Proof. *According to the proof of Theorem 15, we know that has a unique fixed point and so let be a unique fixed point of .

Here, we show that the fixed point problem of is Ulam-Hyers stable under the hypothesis in (a). Let and be a solution of (42); that is,
It is obvious that the unique fixed point of is also a solution of (42). From hypothesis in (a), we get . Now we have
This implies that
Consequently, the fixed point problem of is Ulam-Hyers stable.

Next, we prove that the fixed point problem of is well-posed under the assumption in (b). Let be a sequence in such that . From assumption in (b), we get for all . Now, we obtain that
for all . This implies that
for all . Since , we have and so the fixed point problem is well-posed.

*Interesting Problems*. Consider the following.(i)In Theorem 15, can we replace conditions and by other conditions or more general conditions?(ii)In Theorem 19, can we drop some condition in (a) and (b)?(iii)In Theorem 19, can we prove other types of stability of fixed point problem?(iv)Can we extend the result in this paper to other spaces such as complex valued metric space, partial metric space, -metric space, or circular metric space?

*Conflict of Interests*

*The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.*

*Acknowledgment*

*The first author gratefully acknowledges the support from the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR) at King Abdulaziz University (KAU) during this research. The second author would like to thank the Thailand Research Fund and Thammasat University for financial support, under Grant no. TRG5780013, during the preparation of this manuscript. Moreover, the authors thank the editors and referees for their insightful comments.*

*References*

- S. M. Ulam,
*A Collection of Mathematical Problems*, Interscience, New York, NY, USA, 1960. View at MathSciNet - D. H. Hyers, “On the stability of the linear functional equation,”
*Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America*, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 222–224, 1941. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - M.-F. Bota, E. Karapınar, and O. Mleşniţe, “Ulam-Hyers stability results for fixed point problems via $\alpha \text{-}\psi $-contractive mapping in $(b)$-metric space,”
*Abstract and Applied Analysis*, vol. 2013, Article ID 825293, 6 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet - M. F. Bota-Boriceanu and A. Petruşel, “Ulam-Hyers stability for operatorial equations,”
*Analele Stiintifice ale Universitatii Al I Cuza din Iasi: Matematica*, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 65–74, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - V. L. Lazǎr, “Ulam-Hyers stability for partial differential inclusions,”
*Electronic Journal of Qualitative Theory of Differential Equations*, vol. 21, pp. 1–19, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - I. A. Rus, “The theory of a metrical fixed point theorem: theoretical and applicative relevances,”
*Fixed Point Theory*, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 541–559, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - I. A. Rus, “Remarks on Ulam stability of the operatorial equations,”
*Fixed Point Theory*, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 305–320, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - F. A. Tişe and I. C. Tişe, “Ulam-Hyers-Rassias stability for set integral equations,”
*Fixed Point Theory*, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 659–668, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - J. Brzdȩk, J. Chudziak, and Z. Páles, “A fixed point approach to stability of functional equations,”
*Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods and Applications*, vol. 74, no. 17, pp. 6728–6732, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - J. Brzdek and K. Ciepliski, “A fixed point approach to the stability of functional equations in non-Archimedean metric spaces,”
*Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods and Applications*, vol. 74, no. 18, pp. 6861–6867, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - J. Brzdȩk and K. Ciepliński, “A fixed point theorem and the Hyers-Ulam stability in non-Archimedean spaces,”
*Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*, vol. 400, no. 1, pp. 68–75, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - L. Cadariu, L. Gavruta, and P. Gavruta, “Fixed points and generalized Hyers-Ulam stability,”
*Abstract Applied Analysis*, vol. 2012, 10 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar - F. S. de Blasi and J. Myjak, “Sur la porosité de l'ensemble des contractions sans point fixe,”
*Comptes Rendus des Séances de l'Académie des Sciences I: Mathématique*, vol. 308, no. 2, pp. 51–54, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - S. Reich and A. J. Zaslavski, “Well-posedness of fixed point problems,”
*Far East Journal of Mathematical Sciences (FJMS)*, Special volume, part III, pp. 393–401, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - B. K. Lahiri and P. Das, “Well-posedness and porosity of a certain class of operators,”
*Demonstratio Mathematica*, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 169–176, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - V. Popa, “Well-posedness of fixed point problem in orbitally complete metric spaces,”
*Studii şi Cercetări Ştiinţifice. Seria Matematică*, no. 16, pp. 209–214, 2006, Proceedings of ICMI 45. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - V. Popa, “Well posedness of fixed point problem in compact metric spaces,”
*Bulletin Universităţii Petrol-Gaze din Ploieşti. Seria Matematică—Informatică—Fizică*, vol. 60, no. 1, p. 14, 2008. View at Google Scholar - B. Samet, C. Vetro, and P. Vetro, “Fixed point theorems for $\alpha $-$\psi $-contractive type mappings,”
*Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications*, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 2154–2165, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet - R. P. Agarwal, W. Sintunavarat, and P. Kumam, “PPF dependent fixed point theorems for an c-admissible non-self mapping in the Razumikhin class,”
*Fixed Point Theory and Applications*, vol. 2013, article 280, 2013. View at Google Scholar - M. A. Alghamdi and E. Karapinar, “G-beta-psi contractive type mappings and related fixed point theorems,”
*Journal of Inequalities and Applications*, vol. 2013, article 70, 2013. View at Google Scholar - N. Hussain, E. Karapınar, P. Salimi, and P. Vetro, “Fixed point results for ${G}^{m}$-Meir-Keeler contractive and $G$-$(\alpha ,\psi )$-Meir-Keeler contractive mappings,”
*Fixed Point Theory and Applications*, vol. 2013, article 34, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet - E. Karapnar and B. Samet, “Generalized (
*α*-*ψ*) contractive type mappings and related fixed point theorems with applications,”*Abstract and Applied Analysis*, vol. 2012, Article ID 793486, 17 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus - E. Karapinar and W. Sintunavarat, “The existence of an optimal approximate solution theorems for generalized
*α*-proximal contraction non-self mappings and applications,”*Fixed Point Theory and Applications*, vol. 2013, article 323, 2013. View at Google Scholar - M. A. Kutbi and W. Sintunavarat, “The existence of fixed point theorems via $w$-distance and $\alpha $-admissible mappings and applications,”
*Abstract and Applied Analysis*, vol. 2013, Article ID 165434, 8 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet - W. Sintunavarat, S. Plubtieng, and P. Katchang, “Fixed point result and applications on b-metric space endowed with an arbitrary binary relation,”
*Fixed Point Theory and Applications*, vol. 2013, article 296, 2013. View at Google Scholar - M. U. Ali, T. Kamran, W. Sintunavarat, and P. Katchang, “Mizoguchi-Takahashi's fixed point theorem with $\alpha ,\eta $ functions,”
*Abstract and Applied Analysis*, vol. 2013, Article ID 418798, 4 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet

*
*