Conservation Laws, Symmetry Reductions, and New Exact Solutions of the (2 + 1)-Dimensional Kadomtsev-Petviashvili Equation with Time-Dependent Coefficients

Zhang, Li-hua

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/853578

Abstract and Applied Analysis

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusions References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Recent Advances in Symmetry Groups and Conservation Laws for Partial Differential Equations and Applications

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 | Article ID 853578 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/853578

Conservation Laws, Symmetry Reductions, and New Exact Solutions of the (2 + 1)-Dimensional Kadomtsev-Petviashvili Equation with Time-Dependent Coefficients

Li-hua Zhang¹

Academic Editor: Mariano Torrisi

Received16 Nov 2013

Revised25 Jan 2014

Accepted19 Feb 2014

Published09 Apr 2014

Abstract

The (2 + 1)-dimensional Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation with time-dependent coefficients is investigated. By means of the Lie group method, we first obtain several geometric symmetries for the equation in terms of coefficient functions and arbitrary functions of . Based on the obtained symmetries, many nontrivial and time-dependent conservation laws for the equation are obtained with the help of Ibragimov’s new conservation theorem. Applying the characteristic equations of the obtained symmetries, the (2 + 1)-dimensional KP equation is reduced to (1 + 1)-dimensional nonlinear partial differential equations, including a special case of (2 + 1)-dimensional Boussinesq equation and different types of the KdV equation. At the same time, many new exact solutions are derived such as soliton and soliton-like solutions and algebraically explicit analytical solutions.

1. Introduction

The Lie group method is a powerful tool to perform Lie symmetry analysis, study conservation laws, and look for exact solutions of nonlinear partial differential equations (NLPDEs) [1–4]. The notion of conservation laws, which plays an important role in the study of nonlinear science, is used for the development of appropriate numerical methods and for mathematical analysis, in particular, existence, uniqueness, and stability analysis [5, 6]. In addition, the existence of a large number of conservation laws of a partial differential equation (system) is a strong indication of its integrability. On the other hand, seeking exact solutions of NLPDEs has become one central theme of perpetual interest in mathematical physics as explicit solutions will be helpful to better understand the phenomena described by the equations. To get exact solutions of NLPDEs, many effective methods have been presented such as inverse scattering method [7], Hirota’s bilinear method [8], and Painlevé expansion method [9]. Among them the Lie group method offers a systematic algorithmic procedure to find the symmetry reductions and exact solutions of a partial differential equation. In this paper, we use the Lie group method to consider a time-dependent Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation: with time-dependent coefficient functions , and .

The above equation was also called “a 2D KdV equation with time-dependent coefficients” by Hereman and Zhuang [10]; they performed Painlevé analysis for (1) and found that (1) was Painlevé integrable when . Equation (1) can be reduced to the KdV equation () or the KP equation (). Equation (1) can also be reduced to the cylindrical KdV equation when or the cylindrical KP equation when . The KdV and KP equations and their cylindrical generalizations (2a) and (2b) are all known to be completely integrable [10]. Zhang et al. [11] performed Painlevé analysis for (1) and constructed bilinear auto-Bäcklund, analytic solutions in the Wronskian form. Soliton-like solutions, Jacobi elliptic function-like solutions, and other exact solutions have been obtained by the method of auxiliary equations [12–15]. Elwakil et al. [16] used the homogeneous balance method to study the exact solutions of (1). Based on the homogeneous balance method and Clarkson-Kruskal method, direct reduction and exact solutions have been obtained in [17] by Moussa and El-Shiekh. The bilinear formalism, bilinear Bäcklund transformation, and Lax pair of (1) have been obtained by the binary Bell polynomial approach in [18]. As far as we know, conservation laws and symmetry reductions for (1) have not been studied.

The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, the Lie group method is applied to the time-dependent Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation (1) and thus Lie symmetries of (1) are obtained. In Section 3, using the obtained symmetries and the general theorem on conservation laws by Ibragimov, nontrivial and time-dependent conservation laws are derived. In Section 4, we use the symmetry to get symmetry reductions and new exact solutions of (1). The last section is a short summary and discussion.

2. Lie Symmetry Analysis of (1)

Generally speaking, Lie symmetry denotes a transformation that leaves the solution manifold of a system invariant; that is, it maps any solution of the system into a solution of the same system, so it is also called geometric symmetry. In this section, we will perform Lie symmetry analysis for (1) by the classical Lie group method. Suppose that Lie symmetry of (1) is expressed as follows: where , , , and are undetermined functions with respect to , , , and . According to the procedures of Lie group method, the vector field (3) can be determined by applying the fourth prolongation of to (1) and thus the undetermined functions , , , and must satisfy the following invariant condition: where Substituting (5) into (4) with being a solution of (1), that is, we obtain the determining equations of symmetry (3). Solving the determining equations with the aid of Maple, we can get the following cases.

Case 1. When and are arbitrary functions, where and are arbitrary functions. It shows that (1) admits an infinite-dimensional Lie algebra of symmetries where

Case 2. When , , , , and , where , , , and are constants and and are arbitrary functions. This shows that the symmetries of equation have the form of where is a one-dimensional Lie algebra of symmetries and and are two infinite-dimensional Lie algebra of symmetries as expressed by (9) with .

Case 3. When , ., and , where and are arbitrary functions. It shows that the KP equation admits an infinite-dimensional Lie algebra of symmetries where is a constant and ; and are expressed by (9) with .,

Case 4. When , , and , where and are arbitrary functions, is an integral constant, and and satisfy the following ordinary differential equation: This shows that, under the condition (19), the equation admits an infinite-dimensional Lie algebra of symmetries where and are expressed by (9):

3. Conservation Laws for (1)

3.1. A General Theorem on Conservation Laws

As expressed through the famous Noether theorem, for a given differential equation, there is a close connection between Lie symmetries and conservation laws. To derive conservation laws of (1), we use the following conclusion proved by Ibragimov in [19].

Theorem 1. Every Lie point, Lie-Bäcklund, and nonlocal symmetry of a system of equations with independent variables and dependent variables; provides a conservation law for system (24) and the corresponding adjoint system Then the elements of the conservation vector are defined by the following expression: with

3.2. Conservation Laws for (1)

To search for conservation laws of (1) by Theorem 1, adjoint equation and formal Lagrangian of (1) must be known. We first construct its adjoint equation. Following the idea in [19], the adjoint equation of (1) is where is a new dependent variable with respect to , , and .

According to the method of constructing Lagrangian in [19], the formal Lagrangian for the system consisting of (1) and (28) is

By means of the symmetries of (1), conservation laws of the system consisting of (1) and (28) can be derived by Theorem 1. However, we are only interested in the conservation laws of (1). Therefore one has to eliminate the nonlocal variable which is introduced in the adjoint equation. To solve this problem, the concepts of self-adjointness, quasi-self-adjointness, and nonlinear self-adjointness are developed [20–24]. In the following, we will discuss the adjointness and nonlinear adjointness using these definitions.

Equation (1) is said to be self-adjoint if the equation obtained from the adjoint equation (28) by the substitution is identical with the original equation (1). It is easy to see that (28) is not identical with (1) when , so (1) is not a self-adjoint equation. According to the definition of nonlinear self-adjointness [24], (1) is said to be nonlinearly self-adjoint if its adjoint equation (28) is satisfied for all solutions of (1) upon a substitution In other words, (1) is nonlinearly self-adjoint if and only if where is an undetermined and smooth function.

From (31), we can get the following equation: Solving the above system with the aid of Maple, the final results read as where , , , and are arbitrary functions. In summary, we have the following statements.

Theorem 2. The time-dependent KP equation (1) is nonlinearly self-adjoint.

In the following, we first construct the conservation laws for the system consisting of the initial equation (1) and its adjoint (28).

For the symmetry in Case 1, the corresponding components of the conservation laws are

For the symmetry in Case 2, the corresponding components of the conservation laws are Here we should note that the coefficient function in the expression of , , and satisfies , , , and are constants, and , .

For the symmetry in Case 3, the corresponding components of the conservation laws are

For the fourth symmetry, the two functions and are determined by the differential equation (19) and they have many explicit solutions. For simplicity, we take ; then and . When , the corresponding Lie symmetry is and the components of the conservation laws are

We should mention that in the above components of the conservation laws for (1) and (28), is a solution of (1) and is a solution of the adjoint equation (28). Making use of the explicit solutions of (28), local conservation laws for (1) can be obtained. For example, when and in (34), where and are arbitrary functions, is an exact solution of (28). Substituting (40) into the above four conservation laws, we can obtain time-dependent and local conservation laws for (1). Here we take as an illustrative example; when the components of the conservation laws become

These are local and explicit conservation laws of (1). Next we show that the above conservation laws () are nontrivial: Obviously, if , are not zero at the same time, . And we can easily check that

4. Symmetry Reductions and New Exact Solutions of (1)

In Section 2, we obtain the Lie symmetries of (1). In this section, we will investigate the symmetry reductions and exact solutions for the equation. Using the obtained symmetries (3), similarity variables and symmetry reductions can be found by solving the corresponding characteristic equation: For the four different cases, we determine the following symmetry reductions and exact solutions of (1).

4.1. For the Symmetry in Case 1, Where and Are Arbitrary Functions

(i) When , , we can obtain and is a solution of the following reduction equation: From the above equation, we can obtain an algebraically explicit analytical solution for (1): where and are arbitrary functions of .

(ii) When , , the corresponding symmetry is By the characteristic equations of the symmetry, we have , . Substituting it into (1), we get a symmetry reduction of (1): If the coefficient functions , ., the obtained symmetry reduction can be simplified to Integrating (50) with respect to and taking the constant of integration to zero, we get the following equation: Equation (51) is the (1 + 1)-dimensional generalized KdV equation with variable coefficients. To the best of our knowledge, exact solutions of (51) have not been studied up to now. Solving (51) by the method in [25], we can get the following solutions for (1): where , , and are arbitrary constants and the function satisfies where , , and are constants; solutions of (53) have been given in [26]. By means of the solutions of (53), plenty of solutions for (1) can be obtained; for example, where denotes the modulus of the Jacobi elliptic function.

(iii) When , , , , , and , we can get And satisfies the following reduction equation: The above equation can be integrated by and, when we take the constant of integration to zero, we get a reduced reduction equation: Equation (57) is variable coefficient KdV equation and soliton-like solutions have been obtained in [27]. By means of the known solutions, many explicit solutions of (1) can be obtained. For example, where , , and are constants.

(iv) When and , , . By the corresponding characteristic equation of the symmetry, we have

Substituting it into (1), we get the following symmetry reduction of (1): Integrating the above equation with respect to and taking the constant of integration to zero, the obtained reduction equation becomes Equation (61) is a variable coefficient KdV equation [28, 29].

4.2. For the Symmetry in Case 2, , , ,

When , , , then , and ; the corresponding symmetry of (1) is By the characteristic equations of the symmetry, we can get the explicit solutions for (1) where the function satisfies the following reduction equation: Equation (64) is difficult to solve and we will study its exact solutions in a future paper.

4.3. For the Symmetry in Case 3, , , and

When , , the corresponding symmetry is By the characteristic equation of the symmetry, we have Substituting it into (1), we get a symmetry reduction of (1): Equation (67) is the special case of (2 + 1)-dimensional Boussinesq equation and exact solutions of (67) have been studied by Chen and Zhang in [30] (with , , , and ). With the help of the known solutions in [30], many explicit solutions of (1) can be obtained. We list the following soliton solutions (–) and Jacobi elliptic function solutions (–): where , and are constants, denotes the modulus of the Jacobi elliptic function, and and are arbitrary elements of . We should mention that the soliton solution is the limit of when , , . The solutions , , and are the limit of , , and , respectively, when , .

4.4. For the Symmetry in Case 4, , , and Satisfy (19)

For simplicity, we take , ; then and . Solving the corresponding characteristic equation, we get Substituting it into (1), we get a symmetry reduction of (1):

Obviously, is a solution of (70). From that, we can get an algebraically explicit analytical solution for (1) as follows: where and are integral constants. And, if , (70) becomes the following (2 + 1)-dimensional variable coefficient Boussinesq equation:

Remark 3. To the best of our knowledge, the symmetry reductions obtained in this paper have not been reported in the existent literature, so they are completely new. The exact solutions of (1) obtained here are all different from the known solutions and they are also new. All the solutions and conservation laws obtained in this paper for (1) have been checked by Maple software.

5. Conclusions

In summary, by performing Lie symmetry analysis to (1), four cases of geometric symmetries are obtained when the coefficient functions satisfy four different constraint conditions. According to the relationship between symmetry and conservation laws given by Ibragimov, many explicit and nontrivial conservation laws, which includes arbitrary functions of , are derived. These conservation laws may be useful for the explanation of some practical physical problems. Using the associated vector fields of the obtained symmetry, (1) is reduced to (1 + 1)-dimensional nonlinear partial differential equations including different types of variable coefficient KdV equation (see (51), (57), and (61)), special case of (2 + 1)-dimensional Boussinesq equation (see (67) and (72)), and other reduction equations (see (64) and (70)). Many new explicit solutions of (1) have been derived by solving the reduction equations. These solutions, including soliton solutions, Jacobi doubly periodic solutions, and algebraically explicit analytical solutions, can make one discuss the behavior of solutions and also provide mathematical foundation for the explanation of some interesting physical phenomena.

Conflict of Interests

The author declares that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgment

The work is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2013AQ005 and ZR2010AL019).

References

G. W. Bluman and S. Kumei, Symmetries and Differential Equations, vol. 81 of Applied Mathematical Sciences, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1989.
View at: MathSciNet
G. W. Bluman and S. C. Anco, Symmetry and Integration Methods for Differential Equations, vol. 154 of Applied Mathematical Sciences, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2002.
View at: MathSciNet
N. H. Ibragimov, Transformation Groups Applied to Mathematical Physics, Mathematics and its Applications (Soviet Series), D. Reidel Publishing, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1985.
View at: MathSciNet
P. J. Olver, Applications of Lie Groups to Differential Equations, vol. 107 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1986.
View at: Publisher Site | MathSciNet
P. D. Lax, “Integrals of nonlinear equations of evolution and solitary waves,” Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 21, pp. 467–490, 1968.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
T. B. Benjamin, “The stability of solitary waves,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A, vol. 328, pp. 153–183, 1972.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
M. J. Ablowitz and P. A. Clarkson, Solitons, Nonlinear Evolution Equations and Inverse Scattering, vol. 149 of London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1991.
View at: Publisher Site | MathSciNet
R. Hirota, “Exact solution of the korteweg-de vries equation for multiple Collisions of solitons,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 27, no. 18, pp. 1192–1194, 1971.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Weiss, M. Tabor, and G. Carnevale, “The Painlevé property for partial differential equations,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 522–526, 1983.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
W. Hereman and W. Zhuang, “Symbolic software for soliton theory,” Acta Applicandae Mathematicae, vol. 39, no. 1–3, pp. 361–378, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
C. Zhang, B. Tian, L.-L. Li, and T. Xu, “Analytic analysis on a generalized $(2 + 1)$ -dimensional variable-coefficient Korteweg-de Vries equation using symbolic computation,” International Journal of Modern Physics B, vol. 24, no. 27, pp. 5359–5370, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
E. Yomba, “Construction of new soliton-like solutions for the $(2 + 1)$ dimensional KdV equation with variable coefficients,” Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 75–79, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
E. Yomba, “Abundant families of Jacobi elliptic function-like solutions for a generalized variable coefficients 2D KdV equation via the extended mapping method,” Physics Letters A, vol. 349, no. 1–4, pp. 212–219, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Shen, J. Zhang, C. Ye, and Z. Pan, “New exact solutions of the $(2 + 1)$ -dimensional KdV equation with variable coefficients,” Physics Letters A, vol. 337, no. 1-2, pp. 101–106, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
H.-N. Xuan, D. Zhang, and C. Wang, “Families of non-travelling wave solutions to a generalized variable coefficient two-dimensional KdV equation using symbolic computation,” Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 171–174, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
S. A. Elwakil, S. K. El-labany, M. A. Zahran, and R. Sabry, “New exact solutions for a generalized variable coefficients 2D KdV equation,” Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 1083–1086, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
M. H. M. Moussa and R. M. El-Shiekh, “Direct reduction and exact solutions for generalized variable coefficients 2D KdV equation under some integrability conditions,” Communications in Theoretical Physics, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 551–554, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
Y. Zhang, W.-W. Wei, T.-F. Cheng, and Y. Song, “Binary Bell polynomial application in generalized (2+1)-dimensional KdV equation with variable coefficients,” Chinese Physics B, vol. 20, no. 11, Article ID 110204, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. H. Ibragimov, “A new conservation theorem,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 333, no. 1, pp. 311–328, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
N. H. Ibragimov, “Integrating factors, adjoint equations and Lagrangians,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 318, no. 2, pp. 742–757, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
N. H. Ibragimov, M. Torrisi, and R. Tracinà, “Self-adjointness and conservation laws of a generalized Burgers equation,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 44, no. 14, Article ID 145201, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
N. H. Ibragimov, “Quasi-self-adjoint differential equations,” Archives of ALGA, vol. 4, pp. 55–60, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
N. H. Ibragimov, “Nonlinear self-adjointness and conservation laws,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 44, no. 43, Article ID 432002, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. H. Ibragimov, “Nonlinear self-adjointness in constructing conservation laws,” Archives of ALGA, vol. 7-8, pp. 1–90, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
C.-L. Bai, C.-J. Bai, and H. Zhao, “A new generalized algebraic method and its application in nonlinear evolution equations with variable coefficients,” Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung A, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 211–220, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
L.-H. Zhang, “Travelling wave solutions for the generalized Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation with higher-order nonlinear terms,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 208, no. 1, pp. 144–155, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
X. Zhao, D. Tang, and L. Wang, “New soliton-like solutions for KdV equation with variable coefficient,” Physics Letters A, vol. 346, no. 4, pp. 288–291, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
K.-J. Cai, C. Zhang, T. Xu, H. Zhang, and B. Tian, “Modified Exp-function method and variable-coefficient Korteweg-de Vries model from Bose-Einstein condensates,” International Journal of Modern Physics B, vol. 24, no. 19, pp. 3759–3768, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
J. Li, B. Tian, X.-H. Meng, T. Xu, C.-Y. Zhang, and Y.-X. Zhang, “Variable-cofficient miura transforamation and integrable properties for a generalized variable -coefficeint korteweg- de vries equatiojn from boseeinstein condenstates with symbolic computiation,” International Journal of Modern Physics B, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 571–584, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Huai-Tang and Z. Hong-Qing, “New double periodic and multiple soliton solutions of the generalized $(2 + 1)$ -dimensional Boussinesq equation,” Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 765–769, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet

Copyright

Copyright © 2014 Li-hua Zhang. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

873

Downloads

1315

Citations