Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Abstract and Applied Analysis
Volume 2014, Article ID 731827, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/731827
Research Article

Empirical Mode Decomposition Combined with Local Linear Quantile Regression for Automatic Boundary Correction

1School of Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800 Minden, Penang, Malaysia
2Statistics Department, Sebha University, Sebha 00218, Libya

Received 22 November 2013; Revised 30 January 2014; Accepted 4 February 2014; Published 25 March 2014

Academic Editor: Biren N. Mandal

Copyright © 2014 Abobaker M. Jaber et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. N. E. Huang, Z. Shen, S. R. Long et al., “The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A, vol. 454, no. 1971, pp. 903–995, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  2. Z. Liu, “A novel boundary extension approach for empirical mode decomposition,” in Intelligent Computing, vol. 4113 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 299–304, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. W. Wang, X. Li, and R. Zhang, “Boundary processing of HHT using support vector regression machines,” in Computational Science—ICCS 2007, vol. 4489 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 174–177, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. Zhao and D. Huang, “Mirror extending and circular spline function for empirical mode decomposition method,” Journal of Zhejiang University Science, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 247–252, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  5. K. Zeng and M.-X. He, “A simple boundary process technique for empirical mode decomposition,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS '04), pp. 4258–4261, September 2004. View at Scopus
  6. Z. Zhao and Y. Wang, “A new method for processing end effect in empirical mode decomposition,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Communications, Circuits and Systems (ICCCAS '07), pp. 841–845, July 2007. View at Scopus
  7. J. Wang, Y. Peng, and X. Peng, “Similarity searching based boundary effect processing method for empirical mode decomposition,” Electronics Letters, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 58–59, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R. Koenker and G. Bassett Jr., “Regression quantiles,” Econometrica, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 33–50, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  9. M. Buchinsky, “Quantile regression, Box-Cox transformation model, and the U.S. wage structure, 1963–1987,” Journal of Econometrics, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 109–154, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. Y. Wei, A. Pere, R. Koenker, and X. He, “Quantile regression methods for reference growth charts,” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 1369–1382, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  11. P. Chaudhuri, “Nonparametric estimates of regression quantiles and their local Bahadur representation,” The Annals of Statistics, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 760–777, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  12. K. Yu and M. C. Jones, “Local linear quantile regression,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 93, no. 441, pp. 228–237, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  13. R. Koenker, Quantile Regression, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2005.
  14. H.-G. Müller and J.-L. Wang, “Hazard rate estimation under random censoring with varying kernels and bandwidths,” Biometrics, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 61–76, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  15. H.-G. Müller, “Smooth optimum kernel estimators near endpoints,” Biometrika, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 521–530, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  16. H.-S. Oh, P. Naveau, and G. Lee, “Polynomial boundary treatment for wavelet regression,” Biometrika, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 291–298, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  17. H.-S. Oh and T. C. M. Lee, “Hybrid local polynomial wavelet shrinkage: wavelet regression with automatic boundary adjustment,” Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 809–819, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  18. Q. Wu and S. D. Riemenschneider, “Boundary extension and stop criteria for empirical mode decomposition,” Advances in Adaptive Data Analysis, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 157–169, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  19. Y. Deng, W. Wang, C. Qian, Z. Wang, and D. Dai, “Boundary-processing-technique in EMD method and Hilbert transform,” Chinese Science Bulletin, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 954–961, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. D.-C. Lin, Z.-L. Guo, F.-P. An, and F.-L. Zeng, “Elimination of end effects in empirical mode decomposition by mirror image coupled with support vector regression,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 31, pp. 13–28, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. C. D. Blakely, A Fast Empirical Mode Decomposition Technique for Nonstationary Nonlinear Time Series, vol. 3, Elsevier Science, New York, NY, USA, 2005.
  22. A. Amar and Z. El abidine Guennoun, “Contribution of wavelet transformation and empirical mode decomposition to measurement of US core inflation,” Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol. 6, no. 135, pp. 6739–6752, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  23. Y. Fan, J. W. Zhi, and S. L. Yuan, “Improvement in time-series trend analysis,” Computer Technology and Development, vol. 16, pp. 82–84, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  24. R. Koenker, P. Ng, and S. Portnoy, “Quantile smoothing splines,” Biometrika, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 673–680, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  25. D. Ruppert, S. J. Sheather, and M. P. Wand, “An effective bandwidth selector for local least squares regression,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 90, pp. 1257–1270, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  26. X. Xu, Semiparametric quantile dynamic time series models and their applications [Ph.D. thesis], University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, USA, 2005.
  27. Z. Cai and X. Xu, “Nonparametric quantile estimations for dynamic smooth coefficient models,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 103, no. 484, pp. 1595–1608, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet