Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Agriculture
Volume 2018, Article ID 5085163, 8 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5085163
Research Article

Response of Two Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Varieties to Rates of Blended Fertilizer and Row Spacing at Tselemti District, Northern Ethiopia

1Shire-Maytsebri Agricultural Research Center, Shire-Endasilase, Tigray, Ethiopia
2Mekelle University, Department of Dry Land Crop and Horticultural Sciences, Mekelle, Tigray, Ethiopia

Correspondence should be addressed to Tesfahun Mekuanint; moc.liamg@tninaukemt

Received 2 April 2018; Accepted 4 September 2018; Published 4 October 2018

Academic Editor: Christos Tsadilas

Copyright © 2018 Tesfahun Mekuanint et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. Fikre, “An overview of chickpea improvement research program in Ethiopia,” in Legume Perspective, D. Rubiales, Ed., pp. 47–50, International Legume Society, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  2. D. K. Kamithi, A. M. Kibe, and T. E. Akuja, “Effects of nitrogen fertilizer and plant population on growth, yield and harvest index (HI) of chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.) under dry land conditions in Kenya,” Journal of Applied Biosciences, vol. 22, pp. 1359–1367, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  3. CSA (Central Statistical Authority), Report on Area and Production of Major Crops (Private Peasant Holdings, Meher Season), FDRE Statistical Bulletin, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2015.
  4. R. Purushothaman, H. D. Upadhyaya, P. M. Gaur, C. L. L. Gowda, and L. Krishnamurthy, “Kabuli and desi chickpeas differ in their requirement for reproductive duration,” Field Crops Research, vol. 163, pp. 24–31, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. G. W. Gee and J. W. Bauder, “Particle size analysis,” in Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 1—Physical and Mineralogical Methods, A. Klute, Ed., Agronomy Monograph, Agronomy Monograph no. 9, pp. 383–411, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, USA, 2nd edition, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. Dawis and Frietas, Physical and Chemical Methods of Soil Analysis, no. 10, FAO Bulletin, Rome, Italy, 1970.
  7. M. F. Morgan, “Chemical diagnosis by the universal soil tests system,” Conn.Agr. exp. Sta (New Haven) Bull, vol. 450, 1941. View at Google Scholar
  8. J. R. Okalebo, K. W. Guathua, and P. L. Woomer, “Soil laboratory methods and plant analysis,” Working Manual, Karhsobf, Nairobi, Kenya, p. 55, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  9. S. Sahelemedhin and T. Bekele, “Procedures for soil and plant analysis,” Technical paper 74, National Soil Research Center, Ethiopia Agricultural Research Organization, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  10. A. Asrat, Response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties to rates of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer rate at Debre Zeit, Central Ethiopia, Haramaya University, 2013.
  11. M. A. Malek, M. Shafiquzzaman, M. S. Rahman, M. R. Ismail, and M. M. A. Mondal, “Standardization of soybean row spacing based on morpho-physiological characters,” Legume Research, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 138–143, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. B. Uzun, E. Yol, and S. Furat, “The influence of row and intra-row spacing to seed yield and its components of winter sowing canola in the true Mediterranean type environment,” Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 83–91, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. F. Rasul, M. A. Cheema, A. Sattar, M. F. Saleem, and M. A. Wahid, “Evaluating the performance of three mungbean varieties grown under varying inter-row spacing,” Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1030–1035, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. Farjam, M. J. Kenarsari, A. Rokhzadi, and B. Yousefi, “Effects of Inter-row spacing and superabsorbent polymer application on yield and productivity of rainfed chickpea,” Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 316–320, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  15. B. Pooniya, R. K. Rai, and Jat., “Yield and yield attributes of chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.) as influenced by various row spacing and weed control,” Indian Journal of weed science Science, vol. 41, no. 3&4, pp. 222-223, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  16. A. Mahmood and B. Honermeier, “Effect of row spacing and cultivar on biomass yield and quality of Sorghum bicolor L. Moench,” Journal fur Kulturpflanzen, vol. 64, no. 7, pp. 250–257, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. Sarkodie-Addo and O. Mahama, “Growth and yield response of early and medium maturity soybean (Glycine max(L) merrill) varieties to row spacing,” International Journal of Science and Advanced Technology, vol. 2, no. 11, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  18. X. B. Zhou, L. Qi, G. M. Yang, and Y. H. Chen, “Row spacing effect on soil and leaf water status of summer soybean,” Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 680–685, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. R. Raymond, K. McKenzie, and R. C. N. Rachaputi, Impact of row spacing on faba bean yield, Australian Grain, 2015.
  20. A. M. Gezahegn, K. Tesfaye, J. Sharma, M. Belel, and M. Tejada Moral, “Determination of optimum plant density for faba bean (Viciafaba L.) on vertisols at Haramaya, Eastern Ethiopia,” Cogent Food & Agriculture, vol. 2, no. 1, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar