Assessment of Groundnut Elite Lines under Drought Conditions and Selection of Tolerance Associated Traits
Table 2
SPAD Chlorophyll Meter Reading (SCMR) of groundnut genotypes in the well-watered (WW) and water-stressed (WS) treatments at 60 DAS in 2017 (year 1) and 2018 (year 2) in lysimeter experiment. G= genotypes, W = water regimes, and Y= year.
Genotypes
Year 1
Year 2
WW
WS
WW
WS
55-437
38.4ab
37.43ab
40.67ab
32.87a
FLEUR11
39.13bc
34.92a
41.83ab
36.87b
ICGV 02005
42.4cd
36.12a
40.43ab
37.2b
ICGV 02038
41.73cd
41.63cd
38.7a
41.27cde
ICGV 02125
43.6d
40.27bc
43.13 ab
43.69e
ICGV 06319
39.7bc
46.33e
42.07 ab
49.77f
ICGV 07210
43.17d
40.97bc
43.13 ab
36.57b
ICGV 07211
37.17a
39.9ab
40.4ab
36.75b
ICGV 92035
41.93cd
41cd
42.13ab
38.27bc
ICGV 92195
38.67ab
42.87cd
39.57a
37.67b
ICGV 92196
38.73ab
38.57ab
40.25ab
40.1bcd
ICGV 92206
40.67bc
41.8cd
45.83b
42.4de
Means
40.44
40.15
41.49
39.44
G (F prob)
<.001
W (F prob)
0.006
Y (F prob)
ns
G x W (F prob)
<.001
G xY (F prob)
0.02
G x W x Y (F prob)
0.03
= significant at 5% level. ns = not significant at 5% level. Means with the same letter are not significantly different within the same treatment by Duncan’s multiple range test.
